|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Photo Infinity www.juzaphoto.com/p/PhotoInfinity  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 85mm f/1.2 L II USM Pros: Blurred, cut, cream Cons: Objectively slow AF Opinion: It has been said and read practically everything about this lens. My opinion is that, like all lenses, this one in particular should be used for what was conceived: posed portrait. Of course it can also be used in other areas, but the best provides it in this context. My specimen has no particular problems with TA, on the contrary, with still subjects you get practically sharp images already at f / 1.2. Then, closing slightly you can afford to be even sufficiently quiet. The PDC is minimal (obvious), high-resolution files do not forgive but, as I said, with static subjects it is the maximum. Someone considers it heavy: of course, after hours of use maybe with a heavy FF and with BG the weight is felt, but nothing terrible; I also use medium-format lenses with much heavier lenses and I do not find it as a deterrent ... . About the price, well, the beautiful things are paid (and in any case in the used you find yourself at very affordable figures for the type of performance you are looking for). Every now and then I also use it with APSC without regretting an FF at all. Lens definitely recommended with any machine. sent on October 22, 2021 |
 | Manfrotto 804 RC2 Pros: Classical three-way head, optimal functioning. Cons: I am not at all well with the quick-release plate; it is extremely hard to unlock. Opinion: As I said, the only flaw I find in the quick-release lever; given that its typical use is to just unlock the plate with a certain speed, going to act anyway with two hands, one of which holds the tripod and the camera body at the same time, the time impipegato for the operation seems to contradict with its intended purpose. There should be a lever that acts as a "lever", in fact, to relieve stress. sent on September 02, 2014 |
 | Manfrotto 055 X PROB Pros: Stiffness and height reached. Cons: Lack of quick release levers of closing. Opinion: The use with a head 804RC2 three lever screw. I am very well. If he had the quick release levers of the legs would be easy to adjust on uneven ground. About the weight, yes indeed can be a negative characteristic, but certain levels of strength are only obtained with the material. It 's the price you pay. sent on September 02, 2014 |
 | Canon TS-E 17mm f/4 L Pros: Tilt and shift, of course; short-throw; also uses art, made at the corners, flare limited (due to the absence of the hood). Lately, Lee Filters catalog has a dedicated kit. Cons: Lens exposed, the time required for pre-trip (in case they were needed quickly); Price sobering. Opinion: I would choose the 24 TSE, but the 7mm focal length less sometimes I just necessari.rnLente top of the range that has a very high resolution (one of the best ever). For those who need to architectural shots (or at least with straight lines) I would say that it is the right lens; not to mention that you can use it anyway as any wide angle freehand. Made perfectly straight lines as long as you put the car whenever you click on the bubble. The lens needs at least a dusting of optics / physics to understand the concepts of plan and convergence / divergence (but clear concepts to anyone who engages in such a purchase). A flaw, but not the lens of marketing: in contrast to all the lenses that I acuistato, the package does not include the classic instruction book, but I'm a brochure (in common with the 24 TSE) that explains the features in many languages. Personally, I find it confusing and not at all complete. Even online there is nothing. Sin. sent on April 28, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: Bokeh, creamy texture, feeling, and ex ... immediate satisfaction. Cons: Never have I had until yesterday. Opinion: I have read everything before you buy it. And 'if you buy a lens that you know what you want, and what does such a choice (time AF, the minimum pdc etc ...). When put hands in their pockets, mounted on the FF and realized that it's really yours, you forget that you have other lenses. All of them. But I think that is a lens which must approach after doing some obligatory steps, made of kit, techniques and passion, why not. Otherwise the risk is that you might not fully appreciate (or at all). Highly recommended. After 50 1.2 L you have to wonder what it might be in terms of ... libidine.rnE think that some (not many thankfully) consider him the idiot brother dell'85L ... sent on November 28, 2013 |
 | HTC One (2013) Pros: Great sound, display quality, weight, thickness, two speakers, performances. Cons: Camera toy, size, too much social-based. Opinion: Taken after having many other HTC.rnPer the use of telephone and business find it ok. For the rest, all based app has no use for social network.rnIo use it a lot as an access point and I must say that the performance and the data transmission is excellent, although this depends very much on the manager and the dns.rnIl selling price seems a little high. On the other hand, is still a phone. sent on October 18, 2013 |
 | Canon 5D Mark III Pros: Using high ISO, which is easily supplied raw, real management pdc and everything already said. Cons: For a non-pro as I am, maybe a little too many functions in the menu. Opinion: Coming from a 7D the jump is impressive. The bike plane. Of course, one must use optical worthy of her, but usually those who have it, it also has the right optics. The years that have passed between the 7D and 5D3 are made sentire.rnHo made the suggested settings Sailor and I must say that I am fine. The story I will tell you if the use to which they do I will have to make further changes or meno.rnConcludendo, I highly recommend. sent on March 25, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM Pros: Quality worthy of the series L, competitive price. Cons: Lack of IS, weight. Opinion: Although this lens feels a little design a little dated, rimande a great lens, especially considering the quality / prezzo.rnVersatile and outdoors and in the studio, it becomes a good choice for portraits, given its apertura.rnPurtroppo the its weight limits prolonged use wrists more "sensitive". RNLA maf can be great if obtained thanks to the live view: you can also go into detail more motivated to focal intermedie.rnAggiornamento: rnho just bought a FF (5D3 ) and I have to confirm the vignetting at 24mm. Not everyone, however, bother ... just stay at 26-27 that no longer occurs. sent on November 02, 2011 |
 | Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 L II USM Pros: Price, weight, quality L series Cons: Is not tropicalized Opinion: For a very affordable price you bring home a 200mm L series I think it is a fairy tale. Its strengths are the portraits that because you have to take enough away from the subject, leaving very spontaneous and with a phenomenal bokeh. Would highly recommend to anyone looking for a high quality fixed. Too bad for the tropicalization that, if there were, it would be a plus. Give it a good 10 - because perfection does not exist. And if there was, we'd never figure it out, given the ns. imperfection. sent on October 25, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
