Untitled Photo | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

8.0 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

La Nature... View gallery (5 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on June 07, 2013 (14:00) by Ombranhc. 7 comments, 592 views.

at 70mm, 1/250 f/32.0, ISO 3200, hand held.

View High Resolution 8.0 MP

4 persons like it: Alberto Ghizzi Panizza, Albieri Sergio, Francesco Iafelice, Guidotti Claudio

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Francesco Iafelice

sent on June 12, 2013 (22:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

recovery and 'pleasant
disturbs a little 'digital noise that you could avoid being pre-snap with a diaphragm more' open (f.32wow!) and then a sensitivity 'ISO more' low-
the "star" effect for the sun the ottenevi already 'f.11
hello and good photos
Franco

Ombranhc

sent on June 12, 2013 (23:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

:-| Sisi I never thought of it as well but it was too late :-| :-|

thanks for the advice and for the passage :-)

hello

Pigi47

sent on June 20, 2013 (17:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The light caught in that moment, the reflections on the water and the colors make the whole a pretty picture.
I see very combrattuto between leaving the noise for further alignment photo to a painting or clean it if the digital noise to make it look like what is in fact ..... a photo.

Ombranhc

sent on June 20, 2013 (20:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Pigi for the passage and comment ;-) ;-) I honestly, having seen that without noise, without my favorite:-D:-D

hello ;-)

Elleemme

sent on June 20, 2013 (22:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The question then arises: why have you embraced the diffraction closing at f.32 and raising the ISO to as many as 3200? wow! . Hello and good light, laurel

user612

sent on June 21, 2013 (0:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I agree with the thought of Francoia, especially the noise.

Ombranhc

sent on June 21, 2013 (8:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

ElleEmme:-D:-D:-D I answer in a moment:-D:-D because it was the 2nd day I owned the camera and it was the first time that I used really on the field after 2 weeks of theory with video Internet :-| :-|

And it was the first PP in lightroom :-| :-|

:-D:-D:-D

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.