RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Landscape (wilderness)
  4. » Seascape Heaven

 
Seascape Heaven...

Seascape

View gallery (21 photos)

Seascape Heaven sent on August 21, 2014 (14:35) by Beckerwins. 93 comments, 16282 views.  [editors pick]

, Posa B f/8.0, ISO 100, tripod.

Altra immagine facente parte del mio ultimo progetto fotografico "Seascape Heaven". Stavolta ci troviamo dinanzi ad incredibile spettacolo naturale. Nonostante la pioggia battente, il forte vento proveniente dalle mie spalle mi ha consentito di cogliere questo momento senza bagnare i filtri. Questo e' solo l'inizio di un viaggio di cui poco per volta vi raccontero'...



358 persons like it: 110ermya, 7h3 L4w, Adriano Campione, Adriano Ghiselli, Adrimas51, Agaler Layenel, Aguilucho, Alago, Alan Ford, Alberto23, Albieri Sergio, Alby85, Alefa, Alessandro Bormida, Alessandro Garino, Alessandro Traverso, Alessio Aiello, Alessio Cuccurullo, Alessio Del Frate, Alessio.caria, Alessmile, Alex Amariei, Alexrozzy, Alext, Almar63, AmigaMan, Andrea Cacciari, Andrea Chemello, Andrea Panagini, Andrea_cristo, Andrynoce, Andy 66, AngeloPerronePhoto, Anna Agostini, Anna Brun, Antonera77, Antonio Aleo, Antoniomaggiore, AntoTru90, Apollo79, Arvina, Baribal, Batcaius, Belhaven, Boss53, Brad Pipis, Briè, Buenavida, Cap91, Carlez91, Carloc82, Carminexx, Carracate, Cassiopeo, Caterina Bruzzone, Christian, Cianlox, Cioccolataia, Ciska, Claudio Santoro, Claudio Sferra, Cola, Corraflex71, Cosiminodegenerali, Cris1976, Cris59, Dalla Riva Daniel, Daniel Maran, Daniele Quaranta, Daniele Ruggeri D2, Daniele_86, Dantes, Dany Sei, Dar_io, Davide Dutto, Davide Gadda, Davide99, Devil.six, Diego Moscati, Diego-v-73, Domenico, Donalds, Donato Lorubio, Donato Romagnuolo, Donna, Donoterase, Ecka, Eldhosepaul, Elias Piccioni, Eliobe, Emiliano De Franceschi, Enricor69, Eosman, Ermete Forloni, Estroverzia, Eukap, Fabio Polidori, Fabrizio Bellandi, Fabrizio Zerbini, Fabrizio85, Falconfab, FasoAD, Fedebobo, Federico Bergamaschi, Federico Cavalli, Federico Controni, Federico.rugo, Feffo, Florin, Folk1963, Fotoddo, Fotonutria, Fra78, Francesco Iafelice, Francesco Mussapi, Francesco Talin, Francescodeflorio, Franzmz, Freediver214, Fulvio Gioria, Gabriele Netti, Gabriele Prato, Gabrielle Martin, Garciamarquez, Gare75, Gascri, Gaucho62, Gi87, Giacomo Feroldi, Gian Mario Zaino, Gianfranco1956, Gianluca Podestà, Gianluca Porciani, GianlucaM83, Gio975, GionaTabarini, Giorgiaschuma, Giorgio Colo, Giorgio Vantini, Giovanni Mosca, Giovannigenzini, Giovannini Italo, Giulietta Cazzaro, Giuseppe