|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Puliciclone www.juzaphoto.com/p/Puliciclone  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus OM-D E-M5 Pros: Indestructible, tropicalized Cons: Autofocus, screen definition, lack of advanced features Opinion: After years of possession I can give an accurate opinion. For me, it's still a worthwhile purchase in 2023. It is small, light, solid and tropicalized; Considering that you can buy it for 100 euros when you buy it used, it can be said that it is among the best camera bodies for the price/results ratio. Even if you buy it third-hand, it remains a valid purchase, since thanks to the quality of construction it can always guarantee a few years of service. Incredibly solid when I compared it to my brother-in-law's Canon SLR or his brother's Pentax K. The technology is largely outdated but it is hard and reliable and in the end, still in 2023 it is the machine I use the most. sent on August 07, 2023 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/4-5.6 Pros: Weight, size, price Cons: Depends on Opinion: It depends x what you use it. If you claim to resume birdlife or a wedding you are very disappointed. If you bring it x an excursion x take back details of landscapes is the best in the world. It is very light and very small , you put it everywhere and despite the plasticity is solid and well done. I put it up for sale twice and thank God no one ever bought it for me. sent on August 01, 2020 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 II Pros: Price, crisp, flare resistance and aberrations, size Cons: Plasticious and a little fragile, not at all bright Opinion: As a kit lens for a non-professional machine there is. In abundant light conditions is good for his duty. In my opinion excellent anti-reflective treatment and in optimal conditions good definition and color rendition. But if you use it at sunset, in the shade or even worse at night does not go. Unable to focus manually and shadows made bad. The reduced brightness then makes it difficult to focus selectively and for this in my opinion is OK only x photos landscapes with a lot of light. sent on March 06, 2019 |
 | Olympus OM Zuiko 200mm f/4 Pros: Price, solidity Cons: MAF, chromatic aberrations Opinion: I bought it to take pictures of birds and animals and for this I use the bud clamorously. The MAF with fast subjects is impossible and if you put it against the light is an explosion of chromatic aberrations. Image quality and good definition with static subjects. Much better x stealing photos from the street to unwitting subjects or x portraits. If you do a safari or a bird watching better a 200/300mm digital zoom. If you want a lens from 30 Euro x paparazzi someone is what it does x you. sent on March 04, 2019 |
 | Olympus Zuiko Auto-W MC 28mm f/2.8 Pros: Solidity, price, image definition Cons: Color rendition Opinion: Among the most common of the wide angle OM and therefore available at a very good price, usually around 60-70 euros. I use it instead of the standard zoom on Olympus (the 14-42 F 3.5-5.6) and after an initial running-in period I find it much better than the latter. Excellent definition and yield in BN. On the color seems to me to return very vintage colors, sometimes too. Among the three old OM that I own remains still the best. A bomb when used on OMD with focus peaking. sent on January 21, 2019 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
