|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Jooferr www.juzaphoto.com/p/Jooferr  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X-S20 Pros: Battery, AF, IS, built-in small flash Cons: Price Opinion: For about a month I have been using the xs20 taken instead of the xe4, I also own the xt5 for about 10 months. I don't want to make comparisons between them because I don't think it's necessary in this area. The first things that catch the eye are the compactness in the sense that it is small, manageable and weighs little, that is, less than 500 grams, in short, a featherweight. I only bought the body because I already had the optics and the first tests were done with the 90mm and what can I say this lens that has a few years of design on its shoulders has taken on new vitality. This is to introduce the fact that its AF is really good and I am talking about AF-C because the xs20 mounts the X-Processor 5 (xt5) image processor while keeping the sensor at 26 MP. The battery is always the same as my xt5 and lasts a long time. I don't make videos but I read that it behaves very, very well. My final summary is that the xs20 is much more than an entry level. Recommended even if the price is a bit high but we know that between cashback and other initiatives it will drop as time passes. sent on October 30, 2023 |
 | Viltrox AF 75mm f/1.2 Pro Pros: Performance, price. Cons: Cat eye lights backlit but not always. Opinion: I wanted to take the new Fuji 56 1.2 wr and instead pushed by the great reviews but, not entirely convinced, I bought the 75 1.2 in early June. The hesitations I had disappeared completely once I took it in hand and tried. At the price of about 600 euros you come into possession of a lens that amazes for several reasons starting from a fast and performing AF even at 1.2 low light on X-T5, passing through the wr to get to a really Pro construction from all points of view. The rings are perfect without the slightest hesitation, in short, you have the real feeling of a nice leap in quality like the best Fuji. Brava Viltrox, recommended purchase. sent on July 23, 2023 |
 | Fujifilm X-T5 Pros: AF, nostalgic neg simulation, battery life, very accurate in detail, tilting display, 40mpx for crop and large prints. Cons: Awkward AF-ON button, price. Opinion: Ok the XT series is no longer the flagship of Fuji and all in all I do not care. I come from an xt3 that in my opinion was not easy to replace, not having considered the xt4 because of its display. I've owned it for just over a week and I immediately felt comfortable with its rings where you expect them. I chose the silver model and I must say that it is very fascinating. The cons are few and I have already described them above. A very positive thing is the battery life and its housing very well done, all giving a good feeling of solidity. It is a machine for those who do photography and not video but also do those. I shot at 1/30 handheld with the 70-30 without even the shake thanks to his IBIS. Promoted. sent on December 24, 2022 |
 | Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 Pros: AF like a Fuji, light although it looks metal, cost Cons: Diaphragm ring decliccata Opinion: I have been using it on Fuji xt3 and xe4 for about seven months. A 33mm 1.4 (a 50mm on FF). Objective well done in all its parts including the hood that still has a small yoke but nothing serious. It costs much much less than the respective Fuji which I think is overwhelmed, for what it costs it is a must have. Very good AF also in low light and AF-C. Other pros and cons in description. sent on October 13, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm XF 90mm f/2 R LM WR Pros: Construction, AF, WR, optical quality Cons: Wish it had been 1.8 ... but that's okay too, it weighs a little, price Opinion: Bought at the beginning of 2022 and used exclusively with X-E4, while also having the X-T3, with an additional grip it forms a combination that is giving me a lot of satisfaction. It's a portrait lens but I don't use it for this, I'm not a portraitist, so I go out of street in a broad sense with photos after sunset or artificial light. Its focal length f/2 is already quite good in low light especially because you also come up with an AF worthy of the name. What is surprising about this goal? First the optical quality that is at the highest levels, the soft blur and how it is built. I think the 90 is a classic must-have. Highly recommended, vote 10. sent on February 26, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm XF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 R LM OIS WR Pros: Very light, very good AF, WR, price and many others Cons: When extended to 300 it is ugly to see Opinion: Purchased at the end of 2021 and used a lot because in addition to being light it is also sharp with fast AF with the X-T3 but much faster AF on the X-E4, on the latter it clearly unbalances a little. The X-T3 hooks in single AF very well but X-E4 hooks well even in continuous AF. Clearly with the T3 seen the WR of both you go safer in situations of rain and dust. The optical quality surprised me in a positive way and the blurred, while not being like the 50-140 2.8, is very good. Recommended purchase also for the low price. sent on February 26, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR Pros: Construction, AF, 1.4 aperture, WR, quiet. Cons: Cost Opinion: A 27/28 equivalent on FF is in my opinion the best wide-angle compromise you can have. This lens has everything to put itself at the top of Fuji optics. I use it on E4 and T3 and in both cases it is very fast, silent and focuses in the "dark" with its 1.4 aperture. Of course the cost that touches the thousand euros is high but as we now know the quality you pay dearly. From many parts we read that it is cold, analytical and does not have the magic of