|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Vblack69 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Vblack69  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Pros: Light, focal range, sharpness, color rendering, AF Cons: For age and price none Opinion: Purchased on occasion in addition to a 5d sold to a friend and reused on 6d and fuji xt-10, I find this optical project extremely valid despite age. All right.... it is not stabilized, distortion at 24 mm, light color aberration at TA, but on the other hand sharpness more than good also and, I would say, especially in TA, lightness, compatibility with nx adapters, excellent colors, very comfortable focal length range, minimum footprint. There is always regret that this format has been abandoned by the manufacturers for the 24/105 all-rounders who, although stabilized, improved, pumped etc. in comparison remain uncomfortable. All-rounder overconsiled especially for ff. sent on March 14, 2020 |
 | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 Macro DG OS HSM Pros: Sharpness, blurry, double stabilization, price Cons: Noisy stabilizer, chromatic yield, weight Opinion: Undoubtedly an exceptional lens for sharpness and blurry, but not suitable for portraits as it needs pp to attenuate the "extreme" effect, the cost is undoubtedly low for a stabilized lens even if in macro the is is serves little, the color yield at least for my exemplary canon attack seemed too micro-contrasted and on the 6D sensor the red and orange colors appear unnatural perhaps makes it better on Nikon sensor because I see extraordinary photos. The stabilizer is effective but damn noisy and sometimes transmits microvibrations to the mirror so much that it perceives it in the crosshairs, that to say is an opticthat that complicit in the weight and what I said I have never loved more than that, at the same cost (used) I would have preferred the counterpart Canon not i.s. P.S. Incredibly my specimen is not compatible with the Sigma MC-11 adapter sent on December 03, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 35-105mm f/3.5-4.5 Pros: Sharpness in the center, chromatic rendering, lightness. Cons: Soft to TA, loss contrast in backlight. Opinion: Lens purchased for curiosity and occasion on ebay at 70 euros, half-brother of the little-known but appreciated FD 35-105 3.5/4.5, dates back to the prehistoric Canon ante l series, very light, bright, warm colors a little vintage but very pleasant, short-pump zoom but to 30 years away still holds the focal length even upside down. Uncoated lens so absolutely indispensable the lampshade pain fall contrast, at TA a little soft but at f 5.6 is very sharp, slight drop at the edges but on ff is normal, some aberration easily solvable in pp. A great all-rounder, very cheap. sent on June 23, 2019 |
 | Canon 100D Pros: Footprint, raw file, touch screen, good sensor rendition, PDC preview key, exposure bracketing, used price. Cons: Limited ISO seal, small handle, battery life, jpg Opinion: I have this entry-level for 4 years, bought with a certain skepticism on SLR cameras, had the merit of making me passionate about photography, is lightweight, practically pocket-sized with pancakes 24 or 40 mm, the yield of the sensor is good and improves with optical level ( Tried with satisfaction Canon 70-200 2.8 is and Sigma 35-70 2.8), the high ISO yield is of course Limited (max 800 still well machinable in PP), the size of the raw is contained then manageable. I would not recommend it to anyone who has huge hands because the handle is small, with the external flash ng60 is actually unbalanced so I equipped it with a Godox TT 350c Flash (perfectly compatible) which is less powerful but for amateur use can go and the whole thing is more Balanced. The memory card is together with the battery so if you put it on a tripod to remove it you have to detach it and it can be uncomfortable. The rendition of JPG files with the default settings is, in my opinion, a little ' thrust and you can see some artifact that disappears with a more accurate setting. With a charge the yield is about 300 photos as long as you limit the use of the display which is also excellent, in Live View.... as well as for the videos, buy more batteries. The autofocus with 9 points, but only the cross-section is sufficiently precise for amateur use. In conclusion if you scare the weights and dimensions of the older sisters and fear to leave the reflex in the drawer the 100d is for you....... highly recommended. sent on September 16, 2018 |
 | Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Lightness, sharpness and low cost Cons: Autofocus some uncertainty with little light, uncomfortable in MF Opinion: Combined with a canon 100d transforms it into a pocket bridge, purchased at € 80 and used in street and portrait set, lightweight and very manageable vignetting. The focus ring is, for obvious reasons small, therefore inconvenient in MF. Exceptional on the road and for occasional shots at parties, birthdays, etc. given the small size. Recommended purchase. sent on January 31, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
