|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on July 01, 2018 Pros: Footprint, manageability, good RAW files, price, Touch, AF, excellent entry level... Cons: Plasticosa, non-optimal grip, Jpeg, slightly restrictive Iso Opinion: I have this little SLR for a couple of years, bought to support a FF system always Canon, so I tried "good" optical and the sensor output is cmq satisfactory. The purchase was motivated especially when you do not want to bring the heavy FF kit, often in view in European cities with the 24 2.8 STM and the 50 1.8 stm, you bring home good files, with really minimal footprints... and obvious that it is an entry level and is a little limited , but it has everything you need. The use of a little ' luminous optics helps not to balance the gap of an ISO not exceptional... for the rest at the price that can be found in the used is a good choice for those who want to have always at hand a "discreet" small reflex... |
 | sent on December 12, 2017 Pros: Weight and small size, good sensor, touch screen, good AF in live view Cons: Lack of wireless communication with flashes, battery life, the small size makes it uncomfortable for those with medium to large hands, occasional random noise even at low iso Opinion: It's been more than 3 years since I bought the 100D, at the moment my first and only DSLR. I'm very satisfied, the only flaw for me is the lack of communication with the flashes wireless because the battery life if you do not use much the display and the flash is good, with a spare battery you can also do a thousand of photos without problems. I have medium to large hands, not the best ergonomics but using the other hand under the lens, combined with the fact that it is very light you can do hundreds of photos without having pain at the end of the session. The 200D has just been released, which is on the same segment as the 100D but has slightly increased in size and weight, due to the addition of the swivel monitor and other components for wireless communication. In practice, to date the 100D is still the smallest and lightest SLR in the world. The price is very convenient, I continue to recommend it to those who want little clutter and light weight but do not want to give up the specchio. |
  | sent on November 24, 2017 Pros: handy, lightweight, without much pretense Cons: For now none Opinion: I bought the 100D as the second body, living in Brazil, where it is very dangerous to shoot with photographic equipment, it helps me because it's small and less visible, I used it on several occasions even on the visit of car and motorbike pads and with I did not have any problems, certainly as a toy, but there was almost everything I shot more than one hundred photos with flash and the battery was not even the target. |
 | sent on October 17, 2016 Pros: Lightweight, touch screen, excellent yield in various situations. Cons: for any price. Opinion: I took my 100D super discount on amazon in a kit with the 18-55 stm objective has since been resold because I use it mainly with other lenses (EF 35 f / 2 USM in particular). RNE 'a machine that used mainly for making videos, as for the photos I have two other camera bodies equipped with optical "important." rnFunziona well and if you need a compact body with little dimensions and weight, but with all the functions (of course those base) that a camera can give you the choice ideale.rnL'anti mirrorless par excellence according me..chiaro that there mirrorless are of all types and prices, but if you search for an SLR or to start a small body for easy car or situations where you have very little space in your bag / backpack can be choosing the giusta.rnIo also recommend to beginners and does not want take the 1300D, eventually the 100D has the same functions of a 700D in a compatto.rnNon body know if tomorrow will sell, but it is far more likely that I will keep combining it with other optical molto compact for situations in which take a heavy kit is not possible. |
 | sent on September 27, 2016 Pros: lightweight, portable, touch screen, excellent sensor Cons: battery life, wifi, Mass AF points Opinion: excellent as a second body to always have a compact (with 24mm becomes invisible) and go unnoticed, but also with most optics' performance (70-200f4 is) it becomes a pleasure to use and provides the excellent files, obviously with heavy lenses becomes almost uncomfortable but not 'a problema.rnPeccato the lack of wifi but was not' fundamental advantage that gave the 100D that little bit more ', remember to buy extra batteries because those are short-lived series, but cost little ones "competition" rnUnico precisely the 9 AF points that are pochirnconsigliata strongly for the price! |
| sent on September 27, 2016 Pros: lightweight, portable, touch screen, excellent sensor Cons: battery life, wifi, Mass AF points Opinion: excellent as a second body to always have a compact (with 24mm becomes invisible) and go unnoticed, but also with most optics' performance (70-200f4 is) it becomes a pleasure to use and provides the excellent files, obviously with heavy lenses becomes almost uncomfortable but not 'a problema.rnPeccato the lack of wifi but was not' fundamental advantage that gave the 100D that little bit more ', remember to buy extra batteries because those are short-lived series, but cost little ones "competition" rnUnico precisely the 9 AF points that are pochirnconsigliata strongly for the price! |
