RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Carcat
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Carcat



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Carcat


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

dji_mavic_mini2DJI Mini 2

Pros: reliability, compactness, portability, lower regulatory limits

Cons: absence of collision sensors, absence of tracking, mediocre sensor (especially for photographic use)

Opinion: drone at the top of the C0 category of the limited open category, before the mini3 was released, but it remains a very valid UAS at a correct cost. Very reliable and thanks to the Ocusync 2 system guarantees an excellent signal, portability at the highest levels, possibility of urban overflights (never on gatherings), great flight autonomy. It remains, for any drone, even if less than 250 grams, the controversial and complicated legislation that effectively prevents its use in many areas. More and more often they are tracked remotely by the FF. OO. or by the institutions thanks to the aeroscope system, you have to be very careful to fly in good standing and safely.

sent on May 12, 2022


sony_a7iiiSony A7 III

Pros: versatility, sensor, AF

Cons: menu, lack of ML functionality

Opinion: I have been using it for a few months, I have not become a "Sony fun boy", I try to maintain objectivity and while considering it a great machine, extraordinarily versatile in almost all photographic genres, sensor and AF fantastic, I check several shortcomings between ML features (focus stacking, time lapse, double exposure in the room). It is likely that for many they are unimportant but they are often present on the bodies of other brands, and here you feel the lack of them...like the charger... I don't say anything about the menu because it's like shooting on the red cross...

sent on May 02, 2020


sigma_24-70_f2-8dnSigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN Art

Pros: sharpness, build quality, minimum MaF distance

Cons: weight and size

Opinion: Amazing lens, very sharp already at TA, excellently built, very solid, AF very fast and quiet. I thought about it a lot before choosing it compared to Tamron and GM, for me the 4mm at the bottom were fundamental and I preferred it to Tamron sacrificing the significant increase in weight and size, compared to the GM the only real difference is the cost...

sent on May 01, 2020


nikon_d750Nikon D750

Pros: sensor, versatility, price

Cons: operational slowness (compared to the flagships)

Opinion: I had 4, all without problem shutter (however, now resolved for some time), several tens of thousands of shots made in the most varied conditions. I think I can reasonably state that it is a true "allround", an extraordinarily versatile machine, with an excellent sensor (especially at high ISO), a relatively low price in relation to the product. 24 Mpx are ideal for an appropriate detail in most situations and allow you to crop even moderate, the raw remains light and manageable even in quantity without having to have superconfigured PC. Some faults have it but marginal and evident especially when compared to the flagships I had (D4 D4s), in particular the slowness of some quick buttons, and I refer, for example, to the waiting time between pressing the button of ISO adjustment and switching on the display to read its value. When you work there ... 1 second ... it seems a lot ... rnSpere the production again for a few years to be able to replace others and have a very versatile machine at a pricemodest.

sent on February 09, 2018


tamron_24-70_f2-8vc_g2Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2

Pros: sharpness, af, construction

Cons: none for the lens type

Opinion: After a couple of years of 24-70 G1 I went to 24-70 G2, improving (without excess) in everything: construction, stabilization, sharpness at corners, AF speed. It does not overwhelm the already good 24-70 G1, but it improves on the peculiar aspects I have mentioned earlier. It will be a best seller of Tamron as it is the G1 ...

sent on October 24, 2017


manfrotto_pixi_evoManfrotto Pixi EVO

Pros: Convenient and cheap

Cons: Best to use remote control or delayed release for not moving

Opinion: Bought for trips where it is not possible to bring a serious tripod, I chose it from the pixi because the head has a capacity of 2.5 kg against 1 kg.rnsi behaves well with the ML or anyway with light machines. The head guarantees the desired movement.rnPlay a wink on the smallest union so better to use it with remote control or delayed delay to avoid flexion and movement.rnStraordinary portability, a little less ... stability ...

sent on August 31, 2017


yongnuo_yn568exYongnuo YN-568EX II (Nikon)

Pros: Quality / unbeatable price, easy to use, powerful (guide number 58)

Cons: Manual ridiculous instructions

Opinion: Not being a big flash user, I had still the need for sporadic cases, and after reading great reviews on this generalized model I wanted to try it. The results are satisfactory, it has definitely proved reliable even in situations where I would not have thought that we could do it. I use both manually and multi without difficulty, from the maximum ttl proving himself properly balanced.

