|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Astore71 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Astore71  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | DJI Mavic Mini Pros: great value for money, no driver's license, lightweight, compact and good quality video in relation to the mounted sensor. Cons: no active track, no waypoint, no 4k, only wi-fi connection, only lower sensors. Opinion: the best drone for those who have to start, I do not use it for photos so I do not make judgments. the videos are great with a lot of light, less with little, but with the sensor so small can not wait miracles. I ride in 2.7 k then I monto in FHD and the results are more than satisfactory. I was very impressed by the stability even with medium wind, despite the small size and power of the engines. 3500 meters and didn't make a crease, obviously the batteries run out fast. Surely you should not overdo it and fly judiciously, also because there are only lower proximity sensors. I've been lucky but my specimen has never had problems connecting with the controller, I use it with iphone and it goes that's a pleasure. I miss the advanced active track features that in the mountains would be very comfortable. Ultimately a well-made object with excellent flying capabilities. sent on September 05, 2020 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II Pros: Sharpness, Af, stabilizer Cons: weight and maybe the price Opinion: I finally found peace, after 6 months of use I can claim to have found a fantastico.rnvengo paintings from Sigma 150-500 and 400 noble canon hard but I make 90% stalking and have never managed to be happy with the pienamente.rnPer sigma, as noted, it was necessary to close at least in f9 to have good sharpness but in the forest with little light came out casini.rnil 400 fixed to a tripod or rest on some stable support was great but "wandering" no, no stabilizer camera shake has always been presente.rncon the 100-400 I managed to find the square, I find only the weight too little (after hours of walking is felt) and maybe the price a little high but then I would say that quality pays off a lot. rnRiesco also to use it with the Kenko 1.4x pro 300 DGX without losing any automation with good soddifazione obviously he lost a sharpness hair and the AF slows a bit in low light but nothing fantastic esagerato.rnObiettivo and highly recommended for those who want have a quality canvas sent on April 17, 2016 |
 | Canon 100D Pros: Very compact, light weight and good ergonomics in relation to the size. Cons: Probably for those with large hands ergonomics it is not the best Opinion: Taken as a second body (6 months ago) to carry for outputs "read" especially during the trips in mountains. From this point of view I find great. very good overall yield, practical touch screen (already appreciated on 70d) and good quality video files. I have been lucky but I the low ISO noise problem I never detected, even I find it very clean and well-defined files. As written on the dimensions are its strength, for those who want a "reflex" with minimal dimensions and light weight it safe. Obviously use with optical "heavy and long" virtually eliminates practicality as is cautious too. Some defect is, in fact the battery has a limited life and would have preferred the swivel screen, but you would be lost in lightness and practicality why not consider them real defects. Finally the cost, in my opinion a very good quality / price ratio. sent on March 28, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 400mm f/5.6 L USM Pros: lightweight, af lightning excellent value for money Cons: not stabilized, f5.6, not suitable for stalking. Opinion: Taken after reading the many great reviews I used it for some months but ultimately failed to achieve the performance as much as 90% decantate.rnfacendo stalking and often with poor lighting (in the woods, cloudy etc. ) it is difficult to stay within the safety and shake-it is almost always presente.rnHo tried to use it on a tripod from the shed and "things" have changed radically (for the better of course) but it's not my genere.rnL'ho sold to switch the new 100 400. sent on April 27, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: light, very sharp and fast af Cons: is a bit noisy but I honestly do not know if it can be considered a "counter" Opinion: Used for a short time but "squeezing" maximum in 2 outputs for wildlife (no birds) .rnOvviamente for nature in general is short, but in my opinion, to use from time to time and for large animals (chamois, ibex, deer etc. ) and with due caution is sufficiente.rnL'ho used with the 70D multiplied (1.4x Kenko Pro 300 DGX) and not and I must say that I found myself very well, certainly the multiplication slows down a little bit but nothing AF critico.rnPer other genres is fantastic, I loved it sfocato.rnrn sent on April 27, 2015 |
 | Canon 70D Pros: af video, adjustable touch display, wi-fi, general ergonomics. Cons: shooting silenzionso it is little, the rear wheel to select functions is a bit small and it is easy to press the buttons adjacent. Opinion: I come from the 450d so I find it best to use tutto.rnla 4 months or so and I am very well, I find the great burst, up to 3200 iso files are very good and with little noise and not a wizard of PP this for me is ottimo.rn in acuni shots I've tried up to 6400 iso with the right conditions and I was pleasantly surprised. rnottimo the wi-fi that allows me to use the camera with the phone to click the "stolen" the little animals more difficult to avvicinare.rnottima the video function that between the screen swivel the continuous focus and the ability to select points through touch makes everything very easy and intuitivo.rnla use coupled with the 24-70 f4 10-18 and the legendary 400f5,6 and I must say I am very PLEASED even if I have to improve my technique to use to take advantage of all the potential of this camera. sent on October 10, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 24-70mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: solid, weather sealed, fast AF and excellent stabilization, excellent yield. Cons: on aps-c I have not found Opinion: Purchased by Galaxia with the summer campaign at a fantastic price (€ 654), I was torn between this and the 15-85 and after reading various reviews I decided to give up several mm to several qualities and are satisfied with the scelta.rnLo use on 70D how to do everything, just took and made the first shots went off immediately feeling.rnnitido already a TA becomes a blade closing of a stop, to the best of the focal intermedie.rnovviamente on aps-c is lost but I took the GA a dedicated lens, the macro function is very interesting if understood as "sporadic and unpretentious" and therefore no performance as a "real" macro, in fact, the operation provides a complete distance from the subject much reduced so it is not suitable for insects microscopoci .rndopo two months of heavy use, I can say that it is great lens and would recommend it without problemi.rnrn sent on August 31, 2014 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: price, compact, fast AF, good yield generale.rn Cons: low resistance to flare, wide open cartoon but nothing not risolvible PP, plastic abbonda.rncome usual missing the hood. Opinion: mounted on 70d, I was pleasantly surprised by this obiettivo.rntempo ago I had the 10-22 (sold x unforeseen expenses) and the overall yield does not differ tantissimo.rnleggero, compact, well-made plastic (at least my copy) and my opinion has little to do with the lens kit (18-55). rnaf fast and effective stabilazzazione (often shooting freehand in the mountains in critical condition). rnovviamente limits are there but the quality / price ratio is ottimo.rnx who has the 10-22 does not make sense to make the change x those who want a wide-angle cheap but good performance is ottimo.rnsegnalo that is clearly stated in the instructions that with some models (700d for example) you need to update the firmware to the latest version Recently worth the camera to malfunction. sent on July 28, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
