|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on September 20, 2022 Pros: Almost perfect machine. Cons: If she had the stabilization she would have been perfect Opinion: Beautiful light robust double slot machine excellent autofocus has all the features to be a top of the range at the height of the emblazoned Sony Nikon and Canon. The photo and video quality is great for being a 2018 camera. Even in 2022 it makes sense to buy it at a price around 1000 euros. The only flaw is the lack of stabilization. For the rest a fairy tale!! |
  | sent on August 11, 2022 Pros: Rings, af, used cost, solidity, durability, dedicated battery grip, sensor, operating capabilities. Cons: For photos no one , for video absence of the stabilizer , but it is not a real cons as on tripod or gimbal produces an exceptional quality with the 4k 60 fps Opinion: Hybrid medium more dedicated to photography, coming from xt4 I can say that the xt3 is identical in almost all respects only that it costs less! So I preferred two bodies , a stabilized xs10 flanked by this xt3 , with fixed Fuji optics , 23 1.4 wr fixed on xs10 and 50 1.0 wr fixed on xt3 , the 14 2.8 Xf taken for leisure in the street and other genres where you need a wide angle with zero distortions ... I mount it on xt3 because of the best screen for the street . |
  | sent on May 11, 2022 Pros: Speed , Af , colors , feeling , rings , dual slots , tiltable screen vertically , built well , safety keys on the rings , video , viewfinder Cons: Application on smartphones for disastrous control but it depends on the App Opinion: I approached Fuji with many perplexities, after a bad experience with the Xt2, only tried and an x100s with which the feeling never clicked, but those rings attracted me too much and so I decided, sold all the 4\\3 I switched to Fuji and there the love blossomed for the XT3. I have been working with her for 3 years now, I have used Fuji and Viltrox optics, always excellent results, noise at other iso manageable up to 6400 excellent up to 3200 but the best is reached within 800, the grain however is increasingly acceptable that with any other system has worked. The beauty of these machines is to be able to turn on the same being able to reset the parameters even earlier through the rings, also having the diaphragm ring on the optics available you return to manage the machine as with the analog and this is priceless. I bought through Amazon American a grip with 2 additional batteries of the Meike unobtainable in Italy (at least then) I can manage a whole day with this set, on any occasion. I consider it essential for the Fuji system, use Capture One, there is the free Express version, use it. I would take an XT4 solely to see if there is an improvement via the stabilizer. Recommended for those who want a real camera in hand |
 | sent on April 29, 2022 Pros: Af, construction, viewfinder, price, shutter Cons: Charger absent, Fujifilm which is without repair center in Italy, to implement more software features (HDR RAW, integrated ND, star AF etc) Opinion: The camera is 4 years old but it is really good, fast and responsive, the first Fuji really valid for sports, fast and durable shutter, discreetly good even in electronic even if the rolling shutter is lurking in lateral movements or too fast. The AF is pro, it must also be known to customize, the tracking is discreet even if there is not much to rely on, Eye Af quite ridiculous, luckily I do not use it. The viewfinder is always great and with very little blackout, the menu I find easy, Sony or Oly drive you crazy, after 4 years it is still a very valid and concrete camera, so much so that the X-T4 is a very limited upgrade. What would I like? First of all 2 batteries and double charger as an obligation for homes! Then more advanced software functions, stuff that had the first paid A7 (20/30 € of app) 10 years ago must be standard today on the rooms, a few bales. |
 | sent on February 08, 2022 Pros: Image Quality, Film Simulations, Colors, Responsiveness, Aesthetics, Viewfinder, Experience Cons: Battery Life Opinion: After almost a year of use I can only speak really well of this X-T3. Really fantastic construction, an object that is a pleasure to use even if different in ergonomics compared to my previous machines. I wanted to take this Fuji to find some pleasure in the shooting experience, something that I missed a lot. Coming from Sony FF (A7 III) I thought that the differences in IQ were appreciable, but at least in my case, this is not the case. Shooting only in RAW I did not have the opportunity to try the famous Fuji JPGs, but using Capture One you still have the opportunity to benefit from the Film Simulations. The machine is very ready if used constantly in performance mode (which is absolutely recommended). The Af is very good, although sometimes slightly uncertain in AF-C, in any case not at Sony levels. The only flaw is the battery life, in any case circumvented through the purchase of other batteries to take with you. A car that I personally love, since it makes me want to go out to photograph. Highly recommended. |
