JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Weight, absence of the tripod fastening ring, internal reflections that break down the optical quality (correctable), manual focus that at 400mm eq. it limits its use a lot
Opinion:I've had this lens for more than 20 years and it's always been love and hate. I didn't understand why he went crazy from time to time making the photographs tarred until I happened to read on the internet that he has problems with an internal plate that reflects the light. I then used the lens as a telescope by putting it close to the eye to understand the point of view of the sensor, I pointed out towards the light and realized that that plate does not reflect but even dazzles the sensor! I then shielded the plate with a matte black cloth and black felts (the ones used at the foot of the chairs). I use this lens with the micro 4/3 system, so I take advantage of the central part of the lens by doubling its actual focus to 400mm, so the added thicknesses do not interfere with the sensor. This is the photo of the saucer: https://postimg.cc/RqQtSwgn This is the embarrassing before and after: https://postimg.cc/ZvZJsBNG This is the whole photo of the example: https://postimg.cc/7fH2fbRt With the edit now I have practically another lens, with a completely different character and I take a few months to complete this review. Update: I confirm that the plate change has completely changed the character of the lens. Sharp photos at all openings, the better you have at f5.6. Now the only suffering is the manual focus that for certain situations is very penalizing, otherwise it is a jewel!
Pros:Very vintage and pleasant photo rendering. Nice blurred in the background if the distance from the subject is adequate. You find it cheaply. Resistant
Cons:A bit 'of chromatic aberrations but not very annoying. The weight is really important, we are talking about a mini metal and glass tank. Someone in my opinion should build something to allow you to use the tripod.
Opinion:It's a vintage lens that I found among the things of my grandmother and therefore I did not have great ambitions. Evidently I had to change my mind. During an evening at the theater the lens was even better than the Nikon 55-200 f / 4.5-5.6. Of course, if you're tired of heavy tools, this lens is not for you. It is completely made of metal and glass, which makes it very resistant. Every now and then there are chromatic aberrations but nothing disastrous. Taking into account the fact that this lens is on the market at a price of around € 70, I think it is absolutely worth it. I would also spend € 50 more to take it if I did not have it. Very "soft" light that makes the photos pleasant. I advise. It also makes you do exercises for the biceps.
Pros:indestructible, good yield, interesting blur, very low price
Cons:weight (but it is all metal and glass), a bit 'dark, missing hook for tripod
Opinion:be prepared to support almost a kilo of glass and metal, this lens weighs almost as much as a 2.8 canvas! the construction is impeccable, we could break the nuts, and despite its years my sample looks really new. it should definitely be used outdoors, given the minimum distance to focus and the lack of brightness. like the other lenses of his time he suffers the conroluce, but nothing disastrous. blurred important and interesting, with the right light gives great shots, given the price is definitely worth having it in the kit.
Pros:Sharpness and contrast ratio of valuable objectives and famous name
Cons:considerable weight although partly justified by military-style building. Lacks a tripod mount on fiber
Opinion:In relation to the price paid 40 Euros for a specimen like new, complete with case and instructions ..and 'mostruoso.Delle beautiful images effettuatte with a Sony Mirrorless A5000.rnVisto the heavy weight around kg..si recommended aquisto of a 70mm ring (usually 68mm) to mount it on cavalletto.rnIl hood built is comfortable though not enorme.rnAccoppiato for a good focal doubler can 'become a great super tele for pictures naturalistiche.rn
Pros:Very high quality, low price for a 200mm fixed.
Cons:Prices are rising as for all optical vintage. It weighs a little bit but it is very solid.
Opinion:I bought this lens to have a fixed 200mm of great quality at a truly budget price. I was satisfied after using just the first volta.rnAvevo already a minimum hand in the use of optical full manual (and I slide for maf manual on canon 60d) and I must say that this objective as well as having a built enviable as to strength and materials (resulting in weight gain!) is also very good quality and photographs that churns are ottime.rnPersonalmente not find the weight of a defect, it, gives me a nice solid feel and you can handle very well freehand (no shooting almost never with the tripod).
Opinion:I recently found out that you have this lens I used it only 2 times. In ritatto I did decent photos. At bioparco a little 'less because I find it hard to focus manually even faster because of peso.Dovrei try monopiede.obiettivo very sharp. I did not understand if applying between it and my Sony Alpha 100 l 'adapter M42-SONY Alpha something better! Rn06, 07.2014 I just found this explanation on Wikipedia after reading a note on this subject made by the vineyard 88. Http :/ / it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/M42_ (photo) perhaps someone may be of interest.
Pros:200mm fixed cost good optical performance and very solid
Cons:To infinity loses punch against the disastrous for some could be heavy and of course full manual.
Opinion:Optics in my opinion ecceuzionale 50 euro better spent on a vetro.rnAd a first approach with manual lenses may seem cumbersome, but it is mastered in a short time with a lot of pissed soddisfazione.rnLo 20d and the complex actually pesantino but nothing impossible .. . RNA is relatively soft wide open but closed one stop is incredibly detailed and nitidio over short distances, pointing toward the horizon to infinity misfires and backlight completely sbarella but overall it does its job very well.
Pros:very low price, fixed lens, solid construction
Cons:heavy, not excellent optical quality, a bit dark
Opinion:memory of my father, it is a perspective that is more like a shell cannon, of weight and construction, all-metal, I personally would break easily if one foot out of hand, relatively inexpensive (the network is also within 40euro) is not is nothing exceptional after all, has a discutibilissimo hood and the aperture ring is prone to damage, some people (I have tested 3) and in particular mine, have fingerprints of those who have mounted on an inside! however, is not to throw it clear
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
