JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Price, ease of use, sensor, display definition, compactness, grip, aesthetics
Cons:High ISO (but forgifable), very small viewfinder and dark, lighting of the points for the confirmation of the MAF do not see if not in low light, touch keep the "beep" and remember which point you are using. If you use them all you do not understand which hooks. Unacceptable the absence of the Jack input for the microphone!!!
Opinion:It's an entry level, and it was the cheapest SLR on the market until last year, so there's little to complain about. But I must say that, until now is the entry level economic most successful House canon, able to give really great satisfaction. Squeezing it well and flaning it with optics of a certain caliber, the satisfactions are many. In optimal light conditions produces very beautiful files, it exhibits well and the Auto WB always does its job very well, so much so that in PP I almost never touch it. It remains the most valid choice for those approaching photography and does not want to spend much: the new 2000d and 4000d are both a downgrade, 24 mpx are too noisy for this processor.
Pros:Price, compactness, quality (relative to price), easy to use, battery life
Cons:Iso seal, Gust, AF points, a little plasticosa, little customizable
Opinion:I had the 1300d as the first machine and I must say that for the cost it has is perfect to approach the world of photography. Unfortunately it has some flaws like the small and dark viewfinder (but in the end almost all the APSC are so) very poor ISO seal, gust by 3fps (if I'm not mistaken), a few AF points... The body is quite plasticky but in the end done well and the machine very light and compact. With Canon you have a huge choice of lenses with very good quality/price ratios and that's good.
Cons:At this price no one, but if we really want to be picky: lack of jack for external microphone, non-orientable screen, high ISO performance not extraordinary, only 18mpx.
Opinion:I don't think there is much to say about this machine: it has such a low price that it has approached a lot of guys like me to manual photography, and of these many have kept active the interest passing to higher-end cameras. I would never start taking pictures without the 1300d to entice me, and now I can't help it anymore. Tip: The 2000d and 4000d have just been released: The 2000d, while having the same sensor, is of a constructive quality lower than the 1300d but of higher price (since newer), while the 4000d is an excellent and worth updating of the 1300d. My advice is to avoid the 2000d, rather recovered a 1300d (Nonostant is out of production is still in Vendit, and you can find it also used) or if you have some more Soldino opt for the 4000d, or even the 200d!
Pros:Low cost, ability to use many manual controls and learn how to photograph, battery life
Cons:ISO seal, burst in raw
Opinion:It is my first DSLR, which has brought me closer to the world of digital photography. With little space it allows you to learn a lot, using it in manual and in the priority modes of times / diaphragms.rnLearning to exploit light well, and with quality objectives allows get great shots.rnPersonally I found the lens kit (18-55) a little 'poor, but to start may be enough, then as I did I can invest on real optics (like the L series) that will remain in the kit. rnWith this camera I have learned and I am really learning to photograph, so I can not talk about it too bad .... the real flaw? ISO tightness in low light conditions. 800 ISO is for me the maximum limit, rnOn this value, the images are acceptable are for mobile screen size.rnNontheless, after a year and a half I made 21,000 shots on many occasions, even sports, both indoors and outdoors.rnIn average the battery lasts me 800-1000 shots.rnComodo the Wi-Fi and the app on the phone to shoot remotely .rnrnIn dand, for what it costs, I consider it an excellent choice. Going back, however, I would have avoided the 18-55 de kit, perhaps in favor of 18-135 or higher
Pros:Cost, RAW quality, wide optical availability.
Cons:It goes into crisis with the high ISO, pentaspecchio and non-pentaprism, slow burst but for the price you can not ask for more.
Opinion:I took it for the irrepressible desire to have a camera, after almost 20 years of photographic fasting, to support the beautiful and versatile Fuji X30 but that does not have the possibility to change optics. I'm not a digital photo expert and initially I met several difficulties and was disappointed. Then I realized that I had to change the approach and so the 1300D despite its obvious limits is giving me a lot of satisfaction. The most obvious advantage? with little expense you enter the Canon ecosystem and you can use many original and universal optics. I think I will soon switch to another camera, probably Pentax reselling the Canon material, but for now I'm really satisfied with this little girl who learns to use it produces images that I like a lot.rnrnNon technical comments because I do not have sufficient preparation in that sense. I can only say that it is perfect to start with the digital SLR even if with the benefit of hindsight I would have bought, spending "only" 200 euros more, thePentax K-S2 at an "almost" entry level price but with semi-transparent characteristics.
