RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Birds
  4. » Sony A7RIV Test - Sony FE 200-600mm Fringuello 5K

 
Sony A7RIV Test - Sony FE 200-600mm Fringuello 5K...

Passerine/passerotti mkIV

View gallery (60 photos)

Sony A7RIV Test - Sony FE 200-600mm Fringuello 5K sent on January 09, 2020 (15:52) by PannaeFragola. 13 comments, 1650 views. [retina]

at 594mm, 1/250 f/9.0, ISO 1250, hand held.

Scatto senza pretese ma è il primo fringuello extraoasi che riesco a fare su un posatoi : un evento...l'altro evento è a mio giudizio la leggibilità dei bianchi a 5K sul fianco...attendo giudizi (di ogni genere)



View High Resolution 16.7 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on January 09, 2020 (16:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A flaw the 200-600 has it ... I see you shot at 594mm ... even I happen to shoot at 580-590 mm instead of 600, this because it does not have the zoom block that instead had the Sigma Sport on multiple positions (including 600)

avatarsupporter
sent on January 09, 2020 (16:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Exactly !!! ;-)

avatarsupporter
sent on January 09, 2020 (16:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

you won't have the hang but what quality guys :-o
always ecstatic with your masterpieces Lorenzo
hello 8-)

avatarsenior
sent on January 09, 2020 (16:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Exactly !!! ;-)

It me off a bit, there's not once I shoot at 600, just lean on you for a moment... :-D

avatarsupporter
sent on January 09, 2020 (17:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Congratulations... Good job!!!!

avatarjunior
sent on January 09, 2020 (17:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very nice Lorenzo. A curiosity: when you write 5k or 4k in your photos, do you mean the resolution to which you scaled it?

avatarsenior
sent on January 09, 2020 (18:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful colors and great detail; really good work.
Congratulations, bye.
Richard

avatarsupporter
sent on January 09, 2020 (18:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I mean the size of the HD posted

avatarsupporter
sent on January 09, 2020 (22:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

:-o resolution .. but also the image cleanup is really remarkable. as well as readability in the shadowy areas... Top!!

avatarjunior
sent on January 11, 2020 (18:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello I would like to ask you for advice, I would like to buy the 100/400 gm, I would like some opinions compared to 200/600, I had excluded it because I find it a little too cumbersome, I would mainly make landscapes, reportage, although I do not disdain the birdwatching. Excuse the OT.
Anthony

avatarjunior
sent on January 11, 2020 (19:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Congratulations on the very beautiful images, I also bought the r4 from a few days and from the first tests, I find it exceptional, has a beautiful file that in addition to being very resolute, presents a much more obvious microcontrast.
Anthony

avatarsupporter
sent on January 11, 2020 (19:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

hello antonio I would go 200-600, at least spend less and you have 200 mm more without multipliers... the quality is excellent cmq !

avatarsenior
sent on January 21, 2020 (12:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

very nice :-D
such profane i have a question:
Why is it not a time not fast enough for a photo with a subject so fast indeed elusive and with a focal of 600mm? or with the ibis of r4 you can give a?


RCE Foto

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me