What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user44198 | sent on January 06, 2017 (14:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Marzio you've read that right .... only still must do a session with the SBIG but I fear that despite being a color CCD and cooled will opt for the sale because I find the recovery image cells too cumbersome, I honestly thought I better find me obviously I was wrong!! so if there is no marvel of Astrosell :-D si Marzio hai letto bene....solo che ancora debbo fare una sessione con la SBIG ma temo che nonostante sia una CCD a colori e raffreddata opterò per la vendita in quanto trovo la ripresa celle immagini troppo macchinosa,sinceramente pensavo di trovarmi meglio evidentemente mi sbagliavo!! perciò se la troverai su Astrosell non ti meravigliare |
| sent on January 12, 2017 (22:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Marzio Hello, congratulations for the triple challenge won, with frame, with light pollution and with the elusive little witch ;-) I really like how you can make colorful stars, it is not easy especially if the image is pulled very much! Salutoni Ciao Marzio, complimenti per la tripla sfida vinta, con la montatura, con l'inquinamento luminoso e con la sfuggente streghetta A me piace molto come riesci a rendere colorate le stelle, non è facile in particolare se l'immagine viene tirata molto! Salutoni |
| sent on January 13, 2017 (8:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I am thankful that the bargain, but there's more: -D I hope soon will take up this subject and this time thinking about the less instrumentation :-) Thanks Marco Hello Marzio Ti ringrazio d'avvero, ma non è finita qui Riprenderò questo oggetto spero presto e questa volta pensando di meno alla strumentazione Grazie Marco Ciao Marzio |
| sent on January 13, 2017 (9:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Superb capture, always thank those who coke you ci.mostrate beauty to which many of us hannp difficulty seeing. Bravo and congratulations Stupenda cattura, ringrazio sempre chi coke te ci.mostrate bellezze a cui molti di noi hannp difficoltà a vedere. Bravo e complimenti |
| sent on January 13, 2017 (13:03) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful! |
| sent on January 14, 2017 (14:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Alpha, this is also a game and it's always nice to receive positive feedback :-D Thank you :-) Hello Grazie Alpha, è anche questo un gioco ed è sempre bello ricevere riscontri positivi Grazie Ciao |
| sent on January 14, 2017 (14:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride Ittogami :-D Hello Marzio :-) Grazie del passaggio Ittogami Ciao Marzio |
| sent on January 16, 2017 (23:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Many, but just so many years ago, I was delighted with astronomy. In my day I remember that I read books on astronomy that the limit magnitude for photos taken with the 5 m telescope of Mount Palomar was the 23rd or 24th (if I remember correctly). I at least thirty years no longer follows astronomy, so I want to know, out of curiosity, with the techniques and appropriate equipment, with a "not so poor" say mirror 12 ", in that magnitude you come today? I would not be surprised to hear me say that you will come to a magnitude not far from that of telecopio is Palomar. I would add: compliments your astronomical shots, IR and spherical. Great technique and beautiful inventive especially for photo spheres. Tanti, ma proprio tanti anni fa, mi dilettavo con l'astronomia. Ai miei tempi ricordo che leggevo sui libri di astronomia che la magnitudo limite per foto riprese con il telescopio da 5 m di Mount Palomar era la 23esima o 24esima (se non ricordo male). Io da almeno trent'anni non segue più l'astronomia, per cui vorrei sapere, per pura curiosità, con le tecniche ed attrezzature opportune, con un "non tanto misero" specchio diciamo da 12", a che magnitudo si arriva oggi? Non mi stupirei di sentirmi rispondere che si arriva ad una magnitudo non lontana da quella del telescopio di Mount Palomar. Aggiungo inoltre: complimenti per i tuoi scatti astronomici, IR e sferici. Grande tecnica e bella inventiva soprattutto per le foto sferiche. |
| sent on January 17, 2017 (10:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I thank you for the compliments, but I'm sorry not to be of help with your question about the magnitude, I have to be honest I do not have this notion, and like you I could not amaze me !!! Hello ! :-D Ti ringrazio per i complimenti, mi spiace però di non esserti di aiuto con il tuo quesito sulla magnitudine, devo essere sincero non ho questa nozione, e come te potrei non stupirmi !!! Ciao ! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |