What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 18, 2016 (16:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The idea is good although I find the composition not really good, I do not understand why so high iso despite being provided with tripod. L'idea è buona anche se trovo la composizione non proprio buona, non capisco perchè iso così alti pur essendo provvisto di treppiede. |
| sent on June 18, 2016 (16:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's been a few years but if I remember correctly there was a network that bordered the yard and the tripod support was quite precarious and had preferred to avoid a several second time taking the high ISO. Thanks for the comment. Sono passati alcuni anni ma se non ricordo male c'era una rete che delimitava il cantiere e l'appoggio del treppiede era abbastanza precario e avevo preferito evitare tempi di svariati secondi tenendo gli ISO alti. Grazie per il commento. |
user81257 | sent on June 18, 2016 (17:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The composition is also good, I would have cut a part we sky. True that the beam of light goes upward, but part already low, then the direction it would still also performing the cutting.
Unfortunately iso pull off lots and lots of sharpness to the picture and this is the real reason why this photo I love it. La composizione è anche buona, avrei tagliato una parte ci cielo. Vero che il fascio di luce va verso l'alto, ma parte già da basso, quindi la direzione resterebbe comunque anche effettuando il taglio.
Purtroppo gli iso tirano via tanta tanta nitidezza alla foto e questo è il vero motivo per cui questa foto non mi piace tantissimo. |
| sent on June 18, 2016 (19:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I try to review as per your request. I know the place well, even I have to Cremona, the choreography is really beautiful and special and the photos you've done you managed to immortalize it for future reference and also good I'd seen the state he was in the area opposite. The photo itself ', however, in addition to document that moment does not tell me much. Provo a commentare come da tua richiesta. Conosco bene il posto, sono anche io di Cremona, la coreografia è davvero bella e particolare e con la foto che hai fatto sei riuscito a immortalarla a futura memoria e anche bene direi visto lo stato in cui si trovava l'area antistante. La foto in se', però, oltre a documentare quel momento non mi dice altro. |
user33434 | sent on June 18, 2016 (21:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice shot. The vertical framing choice is judicious view of the allusion to the arches. A bit too much noise but good for me considering that with a longer time would have had the stars swiping. A greeting Bello scatto. La scelta dell'inquadratura verticale è azzeccata vista l'allusione agli archi. Un pò troppo rumore ma va bene per me considerato che con un tempo più lungo avresti avuto la strisciata di stelle. Un saluto |
| sent on June 19, 2016 (1:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The swiping of stars there would have been more than 15-25 seconds, within which the stars would have been point. La strisciata di stelle si sarebbe avuta a più di 15-25 sec, entro i quali le stelle sarebbero state puntiformi. |
| sent on June 19, 2016 (12:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I really like the composition, I found less interesting a pdr as perpendicular and symmetrical. Beautiful colors, frankly I do not see all this noise. I think a good achievement. A me la composizione piace molto, avrei trovato meno interessante un pdr più perpendicolare e simmetrico. Belli i colori, francamente non vedo tutto questo rumore. Mi sembra una buona realizzazione. |
| sent on June 19, 2016 (13:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think shooting is interesting and the pdr guessed. The only thing that I think bothers a little is the lower part that I cut. For the rest I like it :-) Credo che lo scatto sia interessante e il pdr azzeccato. L'unica cosa che secondo me disturba un pochino è la parte inferiore che avrei tagliato. Per il resto mi piace  |
| sent on June 19, 2016 (19:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you all for your comments and advice. Grazie a tutti per i commenti ed i consigli. |
| sent on June 20, 2016 (8:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like the composition and colors.
I am having used the tripod would keep the ISO lower to have a cleaner image.
Particularly in illuminated the building, I find it a bit 'too hard.
A me piacciono la composizione e i colori.
Avendo usato i treppiede avrei tenuto gli iso più bassi per avere un'immagine più pulita.
Soprattutto nell'area illuminata dell'edificio, la trovo un po' troppo dura.
|
| sent on June 20, 2016 (17:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
great subject and the good pdr. (A front?)
I do not like how it was taken. because 3200iso?
I find that having that bright framed building on the left disorders lot of the composition. ottimo soggetto e buono il pdr. (una frontale?)
non mi piace come è stata scattata. perchè 3200iso?
trovo che aver inquadrato quel palazzo luminoso sulla sinistra disturbi parecchio la composizione. |
| sent on June 20, 2016 (19:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to you for the comments; As mentioned above, there was a network that bordered the yard and the tripod support was therefore quite precarious I preferred to avoid taking several seconds time high ISO. For the same reason, the PDR was pretty forced. Grazie anche a voi per i commenti; Come detto sopra, c'era una rete che delimitava il cantiere e l'appoggio del treppiede era abbastanza precario quindi ho preferito evitare tempi di svariati secondi tenendo gli ISO alti. Per lo stesso motivo il PDR era abbastanza obbligato. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
