What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 20, 2015 (22:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful moved, perhaps with a shot in the vertical picture would be even more beautiful, congratulations! Splendido mosso, forse con l'inquadratura in verticale la foto sarebbe ancora più bella, complimenti! |
| sent on September 22, 2015 (21:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I thank you claudio, not a lover of the upright, actually I do not even have one in my account. Hello ti ringrazio claudio,non sono un amante del verticale,effettivamente non ne ho neanche una nel mio account. ciao |
| sent on September 27, 2015 (20:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Special light, looks at nightfall. The water stands well and has a nice effect silk. Good boy ! Hello Luce particolare, sembra scattata all'imbrunire. L'acqua risalta bene ed ha un bell'effetto seta. Bravo ! Ciao |
| sent on September 30, 2015 (19:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thanks Roby, to be honest I do not meet the sharpness, but I do not 'clear' cause ... who knows' if anyone has the answer, I also used the tripod with timer ... grazie roby, per dirla tutta non mi soddisfa la nitidezza,ma non mi e' chiaro il perche'... chissa' se qualcuno ha la risposta,ho anche usato il treppiede con autoscatto... |
| sent on February 23, 2017 (8:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, maybe a little 'more light would have been better. For clarity I can not see a good depth of field.
Hello
Francis Ciao, forse un po' più luminosa sarebbe stato meglio. Per la nitidezza io non riesco a vedere una buona profondità di campo. Ciao Francesco |
| sent on February 23, 2017 (11:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice shot Luckyc, a greeting
Angel bello scatto Luckyc, un saluto Angelo |
| sent on February 23, 2017 (12:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ to be honest I am not satisfied sharpness, but I do not 'clear' cause ... who knows' if anyone has the answer, I also used a tripod with a timer ... „
What I know is that the picture is a bit 'dark and flat .. Let's say that at the level of sharpness does not seem to move, but probably a bit 'soft ... You should understand that steps have you done in post and think if one of those made you lose quality ... Or where it was located the tripod (it was in the water?) " per dirla tutta non mi soddisfa la nitidezza,ma non mi e' chiaro il perche'... chissa' se qualcuno ha la risposta,ho anche usato il treppiede con autoscatto... " Quello che noto io è che l'immagine risulta un po' scura e piatta.. Diciamo che a livello di nitidezza non sembra proprio mossa, ma probabilmente un po' morbida... Bisognerebbe capire che passaggi hai fatto in post e ragionare se uno di quelli ti ha fatto perdere qualità... Oppure dove era situato il treppiede (era nell'acqua?) |
| sent on February 23, 2017 (17:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In the original frame was already so, I just tried to improve clarity, and succeed in small part, was still on a stone Nel fotogramma originale era già così,ho solo tentato di migliorare in nitidezza,riuscendoci in minima parte,era su una pietra comunque |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |