Few days ago, thanks to Michele (
www.passionenatura.com), I have had the occasion to compare my Canon 1DsIII with new Nikon flaghship, the 24 megapixels Nikon D3x. When it has been announced, the D3x has been heavily criticized for its high price: a $ 8000 SLR has still a market today, when $ 2500 SLRs offers similar performances at 1/3 the price?
Yes and no. Yes, because in some aspects the D3x and the 1DsIII are better than their cheaper alternatives (more rugged, 100% viewfinder, state of art autofocus), and the photographers that value these aspect will accept to pay the premium price to have "the best". No, because if I had to choose now I'd no longer buy the 1DsIII or another $ 8K camera: cheaper cameras does the 95% of what you can do with 8 K cameras, and that's enough for me, even for professional work. With the money I'd save I'd make a couple of nice trips, or I'd buy a new lens or a RED Scarlet :-)
Anyway, the D3x is an amazing camera; it is on par with the Canon 1DsIII, and in some aspects it is even slightly better! I have made a detailed comparison at every ISO sensitivity and I have tested the camera on the field photographing birds.
 
Image quality comparison
I have photographed the same scene with the Nikon D3x and with the 1DsIII; both photos had been taken at 70mm f/11, with tripod and mirror lock up. The images had been taken in RAW and converted with RawTherapee (I prefer Adobe Camera RAW, but currently it does not support the Nikon D3x). All the parameters where on the same values; I have disabled sharpening and noise reduction.
The image above is the test target, and the area highlighted in red, in the center of the image, is the area shown in the following crops. In terms of dynamic range the two cameras are identical, and the resolution is similar (the D3x has a slight advante, but it is a minor difference), so I have focussed my attention on noise. Usually I show 100% crops, but since here the differences are minimal here I show 200% crops.