 | sent on December 21, 2021 Pros: Characteristic JPEGs, retro style controls, advanced video functions, professional features. Cons: X-trans cross and delight, AF not at the level of the competition, screen that goes jerky before stand-by. Opinion: For a video and/ or an amateur photographer, this XT-3 is among the best products you can take home currently at a cost not so high compared to the competition. In both areas it has a lot of customizable functions and features as for videos, although I rarely do it. I point out the functionality of pre-shooting in electronic viewfinder that saves on the frame card before fully pressing the shutter button. For those who miss the wheels of the old dear film SLRs, you can find here bread for your teeth; however, it can also be set to work with the two classic rings as in the current digital ones. Some find a not good battery life: something like this has never happened to me, especially when sometimes I did dynamic photography sessions with a few thousand shots that I worried more about full memory than about the remaining autonomy. Of course you have to use precautions so as not to waste energy. The X-trans sensor is just cross and delight of this system because it churns out already exceptional JPGs but the RAW to be exploited everything needs C1, unfortunately you do not escape the color matrix of this sensor: either you get used to C1 or you will have to endure the vermicelli that easily emerge on Lightroom or other similar retouching programs. As for the AF: in single there is nothing to say (if you are wrong it is probably your fault that you have not read the manual well), but in the continuous it still gives the impression of not being perfect. For heaven's sake, I'm not saying it's painful, but compared to the latest releases from Sony and Canon I expect Fuji to put itself at their level. Finally I found that the screen goes jerky before it turns off in stand-by, I have to press the shutter button halfway through to revitalize it. I did not understand if it is a defect only of my specimen, common or a "normal" feature. |
| sent on August 12, 2021 Pros: Style, ease of use, fantastic JPEGs Cons: Still too many problems in posts with Adobe programs Opinion: After two years of intense use I consider myself quite satisfied with the choice even if not too suitable for my type of photography. I came from Canon 6D and I noticed the improvements in portability, ease of use and fantastic look. In terms of image quality there are no improvements. I think it is excellent for genres or for photography that does not require excessive post because JPEGs are great and film simulations fantastic. Perfect for reportage, street, portraits and in my opinion perfect for a classic matrimonialist. For landscaping as in my case in short, it does its job but the post with Adobe programs just not, yes there are various programs to improve the management on LR but why make extra steps? I'm sorry to have left this brand because the potential is fantastic, but I recommend trying it out and trying its files to the limit before choosing. |
 | sent on July 15, 2021 Pros: iso, speed and responsiveness and in general reliability Cons: fuji menu a bit complex with unclear functions Opinion: I bought this x-t3 as a replacement for an old x-t10 and I must say that I was pleasantly surprised. the quality and reliability of this machine are great, not to mention the build quality which is outstanding. As problems encountered there are certainly the fuji menus that need to be improved, but also the little grip and the consequent battery a little too small, in fact to be well covered for a day you have to have at least 3 batteries. I recommend buying this instead of an x-t4 to those who make few videos, as the main difference is the stabilized sensor on the new one. Highly recommended machine. Good fuji! |
 | sent on July 14, 2021 Pros: Compact, aesthetically beautiful (for those who love a vintage aftertaste", fast in operation. Cons: AF slightly inferior to the competition, Nuts to learn to use. Opinion: Tried as soon as I came out hadn't impressed me. Now I took it back to replace the previous version (xt2) and I must say that beyond everything I found it at the fastest operational level, with a really excellent focus (but perhaps sony especially with EYE tracking is superior). File (especially the Jpeg) fantastic, interesting dimensions (and design, personally fantastic), for those looking for something to always keep behind (but watch out for the rings, you have to take your hand). There is a lack of stabilisation, but I cannot call it a 'cons'. No problem with the APP (iphone). |