  | sent on June 15, 2016 Pros: compact and lightweight, aesthetically pleasing Cons: autofocus, viewfinder pentamirror Opinion: I bought x to tile it fuji XE1 x having an optical viewfinder on the long focal x birds and animals in general. (the viewfinder of fuji does not get along with the speed 'of the subjects). I thought that would have made bad by fuji x noise and sharpness, not + from time to truth, he quickly proved to have the best of fuji color. His Achilles heel and 'always been the maf, I held x almost 2 years, I sent 2 times a Canon without getting big improvements. Used with 55/250 stm he focused enough, with 10/18 stm came into focus only in the live mode, a disaster. All the photos I uploaded in my card made with 10/18 are not made using the viewfinder (pentamirror). A pity, it could be fun to use, has always made me insecure (thinking that I had bought x having an optical viewfinder sic!) |
 | sent on March 28, 2016 Pros: Very compact, light weight and good ergonomics in relation to the size. Cons: Probably for those with large hands ergonomics it is not the best Opinion: Taken as a second body (6 months ago) to carry for outputs "read" especially during the trips in mountains. From this point of view I find great. very good overall yield, practical touch screen (already appreciated on 70d) and good quality video files. I have been lucky but I the low ISO noise problem I never detected, even I find it very clean and well-defined files. As written on the dimensions are its strength, for those who want a "reflex" with minimal dimensions and light weight it safe. Obviously use with optical "heavy and long" virtually eliminates practicality as is cautious too. Some defect is, in fact the battery has a limited life and would have preferred the swivel screen, but you would be lost in lightness and practicality why not consider them real defects. Finally the cost, in my opinion a very good quality / price ratio. |
user58495  | sent on March 28, 2016 Pros: Lightweight, small, fairly complete, pretty well performance for the price range, touchscreen, excellent video performance Cons: AF point selection, viewing photos, fixed LCD screen, no Wi-Fi, dynamic range, sometimes appears noise at low ISO Opinion: Is part of a few months together with a 40D, my second corredo.Comprata for lightness and an aesthetic whim (Nikonist are always and forever, but the Nikon weigh ... and lately my health has deteriorated), I got to appreciate its lightness and comodità.Con a bit 'of attention is good for almost tutto.Certo, ergonomics leaves something' to be desired just on the two most frequently used commands: AF point selection (you have to first press a button, plus small and put out of reach and then press the pad: madness! In any Nikon move the pad and just) .If then, looking at the monitor, you get the urge to zoom the image, Goodbye! here, you have to incredibly FIRST play.La enter the dynamic range mode is like in all Canon, also high-end, similar to that of a good phone, so one must be very careful not to burn the high luci.A sometimes underexpose a bit 'random, it would seem for no particular reason and always random, it appears on the digital noise even at low ISO, especially in the heavens and inshadows. pasty and dense colors, tending to hot, as the tradition Canon.Ottima coupled with the STM lenses, really fast and I silenziosi.Io equipped with 10/18 - 18/55 - 55/250 - 50 fixed and a Samyang 8mm. Machine in the hands of experts gives extraordinary results, in spite of the many Canon professoroni who judge her bad sensore.Con STMs the MAF is safe and quite veloce.Ha the depth of field button, unavailable in other entry and level.Simpatica promoted with a nice 9! If she had the swivel monitor and WI FI, it could compete with the Nikon D5300 and D5500 ... |
 | sent on January 03, 2016 Pros: Value for money, and touchscreen sensor aps-c best of 7d Cons: For what it costs anyone. Opinion: I have the 100d for 2 year (not from 2 days .....) and I think I can say that as a value for money there is little that can match it. RNLA advice and those who want to approach the way SLR and those who already have an important kit. RNLA first consideration is that the 100d is not 'an entry level SLR as the 1200d but it' s definitely a superior product, just think that you can use with all Canon lenses (including the various bianconi) .rnIl my kit sees also a 5D3 and a 1dmk4, the 100d I had taken for my wife but its features lead me to never to travel with both the FF with the aps-h but choose one of the two in combination with the small canon that use without any problem with the various 100-400 or 70-200 2.8, but also with the 400 f2.8 is.rnE 'a product recommended. |
 | sent on April 15, 2015 Pros: Lightweight and compact, economic and quality Cons: Noise even at low ISO (acceptable up to 800), Sprint silent phony (does a lot of noise, which is not ideal in the street), battery autonomy ridiculous. the stand-by screen lcd sometimes does mess with the functions of the touch screen. Opinion: It 's my first digital SLR, probably from neophyte is a gamble to try to review it, but I find that it is a machine suitable for beginners with at least a basic photography. Simple to use for those who shoot in manual mode (like me) thanks to touch controls. I do not understand why sometimes the exposure using high iso go off on a tangent and do not indicate the actual exposure, but it's probably my inexperience that makes me do some bullshit, so I put in against. Good car for those who want to begin to acquire skills in photography, but probably a little more than a toy in the hands of a photographer is also not an expert. Good yield photographic although I'd like to test it on a good lens and not the 18-55 supplied. Overall, the real added value of the small reflex lies in its size and in its weight that I personally find very useful when the port around doing street or hiking. |