others ... try it and you will not regret it. I definitely recommend buying if you need. sent on November 03, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm X-E4 Pros: Small, handy and suitable for street photography but not only. Cons: Little grip Opinion: I have been using it for about a month and I am very satisfied for various reasons. You can take street photos without using the EVF but the small flipping of the screen. Speaking of EVF I find it adequate to the class of the camera and does not suffer from delays. You can customize many functions even those that are physically missing and here I refer to the classic front selector AF-S, AF-C and M. I use it mainly with the new 18mm f/1.4 always in AF-C and this coupling is very fast even in low light. Note of merit are the film simulations of the X-Trans IV sensor that I am using but that I already knew having the X-T3 and in the past the X-T1. Promoted with flying colors. I added a con but in my opinion it is of little importance using small and not very heavy optics. sent on October 12, 2021 |
 | Canon RF 24-105 mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: AF, f/4 on all focal points, travel, stabilizer. Cons: Aesthetics on the barrel extension at 105mm, a bit heavy. Opinion: After an abundant year of use together with the EOS R I can express an opinion on this perfect lens to travel, yes because the 24-105 could be the only one to take with you. Kitd with the EOS R it does not present noise problems or anything else when it extends to the major focal points. Fast and quiet AF, well-made construction with fine plastics and accidental extension block switches complete a very positive picture. The yield is very good at all focal points. Cons are described above although for some it may not be a problem. I can't compare it to previous EFs because I've never had them and tried them. Ultimately a zoom lens to have if they affect the focal points. sent on May 02, 2021 |
 | Fujifilm X-T3 Pros: AF, key customization, manual rings, jpg, dynamic range. Cons: Unintuitive download of files via SW. Opinion: In 2014 I bought the X-T1 which after three years I sold not because I was disappointed but only because I wanted to return to Canon FF. Today I have an X-T3 and a Canon R ... I bought back a Fuji, after 7 years, precisely the X-T3 that I have been owning for about 40 days. The camera externally looks like all those of the beautiful X-T series, captivating with a feeling of good robustness. Internally it has changed in everything compared to the X-T1 at both hw and sw level, changed for the better especially for the double slot, the AF, the complete customization of the keys and the operating speed in general. There are also the 26 megapixels that I didn't initially see as good as 6400 isos there are no big problems. Note of merit for Fuji jpgs which are really a nice plus with their film simulations. Difficult to explain what Fuji jpgs are to those who have never tried them not a commercial move but a real added value that often makes you leave out raw. I set raw+jpg, raw slots1 i jpg slot2 and this thing gives me immediate access to the type of files I want to view and/or work with. I raw them work with C1 free for Fuji when the image has grass trees or anything similar for the rest I use Fuji raw file converter also free. On the other hand I wrote I did a lot of rehearsals but I can't get the download to work via SW so I take off the SDs and download with an external player. sent on March 17, 2021 |
 | Canon RF 50mm f/1.2 L USM Pros: Pretty much everything. The most surprising thing is that at f/1.2 it is already a blade. Cons: In servo AF and in poor light conditions it takes two or three seconds to hook but not always. Opinion: I've been using it on EOS R for about two weeks now and it's pure enjoyment. Now you can photograph it in the evening or in artificial light without the fear of having out-of-focus or sharp shots. Chromatic aberration practically absent, low vignetting, construction and feeling at the top. I was afraid that it was too bulky or unbalanced instead I notice that having the maximum weight in the center does not tire much. I also use it with crop in the car 1.6 becoming an 80mm and I see no difference in results compared to full use. As far as the other thing is concerned, it is not a big problem and you get used to it straight away, and I think the delay of those two or three seconds is due to the lack of light, because it does not always happen. Ultimately we are talking about an exciting lens that makes you fall in love with photography again. sent on November 10, 2020 |
 | Canon EOS R Pros: Speed and responsiveness AF, eye-AF, command customization, infinite optical park, sensor, customizable control ring RF lenses Cons: The video that I still do not use, maybe the ribbon, ridiculous burst that I do not use, price Opinion: I bought the EOS R in kit with RF 24-105 - the adapter just two days before the coronavirus closure, great bad luck because I could try it little outdoors. I had to do a lot of tests at home. My mirrorles approach was not a drama because in the past I had the Fuji XT-1 and I am mainly referring to the transition from the optical sight to the EVF. The machine came to me with the first highly contested firmware when all the reviews practically rejected it. I immediately installed the latest firmware 1.6. The thing that struck me immediately and positively was the AF, with 24-105 RF is a splinter. I would like to say, however, that my lenses EF 70-200 L IS f4, EF 300 L IS f4 and EF 16-35 f4 still go better than the 6D, let's say almost as if they were mounted on the 7D mark II that I had and bought only for its AF module. Also notable is the eye-AF and DPAF that I use in Craw. The files are very workable and do not suffer from the crop and human recoveries so the sensor satisfies me. The EOS R is very customizable at the command level to buttons and dials. Also useful is the sensor protector door (it opens with machine in on and closes with machine in off) when changing the targets as long as this is done by machine off. I don't make videos and I don't use the burst. One bad thing, which you can disable anyway, is the ribbon, I memorized the magnification of the shooting scene and this thing does not affect anything while shooting. I think the Canon approach to the mirrorless world was not bad, from my point of view, because the things for which it has been very criticized do not actually affect the quality of the photos that it manages to churn out. sent on April 13, 2020 |
 | Canon 80D Pros: AF highly responsive even on the side, with well-distributed points MAF, touchscreen Cons: Quiet shutter release is not silent, ISO 6400 maximum limit, price Opinion: I own the 80D just before the summer but I have not used a lot, I still had a good idea compared to my previous Canon 6D and 50D. The thing I like most is the speed and responsiveness of the AF system: top performer 50D where it was still decent and the same goes for the 6D especially on the side (for us Central on the same level). A real treat to use the touch screen to change the point of the fly MAF and over / under exposure. A note of thanks also on good dynamic range slightly higher than the 6D with a good workable files. The good optical 80D wants to look great. The cons I have described above and the most annoying thing on my mind is finely tuned sound that is practically equal to the normal shooting. Recommended facts except against. sent on September 12, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR Pros: As close to the fixed zoom ring perfect, stabilized, weather sealed. Cons: Some pesantino but bearable, hood hard to insert and remove, cost. Opinion: I bought this little gem about two months ago. I use it with xt1 and the first thing I noticed was the speed AF very responsive compared to 14mm. The sharpness is the highest level for a zoom and very close to fixed. At f / 2.8 it makes it well already, going to close clearly is better but I must say that it is appreciated for its uniformity at all focal lengths. Fantastic the zoom ring very well adjusted to the right clutch. Note on the stabilizer that can so dear to do its job. Fuji, once again, has a center adding to its optical XF this goal. Highly recommended to those who want to buy it. sent on April 08, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XF 14mm f/2.8 R Pros: Crisp, detailed, small and light Cons: The usual low-budget fender Opinion: It is a great lens that has nothing to fear compared to other famous Canon lenses that I use. On the fantastic xt1 each shot is a joy both in color and in black and white after editing. As mentioned it is small and gives a nice impression of robust construction. The MAF is fast, not like SLRs, but it's ok for me. Another note of merit is the manual MAF which with focus peaking it is a pleasure to use it as well as the diaphragm ring although a little soft. It's a 21, compared to the 24x36, a focal that I like very much also because it is almost free from distortion. By now it is new to just over 700 euros and is all worth them otherwise used around 500. sent on February 24, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XF 18-55 f/2.8-4R LM OIS Pros: Clear, incisive, quite small. Cons: The hood and cap you risk losing them. Opinion: Using this lens for about two months taken in kit with XT1 and was very impressed by the ability to return photos in my opinion exceptional. The amazing thing is that already in TA 2.8, if shots to 18mm or so, it gives you the results nothing short of excellent. I see that others have given top grades and I do not do nothing but confirm. What I do not understand is why often I see for sale in the market as from 18 to 55 in APS-C is a good all-rounder. If I compare with the Canon 24-70 f / 4 that I had with the 6D, I find this 18-55 (about 28-83 on FF) simply migliore.rnQuesta is a picture taken with this lens is to be noted that a photo native in jpg: http://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=1115489&l=it sent on December 03, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 300mm f/4.0 L IS USM Pros: almost macro function 1: 4, AF more than acceptable on FF, crisp, good bokeh, integrated hood, construction Cons: Is pesantino after a while, slow AF on APS-C Opinion: Project a little dated but that does not mean it's thrown away. I make this clarification because sometimes you think a lens or a camera a few years ago are not comparable to today's material. Instead this goal, which is now quite cheap compared to its photographic performance, churning out fantastic photos thanks to its fixed focal length. rnLo own for some time and despite being valid on APS-C achieves, in my opinion, its highest expression on FF. On the 50D I got good results but on 6D photo quality reaches the maximum. Recommended great for those looking for a tele pushed and on a budget. sent on May 08, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Clear, accurate and fast AF, low weight so much practical Cons: No one ... maybe the hood is a bit cumbersome Opinion: I own this lens for about three years, I tried it on and 50D for about a year on 6D. It behaves wonderfully on both APS-C and on FF. The pictures taken with this lens have a richness of color and detail that always leave me amazed; these peculiarities are found at all focal lengths used. I find it of great value to its lightness and portability for long tempo.rnE 'definitely make a purchase for the simple fact that its quality is superior to its price. Consigliatissimo.rn sent on May 03, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
