What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 06, 2019 (15:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks a lot of compliments and happy that you enjoyed my photo.
@Claudio Molinari: What do you mean technically not perfect? What could I have improved in your opinion?
Grazie mille dei complimenti e felice che abbiate apprezzato la mia foto.
@Claudio Molinari: Cosa intendi con tecnicamente non perfetta? Cosa avrei potuto migliorare secondo te?
|
| sent on February 07, 2019 (21:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Luca, nothing to remove the beauty of the shot, I only allow to point out some purely personal points of view
The MAF I would have extended also on the model, on the third, instead falls on the droplets of glass, where there is the reflection of the face.
I don't know if it's wanted, but the foreground figure is slightly non-focused (vista in HD).
I would have closed the diaphragm of a stop, it would have benefited the sharpness of the Batis.
So it seems a bit ' mixed up the portrait.
I would have made a PP also to the face of the model.
I think there is a slight distortion.
If I said some high-strung... always ready for comparison. Thanks and congratulations again. Greetings.
Luca, nulla a togliere la bellezza dello scatto, mi permetto solo di far notare alcuni punti di vista prettamente personali
La MaF l'avrei estesa anche sulla modella, sui terzi, invece cade sulle goccie del vetro, dove c'è il riflesso del volto.
Non so se è voluto, ma la figura in primo piano risulta leggermente non a fuoco (vista in HD).
Avrei chiuso il diaframma di uno stop, ne avrebbe giovato la nitidezza del Batis.
Così mi sembra un po' impastato il ritratto.
Avrei fatto una PP anche al volto della modella.
Secondo me c'è una leggera distorsione.
Se ho detto degli strafalcioni...sempre pronto al confronto. Grazie e complimenti ancora. Un saluto.
|
| sent on February 08, 2019 (10:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Imagine. Well be constructive criticism. So you learn and you get better.
Yes, I should have quit a bit, but in retrospect, it's all easier. On the camera display unfortunately some things you don't notice until you see them at the computer. I'll have to do even more attention in the future. I didn't want a DoF too high to not focus too much water, but it cost me a little bit of precision.
Figurati. ben vengano critiche costruttive. Così si impara e ci si migliora.
Si, avrei dovuto chiudere un po', ma a posteriori, è tutto più facile. Sul display della macchina fotografica purtroppo alcune cose non te ne accorgi finché non le vedi a computer. Dovrò fare ancora più attenzione in futuro. Non volevo una DoF troppo elevata per non mettere a fuoco troppa acqua, ma mi è costata un po' la precisione.
|
| sent on August 02, 2021 (21:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great photo.. ;-) Grande foto..  |
| sent on February 15, 2024 (20:06) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful image |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
21.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