sent on February 10, 2016


olympus_m14-42ezOlympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 EZ

Pros: Compact size, aesthetics (if it's a pro), good optical quality

Cons: slow zoom

Opinion: I had 14-42 RII, then sold to move to 14-150 (I maintain), I decided to buy the 14-42 EZ outputs "lightweight / compact" and, regardless of whether it is aesthetically perfect for M10 and even if the aesthetic is not the photo, the eye wants its part ... rnNell'uso, however, despite the good optical quality (in my opinion just below the RII), the real penalty is the slowness of the impressive power zoom, if you do not take time to do the problem, but if you want to seize the moment you end ..... rn

sent on September 29, 2015


nikon_85_f1-8dNikon AF 85mm f/1.8 D

Pros: construction, sharpness, excellent optical quality

Cons: nothing really relevant

Opinion: This is one of those lenses that once you try you fall in love and you realize what is really the sharpness and focus, the rest is called "creamy machine" not for nothing ... rngià very good at 1.8, 2 in on spettacolare.rnVa it is used consciously and in small doses ... because then it's hard to find lenses that can bear their comparison :-)

sent on July 06, 2015


nikon_af28-105dNikon AF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 D

Pros: economic, defined, built as a time, excellent risolvenza with macro function, excellent value for money

Cons: basically you can not ask for more to zoom with these features

Opinion: There are many reviews on the net about this zoommettino some five years ago that really works very well. Used on the D700 is that it is a bomb and is a great all-rounder from the appropriate focal range. Contrasts and soft colors, well defined, in macro function is incredibly detailed despite not being a fisso.rnRapporto price / performance / quality priceless. I have equipped its hood HB18. FX cartoon a little 'to 28.rn

sent on July 02, 2015


tamron_14-150Tamron 14-150mm f/3.5-5.8 Di III

Pros: construction, focal width, risolvenza

Cons: anyone who is not implicit in the type of lenses of this type

Opinion: After some hundreds of shots in different situations, I can confirm that it is an excellent alternative to the 14-150 home Oly risolvenza the same characteristics. Probably even better from the point of view of construction and from the impression of solidity to the touch. This series of the focal paraluce.rnL'ampiezza is so broad as to escape all of the situations in which you can find during a viaggio.rnLa sharpness is very good and only very slightly less than the duo kit 14-42RII + 40-150R.rnQualcuno It argues that the price is high (approximately EUR 400 at the moment), but we have to consider that costs 200 euro less homologous Olympus, with optical quality absolutely comparabile.rnrn

sent on June 10, 2015


olympus_m14-42_v2rOlympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II R

Pros: risolvenza and optical quality

Cons: plasticky and bulkier brother pancakes

Opinion: To be a kit lens, I must say that solves very well and, in my opinion, better than the brother EZ pancakes (which I compared the field). Apparently is a bit 'plasticky. The optical quality is very high, not being an objective pro. Being a collapsible lens, once opened is quite long (from 5 to 7 cm.) But in practical terms does not bother much.

sent on April 19, 2015


olympus_omd_em10Olympus OM-D E-M10

Pros: Compact, light, well-built, aesthetically affascinante.rnSforna high image quality, effective stabilizer.

Cons: menu complicated and not immediate

Opinion: I took it as an additional body for outputs read and proved portentous! I stressed over and defends very well, does not make you regret the SLR, the picture quality is remarkable. It took me a while 'to set it according to my tastes and the menu does not facilitate complicated, but once you do it you can manage and make them do what you want. Excellent exposure system that surprised me in strong contrast exhibition. Useful electronic viewfinder where you can immediately see how it will be found useful foto.rnHo the additional handle that makes it much more actionable. It 'a machine suitable for advanced amateur photographers who can claim and ottenere.rnrn

sent on April 19, 2015


nikon_d90Nikon D90

Pros: A true SLR semi-pro

Cons: nobody in opening of use

Opinion: Camera extraordinary, not for nothing is considered as one of the major successes of Nikon. I use it as a second body but often prefer the former to the compactness combined with the presence of all the commands necessari.rnE 'a real semipro, that after a few years of its submission is an excellent choice that goes well beyond any other Nikon camera series 3xxx and 5xxx.rnNe've had three and I think one will always remain in zaino.rnCompleta of what it takes and free of frills and gadgets of dubious hyper utilità.rnrnrn

sent on February 26, 2015


nikon_afs18-140Nikon AF-S 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Pros: Construction, optical quality, fast AF, zoom range is ideal for a true all-rounder

Cons: does not excel at 140

Opinion: I got them or tried them all (18-70, 18-105, 18-135, 18-200) to secure this new 18-140 is better than the first three, and probably also of 18-200 in terms of the quality of the yield . The zoom range is adequate and broad enough to be a real all-rounder travel or light output. Excellent risolvenza sensors dense. I took the hood but no has no fear of flares .... rn

sent on January 23, 2015




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me