|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.user157477   | sent on February 26, 2019 Pros: Weight, size balanced on a 6500, colours, focal length excursion (equal to 24 105) build quality, Zeiss lenses, Cons: The price a bit exaggerated but Zeiss is Zeiss Opinion: It goes around with a 24 105 equivalent from the weight and footprint contained. Well balanced on Alpha 6500, makes it stable to those who have a little big hands, you go around doing almost everything with weights and clutter content compared to Nikon D 7200 \\d 7500 + 16 80 There is no comparison you put in a fanny pack and go. Beautiful colors taken by chance without even wanting it with Alpha 6500 used at a ridiculous price I must admit it is a really nice coupled recommended. |
 | sent on February 22, 2019 Pros: Build quality, weight and bulk, overall yield, F4 constant Cons: Price of the new Opinion: Found used, I use it for a couple of months for my travels, I have to say I was really satisfied. Decidedly good build quality, excellent color rendition, F4 constant, the AF responds well, excellent range of focal, photographers from landscapes to some portrait with a discrete blurred and is not cumbersome, I do not understand who complains about the size, is still a Zoom with 16-70 focal, not a 20mm pancake. I think it's the best handyman in circulation for APS-C, the only flaw in the price of the new, really altino. |
 | sent on January 25, 2018 Pros: Excellent build quality and optics Cons: Price of the new impractical, elongation Opinion: Taken used at an acceptable price, new is not feasible, to have a standard objective to be mounted on A6000.rnThe jump from 16-50 of the kit is noticeable, do not yell at the miracle but get some pictures worthy of being printed and published. The zoom is mechanical and not electric so it remains fixed even if you turn off the machine (very useful if you have the camera on the stand waiting to shoot), the ferrules are well sized and fluid at the right point.rnThe equipment includes a hood with a graft serious and a cap already less performante.rnFa have on condition to find it at an acceptable price.rnThe fall of quality at the edges is irrelevant in normal use. |
  | sent on January 02, 2018 Pros: Lightweight, compact to be an F 4, saturated and very realistic colors. Cons: Price of the new too high Opinion: I bought this lens to replace the 16-50 supplied with the nex6 and I am fully satisfied, even if the 16-50 did not go as badly as they say.rnWe say the zeiss is something else that compensates the price difference from the 16-50, is well balanced with my nex 6 and favors a better grip, rnregala superb and real colors, sharpness for a zoom of 16-70 and more than good, I say this after possessing the Nikon 16-85 that was not bad but the zeiss is another story that should be discovered hand, hand that you learn to use it.rnFor the price just buy a good used, as many people criticize this lens, it remains easy to find on the used market .rn Regarding the comparisons that some make on the internet, leave them to the genes of photography that continually rage on the web with opinions that have nothing to do with real photography. |
 | sent on July 26, 2017 Pros: Versatility, constant openness. Cons: Price, build quality, aberration and fall at the edges. Opinion: I use it on a6000 for a couple of months, chosen as most users more for lack of alternatives than for the desire to have it. Taken also used, the price still remains high. The build quality has left me a little puzzled: the dials are not regular and flow little fluid, the painting is very delicate, it is easily marked (hiking use) and is not tropicalized. I do not express myself on whether it is a real Zeiss or not as I have never tried others but I do not think that the average quality of this brand is this. The image yield is good on all the millimeters and at all openings, I did not notice such sharp drops at the edges, at 16mm f4 the thing is a little more noticeable. In short, it is a good zoom all-rounder, the main problem of this lens is the price that does not fully digest its all in all discrete qualities. Optical rating: 7 Rating assigned q/p: 7. Update to two years of use: I confirm about everything reported at the beginning but evaluating better and more thoroughly the optics, the fall at the edges is present as well as an obvious chromatic aberration. Down the optics vote to 7. |
 | sent on February 06, 2017 Pros: Versatility, build quality, size and weight, overall yield Cons: high price, sharpness at the edges Opinion: It is a versatile zoom, make saturated colors, holds well against the light, it weighs little, perfectly favors the autofocus mirrorless Sony and has an excellent yield in the middle. The sides falls? Well, patience, "not only sharpness at the edges live optics". rnih conclusion I would say that for daily use, travel, documentary, is an excellent zoom, but it is not suitable to replace fixed perspective in fine-art prints. |
 | sent on December 12, 2016 Pros: Lightweight, compact, well constructed, great design, stabilized Cons: Highly priced, lack of physical AF off and stabilizer off, manual focus ring does not mechanically move the optics, drop in extreme angles with infinite maf to the minimum a and maximum focal length Opinion: Used on A6000 by 24Mp. Meanwhile, let's just say one thing: it's the only zoom of this "serious" focus on the market with attack E, and seriously I can use it for all focuses and all the diaphragms. The sharpness is good in the center even at 16mm, less in corners with infinite maf. At intermediate focal points, the situation improves, and then returns to 70mm. It feels better at short distances at all focal lengths, very good at short distances, especially in portraits where a blur soft enough allows great shots. I have the feeling that 24 Mpx on an aps-c would crunch any zoom. However, everything can be solved in post, where you get good results with some MDC work. On the A6000, thanks to its lightness and compact size, it integrates very well. Being branded Zeiss T * would expect an excellent anti-loop treatment, and I must say that it is functional. The use