|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Editore www.juzaphoto.com/p/Editore  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM Pros: lightweight, ultra-sharp, ultra-fast and precise AF, stabilization, great with externder Cons: excessive price, not very bright Opinion: I thought my 100-400 II was the ultimate for a zoom in terms of sharpness. I also had the Sony 200-600 on A7R III (one of the most beautiful sensors ever) because the many comments and authoritative opinions had almost convinced me that it was the non plus ultra of telephoto zooms. And instead, going against the current, I decided to invest in the Canon 100-500. This zoom is lightweight (compared to the 100-400 II and 200-600 Sony), very portable and truly versatile. Photographing often only on the road was what I was looking for. The Sony 200-600 is gigantic and although it has an excellent price quality ratio it is really difficult to consider it practical or compact. The 100-500 doesn't struggle to carry in your backpack and is ideal for my Lowepro Photo Sport Pro 30L AW. ................... Sharpness: from the center to the edges, even at full aperture, it is clearly sharper than both the 100-400 II (especially at the edges, but also at the center) and the Sony 200-600. ................... All my goals I test them with the same method to have repeatable situations every time, so I know what I say and often other professionals or Juza himself during his tests confirms my evaluations. I close by emphasizing that the stabilization is first in class and the tropicalization and care with which this lens is built is of a very very high level. ................... P.S. The tripod ring is easily detachable. Much better than the hybrid solution adopted with the 100-400 II sent on July 17, 2022 |
 | Canon EOS RP Pros: Image quality, Full Frame, Autofocus, Tropicalization, Value for money, Ergonomics, Compactness, Perfect backward compatibility with EF and EF-S lenses via adapter. Cons: Battery life, slow burst. Opinion: I have always avoided theoretical photographers preferring practical ones. Those who go out to take pictures with the RP will find a machine with a fabulous file rendering. 26 megapixels are enough for everything, they are clean and with a characteristic color that distinguishes the Canon. Of course, its relative slowness does not make it an ideal candidate for sports or bird photos, but the excellent autofocus would not penalize it, it would only be a burst problem that here stops at only 4 f / s. Many call it "the great misunderstood", indeed, this is how practical photographers define it that under 1000 euros they take home a product with an unbeatable value for money. The real touch and fully articulated monitor (nothing to do for example with the limited one of other brands) has done and continues to make school so much so that other brands are also adopting it. Honestly, apart from the slow burst and a not excellent autonomy due to the use of the LP-E17 I can not find other defects. With RF lenses it is at its best, but it does the same with EF lenses via the EF-RF adapter. Indeed, with their low price and still high quality, EF lenses have new life and without front or back focus problems. Last note: it is also robust contrary to what is said. The body transfers a feeling of great solidity. sent on June 07, 2022 |
 | Canon RF 15-35mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: Homogeneous sharpness over the entire format and over the entire focal range, exceptional resolution, build quality, stabilization, reduced distortion, excellent flare resistance. Cons: the selling price Opinion: I owned the legendary EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM which is still a reference lens for Canon wide anglers. This RF manages to do slightly better and in addition it is stabilized with an extra millimeter on the wide-angle side. Impeccably built, like all RF L has a customizable bezel and is tropicalized. It was immediately love at first sight repaid by wonderful files and rich in details. The flares are very contained, the vignetting normal for the focal length of the lens that however disappears by activating the correction in the camera. It does not regret the best fixed in the house and solves the sensor of the R5 in a great way. sent on April 11, 2022 |
