|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
MicheleS www.juzaphoto.com/p/MicheleS  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Pros: Performance over the average of the 35 of the same characteristics and to a much lower price. Built with excellent materials. Cons: Nobody Opinion: I use a Nikon D610 and offers fantastic photos. I consider a virtue the opportunity to be able to calibrate at home with dock and dedicated software; in this regard in the net there are many guides that explain step by step the various stages. At an affordable price add to your kit lens f / 1.4 sound and constructed with care. I took hundreds of photos at the maximum aperture and when it is set, it does not have a cannata! sent on November 08, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Versatility, vr, sharpness weight. Cons: Vignette, falling around 120mm, 24mm distortion. Opinion: Give an opinion on this controversial optics is very easy for me. It is a very sharp lens, weather sealed, heavy on the right, with a vr that freezes everything; It could say that distorts much at 24 and dropping to around 120mm and it is true, but enough to work well in PP and everything is resolved. So how come so many criticisms of this lens? Answer: the purchase price. Indeed, the cost / performance ratio at the beginning made it inconvenient, but having patience today you can buy at the right price and new. Overall I would recommend, especially for people like me who was tired of constant changes optics. sent on October 21, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D Pros: Size, af, cost. Cons: Materials, color rendering, old design. Opinion: Bought used and cheap, I used about body fx and gave me wonderful files. Soft at room temperature and with beautiful colors creamy. I tried for some days counterpart 1.4ge I discovered another world. Surely the price with which you can buy is unbeatable but, given the chance, better opt for 1.8go even better for 1.4g. sent on October 21, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 G ED VR Pros: The right heavy, compact, fairly clear, af normal. Cons: Price of the new focal length. Opinion: Honest performance, does not disappoint in the use amateur. If used on modern SLR at high ISO, it is not affected much of the reduced opening. You get files optimally sharp and contrasted and thanks to vr you can afford to take time with 1/20. By contrast, the low focal length, forcing frequent changes in objective and this can be a nuisance. Sold to make style opens the 24-120 f4 only for the reasons mentioned above. In comparison with the latter it does not lose at all ... but that's another story. sent on October 21, 2015 |
 | Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Pros: Impeccable construction, focus ring, feeling of strength, super sharp. Cons: Weight, only for aps-c. Opinion: I had no time for this beautiful goal, resold for crossing ff. One can only speak well, both for the excellent construction materials, for the extreme sharpness that gives and for the purchase price. Keep in mind that are fixed in a 5! The opening 1.8 allows you to take in difficult conditions without loss of quality. L 'AF is lightning and the hypersonic engine is extremely quiet. The stabilization in these focal not needed. There is also some cons: 1) the weight feels lighter camera bodies and therefore, you may want to balance with the bg. 2) if you do not own a camera body with fine-tuning, we recommend purchasing the dock sigma, because there may be problems of front / back focus- I had to adjust the d7000 -20 3) you can not use flash incorporated because the lens casts the shadow on the subject fotografare.rnMi would like to try it with a reflex type D7200 at high ISO values, I think it would be a show! rnComplessivamente us onhigh levels: rating 9.5 sent on June 19, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Good hiking, weight, equipment, decent sharpness. Cons: Overall quality, chromatic aberration, opening. Opinion: Classical lens kit, does not excel in anything, but fails to perform adequately all the tasks that are required to play. It 'very light and feel good gym to learn the basics of digital photography, in fact even if you zoom in you are forced, because of low light, to move towards the subject to photograph if you want to get good results and learned to compose the image. The sharpness is good and tends to fall towards the 90mm. A TA is a slight distortion easily eliminated in pp. Chromatic aberration and dominant green. The vr plays good job. In my opinion it is very suitable for the latest generation sensors dense. Rating 7 sent on May 29, 2015 |
 | Sigma AF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro Pros: Focal length, versatility, quality / price ratio. Cons: Lack stabilizer, poor sharpness between 200 and 300mm. Opinion: I bought this lens and used as new to the modest sum of 77 €, and it was a 'super deal! The lens looks solid and the dials are hard right; 70mm files produces very sharp and up to 200mm is beautifully used; between 200 and 300mm the sharpness falls a lot and moved increases the risk; requires electricity and adequate time to get good results otherwise you have to use a tripod; In conclusion, given the prices at which you can buy, the straconsiglio. rating 8.5 sent on May 27, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Clarity, weight, bokeh, price. Cons: Distortion, chromatic aberration, plastic. Opinion: I am of the opinion that the 35mm kit should not be missing in aps-c and in particular this objective, which remains as the best value for money; TA is very sharp in the center and to achieve good uniformity must close up to f4 or better 5.6. As you close the diaphragm has an annoying chromatic aberration easily eliminated in pp. Distortion is pronounced and even this can be eliminated in pp. The AF is not always guess the subject you want in focus and you may have cases of front / back focus species in TA; it is therefore necessary to intervene on the "fine tuning" of the body (if this will be provided). The construction materials do not seem of the highest quality, but you can not expect more in these figures. In conclusion I would recommend it, especially for those like me who approach the world of photography, to really learn what it means to compose a photo using your legs as zoom. Rating 9 sent on May 27, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Build quality, 16mm, practicality. Cons: Cost, flare, suffers with little light, quality / price ratio. Opinion: Purchased to replace my d7000 18-105, has not made noticeable improvements in terms of the end result would justify the amount spent. For sure it is well built, the vr second generation is performing and 16mm make the difference but, in contrast, can not be ignored flares and especially the low light. So if you do not want to spend a fortune to immediately zoom-opening steady, my advice is to keep for a period lenses kit, set aside a bit 'of money and then jump on optical brighter or buy it used. sent on May 27, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
