|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Simone Simonetti www.juzaphoto.com/p/SimoneSimonetti  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM Pros: Cost, sharpness, lightness, macro quality, stabilizer Cons: Lack of af mf switch Opinion: I waited 1 year x review this lens, taken at 250 euros new, I was immediately impressed by the stabilizer, its 4 stops are all heard, the images it returns are sharp and contrasted, slightly tending to cold, the vignetting at 24mm to many from annoyance, just put the correction in the room and the problem is solved, the brightness is a compromise x have a light, stabilized and compact lens x ff. The real gem that perhaps many do not care about is its macro quality, 1:2 x an inexpensive zoom, which allows you to get closer to the subject up to a few cm is a lot of stuff, also having the 35 rf macro, this 24 105 is superior, you can focus in manual using the programmable ring, along with the focus peaking of the rp you focus easily with very close distances. Going around paired with the RP is unrivaled. Fully satisfied. I have several photos in the gallery, even macro ;-) sent on October 25, 2021 |
 | AmazonBasics - Zaino Hiker per fotocamera Pros: Robust backpack, great value for money, spacious x day trips, great compartment x camera, multitude of straps and pockets x many accessories, comfortable to wear. Cons: X now no one compared to its cost, maybe missing an external bottle holder. Opinion: Taken x day trips I was amazed at its versatility, at the top enters very well a fleece, a 100grams, spare t-shirt, water bottle, towel , kway. It has a pc pocket that you can also use as a bag x water, on top a document case pocket, smartphones, keys, etc. Let's talk about the bottom where there is the removable compartment x reflex and targets, I put a 70_200 2.8, a 17_40 plus the 7d with a mounted lens, c is also space x some filter and batteries. In the outside there is a retina that I put the tripod, a genesis c3 is comfortable, as opposed to how the backpack is designed that tells you to put it in the center where c is the symbol of the tripod I find it more comfortable to put it lateral even if "steal" the pocket x a water bottle. But the real good thing is that x get to take reflex or targets you don't have to take off your backpack, just untie the front straps and turn the backpack type single-shoulder, this movement I find very comfortable because even x change the lens does not risk dropping it to the ground. Below are straps x a sleeping bag. Great x what it costs I think is not better. Paid 58 euros orange but the price is very fluctuating, at the time of the review it costs 79 euros. The p.m. roof is included. Very recommended. sent on August 15, 2020 |
 | Yongnuo YN 100mm f/2 Pros: Good clarity, inexpensive, pretty accurate maf Cons: Maf slow Opinion: I say that I used it a little, I had to do it because the autofocus has been locked a few times on infinite, so even in a manual, making focus impossible in both cases. RnThe maf is accurate without Micro-regulation in the room however is slow and with little effort to hook up. I have found the sharpness all the time open but I can not compare it to the original because I have never tried it. After a while again and after about a hundred shots my specimen was unreliable with my canon 7d. sent on June 13, 2017 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Lightweight, fast and quiet AF, sharpness Cons: Flare, plastic bayonet, ferrule of maf without scale Opinion: Taken on offer on Amazon to 249 with hood, recommended by you users Juza it was very happy. Objective very crisp, a little dark but offset by excellent stabilizer that allows you to take in times prohibitive type 1/10, lightweight with plastic in my opinion good quality, using from 67 filters so content with not being very large costs although 10 mm sticker a little 'recoverable with postproduction. They are unique in the ring maf no full scale and in night makes you damn and plastic bayonet with continuous changes tends to wear out, for the rest Af very fast and quiet, recommended sent on January 17, 2017 |
 | Manfrotto Pixi Pros: Lightweight, small and always ready to use Cons: Unstable with heavy targets Opinion: I am taken xche I heard good ex affordability has proved to live up to expectation. Convenient, is inside the small bag of AmazonBasics along with reflex without ruining it, the head is oriented by pressing the button on the side, legs are rubber plugs that allows you to place it almost anywhere then all metal. I use it with canon 1200, 10 18:35 Fixed no stability problem but with 28 135 and its 500 grams weight head holds malappena. Highly recommended x bring with it at any occasion and have a tripod ready for use simply by screwing it to the SLR sent on December 27, 2016 |
 | Yongnuo EF YN 50mm f/1.8 Pros: It is cheap Cons: Sharpness at TA, af uncertain Opinion: It is taken just because somebody talked about it as if it were the old 50cc canon but ultimately worth what it costs, insufficient sharpness at ta have to close to 5.6 to be discreet, af engine seems a coffee grinder 'in addition to being slow and uncertain in many situations, only serves x experience the fixed focal length and aperture of 1.8. Spend more x the canon .stm and certainly will not be buttati.rnPs money. 18 from 55 kit is more crisp sent on November 06, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: focal range, Ultrasonic af Cons: Dust enters easily, zoom that goes down alone Opinion: It is a couple of months that I use, produces beautiful photos with my 1200d, hungry for light, pictures indoors and at night it is the duty flash, good sharpness from 50 to 100 t, from 5.6 up good on almost all focal lengths. noisy and less effective stabilizer than the 18-55, found used complete with hood original 170 x euro and I would say the price was a good buy, when holding the machine on the zoom neck down by itself and I noticed that the dust easily enters the interior of the target, however, so far without compromising photos. Also convenient manual focus even with af inserted. sent on September 15, 2016 |
 | Canon 1200D Pros: Low cost, easy to use, long battery life and good build quality Cons: a lot of noise with ISO higher than 800, does not have the swivel display but is a EntryLevel Opinion: I upgrade my opinion after 7 months of utilizzo.E 'my first digital SLR and I bought this machine for the very competitive price and was pleased with it, easy, intuitive for a beginner like me that lately only required photos with a compact. autofocus points Pochini but sufficient, use almost always the focus, not the burst fast, fast enough to memorize long exposures. Iso usable up to 400 max 800 but not over, then the noise dominates. long battery life you arrive safely to a busy day, but if you use the liveview you download in no time. I think it's good to start but if he takes a passion begins to feel a bit tight: no swiveling display, second ring and lacks the autofocus video xi fire. sent on July 09, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
