JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Nikon D60 : Specifications and Opinions

Reviews
Cameras
Cameras Nikon
Nikon D60

Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this camera.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Nikon D60)

What do you think about this camera?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

user120016

sent on March 22, 2017

Pros: compact, very light,

Cons: lack upper display. Poor resistance to noise for high ISO.

Opinion: From an entry level no one can expect an excellent quality, yet it does its job very well. Small and handy, find the space in your bag everyday. With heavy optical bilanciatissima but it is not to be put into account. As well as fatigue in low light. The battery lasts an eternity. like all machines in its class lacks the sub dial and sometimes this lack weighs. Ultimately, good car for those who want to enter the DSLR world without spending absurd figures, thanks to the excellent quality / price ratio.

Pucci Mirti della Valle

sent on November 07, 2016

Pros: Weight "almost" compact, reliability, quality and price (I paid $ 81 in San Francisco in 2012), reliability, saturated colors

Cons: He has his years, details not very exciting, already at 400 iso limps night as a high-end smartphones of today, very few focus points

Opinion: View a showcase of San Francisco, I fell in love right away by its compactness and its weight (since I turned to S.Francisco with a Milnolta Konica Maxxum 5D (which still possess) that only the body weighed 799 grams. .. outlet with the 18-55 adored now also for color and for its solidity. Used unpretentious, it performs very well, even better than many other of today's cameras; lowered in the evening it is best to leave it in the drawer, because it suffers lot high iso, already 400 there is a lot of noise, 800 iso files are unusable. Since its reliability, however, has (despite being helpless tropicalization) uncompromising and comparisons. though I have brought in the rivers, in caves, sea, motorcycle, boat, and never a problem, never a dirt on the sensor wire, never a hitch. Unfortunately, it is very slow to process the files, in fact, if you take pictures at night with long exposure and iso "tall "(200-400), and the processing time equal to the duration of a marriage rite with ceremonyfestivities. He also has his years but is perfect as a training ship, I still use as a reserve toy, or use my girlfriend when we go out to take pictures and I must say that the RAW are astounding for colors and color range. Is guilty of little details marked with 18-55, but if you use a lens of high range as the 28 f1.8 or f4.0 17-70 or even the 70-200 f2.8 then everything changes, becomes a jewel. The advice to all for his ridiculous the used price. I realized it about 30,000 times and the owner before me about 10,000.

Alerossi

sent on July 10, 2016

Pros: very light and comfortable, optimum quality / price

Cons: 3 points focus, sometimes problems in 'AF, He suffers ISO, Serial exposures, loss of quality in non-optimal lighting situations

Opinion: It 'was my first Reflex 2-3 years ago and it is at present, but in the coming months will pass in D7200.rnEssendo a car almost 10 years, and given the current price I think it will be great for those who want to start with a good machine spending very little to see if the picture can become a passione.rnLa I find easy to handle, lightweight and comfortable, especially in important aspects viaggi.rnCon above ISO 400 you see a lot of noise, but under certain lighting conditions (especially at night) the noise is also ISO bassi.rnRipeto that quality / price is excellent!

Fiorenzo Fiorenza

sent on November 08, 2015

Pros: Light, handy, easy to use, precise and extremely reliable.

Cons: It lacks internal motor for focusing. Much noise at high ISO, resolution and few limited functions, but are normal for an "entry level", for more of his time.

Opinion: The own for about six years and I was surprised to reliability. I used it a lot and often in "extreme" conditions, as in the cave with plenty of mud, water and humidity, or in the mountains with snow, but I have never betrayed, although a camera is not tropical conditions. Despite my frequent changes of perspective, even in dusty environments, the sensor cleaning system has so far proved effective. It does not require optical refined and, despite the major limitations of a camera-level, has produced (and still does) fine file, well exposed and with saturated colors and true, especially if triggered in good lighting conditions. Although now I switched to a much higher level of quality with the D7100, I consider it a camera that can still give great satisfaction for its ease of use. Excellent for imparare.rn

Paolo Defendenti

sent on September 14, 2015

Pros: Lightweight body, compact rnMacchina simple and easy to use, does not betray even if limited. very good at low ISO (400/800) supports that Ben must begin. Sensor cleaning excellent.

Cons: Limited if you ask an effort to Iso elevati.rnProdotta briefly

Opinion: Personally it's my "school ship", I find it versatile and not betray you ever. The exploit every opportunity is robust and simple leggera.rnUn AF, a bit 'slow but fully justified by the value of macchina.rnE' with me since 2009 and now I'm down to tile with a new Nikon (7200) not to abandon the safe .rnIn any case it allows optimal results despite was a entry-level .The buy back.

Andr.ea

sent on July 18, 2015

Pros: Lightweight compact. CCD sensor. Good image quality and color rendering. It exposes perfectly. AF only 3 points but precise. Excellent yield lower ISO.

Cons: 1 ring. ISO yield good up to no more than 400/800.

Opinion: First SLR. Easy to use and understand. Digest well every optics. He exposes perfectly allows despite its 10Mpx good print resolutions. I usta for 4 years where I pulled my neck and I was always satisfied. Now I rediscovered after selling D7000 and I'm still satisfied. He was always fascinated with the yield of the CCD, for color and tonal range. His humble af missed very few times. The advice to those who have big claims and must learn.

Caneca

sent on April 09, 2015

Pros: The synthesis of the SLR world, essential, practical, good to learn how to photograph.

Cons: All the limitations that may belong to a low-end SLR ...

Opinion: My first reflex.rnE 'excellent as a gateway to SLR photography, it is easy to use, and despite being a' machine 'asserts itself! The CCD sensor is then almost a rarity, with bright colors and shining forms. The black and white picture then reminiscent of Leica (with some differences, of course) .rnCome all DX low-end, suffers a bit 'in the absence of light, but the files, although noisy, are still fascinating, pasty and saturated . Under optimal conditions of light, however, it is a time bomb, with the 18-55 goes like a dream, almost unique in some ways, even by DX higher end. The D3000 is a worthy heir, although a bit 'more modern, and perhaps more digitalosa.rn

Esteban

sent on December 13, 2014

Pros: Very versatile, easy and fun to use, whether you are a beginner it is a bomb. A guarantee (as indeed it must be a Nikon). To all you need if you want to take good pictures. Combined with the objective 55/200 you can do close-ups beautiful. The possibility of being able to do everything in auto mode for more "lazy" is a salvation!

Cons: You can not ask for more in a camera of Base (entry level). Otherwise it means that you have not bought the right for you! Not for nothing on the book of instructions wrote in 2008: Nikon D60 One step from Picture Perfect !!! How can you not buy it?

Opinion: Now I am five years of satisfaction for me, with this camera, and if you were to go back behind the buy back! Of course now I'm getting a little tight, but it's just so. So many times we "want" more just for the sake of having, but today with the D60 can do much good pictures by spending the least. With the models (in its class) on the day of today, suffers a little advancements in performance, but it's still a great quality camera.

user36759

sent on January 03, 2014

Pros: Small, light, line quality files with Big Sisters of the time, great autonomy, combined with a compact, quality becomes even more fixed CCD sensor, sensor cleaning system effective

Cons: Active d-lighting brings the noise even at low iso, digital noise reduction not that good

Opinion: Great reflex, not the heartwarming! I owned it for three years, and thanks to its compact size I took her everywhere and in all weather conditions (of course with caution since it is not tropical) and I did many of my best shots. In combination with the high-quality becomes a fixed compattona and at low iso can still speak his mind. The sensor cleaning system does its job great, never needed cleaning! Big autonomy of the battery. I was very satisfied. But I changed only to switch to Fuji S5. I could go back the buy with your eyes closed!

Willy73

sent on August 26, 2012

Pros: price, light weight, ease of use suitable for non-experts

Cons: internal engine failure, lack quick settings

Opinion: excellent entry level without great pretensions, but be able to churn out good file, the lack of quick settings makes it a little slow adjustment having to necessarily go through the menu and the lack of internal af motor allows you to use the most of all the optics having to focus when focus hand with those without an engine proprio.nel Overall I had this machine for about two years and I recommend it to anyone who wants to explore the world without spending exorbitant amounts reflex or as a second body

Lorenzo D60

sent on August 10, 2012

Pros: light and with many programs

Cons: lacks internal motor

Opinion: excellent performance for money is very beautiful photos using good goals and stabilized with a tripod has no problems of any kind with economic objectives and unregulated also recommended for those who love to take pictures with a second machine without regretting something more expensive I personally have made some macro and landscapes that I have met

Reviews » Cameras » Cameras Nikon » Nikon D60 » All Opinions