Stasolla, Giussa66, Gjo79, Grandisde, Guelfo, Guido Bianchimano, Hamed2240, Hobbit, Ikhnusa78, Ilaria Calciolari, Ilfruttodelpeccato, Ilmadonita, Ingdax76, Ipeppe, Italo Carè, Jacopo Costantini, Japandrea, Jarmila, Jeant, Jeko22470, Johnjz, Jordano74, Juza, Karateka, Kedece, Kenny, Klaudiom, Korra88, Kruzzolo, Laurenzo, Leonardo Santoro, Lio78, Lorenzo Bel, LorenzoGiovanardi, Lorenzo_mc, Lorenzo_rosa, Luca Bacchella, Luca Ceoloni, Luca Tassi, Luca-spleen, Lucabortophoto, LucaCremonini, Lucadavide, Lucas , Luca_berg, Luci, LucianoSerra.d, Luigi Mossali, Luigi Pansecchi, Luigi62, Luigitanganelli, Luka180, Lully, M3ndoza, Madmax72, Maksy, Mamaroby, Marco Anfossi, Marco Bonetti, Marco Fabbri, Marco Fagiani, Marco Nalini, Marco Neri, Marco Tagliarino, Marcolostia, Marlon, MarsCr, Martinclimber, Mascellable, Massimiliano Montemagno, Massimo Strumia, Massimo Vertuani, Massimo-tiga, Massimo.Strumia, Massimoeos, Masti, Mattbre, Matteo M, Matteotellini, Mattfala, Mattia77, Mauelle, Maurizio Bistacchia, Maurizio Junior Gabbi, Mauro66, Max Chiodini, Max Lucotti, MaxShutterSpeed, Maxt, Megatron, Melisseo67, Michele Marini, Mihai, Mnardell, Mostafa Zmi, Mowgli, Mreza, Nadia Terazzi, Narendra Latthe, Nemesi9191, Netttto23, Nicola Pezzatini, Nicola.mazz.86, Nicolasv, Nikcola, Niko14, Nordend4612, Nunziozo, Olovni, Orione68, Orlando Tomassini, Paola Garofalo, Paolo Caloisi, Paolo Garzella, Paolo Gualandris, Paolo.Corona, Paologiovanetti, Patrick Chu, Peppe Cancellieri, Peter Pipistrello, Photony Pescara, Pierluigi Garis, Pino99, Piotr70, Piux, Pix And Love, Ploner Martin, Pm544, Quellolà, Rgb78, Riaz84, Riccardo Arena Trazzi, Richard2, Ricky80, Ricky_71, Riki, Roberto Caliari, Roberto Cola, Roberto Marini, Roberto Tamanza, Roberto63, Robyt, Ronda, Ros1, Rosamaria Bidoli, Rravelli, Sa97, Sandro Mosca, Sasasicilyuno, SavRu, Sballone, Sbrino, Scarlet, Scooby, Scuter1956, Senatore_claudio, Sg67, Silvio C, Simone, Simone.marcon81, Siro, Snowluk, Sofia Sotta, Soriana, Staefano, Ste92, Stefania Saffioti, Stefano Di Chiazza, Stefano M., Stefano Marangoni, Stefano0966, Stefano1969, Stefano3112, Stefano83, Stefanobells23, StefanoMoretti, Stefano_A, Ste_91, Stoppans, Supercecc56, Swagger, Switosky, Tan, Technophil, Tessi, Testadura65, TheBlackbird, Tifotetano, Tilacino, Tito 1960, Trinita, Turibol, Tziu Boykku, Uomoragno, Valerio Colantoni, Valmic, Vermillion, VeronicaPinna, Vincenzo De Paola, Vincenzo Mazza, Vit.Al, Vito Campanelli, Vittorio Busatto, Vittorio Scatolini, Volo, Voodoo, Walter Colombo, Walter Serafini, Wells, Wildvideo, Xchanger, Zman, Zucco55, Zuniga Lorenzo Norberto, _Axl_




