Awakening muffled | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

2.4 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

paesaggi View gallery (18 photos)

Awakening muffled sent on December 30, 2014 (12:53) by Aleziggio. 2 comments, 1156 views.

at 100mm, 1/500 f/7.1, ISO 200, hand held.

View High Resolution 2.4 MP

10 persons like it: Albertopantellini, Albieri Sergio, Cirillo Donelli, Danyz, Emozionevisiva, Grenato, Ilnonnovinci, Ivan Gugole, Kamik64, Pablo ph

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Grenato

sent on February 14, 2015 (17:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Congratulations, very nice photo! I am considering the purchase of a 100-300 pana and I'm looking a bit 'of photos. Convinces me more than 75-300 Olympus. You are satisfied with this view?

Aleziggio

sent on February 14, 2015 (17:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

by having had both I can say that more or less equivalent. Having to choose between one and the other would go on, however, Panasonic, eventually greater openness is appreciated on many occasions. Keep in mind that to get the best results in terms of sharpness should slightly close the diaphragm compared with the TA. Even the optical stabilization is useful and I think works in synergy with the stabilization on the sensor, but I never got to measure this thing. If you have a m4 / 3, there are many alternatives for these focal lengths, so I'd go quietly on Pana.
Hello!

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.