| sent on April 06, 2021 Pros: Quality that you can barely perceive as soon as you hold it Cons: It can be frustrating to see how many customizations you can make through the countless menu items Opinion: A little gem. After so many years of pentax analog and digital SLRs, this was a discovery; the quality of the photos even with the 18-55 kit in my opinion is excellent. A great advantage (the infinite possibilities of customization) can also be a defect for those who are not a professional because it can be frustrating to discover that they cannot exploit all its potential, but it must be said that even to use it in a basic way you get beautiful photos. I like vintage style rings that at a glance indicate the settings without the need to look in the crosshairs or on the display. The viewfinder is a fairy tale. For me who was used to SLRs, being able to see the final result before shooting is a wonder, the focus almost never gets it wrong (I didn't try with particularly fast subjects). As everyone says, the quality of JPEG images is very high and I often don't feel the need to post-produce raw. I bought an adapter ring to use vintage Pentax furniture and the picture quality is higher than what I got with the Pentax! A small flaw in my opinion is the position of the front function button, too easy to press fortuitously. The only criticism I make of Fuji is about the remote camera app, it just doesn't work |
 | sent on April 01, 2021 Pros: Af, construction, intuitive rings, display, high iso color fidelity, film simulations (especially for black and white) Cons: Tends to underexpose, battery not properly performance Opinion: I do a review after months of use. The vintage construction and look entice you to snap. It is intuitive to use, the menus are quite clear and customizable in every aspect. After a while you learn to shoot in such a way as to have ready-made files in the room thanks to film simulations, but if you want to use only raw, with proper exposure, the files are malleable. I also allow respectable recoveries. Not 5 or 6 stops, but in that case it would mean disorence how it exposes itself. If it's a limit for someone, that's critical for me. The limitations of my tool allow me to learn how to agirarli, thus learning the rules of photography. The noise tightness, while not properly at the levels of a FF, is manageable for my needs. Since the xtrans sensor has the peculiarity of not producing excessive chroma noise, at least up to 6400 iso (besides so far I have not gone but from the tests seen on the web even beyond it is faithful to the colors). By having the right colors, the files that come out of it are still appreciable, since the grain of luminance noise is even more pleasant to me, compared to other brands I have tried. I use it mainly for street and portraits, in the latter case I am literally enthusiastic about the complexion it gives me. The lack of stabilization compared to the older sister xt4 for my gender is not a lack and it is preferred to this for the cockpit display, which also offers compared to the competition the possibility of being angled at 45 degrees when the machine is vertical. It's a best buy right now, since it offers top-of-the-range features. The only flaw could be the battery, discreet but with intensive use you do not take a day. Although fujifilms have the peculiarity of being very responsive as soon as they are turned on, which allows you to switch off and happen at the right time. The apsc sensor initially made my nose twist (more out of prejudice), then using it I recoiled on the potential of xtrans that needed some precaution: Capture 1, for example. Free for fuji, but even with LR the results are not despised. |
 | sent on March 17, 2021 Pros: AF, key customization, manual rings, jpg, dynamic range. Cons: Unintuitive download of files via SW. Opinion: In 2014 I bought the X-T1 which after three years I sold not because I was disappointed but only because I wanted to return to Canon FF. Today I have an X-T3 and a Canon R ... I bought back a Fuji, after 7 years, precisely the X-T3 that I have been owning for about 40 days. The camera externally looks like all those of the beautiful X-T series, captivating with a feeling of good robustness. Internally it has changed in everything compared to the X-T1 at both hw and sw level, changed for the better especially for the double slot, the AF, the complete customization of the keys and the operating speed in general. There are also the 26 megapixels that I didn't initially see as good as 6400 isos there are no big problems. Note of merit for Fuji jpgs which are really a nice plus with their film simulations. Difficult to explain what Fuji jpgs are to those who have never tried them not a commercial move but a real added value that often makes you leave out raw. I set raw+jpg, raw slots1 i jpg slot2 and this thing gives me immediate access to the type of files I want to view and/or work with. I raw them work with C1 free for Fuji when the image has grass trees or anything similar for the rest I use Fuji raw file converter also free. On the other hand I wrote I did a lot of rehearsals but I can't get the download to work via SW so I take off the SDs and download with an external player. |
