RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Larcodema
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Larcodema



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Larcodema


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

nikon_d200Nikon D200

Pros: CCD sensor, beautiful colors, everything and more

Cons: For the use I make of it I have not found ...

Opinion: What can I say? Is a legend of machine,very pro beautiful heavy,high iso? I would like to know how many people use! The first rule is light, then technology has made great strides helping photographers a lot .having said that, however, I do not feel the need for I'm billions of ISO. Of course if compared to today perhaps it makes you laugh, but seeing the shots here on the forum and some friend present here: ssssssss. The car does not make the beautiful, the little man behind them. You often see people walking around with monsters and taking shots from. c....... e. that said for those who want to have fun straconsiglio despite the 'age remains a great machine ..

sent on March 04, 2023


nikon_d3sNikon D3s

Pros: All

Cons: Nothing

Opinion: Don't I understand what they say weight and clutter? It's heavy? take a compact cmq goes well. What to say I still use it and I find no flaws, it is no coincidence that the queen of the night was defined in its time. Designed for professionals, it has everything you need. Today they want billions of ISO,video,lightness, price... Ridiculous. .just real people are amazing.cmq is machine is a milestone of photographic history ,defects I do not find.

sent on February 23, 2020


sony_a7iiSony A7 II

Pros: stabilization, sensor, weather sealing, construction, use of optical vintage.

Cons: battery life, not to have it.

Opinion: recently purchased my impressinoe is that this time Sony has produced a machine of excellent invoice, right number of mega pixels, built in magnesium and tropical conditions, with the gem of entering the stabilizer that indeed funzia well, using such optics for those who want vintage stabilizzandole all 'moment. AF certainly not lightning but behaves very well, personalized by buttons, sore battery life which in effect wears off quickly it is advisable to have a spare. all in all the car is a gem for those who want the full frame with good portability, really recommended.

sent on July 09, 2015


sony_fe55_f1-8zaSony FE 55mm f/1.8 ZA Sonnar T*

Pros: High quality, soft and smooth bezel, construction, weather sealing.

Cons: not having it.

Opinion: lens exceptional final yield excellent construction and weather sealing as you should have with lenses'm level, AF is quick short remains one ZEISS with a hat. SONY is churning out slow in my opinion exceptional and the park is increasing slowly but quality and as we know the quality you pay for. recommended for all.

sent on July 09, 2015


sony_fe16-35_f4Sony FE 16-35mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T*

Pros: Sharpness, construction, fast in focus.

Cons: I think maybe not light, but well transportable.

Opinion: having taken just say this: being a wide-angle zoom would say excellent, very sharp wide open and construction by Zeiss. the ring is smooth and flowing, in short, is one Zeiss. for those who enjoy landscapes is a must. nowadays people feel that they can not turn with a few pounds too seems that now people can not stand even a gram more. this zoom lens certainly not lightweight but still not pesantissimo.consigliato.

sent on July 07, 2015


fujifilm_55-200oisFujifilm XF 55-200mm f/3.5-4.8 R LM OIS

Pros: typical construction FUJI or excellent, excellent stabilizer, sharpness, despite being a relatively light weight canvas.

Cons: the hood a bit 'bulky.

Opinion: again FUJI not disappoint churning out a 'very excellent optics, weights and dimensions are valid for a mirrorless system. af improved because of the 'update, the stabilizer does its job very well, on xt1 not unbalance the machine and finally the price in' used is reasonable. recommended.

sent on June 30, 2015


fujifilm_23_f1-4Fujifilm XF 23mm f/1.4 R

Pros: excellent construction, optical quality, very crisp.

Cons: the hood horrendous. I can not find other flaws.

Opinion: I would say excellent optics, a handyman in practice I use it to do landscapes, Street, and reportage. very sharp, blurred maybe some 'duretta but cmq remains a must-have !!! ico a neo to FUJI is that with the hood seems to hate them. admittedly not FUJI stà wrong perspective, produces high-quality lenses, of course you pay for !!!

sent on June 18, 2015


fujifilm_56_f1-2Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R

Pros: OPTICAL quality, COLORS, ALL

Cons: ring soft, not having it.

Opinion: optical truly exceptional, not finding defects at least I, is perhaps not light but it gets worse. equivalent to about 85 full frame at this price there is nothing. its like they cost a bang. only drawback is not having it. FUJI great !!! not miss a shot today on the optics, I often say that I care but then as they say the QUALITY 'and here you pay quality any.

sent on June 11, 2015


olympus_omd_em1Olympus OM-D E-M1

Pros: perfect !!! ergonomics, construction, stabilizer 5-axis, tropicalization total, lightweight

Cons: do not stop, perhaps the manual a bit 'poor, and that the battery has a low battery.