What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on January 26, 2015 (19:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello! Fantastic composition, shooting and 'very nice and well done in the car as well as the right and pleasing blur sea .. incredible and magical moment, I can imagine living it. There are, however, 'the colors that convince me very little: I do not know if' the web or that, but I see them too much saturated and unreal in the part of the earth and rocks (there are shades' orange and yellow too strong).

Good evening, hello. gabri

avatarsenior
sent on January 26, 2015 (19:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well .... after I read the whole thread I heard two conflicting emotions inside of me, I think the first is not to say it nicer while the second can be summarized in a "God ... why? This can not be real ".

What amazes me is not so much that one does not like a shot, but rather that this is not worthy even to know who has faced.
Steps to be referred to a novice or amateur somewhat evolved on duty but come to think that a photographer of the reach of Fortunato achieve a shot with witchcraft wrong post production for ignorance about the world of colorimetry maybe by dropping in some absolutisms ..... well .... frankly is very, very sad to see everything!
Many small metastases with which the social photography is infecting thea photograph of those who still (just) the can.

A tip of all, if you work a vuolcommentare Author (do not photograph) need to arm themselves with humility and above all enjoy (ALL) his works; internalize his way of seeing and acting, listen to his philosophy of life! All this should be the basis to be able to comment a.

avatarsenior
sent on January 26, 2015 (20:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Quoto Francis. Just read the comments above you .. puts chills how much ignorance and little delicacy depopulated the web.

edit. The comment has been removed

avatarsupporter
sent on January 26, 2015 (20:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well, every observer looking work and then the comments expressed some his own world, which can be rich or poor, educated or easier. Visiting the Vatican Museums recently, I picked up strange things even about Michelangelo: beholder, says and says what the work arouses. And 'the eternal fragility of the artist, who is exposed and sometimes do not like. : - |
But this morning I like the rose from 100 to 134, so there are also many who appreciate (I absolutely not, very bright and unnatural colors make me think that deep down that old photographer who still uses the film does not have point ... this photo makes me better understand and even appreciate Berengo Gardin.)

user39791
avatar
sent on January 26, 2015 (20:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Franceco I allowed myself, the premise that they are a goat in the field of landscape, to say that the photo seemed a little pumped. I did it, I think, with grace. But do you think if a user posts 4 photos I have to know that behind his nick hides a famous author who do not know how, according to you, I would have had to savor ALL its work before commenting ???? I think your comment reckless and disrespectful towards those who in good faith has expressed an opinion different from yours. Filiberto.

avatarsupporter
sent on January 26, 2015 (20:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Given the recent speeches I point a cosa..non have no interest to take sides with Fortunato..anzi we operate on the market with facilities diverse..quindi would also compete ..
But I have a habit of saying what I see even though I know that in network sincerity often paga..in this case the explanations given by the author seem to me entirely esaustive..la scene is real post functional project in which the image is inserita..può like it or not but there is nothing to be surprised or indignant.

avatarsenior
sent on January 26, 2015 (20:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Composition and light interpreted at best!

avatarsenior
sent on January 26, 2015 (21:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank someone for having determined that comments perplexed and sometimes placed in a polite terminology are metastases .... delicious and refined .... this "philosophy of life" we do less, because metastases (the real ones ) have plagued us otherwise.

avatarjunior
sent on January 26, 2015 (21:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

This is a picture that looks at first with your eyes and then you meditate in the heart

avatarsenior
sent on January 26, 2015 (21:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Quoto Francis. Just read the comments above you .. puts chills how much ignorance and little delicacy depopulated the web.


but you're referring to me Antonio?

I might add something to my comment .. I do not think I said who knows' what, indeed !! I said that the photo I really like, I made some compliments and criticism (staff) on the colors that do not convince me, I do not like so 'much, I do not seem real .. but it' s my opinion, I could be wrong !! by them to be ignorant and not very delicate !!

many times happen to comment photos without knowing who the author .. and what's the problem ?? a photo can 'be beautiful or less independently of the artist: I mean that an unknown amateur can' make a beautiful picture and vice versa !! personalmente comment and when I judge a picture I prefer not to know who and 'the author .. and this should do it in many !! do not judge a photograph by the author, but only from the photograph, just !!

I had not even seen the previous comments, and the less I wanted to take sides one way or another ..

Good evening to all !!

avatarsenior
sent on January 26, 2015 (21:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

No Gabriele. I edited if you see. was reported to David who, however, later removed the message

user23890
avatar
sent on January 26, 2015 (21:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Given that I do not know absolutely the author ... and thankfully, so at least I could express my opinion without being a kind "reverence royal" ...

In fact, going to look at the site of this photographer ... there are the shots really beautiful and interesting as inspiration.

BUT ....

... There are millions of pages of forums around the world explaining how to properly apply the sharpness ... and considering how much you mena with technical perfection ... not to mention thousands of sensors from EUR to reduce the noise of 0.5% ...

Then someone brought up well colorimetry ... mha!

Remove the "name" from this gallery ...
(Forgive my ignorance ... but until now I did not know him, aggiungero 'also among the links of some 300 photographers bookmarks I have on the browser)
... And many in this forum would have panned much ... at least for the 4 photos currently published ...



"This is not worthy even to know who in the face"

So if a football referee has faced "Totti" must always whistling in his favor? Forgive the football metaphor ... it seems to me, however, that it is apt!

Let's stop the hypocrisy ... excuse the bluntness ...

Greetings

avatarsenior
sent on January 26, 2015 (21:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

David, I'm sorry that you misunderstood, and if you re-read well I have not given anyone ignorant, are simply taken aback by some comments (especially those where you throw evident anathemas against shooting and the author) .... the ltuo in this case was one of those (at the level of the forum was not very pretty clear it, and also I do my gaffe here but I do not try to hide in the closet after all they read).

