What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 28, 2021 (8:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The title says it all! Congratulations!! Il titolo dice tutto! Complimenti!! |
| sent on September 28, 2021 (8:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but I'm too curious to know why f/7.1. as a layman I would have used 11 or 16, since you are on a tripod. maybe because at that aperture the optics give the best of themselves!? suspic but I have to feed the curious monkey :-D però mi incuriosisce troppo sapere perchè f/7.1. da profano avrei usato 11 o 16, visto che sei su treppiede. forse perchè a quel diaframma l'ottica da il meglio di sè!? scusa ma devo sfamare la scimmia curiosa |
| sent on September 28, 2021 (8:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great atmosphere and recovery Gran bella atmosfera e ripresa |
| sent on September 28, 2021 (8:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all! :-)
“ but I am too curious to know why f/7.1. as a layman I would have used 11 or 16, since you are on a tripod. maybe because at that aperture the optics give the best of itself!? „ I tested the lens at all apertures, in steps of 1/3 stop... at 105mm the f/7.1 aperture is the sharpest ever (obviously this only applies to this specific lens, Sony FE 24-105 f/4). With very distant subjects, even at f/7.1 the depth of field is already sufficient, closing at 11 or 16 I would only have loss of sharpness due to diffraction. You have to evaluate from time to time how much depth of field is needed for the scene :-) Grazie a tutti! :-) " però mi incuriosisce troppo sapere perchè f/7.1. da profano avrei usato 11 o 16, visto che sei su treppiede. forse perchè a quel diaframma l'ottica da il meglio di sè!?" Ho testato l'obiettivo a tutti i diaframmi, a passi di 1/3 di stop... a 105mm il diaframma f/7.1 è il più nitido in assoluto (ovviamente questo vale solo per questo specifico obiettivo, Sony FE 24-105 f/4). Con soggetti molto distanti, anche a f/7.1 la profondità di campo è già sufficiente, chiudendo a 11 o 16 avrei solo perdita di nitidezza a causa della diffrazione. Bisogna valutare di volta in volta quanta profondità di campo è necessaria per la scena |
| sent on September 28, 2021 (9:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I tested the lens at all apertures, in steps of 1/3 stop... at 105mm the f/7.1 aperture is the sharpest ever (obviously this only applies to this specific lens, Sony FE 24-105 f/4). With very distant subjects, even at f/7.1 the depth of field is already sufficient, closing at 11 or 16 I would only have loss of sharpness due to diffraction. You have to evaluate from time to time how much depth of field is needed for the scene „ Greos to know how :-D :-D " Ho testato l'obiettivo a tutti i diaframmi, a passi di 1/3 di stop... a 105mm il diaframma f/7.1 è il più nitido in assoluto (ovviamente questo vale solo per questo specifico obiettivo, Sony FE 24-105 f/4). Con soggetti molto distanti, anche a f/7.1 la profondità di campo è già sufficiente, chiudendo a 11 o 16 avrei solo perdita di nitidezza a causa della diffrazione. Bisogna valutare di volta in volta quanta profondità di campo è necessaria per la scena" Ottimo a sapersi |
| sent on September 28, 2021 (9:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very good! Thank you! ottimo! grazie! |
| sent on September 28, 2021 (14:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice! Atmosphere as per the title! Molto bella! Atmosfera come da titolo! |
| sent on September 28, 2021 (16:05) | This comment has been translated
Great shot, congratulations |
| sent on September 29, 2021 (5:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful landscape for atmosphere and light Splendido paesaggio per atmosfera e luce |
| sent on September 29, 2021 (8:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful image with a very suggestive atmosphere, a warm greeting Paola Splendida immagine con un'atmosfera molto suggestiva, un caro saluto Paola |
| sent on September 29, 2021 (8:12) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful image |
| sent on September 29, 2021 (8:56) | This comment has been translated
Enchanting! |
| sent on September 29, 2021 (16:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unique atmosphere, congratulations. Hello Atmosfera unica, complimenti. Ciao |
| sent on September 29, 2021 (19:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful light and atmosphere.... :-) bella luce ed atmosfera.... |
| sent on September 29, 2021 (20:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice! Suggestive atmosphere Molto bella! Atmosfera suggestiva |
| sent on September 29, 2021 (20:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very pleasant. greetings. molto gradevole. un saluto. |
| sent on September 29, 2021 (22:40)
Quite simply wondrous! Ann :)) |
| sent on September 30, 2021 (5:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful place, excellent moment of light to photograph, also in this case an engaging atmosphere. ;-) Luogo bellissimo, ottimo il momento di luce per fotografare, anche in questo caso una coinvolgente atmosfera. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |