JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:I think, at the time, the price and a high mechanical strength.
Cons:Unacceptable as sharp vignetting to the focal corta.Inaccettabile as abrupt loss of peripheral resolution at maximum aperture (ff sensor 1ds3). Mild peripheral chromatic aberrations think due to the fall of light.
Opinion:I do not assume that short and very open mind losing too much definition and light in the suburbs. I understand the scientific inadequacy of the concept of too so simplifying, I'd say, if you love taking pictures simple white sheets squared, you'll be disappointed ... Then we know that everything is relative and even the optical Hubble peering deeper past , minor faults they will have it ...
Pros:Although it is out of production for quite some time, this lens has excellent mechanical construction and has a very solid, quality optics is excellent with a superb color rendering, hot as I like it, it is very resistant the flares and sharp even at the edges ... has fast and accurate AF and what not little cartoon absolutely not (in my esempleare in my possession) having read several times its characteristics in comparison with the new lenses Canon's latest generation and the costs incurred, I promised myself that would be the next purchase in the used market despite being outdated perspective, only for his goodness is hard to find anyone who wants to get rid of it. Bought for 500 euro, I think I have done a very good investment and I do not regret the absolutely new Canon EF 16-35 f / 2.8 L USM
Cons:I have not found anything special
Opinion:For me, even if it is a lens obsolete, is one of the best lenses in wide-angle camera kit in my possession, I searched long and finally I'm happy to own it. Its type lens hood screw even though skimpy, it is suitable to his work, when I have not used a lot, but in the pictures I did not know until now no problem of vignetting nor chromatic aberration in backlight and even fearful of flares almost absent in all lighting situations. In the landscapes stopped down to f / 4 or higher, has an incredible sharpness that can not even be compared to my Sigma 24-70 f / 2.8. For me it was one of my best investments, do not be impressed by his age, is an evergreen! the money you spend will be well spent in used, word of Liguria! ;)
Pros:build quality, sharpness, color, contrast, brightness. Opinion: Using this lens for several years for landscapes. Excellent sharpness and the yield on the corners (virtually equal to the center) to the most openings used for landscapes (f8 - f11 - f16). Excellent resistance to flare when compared to the same objectives focale..specialmente compared to 16-35 and 14-24 Nikon that make it difficult if not impossible backlighting. AC controlled and almost absent. Colors and excellent contrast. Good lens for night: a 2.8 allows you to not raise too the iso and get good exposure. Distorts a lot, but the landscape is not a problem ... it can become in the photography of architecture and interiors, but we know that for that there are specific lenses. The sharpness in 2.8 is not exceptional, as indeed all the lenses type this, better 24-70. At 35 mm, the sharpness is good but not comparable to the remaining focal unless af 11. I highly recommend this lens, capable of restoring good images even in the corners (also 16 mm) when used wisely. Before Di owned this lens 17-40 f 4 and well ... it's another story entirely.
Cons:Minor sharpness in the corners at f2.8, slight vignetting at 17mm.
Opinion:Using this lens for several years for reportage, interiors, landscapes and night. Colors and excellent contrast. Excellent yield with polarizing filter. Good sharpness at f2.8. Excellent sharpness and rendering the corners already f4. Good resistance to flare. Autofocus very fast. Finding used, it can be a good deal compared to similar currently produced lenses. I highly recommend this lens.
Opinion:Despite being an old lens, has an excellent construction typical of the L series and still has a good resa.Io the use of aps-h and produces a negligible vignetting at shorter focal length. Got it used you can find € 500 although not easily. The color rendition is very good and natural, produces little distorsione.rnLa better sharpness of this lens is f / 4, while a 2.8 lose some '. rnTra defects appears a slight chromatic aberration especially on areas of high luminance contrast. rnrn
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