 | sent on March 06, 2021 Pros: Design, operating speed, AF, rings Cons: No key backlight, continuous AF in tracking mode consumes like an 80s biturbo maserati Opinion: Predicting that I bought it at the exit of the X-T4 with an online offer and also with fuji cashback (so paying it a price more than halved compared to the launch price), at certain figures I would say that the machine is simply formidable. The experience of use thanks to fuji's typical rings, joystick and quick menus is fantastic: the machine is fast, customizable, well built and ergonomic. Hard to miss a shot. The file quality is good and the dynamic range is there, however if you are looking for high ISO performance or detail rendering at pushed magnifications, this is not the product for you. The right machine, on the other hand, for those who love a little grain in the file, those who appreciate the fantastic fuji film simulations and those who want to take advantage of a compact body in aps-c format. Well the firmware updates that brought the same AF as the xt4 however remain some problems to solve, such as the inhuman consumption of the battery with continuous AF in tracing mode. Too bad the keys are not backlit, the shots at night are more tiring. Overall, if you're not thirsty for supermegapixellate FF details and stabilized sensors, with this XT3 you can now make a deal. |
 | sent on February 06, 2021 Pros: Sensor, Autofocus, Video Capacity, Construction, Value for Money, Color Profiles, File Workability, Machine Vexatility, Monitor and EVF Cons: Battery life (especially on video), silver paint delicacy, lack of dedicated button for REC Video Opinion: [Review after a year of regular and intensive professional use] The X-T3 was my first purchase (I took two) which sanctioned the definitive Switch from Sony (A7R III). I liked the machine visually right away: vintage look, construction and a really nice menu immediately pop to the eye, but the real surprise I had when I started working on it. On photography it is the only brand together with Panasonic (Sistema S) with which I found myself working with extreme satisfaction in Jpeg, the sensor brings out results that have nothing to envy to the much vaunted Full-frame, especially when combined with the right optics. On the video side the surprises do not end, because this car so cute (sometimes even too much for me) churns out a 4k 60p file of incredible beauty and workability; if you then, like me, use it with an Atomos Ninja V you will go from 8 to 10bit and the internal battery of the machine will benefit. The battery, as specified above in the cons, is the real drawback of this machine especially if you use it on video: you will hardly make more than 20min in 4k 60 without having to change it, while in the photo the duration attested by me is between 400 and 500 shots (with bluetooth and wifi turned off and use in slow burst CL or single shot S) which leads you to two options that are not mutually exclusive. The first is to buy the battery grip (take its, on the used are located at really bargain prices), built really well that allows you to accommodate two more batteries with related extra batteries or the second that is to buy only the latter. At current prices it is impossible to find a similar PRO tool, I personally am not nostalgic for Sony and even in the switch I benefited in some components to which my R III and in general Sony was quite allergic/deficient (video side and color profiles for example). To date the T3 represents my second photo/video body from Tripod while I recently added a T4 as the main body and for handhelds, although I had already worked with great satisfaction with the T3. My advice is to try it without prejudice, all the paranoids inherent in sensor size / do not feel pro if you use an APS-C sensor will pass you when you start looking at the first files I hope this feedback can come in handy, a greeting! p.s. if you buy Silver put your soul in peace, if you use it without using it with gloves sooner or later a scratch /ruler somewhere will pop up! |
 | sent on January 26, 2021 Pros: practicality, customizable and very intuitive menu, image quality for an apsc, the rings for the settings you have everything in hand, excellent car focus and then its lightness and its measurements make it the top Cons: battery but relatively fair to add something to the cons tick. aaaa another against and that hard to get rid of Opinion: after various brands used this was the one I liked the most, I have had two for more than a year, I use them mainly with fixed optics and I tell you that it is an amazing machine. An immediate approach thanks to the practicality of the rings and the menu very well done and customizable, after an agreed day of work thanks to its lightness and size of footprint does not tire you as it happens with the classic mammoth bricks, a camera that invites you to shoot and not to mention the quality of the image you to photographically that in video. I've never had a car for such a long time (in fact I threw money at it) not to mention the really ridiculous price for what it offers. The conclusion and that I am fully satisfied this is my personal opinion, it all depends on the type of photographic work you do. |
user182586  | sent on December 30, 2020 Pros: Fuji image quality, burst, autofocus, viewfinder, film simulations, ghiere convenience Cons: Ergonomics, weight, non-tipper display, paint quality, battery, slight underexposure, IBIS lack Opinion: It was my third Fuji (after the X-E3 and X-T100), and I used it for two years, as an amateur, on numerous trips to Italy and abroad, with the 18-135, the 15-45 and the three fixed 12 f2 (Samyang) 23 f2 and 35 f1.4. I used it to take photos in different contexts: landscape, street, portraits, reportage. It represents the top of fuji image quality, amazing autofocus, and even more the burst, excellent with children and animals. The jpegs in the machine, with film simulations, are excellent and ready-made and you can customize aspects such as sharp contrast and grain in the machine. In terms of materials and construction it is a beautiful object to hold in your hand, and it fully returns the somewhat vintage-hipster feeling that distinguishes the line of many Fuji, and that induces you to buy it compared to others. But beware of paint, in two years it has gone away in several places, an indication of a not perfect construction quality. In terms of ergonomics I have an overall negative opinion: while it is true that the rings are always available, and also the quick controls to decide how to exposure, it is also true for the rest that it is too big and heavy to be an APS-C (it is as big as a Sony AIII), it does not have a significant grip and falls badly in the hands especially with objectives such as the 18-135. Finally, the screen is not completely tilting. The iso seal is good up to 3200 iso, at 6400 it depends a little on the subject of the photo. Be careful because the machine underlays slightly (problem that can be solved with the compensation ring). Excellent videos, the machine reaches 4k60fps (with a small crop). It should be remembered that there is no stabilization system and finally a battery with a limited life of about 350 shots. Fuji over the years has solved many problems especially with the X-T4 but also with the X-S10. |
 | sent on November 23, 2020 Pros: Construction quality, old style rings, customization, autofocus, viewfinder Cons: Battery Opinion: I switched to fujifilm from a Canon kit. I'm very happy with the choice. Finally a compact machine that you can take anywhere. The quality for me is excellent when combined with capture one that also provides the possibility to apply fujifilm film simulations. I absolutely do not regret the full frame. Honestly his vintage style pushes me to use it more than other cameras. I look at it when it's on the table and it looks like it says "let's go out and shoot." The only negative note, in my opinion, is the embarrassing battery life |
 | sent on November 01, 2020 Pros: Construction, fujifilm philosophy, menu, functions, sensor, film simulations Cons: Battery life, non-backlit buttons Opinion: The use for landscape and portrait photography. Immediately despite always being used to having FF machines I realized that the x-trans apsc sensor has an extra gear in terms of color fidelity and grain type very similar to film. Also excellent dynamic range despite the format. Accustomed to another system I immediately see how well Fujifilm has worked for menus, user interface, film simulations (fantastic), totally external rings / controls without the need to complicate life, as lately happens to come across other competitors, for some mental of some engineer who probably had a difficult childhood. Summing up a camera designed by photographers. |