Pros:It costs a little, it's light, you can fit all the canon lenses
Cons:Viewfinder Coverage Not 100%
Opinion:If you buy a panda at 8000 euros you expect it to be 200 per hour and have leather interior? This is the 1300d; you have everything you need to get great photos with so many limits: high iso, burst, shutter duration , Robustness, no top lcd, few autofocus points only a serious defect for a car in this band is the lens cover not 100%, in some situations the photos are wrong because you never know what you can "take" on the edges external
Opinion:It is an accec so it is impossible to expect large holdings at high iso. The machine is complete and coupled with quality objectives gives really good results. The sensor is not particularly dense (which I appreciate) and the focusing system with quality lenses (but also with 18 55 stm) is very fast. It does not fit in all the situations where you get price with equipment such as photographic hunting or indoor sports. I miss the lack of an adjustable screen to read the snapshot data or have the live view in difficult positions.
Pros:Lightweight, good quality construction, wifi, practical and easy to use
Cons:Low hold on iso, no flame
Opinion:The first reflex never forgets! I loved this little apsc, the one who introduced me to the world of photography. The price is really very cheap and is easy and practical to use and is really light. I recommend to anyone who wants to move the first steps in the photographic world or simply to those who do not want to spend astronomical figures for a car body. Great also wifi. It's a shame for the lack of anything to say the least, and the lack of the iso but for that price too good too
Pros:Colors, good image quality, grain and raw quality
Cons:Perhaps kept to high iso insufficient. Nothing else in relation to the price.
Opinion:Taking it in addition to my admirers, I have to say that it does not flawless even with respect to the full frame "snooping". Good picture quality, sophisticating the dynamic range and, if you think about how much it costs, the difference even with the quadruple machines of the cost, you realize that it is not just a machine to start but also and above all to be a active companion Your pro kit. So I'd say it's ideal to start, but it's great to continue!
Cons:Low resistance to ISO, nothing else for the price
Opinion:I'm a neophyte and decide the meeting between me and this car was the amazing bid to throw less than three hundred euros in a store a few miles from my home. What to say, take off of everything and his dirty work does it and well. Although an entry level has more than complete connectivity systems. One flaw? Does not hold high iso but nothing incorruptible in postproduction. Perhaps the menu is not the most intuitive but is really complete
Cons:You can not 'expect more than that, taking into account the price band.
Opinion:I purchased to tile to my beloved EOS 50D, which now has done so many battles and I hope it will do so again, I find myself quite well, considered the fascai, the quality is comparable to the 50D, plus the wifi, it did not stop ISO as the 50D, but you can fly, I think that for those who know how to take pictures, it takes no time .... the pictures do not do the machines but the photographer, then a few bales, those coming from the film, knows what difficulties there are so .... Everything else is boring!
Cons:Few AF points, not reclining screen, high ISO performance.
Opinion:I did yesterday a thorough test on the quality of the new Canon 1300D, the new jewel Entry Level.rnBrevemente, for the price it is really a must for beginners to take their first shots, and is beginning to enter the world of photography as it offers good image quality, and versatility of WiFi, with just three hundred euro.rnLa dynamic range is not at all bad, the exposure latitude when imported files is really discreet, and being a user of the 6D, i must admit I found that the differences are not so great. The focus points are perhaps a bit 'Pochini (9 with the central cross), and the flurry is nonexistent (3fps), the yield at high ISO (a bit' like the old 500D, 550D, 600D and 650D ) is very little used in difficult conditions, but overexposed at high ISO, you get good results once the file is put back to the correct exposure. The screen is not recliner, but there is thepossibility of having Live View and remote shooting directly on smartphones, so it's not a big problema.rnSe were novice, definitely would the body ideal machine to begin with!
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
