|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on August 22, 2018 Pros: Weight, autonomy, compatibility lenses, great photos at low ISO Cons: High ISO pastiness, not present the precision tuning focus Opinion: Great camera to get you started, it has all the manual settings you need to learn; Wide range of compatible lenses and adapters you can use many vintage lenses from the now-insignificant price. Only flaw that I can find is the lack of precise tuning of autofocus, very useful when we have lenses affected by front or back focus, for the rest nothing to say, with a 24 mm pancake is as portable as a mirrorless. |
  | sent on January 30, 2018 Pros: Sensor weight Cons: High sensitivity iso Opinion: The 1200d is a budget entry-level SLR with all the photographic functions necessary to get closer to professional photography, it is the cheapest camera on the market so it's perfect to start. If you're not a professional, it's a SLR that you can keep quiet for a long time, without having to go and buy some more expensive models. rnOggi on the market is the 1300d which is practically the same SLR with just adding WiFi and GPS ... all things almost useless in my opinion. |
 | sent on January 07, 2018 Pros: Weight, sensor, dimensions Cons: resistance to high ISO, gust Opinion: Assuming that it is an entry level, it must be said that it obviously does not have the functionality of a semi-pro or a professional, but despite everything I used it for a year and a half with great satisfaction, it allowed me to learn the shooting parameters and composition, so I recommend it to all those who want a car to enter the world of photography without spending too much. The 18 mega pixel sensor makes good with medium lens lenses such as 35mm f2 and 50mm fixed, with the 18-55 of the kit in my opinion you can get good results only at closed diaphragms. rnDiscord to raise the ISO over 400 with color and 800 with black and white. The burst is good to do some testing but nothing more.rnAutonomy of the infinite battery, especially if you do not use live view. rnAssembly of the plastics I would say more than good. rnErgonomics good if you do not have too big hands.rnThe weight is definitely a point in its favor, being plastic, it becomes easy to keep it around the neck for the whole day without feeling it.rnI autofocus points are only 9, the centraland is the only reliable, but wanting to see a pro in this aspect, I learned to reassemble.rnla advice to all those people who want to start taking pictures but do not know if they like it. |
 | sent on December 22, 2017 Pros: Good for entry-level Cons: Various things are missing, but as a second body or "battle" machine, it's okay Opinion: I have recently bought it in a kit with the 18-55 and 55-250 at a price shot, but as I live in a state (Brazil) where it is not indicated with expensive machines, and it is ideal. Having a 7D that I use when traveling abroad or in the country but in safe places, I find it very well, not in the eye to thieves and snatchers and no more risk, so far as the technical side, various things are missing but I compensate with the years experience with Canon. |
 | sent on January 11, 2017 Pros: Price, ease of use, performance under normal conditions, has all the functions you need, battery life Cons: Few focus points Opinion: He behaves well and gives satisfaction. It weighs little and cluttered the right, so it's a good travel companion. It consumes little battery and never leaves on foot. It's pretty intuitive. The pros definitely outweigh the flaws but the ISO resistance is what it is: at 1600 ISO the photos are practically to throw and already at 800 ISO have too much grain present. There are no reference lines in the viewfinder, which for a beginner would be a great help for not making crooked photos. |
 | sent on August 03, 2016 Pros: ease of use, good quality / price ratio, excellent EntryLevel Cons: ISO and ... just, I think at that price can be good all Opinion: Bought a couple of years ago, made me fall in love with the world of photography, used for travel and photos with friends, resistant materials, small size to be a reflex. If he had even had Wi-fi I probably would have kept like camera battle to keep in your car. I took off a lot of satisfaction, I recommend it to all who want to start taking pictures seen that is used € 200 with kit lens. Know that it will not be your ultimate machine. |
 | sent on July 09, 2016 Pros: Low cost, easy to use, long battery life and good build quality Cons: a lot of noise with ISO higher than 800, does not have the swivel display but is a EntryLevel Opinion: I upgrade my opinion after 7 months of utilizzo.E 'my first digital SLR and I bought this machine for the very competitive price and was pleased with it, easy, intuitive for a beginner like me that lately only required photos with a compact. autofocus points Pochini but sufficient, use almost always the focus, not the burst fast, fast enough to memorize long exposures. Iso usable up to 400 max 800 but not over, then the noise dominates. long battery life you arrive safely to a busy day, but if you use the liveview you download in no time. I think it's good to start but if he takes a passion begins to feel a bit tight: no swiveling display, second ring and lacks the autofocus video xi fire. |
