|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Maurobonora www.juzaphoto.com/p/Maurobonora  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 24-105mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Sharpness, excursion, lightness, stabilization, price Cons: Dimensions, materials, lens hood (absent) Opinion: Bought it for use on the 5D3, I chose it after comparing it with the brother F/4 first version. I also tried the 24-70 2.8 LL. In the end I chose it because compared to the 24-105 L the result of the shot is practically indistinguishable. The 24-70 for my tastes and habits is too heavy though resoous and expensive. The low brightness to tele length for now has not given me problems. The materials are not L but they don't even seem too weak, the rings rotate without games. Canon as always for the lenses do not L does not put in the lens hood that I bought apart (not original). sent on November 01, 2018 |
 | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical Pros: Sharpness, price, weight, footprint Cons: Lens cap, distortion Opinion: I'm not an expert on ultra wide optics, I owned before this the 10-18 EF-S, but I was a little hesitant towards this lens, not so much for the sharpness but for practical use being MF. I changed my mind right away, the focus is really simple given the great PDC that has. The sharpness is very good also to TA, light, practical and small. The lens cap is big and plastic not very good. On the 5D3 works "almost" looks like well, only a few times the exposure meter had problems subjing, which among other things the 5d3 tends to have in general. sent on November 01, 2018 |
 | Canon EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM Pros: Small, light, cheap, excellent colors and nitito Cons: Little light, a little 'flare Opinion: I'm not an extreme wide-angle expert, it is the first that I own. I was a bit 'hesitant before buying it, fearing that it was a useful little object and with major limitations as results. I must say that I changed my mind now! For myself I have to be satisfied in full. And very sharp in the center and on the sides a little 'less but I was expecting much worse. The focus is quiet and fast. He 's small and light that attached to 7d Mk2 hardly feels. As often it happens Canon does not put the lens hood but 10 € you can buy (not original). The plastic bayonet is not a pretty sight but you "get used", the construction in general seems well made and the rings rotate without games. I noticed from the backlit evidence a little 'flare but in PP I was able to take off. The stabilizer works very well that I took pictures to 1/10 "freehand without blur. sent on August 11, 2016 |
 | Canon 7D Mark II Pros: Body robust and ergonomic machine, af fast and accurate, high iso estate, joystick Cons: Lack of touch screen, adjustable display and low battery life Opinion: After I switched to 70D 7DII about 6 months ago. I consider this much better machine than the 70D (at least as regards the copy I had). The raw file that churns think is better and more workable than the 70D, I can not quantify in terms of stop. The maximum possible personalization of keys and functions make it particularly versatile and powerful. The af module is very powerful especially in Ai-Servo mode with 65 cross-type points and the central dual cross f / 8, which keeps the af with tc 1.4x and 100-400II. If he had the swiveling display and touch would be super. The sensor is APS-C, and with all the limitations that this technology has compared to FF, but with tight and fair optical subjects you can take great pictures at 3200 ISO and with a little 'more than even PP to 6400 ISO. sent on May 14, 2016 |
 | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM II Pros: rnNitidezza super even at f / 5.6, rugged, compact, stabilized Cons: Cost, small tripod mount bracket for use as a carrying handle Opinion: I also had the first set, but I must say that the comparison is clearly in favor for the series 2. For the rest it has already said everything I think, I find it really good for me also matched with tc 1.4xII with which loses little sharpness and af quickly, combined with 7dII. The limiter and stabilizer work fine, but I have not done extensive testing to 400mm can be had still shots with a 1/100 "or so compact li.rnMolto, is in a small rucksack or bag, I can say that as quickly zoom was a little 'me better from motion pump. sent on April 24, 2016 |
 | Lowepro Flipside Sport 15L AW Pros: Small, compact, fits well, opening practice, convenient tripod mount Cons: Shortage of pockets for various items. Opinion: Backpack small but very large, I do feel comfortable with the 70d mounted Tamron 150-600, and are hosted three other targets small to medium. The tripod attaches safely and quickly. As against scarce pockets convenient for storing objects ingombranti.rnE 'with anti-rain, the color blue, it does not help (I hope), to understand that it is a backpack photo, and the zipper in the back for support, should limit cases of theft. sent on June 29, 2015 |
 | Tamron SP 150-600mm f/5-6.3 Di VC USD Pros: Range of focal lengths, weight, compactness, sharpness, af fast and accurate Cons: A 600 mm is soft but nothing to worry Opinion: After thinking about it a lot 'of time, last summer I decided to sell and buy the Tamron 100-400. With my 70D + 100-400 I have not found an exaggerated feeling, so I decided to change. Aside from the waiting time of purchase, I must say that the lens is very good, the feeling with my 70D I found it, although I must say that the shots are good with light "good", but that does not believe is a prerogative of this goal. rnLo stabilizer does its job but to get sharp shots even at 600mm are needed very short shutter speed, a tripod is more stable than recommended. The af is very fast, in my opinion even better than that of the 100-400, and works much better in the servo for moving shots. sent on January 04, 2015 |
 | Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: Sharpness and color at all focal lengths, stabilization effective range of focal Cons: Rather dark, lack of lock button zoom Opinion: Purchased used by a user of the forum recently, I must say it works really well. It 'a really good all-rounder, the focal range is very good, the stabilization is very powerful and can really take to 1/8 "to 85mm. Suffers little flare. The worst thing for me is the lack of a keyboard zoom lock, walking zoom is allunga.rn sent on January 04, 2015 |
 | Canon 70D Pros: Operating speed, AF, buffer underrun, noise up to 3200 ISO, touch, wifi, tiltable display, colors, dynamic range, hdr, Cons: Position dial on the back, af settings, shake-free hand .... Opinion: I come from the 40d and honestly after the first few days of pure exhilaration, mainly due to AF, I had a small and temporary setback enthusiasm. rnFacendo traveling shots with the 100-400, I could not get a decent picture quality, using any aperture. Then I got quiet, I have carried out tests to verify if the couple could have 70d/100-400 technical problems; I saw that the problems are not there and I blamed the fault of those shots to several factors: I, distance of the subject (far> 100m), do not use a tripod, mirage effect (given that I shot in hot areas of swamps and wetlands). rnSuperato that time has returned euphoria, I enjoy a lot in macro with 100 usm, both freehand with a tripod in live view (the amazing touch). RNLA use for photos in the gym at my women's volleyball team in 3200 iso, jpg direct baked for me is great. rnEffettivamente for my big hands than the 40d tends to be a bit 'small, but nothing to worry about, rather than the position of the ring multicontrollor is not comfortable. rnAnche portraits made with various apertures 50 is remarkable, dynamic range than the 40d seems much wider. sent on May 13, 2014 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM Pros: Sharpness, compactness, light, fast autofocus, low price Cons: Hood not included Opinion: Great lens for macro and portraits. The autofocus is very fast thanks to the selector of the distances. In the macro AF is not always accurate and fast (maybe with my 40D), a problem that can be addressed using the liveview. Light using a freehand, given the macro focal length is not exaggerated easy shooting freehand. sent on February 11, 2013 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Pros: Small, light, crisp, bright Cons: --- Opinion: I have this lens for a few weeks and I must say I'm loving it. Of APS in some cases is a bit long, but for portraits, street, architecture and I are having a great time. The much bistratta softness TA I do not observable, even in some portraits are forced to soften voluntarily. The colors are very natural and the flare is quite low. sent on February 11, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