I want to clarify that my amazement in leggerealcuni comments in appreciation was not so much or not but just in the argument in favor of the "no appreciation."
We've gone from saying that rainbows could be stuck with some rudiments of the art of PVA glue to assume that lucky face heavy post production finishing with giving absolutism in colorimetry.
Saràche I nI'm used to comment on the work of an author as well, can be too! However, the invitation to look the work of an author before commenting remains valid because it can make some redundant outputs. Especially grow ourselves and see the photograph under a different light.

Gabriele, I disagree with your statement because if I evaluated some (many) works of the master Adams without knowing who it was I would have said "What is this stuff?" but I would have made a huge mistake because what you can figure out by reading his photos insilenzio and overall it is a message strordinario!
As for the colors little real ..... well .... who are we to say what was actually real, we do not even before printing to judge (not, we will rely on mica schermo). We then asked ourselves the question whether certain colors were designed to convey a specific emotion?


Antoniog Unfortunately nowadays we tend to nip the photograph rather than the graphics

For the comparison with the referee obviously did not read what I wrote, try to reread emglio!

avataradmin
sent on January 26, 2015 (21:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Guys, please, please stop bickering, limit ourselves to the comment of the picture without personal confrontations;-)

avatarsenior
sent on January 26, 2015 (21:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Antoniog: As I have already said in the past, you are right on the MDC. Because of my laziness. If it is a print then I apply it selectively, otherwise I try not to lose too much time for the web. Thank You.

avatarsupporter
sent on January 26, 2015 (22:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I pressed as Antoniog I do not know the author even more so if you use a pseudonym. From my humble point of view of an apprentice of nature photos, this photo has a good composition, but has unnatural light and colors pumped. It can also be part of a project which does not dispute the validity but in my view this photo is not a natural landscape, maybe it can be a project within the photo-art discipline equally if not more deserving, but it is not, in my opinion, the naturalness of a landscape. From this point of view also the heavy use of the long times matched, suppose also in this case, to ND filters, continues to create that silky water which may also pleasure but does not represent the true appearance and becomes the long a technicality that threatens to stifle the artistic spirit. Then Ilike referring to this photo are denying me but sometimes it's good to go against the tide ....:-P:-P Greetings

user23890
avatar
sent on January 26, 2015 (22:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Dear Francesco ... is indeed my answer was a little too dry ... but writing long answers on a forum, it becomes tiring for the reader ...

You do, however, point out one thing ... I began to distrust of all those photographers who say:

I make little pp for choice ...

The PP push too do not like ...

I like shooting natural, as is "out" of the car ...

etc etc ...

I see in laziness technique ... You cite Ansel Adam ... who knows would tolerate a "grain" persistent due to a "development" is not accurate ... when there are ways to avoid it?

I say no ...

Cdare I mean? if I had to choose between a perfect shot on the technical / artistic .... and only one artistic ... choose the first ...




user23890
avatar
sent on January 26, 2015 (22:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I wanted to close by quoting a well-known photographer ... then I will speak more!

Exposure Photo (Michael Freeman)

p. 10

Being a professional does not mean achieving best shots of those whose hobby photographer. Indeed, it is often the opposite


Known as many of you appreciate with honors this photo (which cmq has its own charm, God forbid) ... then watch your galleries and I think ...

You are much better ... or at least ... you have nothing to envy ...

Greetings

avatarsenior
sent on January 27, 2015 (0:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Sure Juza but there was no willingness to create havoc! One last comment is then I am silent
Except personal taste on choosing lucky in post production, I like and I think I understand, I agree with you Antonio. If I had to condense what I meant in a few words I could say: "although I do not know the author looking at his picture in gallery I can say with reasonable certainty that it is not the first that passes and that if he decided to post produce so behind c 'is not a choice dictated by the case? "I would say yes! =) So to say (ie not connected to any post) "This is a picture pretending because that color is absolutely wrong" would find it as sterile comment. Totally different to talk about a choice related to the shooting in subjective terms. =)
I like soffermarmi to reflect on a shot trying to interpret the author's choices, I do see each photo in a different light!
Good light to all guys =)

avatarsenior
sent on January 27, 2015 (17:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very nice but I prefer the colors less pumped ... I still do not text ... craft do the electrician:-)




Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me