in af is good, responsive and silent, unfortunately we can not say the same as in manual focus. The ring has no referenceEntities, it does not move the optical array and is difficult to use unless it has already been focused in af and then put into the machine manual because it sends the OFF AF physical button. In short, to use always and only in af. Not even the stabilizer, which empirically gave me the impression of earning up to 3 stops, can be excluded from the optics but needs to get uncomfortable in the a6000 menu. The hood is comfortable and quick to mount, less the cap that is difficult to remove-put. 55 Unusual Filter Attachment. Low price for a Zeiss optic, in fact of this brand I would say it has only the badge, while it is very Sony in its approach and in the average performance. In conclusion this is the best zoom with sony E attack, but certainly not the one with the best value for money. Nb .. corrected some considerations, June 2017 |
 | sent on November 15, 2016 Pros: Lightweight, compact, crisp, great range of focal, auto-focus and stabilization Cons: Price Opinion: I bought this lens (used) for about six months and I'm very happy because it is a great all-rounder (perhaps the best for Sony E-Mount APSC) Quality ... just what I wanted! Rnal feel a sense of strength does not indifferent, very nice hood petalo.rnQuanto for performance I can say that is a clear lens (if I have the chance I prefer not to go below the f5.6) at all focal lengths, for me to be the best at f8 and f11 paesaggi.rnValidissimi for the 'autofocus and stabilization sore OSS.rnL'unica this goal for me is the price too high from both new that used and almost unused in low light conditions .... being a f4 you forces, or to raise both the iso or rely on flash ... rnNon know if recommending it because of the high price, however, I think you deserve a nice 8 ... |
 | sent on November 02, 2016 Pros: light Cons: of Zeiss has only the blue stamp, slightly crisp, expensive for the quality that has, Opinion: call zeiss it takes a lot of courage! for the quality that should cost half of the half, I use it on a sonya6000 and between the machine and the lens does not know who the worst, compared with photos taken with a Canon D10 and 16-35 f 2.8 Lusm wins the canon great, I'm talking about a 16 year old car does! rnspero in sony will understand they have to do one zeiss dedicated to APSC as the a600 with 2,8f opening and with quality lenses, so even a little 'longer heavy but quality if no photos are disgusting! best to use a RX100 iii that falls short of very little, as the quality of prints, the a6000 with Zeiss 16-70mm however you put it in your pocket !!!! rnio if I were you expect to come out something new on the market! Save! |
 | sent on January 12, 2016 Pros: Lightweight, well-built mechanically, well rub the soft ferrules without jamming, compact and excellent optical performance in the center. Cons: Edges a bit 'soft and they say a little' dear, I still have purchased new about € 680. Opinion: A goal which I have been slow to buy, because a review not exactly flattering read in internet, remarked that too negatively the few faults that if they did. Now the 80% use cases and never leave home because your excursion covers most of the situations. I use it with Sony NEX7 and satisfies me completely with excellent results from f5.6 to f11, 16mm and 70mm wide angle is a creative even an average right canvas for reportage and street. I go often combining the Sony 55-210mm that I keep finding myself mounted on Sony in 6000, with the two bodies, the hiked focal 24mm up to 315mm with a total weight of about 1.5 kg, and no need to make engagement and disengagement with risk of dirtying the sensors. That dire..consigliato !! |
 | sent on July 27, 2015 Pros: Compact, lightweight and very good quality (although not perfect, but it is a zoom ...) Cons: A little 'pricey ... Opinion: Superb lens lightweight, compact and very versatile. Covers the entire range of focal lengths that usually use (allowing me to make the change perspective, the minimum possible !!!), with a quality quite good; It is excellent in the middle, a little 'less than the edges, but doing almost exclusively landscape this is not a problem (I use it between f / 8 and f / 11). The AF is really very veloce.rn |
  | sent on February 12, 2015 Pros: Compact and lightweight, fast and silent AF, sharp in the center, f / 4 constant Cons: corners slightly crisp, fairly high price Opinion: The Sony 16-70 f / 4 is exceptionally compact and lightweight (only 300 grams!), And offers an excellent range of focal coupled to the diaphragm constant f / 4. The AF is very fast and totally silent; image stabilization is a big help in handheld shooting. The image quality at the center of the frame is excellent for any aperture and focal length, while the corners are quite soft wide open at the 16 and 70mm focal lengths; improve the focal intermediate and, at all focal lengths, you can get an acceptable sharpness in the corners, closing to f / 11, the diaphragm I use the most in landscape photography. Overall, a good goal, but not perfect. |
 | sent on January 16, 2015 Pros: Very versatile, crisp, perfect for the street Cons: Recently purchased, for now I do not see obvious defects Opinion: I took a few days, coupled with Sony A6000. I thought about it a bit 'before you buy it, is not that cost very little. I took it for fascination (the brand Zeiss intrigues always) but also for exclusion: zoom ordinance, the 16-50, did not convince me at all. I already have a full frame Nikon kit, but I wanted a lightweight instrumentation, barely visible to the street. A Leica of the poor, in fact. So no interchangeable lenses (for now), but a single lens handyman: in this sense, the 16-70 is very reliable, covering a range of 24-100mm (thinking in terms of full frame) with which you can do everything. And 'f4, not very bright, but in return is a fixed-f4. In Nikon full frame, the optical f4 gave an excellent account of themselves. Optics sharp, especially in the center. The edges you notice a slight decline, but absolutely acceptable. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
