What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 27, 2016 (9:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful!
Greetings, Christiano. Bella!
Un saluto, Christiano. |
| sent on May 27, 2016 (10:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Christiano, super fast :-P thank you, a hug. Christiano, super veloce  grazie mille, un abbraccio. |
| sent on May 31, 2016 (21:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
'cause in the M bodies there' the iris information is passed from the lens :-) "calculated" the diaphragm of the car and put in exif data, based on what the meter says, and by the time set ... perche' nei corpi M non c'e' l'informazione del diaframma passato dall'obiettivo :-) viene "calcolato" il diaframma dalla macchina e messo nei dati exif, basandosi su cosa dice l'esposimetro e dal tempo impostato... |
| sent on May 31, 2016 (21:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Luke, thanks for info, sometimes it's correct, but I see that as NOCTILUX very often mistaken for large openings ... and nn I think I never use it very diaphragmed ;-) Ciao Luca, grazie delle info, a volte è corretto ma vedo che col noctilux sbaglia molto spesso alle grandi aperture...e nn credo di usarlo mai molto diaframmato  |
| sent on July 06, 2016 (21:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Ivan, following the discussion of Leica, I came to trovarti- What can I tell you? I like the pictures of all series. Now they are out of the "Photography" on this site, I enjoy it and racconto- Vissi in photography from medium format up, the small format Leica R / M and its optics, the difference could be seen and how. I can prove with large prints. I do not venture into digits. for incapacità- Good evening- FB- Ciao Ivan, seguendo la discussione su Leica, sono venuto a trovarti- Cosa posso dirti? Le foto della serie mi piacciono tutte. Ormai sono fuori dalla " Fotografia " su questo sito, mi diverto e racconto- Vissi di fotografia dal medio formato in su, sul piccolo formato solo Leica R/M e sue ottiche, la differenza si vedeva eccome. Posso dimostrare con stampe di grandi dimensioni. Non mi avventuro nel digit. per incapacità- Buona serata- FB- PS hai letto il libro " Conoscere Leica del compianto Prof. Gino Ferzetti? |
| sent on July 06, 2016 (22:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Franco, thanks to the passage of the comments most welcome, no do not claim to have read it but I will try. Only a blind person can not see the differences between the optical Leitz and a bottom of the bottle or to say that a post can replicate the production yield of lenses as the NOCTILUX. Unfortunately, even by Google's increasingly rich cheesy comments that they have nothing to do with real photography. Ciao Franco, grazie del passaggio e del graditissimo commento, no dichiaro di non averlo letto ma lo cercherò. Solo un cieco può non vedere le differenze tra le ottiche Leitz ed un fondo di bottiglia o dire che una post produzione possa replicare la resa di lenti come il Noctilux. Purtroppo anche juzaphoto è sempre più ricco di commenti dozzinali che nulla hanno a che fare con la vera fotografia. |
| sent on July 07, 2016 (10:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is wrong because the NOCTILUX cartoon lot Ta and why it is not a real 1.0. A 1.0 does not pass the double of that light to 1.4.
He was seen also using analog bodies M6. Sbaglia perché il noctilux vignetta parecchio a Ta e perché non è un vero 1,0. A 1,0 non passa il doppio di luce che a 1,4.
Lo si vedeva usando anche corpi analogici tipo M6. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
