RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Canon EF 180mm f/3.5 L Macro USM : Specifications and Opinions




Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this lens.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Canon EF 180mm f/3.5 L Macro USM)




What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on February 03, 2016

Pros: Sharpness, background blur, building and working distance in macro

Cons: Focus very slow, also would be nice had the stabilizer L 100mm Macro

Opinion: is an optical, clear beautiful, very specialized for the macro and unlike a 150mm or 100mm is almost indispensable the use of the stand for the ratio 1: 1 even if the hand-free tests with moving subjects have given excellent results anyway! rnrnPersonalmente I'd like it even more if it had a system a little faster focus would be phenomenal perspective and more versatile, but then we are talking of a macro is known that searching in a wide range of focus areas to be more fouco lens. I feel the lack of a stabilizer such as 100mm L because it also would be used in other contesti.rnrn is a macro product as it is 96 because it is done well and the number one for macro photography. The working distance is outstanding.

avatarsupporter
sent on September 02, 2014

Pros: Sharpness, contrast, ring maf really well done.

Cons: Weight, no sealing, no stabilizer.

Opinion: Objective great, for me number 1 for macro photography canon available in the house. rnQualità constructive to the top! rnHa exceptional sharpness and contrast by fear. The focus so far is of great help to isolate the subject from the background. In addition to this, the 1: 1 ratio is reached at a distance higher than a shorter focal length. It is used well for portraiture and with the limiter maf the af is fast. The flaws in my opinion are the lack of weather sealing, and especially the almost impossibility to use hand libera.rnPer everything else is a fantastic goal!

avatarsenior
sent on October 05, 2013

Pros: Construction, sharpness, blur.

Cons: Absence of tropicalization.

Opinion: Construction as the other fixed "L-series", and truly at the top, with the classic aesthetically pleasing finish. The absence of tropicalization in my opinion is the only flaw of this view because it is not a lens to use in the studio but in nature. I do not consider defects in the absence of the stabilizer (useless in macro photography), the fact that it is f/3.5 (I challenge anyone to do macro with openness) and the sharpness is peso.rnLa, like the bokeh, unmatched (I had the Tamron 180 macro, but there is no comparison). In my view, the non plus ultra for macro with RR up to 1: 1 even if the quality of the files out of the oven is good even with extension tubes (for these purposes the best canon mp-e 65mm). Rnih conclusion, if used for the macro has no rivals, but of course has a number of "defects" when it wants to use for different purposes (eg. portraiture).

avatarsupporter
sent on June 11, 2013

Pros: resolving power - rnsfocato mellow and pleasant - rndistanza working in macro -

Cons: footprint - rnpeso - rnprezzo - rnassenza IS

Opinion: It 'a piece of optical great value, even at full aperture shows an excellent micro-contrast in terms of fire; strange thing for a macro, has almost one blurred portrait lens, soft, mushy, three-dimensional, pictorial, pleasant, and under this profile also prefer it to 100/2.8 IS L, which also has one blurred more than acceptable, but not to the level of fratellone.rnL 'absence of a stabilization system makes the use freehand at close range a pure utopia ( as opposed to the 100 stabilized) but the working distance, which offers subjects with elusive allows great satisfaction to those who employs him how it's done, on a tripod, mirror raised and cable flessibile.rnIl weight and bulk non-negligible non him a candidate for long hikes if not with the idea to make precise macro: in short, is not the mediotele to take with itself, for this purpose much better than a telephoto or a 200/2.8, much more compact and leggero.rnCredo that Canon is home to everybody 'Today the best for macro photography in the field and for shooting outdoors "committedta ", ie stand eccetera.rnNon tried it yet in the portrait (!) but I plan to do so, the above fuzzy mercy really nice and natural.





 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me