|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
GabrielBosky www.juzaphoto.com/p/GabrielBosky  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Zeiss Milvus 50mm f/1.4 Pros: 360 ° Quality: optics, construction, aesthetics, SOUL Cons: Too bad it's not AF Opinion: I share many of the observations made by Giallo63: the manual focus with today's slides is a business, but I had a hard time to focus manually with the old 5D first series, and I changed the slide on my 6D specifically for the use of this light! RNLA quality is palpable, the weight, the shape and the tactile feeling is surreal! rnPenso that clutter is not a counter (similar objectives are bulkier or similar, smaller targets are not comparable to this), with the EG-S can focuse at any point without recompose (light conditions), it is a modern lens with comparable sharpness almost all'arcinoto Sigma Art but with the yield Zeiss, the Zeiss soul, the Zeiss feeling, the Zeiss reliability! rnSe also had AF probably always recommend to the detriment of the Sigma, but it is not and not everyone want to take pictures in MF.rnIl price is proportionallyand quality, but you perceive higher since competition provides optically valid goals at lower prices, but the construction and pleasure to have it in your fingers is not comparable! RNE 'just to try, I mounted the frosted glass on the 6D, additional why hardly I unmount this objective it;) sent on December 30, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM Pros: Value for money, bright, stabilized Cons: I do not see ... Opinion: And 'one of the best goals you may have in your hands: it weighs little, is not cumbersome and the yield is amazing! RnL'ho taken after a meditation about a month on a 35 to be taken together with the 6D, the final choice was took place between it and the sigma 1.4 and ... there is no story: if you do not need this stop more light make no mistake: the canon 35 is better as yield (from 2.5 onwards), has stabilized, it has an autofocus that does not miss a beat! rnHo instead took 24 Article 1.4 sigma, and I say this because the difference in yield you see all right with this iS USM, the risolvenza is greater and microcontrast is REAL! rnrnLa lack the hood is something useless from consider: I have taken aim + paraluceORIGINALE at a price lower than the minimum AMZ ... and with warranty Italy! rnIl hood is perfect, and it's worth it to buy it and keep it installed! RNLA lack of weather sealing is NOT a defect! Because if one spends € 500 for a obOBJECTIVE and claims it is weather sealed to mount it on a camera not Tropicalized then ... I do not know what to write in false! final rnrnIn the coupled 35 f / 2 is usm + 6D from a hard to combinations of lenses + expensive and more cameras expensive! Hardly it will not be installed if you want to go light, and hard to miss in your bag even when you have no place where to put it! RnStraconsigliato! sent on November 14, 2016 |
 | Canon 6D Pros: Images comparable and often superior to more expensive machines and / or higher performance card if combined with the right goals; iso estate, good recoverability Raw (although not at the top), wi-fi integrated very comfortable! Oh, I forgot: PRICE! Cons: MAF meter and points Opinion: Let's face it: if you were to ask me what I think of 6D and how I am responding that "It 'imperfection that helps to grow!" RnOvviamente there is no perfect car, some guilty of quality or price or some technical feature, however, there are combinations that can be stunning and give greater satisfaction than you would by spending astronomical amounts; in a nutshell, it is true that Canon, in some ways, is a step back to Nikon and Sony is fast climbing, but take a 6D and pair with some specific goals and you will have excellent results! rnParlo in particular the 35 f2 is usm and 135 F2L, the samy 14 ... I think the 6D combined with these objectives (do a quick search on Juza to believe) could deliver superior results or at least comparable to a 5Dm3 with goals L or Sigma much more expensive than on paper they are more performant! And to half or less of the price !!! rnHa defects? Yes, and they are famous: autofocus and youmetering system! To take pictures with the 6D will have to almost start again from scratch and you have to be very open, which is not for everyone; rnquando I arrived I thought I would be lucky: I have not found the side AF points so "preposterous to use" as I thought (even if it tells you to hook but you find yourself really is not entirely true), but the disappointment is the position of these points, 11 AF points and not put they come in third ?? OK! RnAllora perhaps it is good to come back a little 'back and practice well to rebuild starting from the night ninja sniper who is the central point (from tears to perfection also the DARK!), And, when possible, to rely on their eyes and use the good old manual focus! rnL'esposimetro is to be studied again totally, it's weird: I do not see only underexposure in each condition (as I see written in many parts) but also happens the opposite problem: on a medium gray card actually tends to underexpose, but other colors taken as ruses assembly "outside" sometimes took me too overexposed results (see the green grass .....)! rnDetto that the camera is solid, if the wi-fi allows you to do street at the discretion unimaginable levels, image quality is outstanding, yield iso ..... RNE 'you have to tame a wild horse, but if you do not Emboss out and tame you can compete with the best racehorses in the world! My vote is 8, but only because I hated those damn maf points not to third !!! sent on May 18, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