 | sent on September 30, 2020 Pros: The best APS-C on the market, it's fine for everything, unless.......... see below Cons: If you look at the 100% monitor-enlarged photos and maybe examine the pixels with the magnifying glass at the entomologist's view, don't buy it; take a megapixellata FF and you will live happily. If you shoot by candlelight and you want pictures reminiscent of Barry Lyndon, ditto as above; get yourself an FF. Opinion: I took the XT3, I welded the 50mm f 1.4 to the machine body, I develop the RAF with Capture One.Little weight and very high yield!AF very fast, great the viewfinder and fantastic to use with all the adjustments through the ghieres clearly visible even with camera turned off! If you are not pixel peepers and not snapped in the pitch dark, best machine you will not find on the market. |
 | sent on August 09, 2020 Pros: Autofocus great, aesthetic Cons: Underexpose Opinion: The filing with this machine is never taken, the photos I shoot are all underexposed, ok that you can recover in post production, but I do not want to spend hours and process images that with other machines come out exposed correctly, otherwise nothing to exceed everything ok but the flaw (at least for me) of the underexposure is intolerable so much that I'm thinking of selling it and moving on to something else. |
 | sent on August 08, 2020 Pros: Body construction with the possibility of being sewn off, direct access to the controls of the expositional triad. Lightness and compactness beautiful files coupled with good optics. Cons: Handle a little,kept iso above 6400 in low light, flash management not at the level of other brands, ridiculous management of wifi and app. Opinion: High quality machine throughout from body to very complete menu in every particular nothing to say. Light tropocalized lcd spectacular with its perfect articulation method for photographers, no xt4 one made to make videos to each of their own equipment, spectacular dynamic range files from real professional machine both at the top and bottom of the histogram. Autofocus great a few moments of puzzlement every now and then in eye search in somewhat critical situations but nothing that can not be solved with manual positioning. I speak from experience in the field of not very active photos type ceremonies etc. Estate iso great but remember that we are talking about apsc , not comparable to ff if you want to make shots in little light without flash take them ff. You could have a grip a moment fuller and lower corners a more rounded hair would surely have improved the comfort that still remains excellent. A lack instead is found in the management of the flash that is not on par with reflexes for example Canon the car in some mode with iso car shoots the iso to the maximum without taking into account the flash you are forced to handle everything in manual nothing complex . Every now and then with flash barrel the white. But what you can absolutely not accept and the wifi connection is outrageous the connection times and absolutely unthinkable that when I am connected to a device the machine is imposable to shoot, so I am transferring images to any device and I am unable and continue my work. |
 | sent on June 08, 2020 Pros: Design/construction body, materials, file quality, monstrous optics Cons: Battery life, 180-degree non-resealable/tiltable LCD Opinion: I wanted to take the step to mirrorless (arrival from the Canon 80D) in terms of transportability and quality. Initially I was very hesitant regarding all mechanisms for regulating ISO, timing and exposure compensation. After a few weeks of buying I have to say that you learn instantly, at least so it was for me, to use these mechanisms. The treat that Then offers Fuji the adjustment of the diaphragm directly on the dial of the lens, which is extraordinary. Each key of the machine is reprogrammable, so fully customizable according to your needs. Perfect menu, maybe too :) Body materials and lenses (at least XF up) are from TOP of range; this quality of construction and materials is hard to find even in Canon's L series. Spectacular RAW quality, sharpness and dynamic range not even remotely approachable from my previous 80D machine. I'm not a fan of high ISOs (shooting most of the time in normal light situations) so I don't have a feedback on that. Machine in my view perfect in all for photographers (landscape, portrait, macro, nature ); for those who make videos I would recommend the XT4 as there is a sensor stabilizer. The only sore point is the battery life, about 350 shots at best. If they had improved this factor and the LCD monitor was 180 degrees tipper I would have rated 10 with my hands down, I'll have to stop at a 9.5 :) I recommend the purchase! |
 | sent on May 29, 2020 Pros: Many but so many Cons: Evident noises after 6400 iso Opinion: 1 month of use... What a real show. Simple without many tronzols, the dedicated keys for setting are really useful quick and comfortable. Well-made menusas also the construction. Photos really at the top. But since every photographer has a condition called ISOmania... I complain that over 6400 iso you see noise that bothers me. Nothing but for obsessed maniacs like me I mention it. If you don't want noise switch to sony FF however you don't have a fujifilm. YOUR CHOICE. ?? |