 | Canon RF 24-70mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: Image quality, extraordinary sharpness, construction, tropicalization, very precise af Cons: cost Opinion: Crazy color rendering. I state that on my specimen I did not find problems of excessive flare as someone complains. Solid L-series construction, very fast and silent autofocus, very pleasant blurry, tropicalization and, finally, stabilization. The customizable lens ring is a real treat, it provides greater versatility in programming ISO, aperture or shutter. I do not agree with those who had to complain about the keys and plastics, it is an L series in all respects with the quality that is expected. Since I am used to testing all the lenses I buy on my own, especially to see if I have a good copy, I can tell you that compared to that sacred monster of the EF 24-70 f/2.8 L II it is slightly sharper in the center from 50 to 70 mm, while at the edges it is sharper over the entire range. With the Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 there is no match at all. Last consideration the price: it is quite expensive and you can not have an interesting discount, not that the competition costs less, but you pay it practically at full price if you want it with Canon Italia guarantee like me. I hope I have been useful to you. sent on February 07, 2022 |
 | Canon EOS R Pros: Fabulous files, both jpeg and Raw. Robustness of the body, high-performance and instant autofocus with dual pixels. Simple and complete menus, viewfinder, full touch and rotatable screen. Excellent ISO seal, dynamic range and excellent shadow recovery. Large body the right, but with a good grip and well balanced. Good 4K videos despite the crop factor in shooting. Top display to see the main settings with a quick glance. Great feeling. Cons: If I really have to find one, lack of stabilization on the sensor (among other things excellent). I preferred a few customizable keys although on Canon you do not miss them too much because of the well-designed menus. Opinion: I state that I do not understand who turns up his nose in front of an EOS R, it is a 5D MK IV in a mirrorless body with an extraordinary autofocus and with a refinement on the sensor / software side still improved. Of course, many complain about the lack of the Joystick (replaced by a customizable controller that is a bit difficult to appreciate), but the camera is fabulous, robust as only Canon can do and with a fantastic image reproduction. The files are clean and very detailed, the autofocus (after the firmware update) is stratospheric with an eye-control that does not miss a shot. The real touch monitor (nothing to do for example with the limited one of other brands) and fully articulated has made and continues to make school so much so that other brands are now adopting it. The menu, typical of Canon, allows a high customization so that the camera adapts to any style and / or photographic approach. The WiFi works very well and the Canon App, in my opinion, is very good. Is a single slot too little? Maybe, but in years and years of Canon at all latitudes I have never had problems with reading / writing files as long as I use good memory cards. I also find it misleading to compare it to Mirrorless of another category as is often done (I think of nonsensical comparisons with R5 and R6) even if the image quality is absolutely top. Taking into account the price it is absolutely a best buy and a great tool. sent on February 01, 2022 |
 | Canon 90D Pros: High resolution, operating speed, lightning autofocus, file quality, ergonomics, fully adjustable monitor, fabulous touch screen, reliability and robustness, 1/16000 sec. electronic shutter, battery life, 4K 30fps Cons: If you study the instructions well and are aware of what you are using there are no cons, but they could insert the second slot for the SD card Opinion: I went from 7D MkII (who never convinced me) to 80D which was a fabulous companion on so many safaris. Now 90D is the perfect synthesis between the mirrorless and reflex worlds. I do this review after a year that I have it and after evaluating its capabilities and potential well. Many have not yet noticed that on this latest reflex APS-C Canon has used all the latest mirrorless technologies by equipping it in LV also with an electronic shutter of 1/16,000 sec. The high resolution of 32Mp allows you to also make good crops to adjust the frame. The image quality is very high and robustness and tropicalization is a guarantee that I found (at these levels) only in Canon bodies. The autofocus is very fast and precise, the inexhaustible battery (as opposed to the 7D Mk II) and the deadly pairing with the 100-400 L II (also multiplied with the 1.4x III) is pure enjoyment. Not least I love the great display with fully articulated total touch screen. My advice is not to mortify it with lenses that are not up to scratch, especially in relation to the sensor that is not FF and high resolution. sent on March 05, 2021 |
