|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Carlo67 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Carlo67  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX DG HSM Pros: When it hits the focus it is sharp, with beautiful colors and definition. Cons: He misses the focus in 50 percent of the shots. On 6D even with micro adjustment mistakes from afar, then adjusting mistakes closely and vice versa. Unable to achieve consistent results. Opinion: Purchased some time ago as a user of the site... it seemed I had managed to adjust it but this was not the case. It is impossible to obtain an adjustment that makes consistent and acceptable results. It has been lying in the drawer for two years, I do not feel like reselling it in these conditions and to what I understand not even the sigma service center can solve the problem. sent on June 04, 2022 |
 | Pentax SMC M 50mm f/1.7 Pros: Light, good slow coating, compact. Cons: At full opening it has problems with sharpness, contrast and CA. I would have expected better even to more closed diaphragms... but I have to note that my pentacon 50 f1.8 in m42 is considerably higher across the board. The Olympus 50 f1.8 car (zuiko) even better than both. Opinion: In my humble opinion, having a copy practically as new in all, the fame of this lens is much more legendary than real. Those who praise so much of the merits have not tried the peers Olympus, pentacon, konica exanon, and Minolta rokkor. The same applies to the Pentax m 50 f1.4, inexorably detached from the Canon fd 50 1.4 and even the revuenon 50 1.4, not to mention the olympis and Minolta... sent on July 02, 2019 |
 | Canon EOS M6 Pros: Nice car, functional. Good files and easily workable. Cons: I see great improvements over the M3. Surely a speed AF major, but as files and ergonomics are at the same level. Opinion: Tried it for a few days having owned a M3, I actually find that apart from an improved AF speed there are big news. Definitely much better built the M3, it gave me a feeling of strength and design features. This miracle of dual pixels I honestly don't I perceived, files products have virtually the same quality ... and sometimes the digital noise on the m6 looks worse (with the same settings). Honestly the micro 4/3 is several spans over, with Olympus I also stabilized sensor and also produces files in JPGs are really another story. If you have a M3 and are thinking of moving to m6 be calm and keep close the M3 with no regrets. sent on April 24, 2018 |
 | Sigma 19mm f/2.8 DN Pros: Crisp, bright enough, light Cons: Some flare but not much and a slight distortion easily repaired in pp, tends to overexpose a lot in low light. Opinion: First impression from the use of two half giornate.rnrnQuesto "runaway horse" produces on m4 / 3 very sharp images in jpeg files clearly defined and consistent as long as you know how to manage well the light and diaphragms, thus forcing a lot to play with time exposure, management of light and shade depending on the circumstances, diaphragms and iso ... which I tasted because it brings into play the practice of the operator and to force impratichisce things. It seems to have to do with objectives 35 mm 80s, but with a definition of all respect. The loss of sharpness at the edges and almost irrelevant already in TA. A small lens that makes school ... to make up some bones on the field ... sometimes cursing and other rejoicing. focal ideal for street and photos everyday. I will continue to stressarlo (and stress me) soon to find more merits and limitations. I forgot: im MF the focus ring is very sensitive but very well modulated and precise. sent on December 07, 2016 |
 | Olympus PEN E-PL7 Pros: Speed ??autofocus, sharpness and really wide adjustment possibilities (Need to get lost sometimes!), To 1600 ISO images are still very valid qualitatively, camera weight, camera size, ability to use optical vintage and not above all with 4/3 adapter ring. Cons: For now I do not know ... perhaps battery life, but lack the viewfinder LCD fab with both physical adjustments that softwere respectable (then a dedicated viewfinder and maybe used to a human price you can also find), fixed lenses price. Opinion: I state that I started to use it only today, having bought the body already makes time machine. This morning came the basic objective bought from a friendly writing of the site, and immediately tested ..... what to say, a real surprise positively! .... I opted for this camera only for the sake of portability and in the sense weight of the term for that size. I arose a dilemma (as I watched images taken), how come I have not noticed / realized first of the efficiency of this micro 4/3 system? ..... Maybe now I'm exaggerating, and with time this ridimensionerò My initial enthusiasm, but to instincts and first impression I must say really stunned. According to my humble opinion gives a hard time to many aps-c is that MR SLR ..... and I'm using a kit lens (14, 42). I do not guess what might come up with goals a little more "noble" as both fixed lenses that Olympus Panasonic. A big step forward! sent on March 07, 2016 |
 | Canon EF-M 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Price of used, good for video, well-built, all-rounder unpretentious. Cons: Not very clear, we have to work to get acceptable photos, sometimes I have the impression that suffer from back focus, not up to the sensor. Opinion: As mentioned in another review, we need to find the right conditions because the objective is able to turn out satisfactory photo. Considered the price to be used and bearing in mind that it is a kit lens you can not complain too much. Let's say, however, that this lens to Tamron 17-50 f2.8 smooth there is a huge difference .... completely another planet! .... By comparison the Tamron looks like a series L !!! It's fine to carry around for photos from "landing" that is, "much of the heap." Rating: 1/2 6 photos, video 7. sent on September 24, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