user96477  | sent on June 04, 2016 Pros: Price-easy and intuitive-leggera- Cons: no spot exposure-suffering too the high iso Opinion: Excellent reflex to those who approach this world saw the prezzo.rnCome first reflex is fine but after a couple of years will begin to stay there stretta..soffre too high in my opinion ISO (up to 400) for the rest I think is an excellent machine considering the current market price if you go back to buy back now! rn |
 | sent on February 21, 2016 Pros: Full, sensor, ease of use, underrated, very low price despite having a few years. Cons: No IR sensor, not very comfortable in the hand (at least mine), no continuous video focus, lack external microphone jack, the viewfinder a little bit. Opinion: I state that this is my first SLR, purchased by Trony just come at the price of 400 € with the 18-55 kit and bag. I purchased for approciarmi to photography since my Panasonic FZ200 (very good machine) did not allow me the quality of the SLR, but most change objectives. The 1200D has a great value for money and for a beginner it is definitely a good investment pe understand whether the photographic passion can have a depth or be dismissed as so many sudden passions. After two years I feel a little the limits, because I try some body most advanced car, but the quality of the sensor is excellent because ODA like all other cameras with sensor under 35mm. Obviously those seeking to deepen the photograph does not stop at 18-55 supplied, although doscreto does its job, but will purchase other optics that allow to play on depth of field and so on. The 1200d to 3200 ISO is really a great dettagio, despite the noise, and of course in proportion to the pricenew current. In hand it turns out to be a bit awkward, in fact I would prefer something a bit smaller for me. For my hands would prefer a 100d or 400d (as ergonomics) predominance; but after two years of use I never found the excuse to replace it just for that. Sure that of a demanding user searches for a WIFI connection, greater design strength and range of advanced commands should turn our gaze elsewhere, but with the current price is a very to consider machine. |
 | sent on February 13, 2016 Pros: Light weight, ease of use, price, sensor Cons: Viewfinder dark and small, poor autofocus in low light, lack of spot metering. Opinion: Taken almost a year ago, now I think I have clear ideas. It 'good to start, but do not you think that after a year become obsolete, or you are fed up. The plastics may give a feeling of poor quality, but it has never given me problems and still carry substantial weight. It 'easy to use and the sensor is better than you might think. Produces images more than good up to ISO 800, noise is visible to 1600 but it is perfectly recoverable PP, it gets annoying to 3200 and 6400. The unusable There are all functions, is complete and it's fine to learn and above all have fun. Already compared to a compact (or worse, unoi smartphone) the quality difference is huge. From this point of view it gives satisfaction. Bad points: the viewfinder is small it is dark, but considering it is a machine bought by those coming from a compact (in 99% of cases) is not a problem, at least until you try something superior. The autofocus struggling a lot in conditions low light, putting a lot of time to connect with the subject and the end often wrong. The same applies to the autofocus in live view, which turns out to be slower than that in the viewfinder. I do not consider a problem the No. autofocus points: For the average user is more than enough. It did not calculate the exposure spots, which can become a disadvantage in certain lighting conditions. No trust the picture style, can create artifacts. Better to dedicate calmly to PP personally. I can not judge the burst, almost never used. The battery has never given me problems. Highly recommended overall to those who are undecided: at this price I do not think there is anything better, considering quality and versatility. |
 | sent on February 10, 2016 Pros: Great-value, low battery consumption, discreet strength, Canon quality Cons: not silent snap, few focus points, which handle dirty hands during very long sessions and / or high temperatures, such as summer, Opinion: I've owned this camera for about a year, the number of shots between 90,000 and 100,000 without any problem of the machine, no error will jam. I gave a high mark (9) as entry level really impressed me, has gone beyond all expectations. A fantastic price-quality ratio, with 18 megapixels you can afford good crop and the quality of the final file has always been great (while talking about an entry level). I only used in outdoor and sports photography, perfect in many situations, it should be in difficulty in the winter when about an hour from sunset and with low shutter speed (800/1000) there is need for more iso. Unfortunately I have found on my own hands than in the case of sessions with 1,000 and more shots (especially in summer) the handle releases particles that just "dirty" black right hand, all definitely in the "combine" even with sweating my hand, but nothing to worry about. Consumes very little battery, for instance with two battery I completed three football matches from 1 hour, for a total of approximately 800 shots per game. It 'a camera that I recommend especially given the economic cost and also for the fact that is fine, ideal for those who want to approach to photography or who want a second type body "crop". I hope that my description there was helpful. A hug. |