Opinion: well after trying Nikon, Pentax, Fuji I returned home and OLYMPUS ho bought back em1. what to say? the pros know them all, even though few, however, is against the house in addition to innovate machinery produces really high quality optics and equally amazing especially the pro series. produces files dare I say that already bele ready, then eventually just as easy as workability. Another pro not least portability, colors and etc. etc.. in short, fully satisfied and I would recommend this machine along with the other to those who want to have these advantages.

sent on May 01, 2015


fujifilm_35mmFujifilm XF 35mm f/1.4 R

Pros: construction, sharpness in TA, color rendering, weight, price

Cons: hood and cap

Opinion: goal to have in the kit, as mentioned by everyone has a color rendering outstanding, the price, and the weight would not be outdone. precisone af, optical scheme would say excellent and offers a pleasant picture in focus. FUJI is once again made things right. I struggle to detach it from the machine, perhaps not very quiet but discreet in many conditions. recommended.

sent on January 19, 2015


fujifilm_xt1Fujifilm X-T1

Pros: Doc construction, small but solid, weather sealing, rings etc. iso times. estrepitoso large viewfinder, high iso, no noise, color rendition and dynamic range, produces exceptional file, and finally light and aesthetically very beautiful with a vintage style

Cons: one memory slot, key pad tiny and uncomfortable, I do not know more

Opinion: as said by many FUJI has churned un'altrea machine of the highest quality ', with color across. the sensor xtrans second generation really is loved in the sense that churns jpeg files already 'ready, color rendition and dynamic range to gape. short of defects if they are not at least I can not find them removed perhaps the pad with tiny darts and therefore uncomfortable. Fuji has and is creating a park-optic high-quality 'FUJI sure you pay but the quality has a prezzo.consigliata

sent on January 18, 2015


olympus_m45Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm f/1.8

Pros: weight, size, creamy bokeh, image quality in CT, lens exceptional value for the price and yield incredible

Cons: at the moment I can not find fault maybe the hood to buy separately

Opinion: carried away with about 200-odd euro, a really excellent lens by calculating the ratio price quality ', offers a very pleasant blur, clutter to a minimum, to have and carry with them', I understand the success of OLYMPUS and its system. advice in the most 'absolute. offers a truly incredible performance, in short, a must-have, as already stradetto quality fixed.

sent on September 11, 2014


nikon_d700Nikon D700

Pros: quality of the files, made at high iso, serious construction, weather sealing, ergonomics and durability, keys in the right place, everything.

Cons: no double slot, other do not know.

Opinion: always desired, just bought a 1684 brescia with new shots in practice. a real monster combat old-fashioned, is not afraid of adverse climatic conditions, firm to be frightening, it fits perfectly in the hand, the keys are in the right place, in short, a machine as you have less technology and more reflex. less fighetterie type wi fi, gps useless things and no video other thing useless because if I wanted to do comperavo a video camera. back the urge to take pictures, all in all is a machine that lady has to say yet despite his no longer young and looks good with the last born who own a lot of technology but of reflex removed the flagships have a great little. really recommended.

sent on August 06, 2014


pentax_k3Pentax K-3

Pros: sealing high-level, cross-type points 25 out of 27, to yield excellent high ISO, burst, battery life, in short, many pro.

Cons: a bit more noisy sister k5ii / s because of the dense sensor, flash back mmmmm compared to other brands, it is not full frame but it is not a defect.

Opinion: what to say? great machine once again pentax model produces a state of the art, with a high level of weather sealing that is found only on high-end SLR camera, auto focus, I would say very good compared to previous versions, optimum dynamic range, excellent exposure, very beautiful colors and realistic maybe not always, there are dedicated optics, flash synchro perhaps be improved. some maybe a less dense sensor would have been better pe because of the noise but you can not have everything. there is no full copper, but it is not a defect definitely the best aps-c today. Ricoh continues so good

sent on June 09, 2014


canon_7dCanon 7D

Pros: gust, quality materials, produces files very beautiful, etc etc.. all words

Cons: for the use that I do not seem to me there is something missing perhaps the dual slot and the yield at high iso.

Opinion: for as I see it is a great car, very solid body, weather sealed, it gives a sense of robustness, slow large market, produces files and superb colors. of course there was the double slot, the yield at high iso and should be goodnight to the musicians and then what? must also make the pizzas? people always wants everything and then is never pleased, I repeat to me hà many pros, some lack THERE IS! remains a point of reference in the aps-c. good hope with the canon 7d MarkII complement deficiencies!!!!!! ps: Some reviews do not know what they're talking and without knowing the 7d and what is not less important than the photograph. surely the 7d and 'aps-c reference then some difetuccio can' even get it: perfection does not exist, we can only try to chase it!

sent on May 12, 2014


pentax_k5-2sPentax K-5 IIs

Pros: tropicalization serious improvements af, burst, sharp images, made at high ISO, and reactivity af low light.

Cons: and not 'full frame (not' a defect)

Opinion: also having the k3, compared to the latter k5iis has nothing to enviable to her older sister with a few improvements, but the yield on the photos and 'virtually identical indeed k 3 tends to Ceará a little' noise albeit slightly due to 24 Mega sensor perhaps still too many excellent yield. tropicalization serious like reflex in other houses are only on the high end. dynamic range and exceptional quality 'images excellent, I would recommend it once switched to Pentax difficle change.

sent on April 06, 2014


pentax_k5-2Pentax K-5 II

Pros: tropicalization full-speed operation, easy and intuitive menu, made with low lights incredible, dynamic range.

Cons: lack of telephoto lenses like the other houses, flea market not so favorable

Opinion: great car, the other features that damage homes only end models A. incredible performance at low light, iso very valid, colors and exceptional dynamic range, and a full weather sealing. maybe the negative is that the market of 'used is not as' wide as various canon, nikon. little-publicized brand should ask why Fowa to nital or because she is the distributor. Another rather large neo neo neo if you can call it that when one falls in love with the test pentax.

sent on July 18, 2013




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me