 | sent on March 07, 2020 Pros: Beautiful, flawless construction,tropicalized,file quality,Af single a lightning bolt , AFC if set well with the right optics is a guarantee,video with latest update separate settings and very intuitive all on touchscreen,joystick kept ISO up 5000 very good Cons: Now that you take at an honest price ... Nobody Opinion: Great camera, churns out great files and allows incredible light-shadow recoveries It is suitable for many,indeed for all photographic genres,fast burst (although the 30fps do not see them truthful reachable perhaps with some lenses)but 11 fps with shutter mechanical and 20 with the electronic one full format those are all commands and dials for me now The only thing, but I think it applies to everyone.... THE LENSES!! It deserves Top lenses to take advantage of its innumerable quality Photographer always in RAF - JPEG and I have to say that sometimes the color profile is already very useful The various bracketing , especially the FOCUS that for landscape and architecture is a godsend This price should go purchased just to showcase it :) For C1 use files for small tweaks and export in ACR to finish them For those who do not need the IBIS (XT4) this camera will give great satisfaction |
 | sent on January 01, 2020 Pros: Color profiles, file quality, pro video, AF, good construction, good hold high SO. Cons: Disappointing batteries, excessive menu. Opinion: Given that I use it mainly to make videos, in relation to quality/price, the Fuji XT3 is in my humble opinion the best APSC in circulation. Built well, it is now a mature room, capable of restoring excellent performance. The thing I love the most are the color profiles, especially Eternal: a drug for me. I hate battery life instead, for this irecommend battery grip |
 | sent on December 26, 2019 Pros: Manual adjustments with dier, good AF, Great grip, EVF Cons: low-life batteries, magenta-oriented self-WB Opinion: Great work in the fuji house with this machine, AF really fast, IQ great and I love the vintage grip and aesthetics. The only flaw that one has to consider before taking it is the need to switch to Capture one (obviously not obligated, but I recommend to try it), which could destabilize a little who uses adobe for years. |
| sent on November 08, 2019 Pros: Intuitive and always handy adjustments, great autofocus, great image quality, fantastic aesthetics Cons: The battery charger of bad quality with a plastic reminiscent of the bad gicattoli Opinion: The fuji did something really nice with this xt3, they got lost on something, like the battery charger, the often plastic lampshades, but if you exclude these things is fantastic, I let some other photographer who maybe often uses Nikon d810- 800 or similar and there is a clear difference, everyone has been amazed by the colors, the autofocus and the viewfinder that is often described: "low resolution", in my opinion has a fantastic resolution, and it really is a Live View!! Let's not forget the orientable screen, which I didn't appreciate before, now I don't know how to do without, also I would like to disprove the battery life as if it were really a limit, on amazon you will find many types of compatible at lower prices than a original, currently use of the Baxxtar and I manage to quietly make 400 shots or more with a battery, then however small it may seem the park of targets usable there are always fringer type adapters that open a world of opportunities without having to give up autofocus or whatever. my grade is 9.9 |
 | sent on October 25, 2019 Pros: Aesthetics, construction, versatility, keys and adjustments at your fingertips and hand, AF speed Cons: Menu too "stuffed" and tiring, tendency to "burn" the highlights, dominant magenta in the balance of automatic white, ISO noise Opinion: The X-T3 is a mature mirrorless. The new 26.1 mp sensor combined with the X-pro 4 processor and a number of improvements compared to both the X-T1 and X-T2 that preceded it, make it a complete camera suitable for the most varied situations. Definitely very responsive and with a very high-performance AF in almost all light conditions and with a satisfactory ISO hold (nothing shocking). Aesthetically I find it very beautiful and the ergonomics is good but with standard or medium size optics. Very good Jpeg and keys in the right place, as per Fuji philosophy. Double slots, responsive touch screen and miscellaneous connections. But let's get to the less positive notes. I come from the X-T20 and X-H1 that I have resold and I can confirm some aspects "against" that I also find in this X-T3. First of all the menus, in my opinion too extensive and complicated to manage. You have to start over every time you want to change a function if you exit the menu for