user86352 | sent on January 01, 2016 Pros: Price Cons: none for the price Opinion: My first reflex is I have to say that I was pleased with her, I began to understand the shutter speed and aperture, the highly recommend it to those who want to start and see if he has a passion for photography that goes wrong you will have a good camera. To be picky overexpose a bit 'but just if you want to find a nit, but no problem with a little' PP everything is resolved, the files are processed without problems. |
 | sent on October 14, 2015 Pros: - - - - Cons: - - - - Opinion: The Canon EOS 1200D, except that the screen has a lower resolution and is not adjustable, has the same features of the Canon EOS 600D, a DSLR that in the past has been a remarkable success among the amateur photographers for its significant performance. If coupled with good objectives, the 1200D is able to provide more than satisfactory results. Consequently, the Canon has offered its fans a product with great value for money. |
 | sent on August 29, 2015 Pros: Very economical, 18-megapixel, full-featured and easy to use Cons: Given the price: NONE Opinion: I bought this machine (body only) on a Chinese website that ship to Italy, passing through the Netherlands and above all without charges doganali.rnrnConsegnano in about eight days, and you can pay with Paypal risk free! RnrnSono fully satisfied but I think Picture quality depends more on optics used, that the body macchina.rnrnLa advice to those who want to start using a camera on a budget or as a second camera body. |
 | sent on August 26, 2015 Pros: economic and excellent for first experiences with a reflex Cons: Snap a bit 'noisy, quite dark in places with 18-55 lens the auto focus does not work quite well Opinion: I bought the Canon 1200d toward the end of July in London with two objectives: a 18-55 and 75-300 (telephoto), law EF and EF-S, the advice for those who want to start with a reflex, counsel for the first time the modaltà: P or (although the use very often) but also modes A, 18-55 at night with no puts sharp focus with autofocus. also the canon 1200d can also make video just to focus and then click the button for those who live view.rnconsiglio buy this one or other cameras to place the lens a neutral density filter to protect the lens mount 58mm filters . objectives that mount on other Canon EOS are compatible with this camera |
 | sent on August 12, 2015 Pros: Light, handy, robust enough, has what it takes, costs very little, it performs well. Cons: They could leave the AF in video ... sin. Opinion: I took it as a second body to be attached to the use 6D.rnPrincipalmente for astrophotography (on telescope or with an EF 50 f / 1.4) and I am benissimo.rnQuello I most need are high ISO and I must say that I was surprise! rnPer photos terrestrial arrival even up to ISO 3200 that are its real limit in my opinion, very recently unthinkable for a APS-C of such a low cost. |
 | sent on June 10, 2015 Pros: Beautiful, light, handy, functional, essential controls to take a photo, excellent video quality even in low light conditions, indicated for a newit. Cons: Lack of connection for an external microphone, lcd screen with few pixels (acceptable compromise given the price) lacks the micro adjustment AF Opinion: |
 | sent on November 19, 2014 Pros: Lightweight, intuitive, great price Cons: Only 3fps, plasticky Opinion: It's my first SLR, so my comment is more driven by the enthusiasm that a real objective assessment. I find it easy to use, with everything you need to learn how to use the machine in manual and manage time, iso and openings to the situation. Obviously the pictures that churns out are amazing compared to the compact camera that I've used so far, with vibrant colors and usable even at high ISO, but without exaggeration, because even at ISO 3200 noise is evident. In my quality / unbeatable price, the best for a beginner like me. On the other hand is plasticky, especially when viewed in comparison with the most advanced machines, is a little too small (and I have big hands) and I would have preferred a grip "substantial" .rnIn Ultimately there are only advantages, if you considers the range of users who want to hit. Hello |
 | sent on October 04, 2014 Pros: Price and Basic Features Cons: Lack of simple functions such as lifting anticipated mirror and other small things that would have been at no cost. Opinion: E 'clearly a super entry level product, but well done. Plastic body, one could not expect more for certain what costa.rnOttima choice as a second camera body or as the body of the rescue. Excellent for example, if associated with a wide-angle or a second optical drive. The battery is small but at first use however, it seems hard enough for a day of intensive use and never allow to leave a piedi.rnIl body is light, an important advantage for those who do not like heavy bodies. The colors, the noise in the photos, even at high ISO, it is very tollerabile.rnRipeto, it would be silly to compare it with bodies labeled, but in my opinion is defended very well in his field |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
