You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 221000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on April 19, 2015 (14:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
to be at 1600 iso bad, imagine the noise was attenuated in post production. I personally saw it was a large structure would have increased the aperture to get a shot less soft and perfectly focused on all levels. not bad anyway per essere a 1600 iso niente male, immagino il rumore sia stato attenuato in post produzione. Personalmente visto che era una struttura vasta avrei aumentato il diaframma per avere uno scatto meno morbido e perfettamente a fuoco su tutti i livelli. non male comunque
sent on May 02, 2015 (16:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for visiting! Unfortunately, as you know diaphragm and time are linked, a closing of the diaphragm would involve too long for a shot freehand. Grazie della visita! Purtroppo come ben sai diaframma e tempi sono legati,una chiusura di diaframma avrebbe implicato un tempo troppo lungo per uno scatto a mano libera.