JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Panasonic Lumix G X 35-100mm f/2.8 is a tele lens for 4/3, manufactured from 2012 to 2017 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1099 €;
19 users have given it an average vote of 9.6 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Micro 4/3: this lens is compatible with mirrorless micro-4/3.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Compact size, does not stretch, balanced weight, colors, internal stabilization
Cons:Lack of key or other mode to switch from AF to MF, some parts of the barrel are plastic
Opinion:Among the Pro lenses in my kit (Zuiko and PanaLeica that I have or have owned) this is the best. Weight, size, colors. The blur is also excellent. Too bad it doesn't have a button on the barrel like the PanaLeica 12-60, or an alternative mode like the Zuiko 12-40, to switch from AF to MF without having to enter the camera settings. It is a half-all-rounder, ranging from the portrait set to the medium canvases, only the wide part is missing. It is also great for street if you are looking for details in the city and great for portraits. I took this first version because found on offer, and from the various reviews, almost nothing changes from the mkii (the latter seems to have an extra degree of tropicalization) if not the color (the mkii is undoubtedly more appealing than the first version). Great for family trips like Playground, or hiking in the mountains where you do not need to do birdlife and do not need mm more. If they made a 35-150mm with these qualities and the same dimensions (even if a little bigger) I don't think I would change it, because for me this focal range is perfect in this lens. For more mm I would rely on lenses designed for specific uses such as the 100-300 or the 100-400. It is certainly among the objectives considered "essence of micro 4/3".
Pros:Very high quality, both optical and mechanical
Cons:Nobody
Opinion:I have been using this objective for several years with great satisfaction. As others have said, I consider it the true essence of micro 4/3. It has a spectacular yield in 10 cm in length and about 350 grams, at all diaphragms, the autofocus is very fast and the stabilizer extremely effective, the blurry is pleasant, almost on par with the equivalent fixed focals. And Sorry it's not much.
Opinion:If you had to ask me which optics more than any other has appreciated of this system the answer would be obvious: Panasonic 35-100 2.8. 10cm 350gr 70-200eq f2.8 fixed (pdc double rapportata to FF) stabilized tropicalized blurred wonderful AF precise fast and quiet I have to say anything else? I use it both for portraits and in landscaping and it never disappoints. Mounted on oly EM1 it behaves very well perfectly balanced and imposed the priority on the stabilization of the lens that in particular from 80mm up a wire works better than that of the camera body. If I had to find a defect I would say the wheeled ferrule, comfortable when it's cold since it does not become icy like the one in metal oly, but also catches a lot of dust. Also my sample is perfect but I have seen several ruined on the barrel in the lower part or discolored so I think they are delicate from this point of view. That said to find something wrong I had to commit, the 35-100 2.8 100% embodies the philosophy of m4 / 3 and takes the system on another level with regard to weight and size. I advisewithout reserve it will never disappoint you. At the moment it is a fixed pair with the 8-18 panale and they form a deadly combination.
Opinion:I have very few days this goal. Speaking brightness seems an understatement considering that it can be read in the datasheet ... Then I'll talk about what I've tried and I've found it, then: compact and fast. Autofocus lightning. Accurate and reliable. Create beautiful blurred and freezes the image instantaneously. I found in him what I hoped; He has not disappointed me. I recommend it to everyone, especially now that you can find much more affordable! I've paid 750 euro complete with accessories, box and warranty of 4 years (two months and even up to 100 shots), so I think I did a good buy! Plus they gave me accompanied to it, the filter uv ultra slim. What, it's just like we imagine! I highly recommend it to everyone!
Pros:image quality, portability, speed AF, bokeh, construction, tropicalization
Cons:Compared with the Zuiko 50mm in less; Macro has no qualities.
Opinion:I use this lens on Olympus bodies (E and E-M1-M10 first version), after using it for almost two years, 40-150 2.8 Pro Zuiko.rnVenendo the Pros: Very high image quality already at room temperature, with a yield less harsh Olympus that has a bit from its' sharpness more. The blur is smooth and progressive; fast and accurate AF. When you consider that weighs less than a 12-40, and is only 10 cm long I would say that the philosophy of portability characterizing the m4 / 3 system is respected in full. And it is why I chose it. The lens is tropicalized, the building is very good. rnRispetto the Zuiko, it has less travel and has no macro skills.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.