 | sent on February 25, 2015 Pros: Size, light weight, convenient touch screen. Cons: Memory card slot in the same compartment of the battery, poor battery life, lack of wifi. Opinion: I came from a 1100D with which I was fine, I focused on this 100D to decrease the size and weight while maintaining the same optics that I used on the body precedente.rnOttima image quality, low noise even at high ISO (1600/3200) in the shadows, always know that you expose correctly and with the proper post produzione.rnL'abbinamento of this body with optical Pancake (24mm and 40mm) is perfect, makes this really lightweight and compact, for the holidays I was fine ! rnAnche the touchscreen is very convenient, accurate, works perfectly. The great benefit I found the zoom of images taken, that with the keys, to get to 100%, is quite slow, while the touch you do everything in a moment. Also change the parameters is very fast and convenient to do with dita.rnPurtroppo this reflex has some flaws, but nothing of that. The battery lasts quite short, about 400 shots, maybe a little less, but enough to carry a couple of spare batteries and widely covers the day. The wifi was veramentand the gem of this body, missing only one, then it is almost perfect! I think it will fit in the next update of this corpo.rnCome in all entry level (1000D / 1100D / 1200D) the memory card is in the same compartment of the battery, then to replace it you need to turn the camera on and off, a bit uncomfortable but pazienza.rnNel Overall I recommend anyone who has to carry around the camera for a long time during the day and do not need advanced specifications. |
 | sent on February 06, 2015 Pros: Portability, touchscreen practical, value for money, ease of 'use, the' perfect start. Cons: If just-I have to find a flaw, I would say the lack of wi-fi. Opinion: I wanted to pass on aps-c and I thought to 70d, then in a mall I find the "little one", the 'last, to 499 euro with 18-55. The-fly also following the advice of this site. Coming from 4/3 was a significant jump, and now I'm delighted. The software is user friendly and in a couple d 'hours you store everything. Beautiful and useful in difficult lighting conditions can make HDR in your room. Of course, unfortunately, all this is done in JPG. To be able to do with the size of the RAW in human time, it takes other buffers and other processors. . Poor battery life? With ten euro you buy a 1200 mAh battery. With eos utilities you can manage remotely from PC lacks only the wi-fi to manage smartphones. Now look "accasarla" with some good lens to make it big. |
 | sent on January 30, 2015 Pros: small, cheap, and good af affdabile in video, photo-quality aligned with the latest aps-c, excellent touch screen Cons: economic construction but seems robust Opinion: opinion by amateur photographer who uses 6d as a reference: I lent it a friend and here sensations: machine small (almost pocket), quality photo aligned with other canon aps-c, low price, autofocus in video with 18-55 stm I thought was great, definitely better than 6d with the 24-105. the touchscreen is really practical and fuzionale, I would also on 6d. operation speed is discrete, definitely equal to the 6d. I repeat that the size is so small that it leaves you puzzled and after a while you adore this toy. if I had the 6d, with a budget of less than 1.500euro, in my opinion the 100d is the best choice for a machine specialist. goes well also to 10-18 to 24 and 2.8 to 40.2,8 (this last tried it on 100d) for a series of portraits on the outside in the late afternoon and gave amazing results. rnveramente a pleasure to use |
 | sent on December 14, 2014 Pros: Small lightweight excellent photo quality I think is the best entry level you can choose, you are inclined to have it with you always. and adapts well to tripods cheaper Cons: little known there are few dedicated accessories such as underwater housings (if their is a counter), noise in the dark, with the Tamron 70-300 sp seems the car is not there. a little slow multishot Opinion: is a versatile, precise excellent live view and touch screern, no expert but for now I had no problems taking pictures using different techniques so the TIP OF highly to those who are beginners perchée but that goes the photo does not passionate about you macchian remains a small but photo quality from large |
 | sent on December 03, 2014 Pros: Unsurpassed as a new entry-level machine. The best of its class. With the right goals no way inferior to the older sisters. Cons: With an excellent value for money against the nearly zero. Opinion: Solid, compact, easy to handle, to take anywhere you go. Keep it in the car and pull out all the time and did not disappoint. Currently the use with the classic 28/55 mm f 3.5 5.6. stm. Invest objectives bright for at least 2.8 fixed focal type the excellent 40 mm 2.8 costs little and gives results thrilling. A tip: buy any other car to have a higher level this does not ever sell it. |
 | sent on August 05, 2014 Pros: Small, light, easy to handle. HD Movies valuable, useful touch screen system. Very affordable price. Cons: Noticeable noise in the dark areas also not very high iso. Opinion: It 'was my first DSLR and I am fully satisfied. It seems to me that produces well-defined and saturated shots with the lens kit (18/55). RnCon the 40mm is a pleasure to turn the street and shoot, but also with that of the pachyderm 24/105 I'm fine. I just recently purchased a 6D and at the time of purchase I was thinking of selling the 100D, but then I decided: I'll keep! |
