What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 11, 2015 (23:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Andrea. Be 'and normal since you're starting now. Let's say there are machines that have the processor and the points of focus very accurate and reliable, and this often makes the difference with machines under-performing, we talk about birds in flight. The bee-eaters are, in my opinion, especially among the most difficult to do in flight. Then there are species still impossible for me as swallows and swifts. Even the waders small. Martini. Passerines. The birds of prey are engaged much better systems even if there are difficult situations. Anyway I have not much experience on the flight but I really like because difficult. Good night and thanks Ciao Andrea. Be' e normale visto che stai iniziando ora. Diciamo che ci sono delle macchine che hanno il processore ed i punti di messa a fuoco molto precisi ed affidabili e questo molte volte fa la differenza con macchine meno performanti, parliamo di uccelli in volo. I gruccioni sono, secondo me, tra le specie più difficili da fare in volo. Poi ci sono specie per me ancora impossibili come rondini e rondoni. Anche i limicoli di piccole dimensioni. Martini. Passeriformi. I rapaci diurni sono agganciati molto meglio dai sistemi anche se ci sono delle situazioni più difficili. Cmq non ho ancora molta esperienza per il volo ma mi piacciono molto proprio perché difficili. Buona notte e grazie |
| sent on November 10, 2015 (18:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great for background subject pdr sharpness. Your photos show conclusively that, even in nature, you can make good pictures with equipment not "professional." Despite the example of Juza, the site has spread the belief that, to get good shots, the equipment weight more than those who use it. : Fconfuso: Fantastica per soggetto sfondo pdr nitidezza. Le tue foto dimostrano in modo inconfutabile che, anche in naturalistica, si possono fare ottime foto anche con attrezzature non "professionali". Malgrado l'esempio di Juza, nel sito è diffuso il convincimento che, per ottenere buoni scatti, l'attrezzatura pesi più di chi la usa.  |
| sent on November 10, 2015 (19:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You make me blush with this great compliment. I I put all and I thank you sincerely Claudio although I recognize the greater quality of photos taken with pro equipment. From the time I took the 70d I'll try to improve something for shooting in flight but it would take quite a canvas original Canon. Mi fai arrossire con questo grande complimento. Io ce la metto tutta e ti ringrazio Claudio anche se sinceramente riconosco la maggiore qualità degli scatti fatti con attrezzature pro. Dai ora che ho preso la 70d vedrò di migliorare qualcosa per gli scatti in volo ma ci vorrebbe un bel tele originale Canon. |
| sent on November 10, 2015 (19:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Do not be confused about the quality of 'equipment: I recommend a Canon ef 500 4.5 unregulated which also costs 2000 euro and that the pictures in the air makes as f: 4 II is that costs four times as much (just close to 2/3 stop). :-) Non farti confondere sulla qualità dell' attrezzatura: ti consiglio un Canon ef 500 4.5 non stabilizzato che costa anche 2000 euro e che nelle foto in volo rende come f:4 is II che costa quattro volte di più (basta chiudere di 2/3 di stop). |
| sent on November 10, 2015 (21:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Claudio, will not believe it but the 500 4.5 and 'just what I see right for me even if not disdain, indeed, a zoom 150-600 (see Sigma sport) because I missed a lot of shots because I was too long with 300 duplicated. Claudio, non ci crederai ma il 500 4,5 e' proprio quello che vedo giusto per me anche se non disdegno, anzi, uno zoom 150-600 (vedi il sigma sport) perché ho perso un sacco di scatti proprio perché ero troppo lungo con il 300 duplicato. |
| sent on December 27, 2015 (13:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
As beautiful as all the pictures I've seen in your galleries, congratulations and greetings. Bella come tutte le foto che ho visto nelle tue gallerie, complimenti e un saluto. |
| sent on December 27, 2015 (13:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Antonio fantastic compliments !!! Fantastica Antonio complimenti !!! |
| sent on December 27, 2015 (13:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Many thanks to Loris and Paul. Salutone and a good Sunday Grazie mille a Loris e Paolo. Un salutone e buona domenica |
| sent on April 30, 2016 (13:22)
Hello
Very wonderful flight shot. |
| sent on April 30, 2016 (17:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks shahab
A greeting
Antonio Grazie shahab
Un saluto
Antonio |
| sent on June 24, 2023 (19:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice bee-eater on the fly, perfectly stopped.
Great shot, congratulations. Bel gruccione al volo, perfettamente fermato.
Ottimo scatto, complimenti. |
| sent on June 24, 2023 (19:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Cesare
Buon w.end Grazie Cesare
Buon w.end |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
