What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 03, 2022 (21:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice
Greetings Molto bella
Un saluto |
| sent on July 03, 2022 (21:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Daniele. Good evening. Grazie Daniele. Buona serata. |
| sent on July 05, 2022 (7:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It seems to me that the subject turns out to be a bit kneaded resulting so little incisive. Personally I would have cloned the flower to the left of the observer Mi sembra che il soggetto risulti essere un po' impastato risultando così poco incisivo. Personalmente avrei clonato il fiore alla sinistra di chi osserva |
| sent on July 05, 2022 (16:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Pigi. Thanks for the ride. :-)
Looking at it I do not know if this slight kneading is due to diffraction.
At the end, we all know that true macro optics have a very good acuity. It is not the case of this lens, although the results are not terrible, it is still a 400mm lens for full frame, adapted on an apsc with a different attack.
For the elimination of the flower on the left, I disagree. Since there are those two stems behind the subject, the composition would be unbalanced. In this way, however, I see it more balanced, in the end it has no colors that distract from the subject. :-) Ciao Pigi. Grazie del passaggio.
A guardarla non so se questo leggero impastamento, sia dovuto alla diffrazione.
Al finale, sappiamo tutti che le vere ottiche macro hanno un ottima acutanza. Non é il caso di quest'ottica, benché i risultati non siano terribili, resta comunque un ottica da 400mm per full frame, adattata su un apsc con un attacco differente.
Per l'elimizazione del fiore a sinistra, non sono d'accordo. Essendoci quei due gambi dietro al soggetto, la composizione risulterebbe sbilanciata. In questo modo invece, la vedo più bilanciata, alla fine non ha colori che vanno a distrarre dal soggetto. |
| sent on October 22, 2022 (19:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
.... Finally I find others who use the good old Sigma - in fact the shot does not give credit to the optics - probably moved by the subject - the PDC of this glass, at short distances and 'very limited but you should see a few mm sharp - true that it is not' a macro, personally I also use it with extension tubes, but you get to good close-up ... certainly not at RR 1:1 - the background flower does not mind, enhances the detachment of the planes and visually "builds" the diagonal - in these contexts, this glass likes the flash in HSS .... Finalmente trovo altri che usano il buon vecchio Sigma - in effetti lo scatto non rende merito all' ottica - probabilmente micromosso dal soggetto - la PDC di questo vetro, a brevi distanze e' molto limitata ma si dovrebbe vedere qualche mm nitido - vero che non e' un macro, personalmente lo uso anche con tubi di prolunga, ma arrivi a buoni close-up ... non certo a RR 1:1 - il fiore di sfondo non mi dispiace, valorizza lo stacco dei piani e visivamente "costruisce" la diagonale - in questi contesti, questo vetro gradisce il flash in hss |
| sent on March 06, 2023 (21:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In my opinion it is a shot to be accepted with its limits,
with a thread of contrast already improved.
Even ignoring the aperture used, you could bring the sensitivity to 100 with time 1/60 or so.
I greet you Secondo me è uno scatto da accettare con i suoi limiti,
con un filo di contrasto già migliorava.
Pure ignorando il diaframma usato, si poteva portare la sensibilità a 100 con tempo 1/60 o giù di li.
Ti saluto |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
13.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
