RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Birds
  4. » Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus)

 
Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus)...

fauna-avifauna

View gallery (57 photos)

Griffon Vulture (Gyps fulvus) sent on July 11, 2014 (6:42) by Joe84. 7 comments, 760 views.

, 1/80 f/4.5, ISO 2000, hand held.

Le foto non sono state migliorate in PP,se non un po l'esposizione,nitidezza,contrasto e temperatura colore,e un po di riduzione del rumore,ma non essendo bravo in modifiche di PP il risultato lascia il tempo che trova,anche perchè ho un netbook che non permette molto.





What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on July 11, 2014 (21:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Great capture and shooting ...

avatarsenior
sent on July 11, 2014 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

thanks gaetano

avatarsenior
sent on November 20, 2014 (10:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Sorry curiosity: you wrote that the photos have not been improved, if not a little exposure, sharpness, contrast and color temperature, and a bit of noise reduction, but not being good at PP changes the result leaves time that is also why I have a netbook that does not allow. very much.
What other changes would you do? You make those changes seem much, add more changes to what could be used? I completely beyond what you mean.
So what I should do I limit myself to just resize the photos public?
Personal opinion: I think it's better to think before you press the shutter button and make any adjustments you need rather than spend hours in post production:-D

avatarsenior
sent on November 22, 2014 (12:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Your thought is questionable, ask in the forum to other photographers on how to conceive the shot and there are those who will tell you that a photographer and press the shutter button regardless of regardless significantly exposed to such, still trying to bring in home the shot rather than take their own and do not miss the photos (especially in nature) and then make adjustments to the entire PP and someone like me (then I agree with you) that you wish to better adjust exposure time, aperture and exposure, then PP work in the least possible.
If you think you adjust color temperature a little exposure to the WB and other little things like this is to make a lot then you do not know the potential of PS or similar and you have no idea how a good photographer is able to improve the image in PP.
But you took a ride on this page you have seen the pictures posted? With theOscans layer masks, noise reduction etc etc .....?
do you think that most of the photos published here are just changing postprodotte-wb-exposure and color temperature?
I know that you're wrong !!!!
most of the photos on this site are masterpieces in which the PP has a very important role, this does not say that the photos starting suck but just that good photographers working in PP and get it right

avatarsenior
sent on November 22, 2014 (12:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I personally am not a fan of PP but at least it serves as needed to make a good darkroom choosing the right timing for the impression of the paper, the right time in acids etc etc ....
even in the digital raw, as also saith the word (raw derives from the English word meaning rough, so it is a raw file, as the old negative) should be a minimum postprodotto and I assure you that my edits PP are really essential and minimal, in fact most of the photographers on this site operates much more heavily on the photos PP

avatarsenior
sent on October 04, 2020 (10:32) | This comment has been translated

Beautiful

avatarsenior
sent on October 04, 2020 (15:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Roberto.


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me