 | sent on July 26, 2014 Pros: Otti on portability! Featherweight! Robust although almost entirely of plastic! Excellent yield with the objectives set Cons: Becomes unstable and easily with heavy targets! I used the little girl with the Canon 100 macro and after photos of a 20 if not held with both hands annoys the wrist Opinion: A real surprise! lightweight but well built, once contested immediately gave me a feeling of strength, plastics fit together perfectly without creating crunches typical entry level models a category to which I do not think appartiene.rnper As regards performance ... And what about good rich, saturated colors. rnProvata with 40mm pancake and a compact! With 100 mm macro produces fear! RnMi absolutely would recommend it to anyone looking for quality in a very compact body, or as in my case as a second body, in fact I own a 5d iii which has an excellent quality in various situations but is too cumbersome ! |
| sent on June 18, 2014 Pros: Lightness, handle (despite the size and my hands are not small), sensor quality more than good considering the level of membership, as the screen and position controls. It has everything to learn and go further without investing too much. Cons: Flasher just enough, battery life (but only if you do not consider the benefits of size and weight in the game). Opinion: With the Canon 100D has put on the market a camera "trap"; when used with optical kit we are located just a short time later, but dissatisfied, always Canon has made in my opinion the master stroke by pushing the 100D with the 40mm f2.8 stm (loss of quality because although on aps- c I think most versatile a fixed 28 mm). I think most people who buy an SLR do to try to go beyond the photographs and memories, having tried for a few weeks the 40 f2.8 on the 100D, the combination creates a very good condition and very inspiring to want to go out and photograph. I personally use the "small" with different optics and 70% returns me to the first shot, and without too much work setting, the result I want, obviously thinking to post production. I do not evaluate the video part because until now never used a camera to make movies. |
 | sent on July 01, 2013 Pros: Small and lightweight, with pancake 40mm fits comfortably in your pocket, touch screen 3 "high-resolution, 1080p movies with Hybrid CMOS AF II (continuous focus during filming), excellent metering system, simple but very fast AF and precise sensor with great detail and fully usable up to 1600 ISO, convenient small built-in flash, great white balance than the Canon tradition. Cons: Noise present in the shadows even at low ISO (but much less than the 7D), gust poor, not too ergonomic grip for those with big hands, Continuous AF during video shooting is not very fast, lack of vision of 100% a touch, limited duration of the battery (about 300 shots), plastic very "cheap." Opinion: Impressions of use decidedly positive, I have used the 18-55 stm that little monster by 40 mm f / 2,8. With the latter, the yield is truly spectacular. The lens of the kit is good, but obviously stops them (given the price), the construction is a little leggerina, good non-slip rubber handle for those with small hands, the car with the kit lens is really light , with 40 mm mounted slips easily in your pocket or purse. Horrendous and cheap plastics used by canon that now are not changed since the 350D ... A rough plastic of which remains attached all the dead skin of the fingers is a sort of "scrub" free. True that then you clean, but I always found annoying to the touch and sight. rnrnIl sensor is in my opinion better than the 7D, a hair more dynamic and less noise. I shot indoors with good lighting, up to 2000 ISO is acceptable, color noise content and grain dry with lightroom and 15-20 points luminance reduction remains a good cleaning and detailncora good. In addition it is better not to go, but this applies to all APSC, having the 5DII the comparison is merciless. rnrn18 mpx are many, but they give you a nice detail, especially on images taken close up, macro and portraits are not a problem and the plasticky 18-55 STM pulls the center excellent definition. It is the unfortunate tendency of this family of sensors to have the shadows noisy even with low sensitivity, especially when they are opened, and of course, better to expose to the right and retrieve luci.rnrnTutte considerations for a raw file with all the newfangled reset (noise reduction in Room and optimization of light strictly off ...) rnrnL'AF I liked it very much, fast and accurate, has not missed a shot, even in good light lateral work well. The viewfinder is decent, certainly better than the 350-400D. The complete info and the convenience of having everything can be set with the touch screen Q is a nice added value, use it is really a pleasure. rnrnComodissimo the touch screen, it does pretty much youtto with your fingers as one smartphone.rnDi high quality movies in HD with the convenience of continuous focus. Passing from one subject in the foreground to the background, the focus gradually changes from one floor to another with cinema effect significant, even though it is a bit slow. Whisper quiet the engine of STM 18-55. A must an external microphone, the internal monaural just sufficiente.rnrnInsomma, if you need a good machine as a second body to always bring below, the flea is perfect! We only hope that other mom Canon face pancake, like a 22 mm f / 1,8 and a small tele macro. Then it would be a big party, baby carrier and go!! |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
