What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 06, 2019 (17:00) | This comment has been translated
Marvelous |
| sent on July 07, 2020 (9:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I can only repeat myself, another spectacular shot.
Andrea Posso solo ripetermi, altro scatto spettacolare.
Andrea |
| sent on September 07, 2020 (16:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Alessandro, I see that you always keep isos high, you never use self-iso, I don't understand why you do it. I understand keeping safe times for portraits at 1/160-200. But so you steal dynamic range and introduce noise
Alessandro, vedo che tieni sempre gli iso alti, non usi mai l'auto-iso, non ho capito perché lo fai. capisco tenere tempi di sicurezza per ritratti a 1/ 160-200. Ma cosi ti rubi gamma dinamica e introduci rumore
|
| sent on September 07, 2020 (23:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
because I do a kind of breaketing with diaphragms, starting from the diaphragm very open and very fast I close and click until you get to f4. I am a lover of TA but sometimes you can err on fire, especially when the light conditions are difficult. In doing so I am sure that I have a focus image at the expense of the high iso, which personally I do not live absolutely as a problem in the rendering of my photographs.
I don't like iso automatic because I like to keep myself trained in managing the times as I see fit, I happened to want to shoot with very slow times to give effect moved, and when I happened I had to be in grando to set the parameters in very few sixteens.
I hope to be clear and exhaustive! perchè faccio una sorta di breaketing con i diaframmi, partendo da diaframma apertissimo e velocissimo chiudo e scatto fino ad arrivare ad f4. sono amante della TA ma a volte si può sbagliare il fuoco, soprattutto quando le condizioni di luce sono difficili. Così facendo sono certo di avere una immagine a fuoco a scapito degli alti iso, che personalmente non lo vivo assolutamente come un problema nella resa delle mie fotografie.
Non amo iso automatici perchè mi piace tenermi sempre allenato nel gestirmi i tempi come meglio credo, mi è capitato di voler scattare con tempi molto lenti per dare effetto mosso, e quando mi è capitato dovevo esser in grando di impostare i parametri in pochissimi sencondi.
Spero di esser stato chiaro ed esaustivo! |
| sent on September 08, 2020 (18:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact I wondered how you did with the Sigma 35 that everyone complains of incoherence in focus, that's why I would like to try the Tamron 35 1.4 that having a better performing engine should be more precise and repeatable. Thanks for the suggestion of diaphragm brketing
Infatti mi chiedevo come facevi con il Sigma 35 che tutti lamentano di incostanza nella messa a fuoco, ecco perché vorrei provare il Tamron 35 1.4 che avendo un motore più performante dovrebbe essere più preciso e ripetibile. Grazie per il suggerimento del brketing di diaframma
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
