What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 19, 2011 (17:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful, congratulations, proof that you do not need to take good pictures have camera bodies and lenses stratospheric or L series ... I might have moved a little on the subject more to the left ... Bella, complimenti, la dimostrazione che per fare belle foto non serve avere corpi macchina e lenti stratosferiche o serie L.... forse avrei spostato un pochino il soggetto più a sx... |
| sent on September 22, 2011 (14:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello, thanks for the comment :) well actually looking at the left side is a bit anonymous, but I did not want to focus on the main subject of the photo ciao, grazie per il commento :) guardandola bene effettivamente la parte a sinistra è un po anonima, ma non volevo porre al centro della foto il soggetto principale |
| sent on September 25, 2011 (12:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful execution, congratulations! Bella esecuzione, complimenti! |
| sent on November 03, 2011 (15:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fully agree with Cactus ... including the fact that cut a little to the left and leave more space to the right. Andrea. Pienamente d'accordo con Cactus...compreso il fatto di tagliare un pò a sinistra e lasciare più spazio a destra. Andrea. |
| sent on November 03, 2011 (17:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi, quoto Cactus to demonstrate that the "pretty picture" depends waaay by the "handle" and "... even" the technology used, to cut to the left are more in agreement with Damis which highlighted the subject framing right obtaining three-dimensional depth then, I find it very interesting that the drop has the same chrome faucet. Francesco Hello Salve, quoto Cactus per la dimostrazione che la "bella foto" dipende mooolto dal "manico" ed "...anche" dalla tecnologia usata ;per il taglio a sinistra sono più d'accordo con Damis che ha evidenziato il soggetto inquadrandolo a destra ottenendo profondità quindi tridimensionalità; trovo molto interessante che la goccia ha la stessa cromatura del rubinetto .Ciao Francesco |
| sent on November 03, 2011 (17:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for the comments:-D and appreciation Grazie a tutti per i commenti e gli apprezzamenti |
| sent on November 03, 2011 (20:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello good work ottimo lavoro ciao |
| sent on April 15, 2012 (22:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful compliments, but how do you focus so in detail (sorry I know it's a stupid question because I miss some of the fundamental), the drop impresses me because with time 1/200 and an aperture cmq not quite closed and 'perfect ! I close the aperture a bit to have more detail but overall I can not make them like this: ( Compliments bellissima complimenti ma come si fa a mettere a fuoco cosi nel dettaglio (scusa so che e una domanda stupida perche mi mancano un po di fondamentali),la goccia mi impressiona perche con tempo 1/200 e cmq un diaframma non proprio chiuso e' perfetta! io chiudo un po il diaframma per avere piu dettaglio generale ma non riesco a farle cosi :( Complimenti |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |