Flora in motion | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Macro and Flora

19.1 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

macro e flora View gallery (24 photos)

Flora in motion sent on May 13, 2022 (12:43) by SalvoCmos. 4 comments, 157 views.

, 1/15 f/11.0, ISO 100, tripod.

Uno dei primissimi approcci con le farfalle, scatto realizzato grazie ad anello di prolunga da 13mm

View High Resolution 19.1 MP

2 persons like it: Antonio Parrucci, Aringhe Blu

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Pigi47

sent on May 13, 2022 (18:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I think the parallelism should be better taken care of to have a better reading of the moth. Observing the high resolution the noise is noticeable, in pp it could have been attenuated.

SalvoCmos

sent on May 13, 2022 (18:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you Pigi for your point of view, Parallelism understood as a point of recovery? Noise? From what I remember I was at iso 100, maybe I pulled up too much in the adjustment of details and radius, I have to double check the RAW

Pigi47

sent on May 14, 2022 (11:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

“ Parallelism understood as a point of recovery? „

Yes, in order to have the most readable wing part.

“ Noise? From what I remember I was at iso 100, maybe I pulled up too much in the adjustment of details and radius „

You are probably right since the sensitivity value is quite low, however if you look at the image in high resolution you realize it perfectly.

SalvoCmos

sent on May 14, 2022 (12:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

“ if you look at the image in high resolution „

yes I saw, you see but with 100%

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.