 | Canon 80D Pros: Excellent autofocus, truly swivel and solid Touchscreen (not like competition), timelapse widely manageable, HDR, excellent high ISO hold; Excellent battery life. Great sturdiness and constructive quality that emerges especially in the use although at first glance it may seem more delicate. Cons: For my use no one but I don't hide that if there had been the 4k would have been perfect Opinion: I write this opinion because after reading the last two reviews I felt pulled for the jacket. I routinely use EOS 5d Mark IV, but just these days I purchased my second 80d (which I use as a second body). I read about price not related to quality, too much plastic, seems to crumble in hand.... and other nonsense that did not match the reality. Thank goodness there are also reviews of authoritative photographers like Mauro Gamberini to support the real capabilities of this camera. After you've used it properly, I consider the 80d a notch above the 70d and, in my opinion, except for the AF, even a notch above the 7d MK II, quality of the files really good, be they RAW or Jpeg, quietly holds the ISO 3200 sensitivity , but also more depending on the shooting conditions. 24 megapixels that you see all, customizable as you want and, I add I have tried it around the world, robust as never before. He endured the red dust of African and Indian safaris, soaked in water under monsoons or boating on the Ganges, never denied me a jerk. An enviable autonomy and a dynamic range nothing bad to be a Canon;-). Personally I preferred it to the 7d Mark II (which I owned). So when I read some nonsense I think that should release a review only those who use cameras and not the fan boy of the last minute who do not know what they are looking for. sent on December 08, 2018 |
 | Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM Pros: sharpness, brightness, edge yield, contrast and micro contrast, tropicalization, sturdiness, high build quality. Cons: Price Opinion: Before him I had the EF 16-35mm f/4l IS USM and later the Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD. This Canon is superior to both without a shadow of a doubt. In my personal ranking is positioned at the top staccato little from the Tamron while farther you place the 16-35 F/4 that Pecca, compared to the first two of less sharpness. Nothing dramatic, but the Tamron and the 16-35 f/2.8 III are really very sharp. The difference between the two is that the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8 L III USM is always sharp, from 16 to 35, from the center to the edges and even at full aperture. The Tamron does not have sharp edges like the Canon and from 22-24 onwards it deteriorates altogether its performance. In short, this lens is fabulous, it returns you some files that look alive, three-dimensional, with a total yield impossible for the excellent Tamron pur (which I repeat to be an excellent lens) and with an embarrassing sharpness. Rightly the question that is often addressed is whether it is compared to brother F/4 since it costs twice as much. Is this price difference really worth it? For me yes, especially if you have a camera with many pixels that enhance this lens. sent on September 29, 2018 |
 | Tamron 15-30mm f/2.8 VC USD Pros: Sharpness, Stabilization, f / 2.8, Very fast and accurate AF, well-built, tropicalized. Cons: Nothing relevant, just the size, but were known before buying. Opinion: I read a review that defines this non-character objective. I was a little surprised.rn this lens has the character to sell and returns extraordinary files. I use it on Canon 6D, i made an opposite choice to many of my friends and forum users, i gave away the EF 16-35 f / 4 of Canon to take this 15-30 f / 2.8.rnAt the beginning I was skeptical, 16-35 is a stratospheric lens, I would be satisfied with results just comparable to Canon to be satisfied with the change.rnI have also always purchased Canon lenses, I hardly buy third-party lenses, but this time I wanted to try and I was impressively impressed. "The big surprise is that the Tamron is always sharp, always open. And even more sharp than the EF 16-35 f / 4.0 I had. The tropicalization is definitely not at the Canon level, but it is still present and there is also the rubber seal on the dustproof attachment and I have never had problems with rain or humidity.rnIt is personally rimasus positively surprised and I can only recommend it to anyone who wants a great lens at all.rnrnrn sent on October 16, 2017 |
 | Samsung Galaxy Note5 Pros: Construction, design, speed, hardware, display and improved interface. The new stylus is something extraordinary, fast camera and professionale.rnGeniale recognition of handwriting. Cons: Only internal memory, no expansion with MicroSD, non-replaceable battery (but can not find a large defect). Multitasking to be finalized. Opinion: If the Galaxy Note 4 was already perfect, here they improved interface and above all made camera. Many small improvements which are appreciated by people like me who used the notes 4. The shell design and are now enjoying the most exclusive materials, Gorilla glass 4 to the front and to the rear shell. The new stylus is fabulous! The nib can be used in two ways. Taking out the stylus when the device is in standby mode will launch minimalist app that will allow you to take notes on a notepad white on black. A quick and easy way to write and save your notes. On the phone unlocked, pulling out the S Pen will be launched on the display menu where you will find the Air Command Memo quick, intelligent selection, screen writing, S Notes, Gmail, and you can also click on the symbol (+) to add a shortcut to your liking. sent on December 13, 2015 |
 | Samsung NX500 Pros: Good image quality with the new APS-C sensor backlit, good ergonomics, personally I find it a great value for money, 4k video, highly responsive auto focus, same controls of an SLR, screen tilting touch screen, highly customizable and configurable. Controlled remotely by smartphone. Cons: noisy than 1600 ISO, but I think it is normal for this type of product. Opinion: The bought my wife for a few shots without pretense and instead the camera to its outstanding image quality that I was pleasantly surprised. rnVelocissimo autofocus and very precise. Please also scenic shots as a phone (but with a much higher quality). NFC and WiFi complement caratteristiche.rnBuono also the lens kit, the 16-50, apt zoom range, excellent quality although a little 'shadow gap. Fabulous video section with 4Krn sent on September 02, 2015 |
 | Canon 760D Pros: Entry level only for the category of membership, but not in fact. 24 mpixel with the same noise as the 600d-700d sisters; Same performance AF of the 7d (old), continuous af on the movies, AF to chase (in Live View) once selected the subject. 19 points AF all cross. Professional quality footage. Second display. Cons: Absence of micro autofocus adjustment. Shutter a bit noisy. Small and compact like all XXXD series (assuming this is a limit) Opinion: I used it this summer on holiday and I enjoyed it a lot. There are some features in this machine that are Canon's blatant response to the right criticisms that had been posed after having baked a series of photocopy models anchored to the 18MP sensor. I expected a worsening of noise at high ISO because of the increase in pixel and instead I was very impressed to see that it remained virtually the same as the 18MP sensor. The autofocus is the most incredible novelty, 19 points all cross and the same module of the old 7d (which I have owned) make it an excellent car even by Chase or avifauna (with the sacrosanct distinction). There is no comparison with the very slow AF of the 6d that I used as the first body. The 24mp are very interesting to exploit the new lenses highly resolutive or, in case of need, to crorip the image. The quality of the images is more than excellent and is not discussed, as you can see from the photos at the bottom. Fabulous the swivel touch screen display, is how to use your mobile phone for speed and sensitivity. It was love at first sight, love reciprocated, even if I never got used to challenging such small bodies. Its lightness and compactness can be a problem when used with heavy white. This has always been a limit (rightly) of the Entry level series (which such must remain). sent on August 31, 2015 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Construction excellent, robust, without games, well finished, f/2.8 with stabilizer, razor sharp at all focal lengths is at the center than at the edges, and even at full aperture. I'm loving it. I got to compare it directly with the Canon 24-70f/2.8 LI series, there is no story! Cons: Distorts at 24, but nothing that can not correct in PP. a bit 'heavy, but in this class of targets who is not? Lens hood a bit 'too light. Opinion: After purchasing the new Canon 24-70 f/2.8LI series and not be left satisfied, I found peace by purchasing this Tamron at the suggestion of friends in this forum. I fell in love, both for the high quality construction, both for the clarity that reaches wide open and at all focal lengths. Fast autofocus, VC 4 stop which is a rarity on this class of targets. Lately Tamron is doing a great job with its optics. I have not found defects alleged by the other kind of sharpness fall on low contrast situations. No problem with regard to the discharge of the battery. All new Tamron have the latest firmware and do not suffer more from this problem. Probably the 24-70f/2.8 Canon L series II will be sharper (what?), But it certainly does not have the stabilizer is costs more than double. Evaluate you. About: warranty 5 anni.rnP.S. Who wrote this review has owned and has only Canon lenses and was very reluctant to buy a non-Canon optics. sent on July 04, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