verification. It makes you nervous. And then in my own way (compared with Nikon and Leica that I own) too many functions; too many possibilities that in most cases risk confusing or are not necessary. I also found, but this also in the other Fuji that I had, a tendency to easily burn the highlights especially in black white that I use often. This with different optics that I got to test. In the presence of very contrasting scenes you often have to work in the DR 400 (dynamic range) and this at the expense of a much more visible background noise (from 640 iso onwards). The live view often goes jerky but to that you get used to it, just press the shutter button in half, even if I find it very annoying. I would then like to dispel the myth of white balance automatically. In the X-T3 I thought I would find a marked improvement over the cameras that preceded it and instead I often find it inaccurate and with an obvious magenta dominant. Also this common to Fuji that I owned. Obviously everything can be corrected but I do not find it so "automatic"! Finally, the exposure adjustment key (matrix, spot, etc.) is too close to the power button and easily in the variation happens to turn off the camera. To conclude the positives there are and are many but the Fuji X-T3 once again is confirmation that the perfect camera does not exist. A reliable travel companion, light and versatile, good for everything but with a character similar to many others |
 | sent on October 09, 2019 Pros: Very beautiful aesthetics, image quality Cons: Battery life like all mirrorless Opinion: The line is very beautiful and reminiscent of the Contax and Fujica cameras of the 70s and 80s. You pick it up and immediately feel the cold metal. It is carefully constructed and is very handy and lightweight. Heavy Reflexes are now a distant memory. With its fantastic ghieres you always have everything under control. The adjustments are precise and fast without entering the menus and making you lose focus or the moment. The autofocus is fast and makes no mistake. Exposure is always perfect and even in the most difficult light situations no subsequent adjustments are necessary. The white balance automatically is great. The quality of the jpeg files is excellent with such sharpness. Very nice colors and not bad film simulations. I often use the Velvia simulation for macro and landscape. Not bad black and white, too. I usually shoot with jpeg -raw but the latter almost always archives it without even looking at it. The viewfinder is very large, bright and well detailed and with the adjustments allowed by the XT3 you can see the perfect final result even before the shot. Usually I use it with the best Fuji fixed optics (16mm f1,4mm f.1.4 -35mm f1.4 ..) along with the XT2 and I am very satisfied with it. For those looking for a compact, lightweight and well-performing camera, this is a great choice. Recommended! |
 | sent on September 16, 2019 Pros: Light, fantastic aesthetic, AF speed, outstanding EVF, image quality Cons: Battery life (common problem of mirrorless, but not a limit) Opinion: I waited 5 months, a 20day trip and lots of more tests before making a judgment. I'm going to say it's my first mirrorless, before this I used a d700 with 80-200 2.8 and other standard 24-70 targets. First of all it weighs little; At the same lens as the nikon d700 (i.e. using the fujinon xf 50-140 2.8) is a featherweight! Then I was amazed by the really advanced features such as eye tracking that works great and the focus peaking that is very useful in case you want to use opticals without AF. Aesthetically it is fantastic and the eye wants its part. The line is vintage, the solid body is made of magnesium and at the top there are ISO dials, time and exposure compensation: I personally find them much more intuitive than the controls of the classic sLLRs. There are many physical commands and they are all customizable: you can also customize swipes on the touch screen! The ergonomics is good although I having big hands I preferred to buy the additional grip of the Meike which helps me a lot especially when I use the 50-140. The quality of the photos is exceptional, even the jpeg are as good as they come out. The AF is very fast (especially with the 50-140) and the eye tracking works great, especially after upgrading to version 3.xx that came out with the arrival on the market of the younger sister, the x-t30. I also tried the videos and the quality is remarkable. Perhaps the only thing missing is the IBIS. In any case according to many it is the best APS-C on the market and I can only confirm it. |
 | sent on September 07, 2019 Pros: SPEED AF, Great ergonomics, great image quality, outstanding videos! Cons: Paint silver version that comes away quite easily, battery life not at the levels of a reflex but enough for my use Opinion: I bought the XT3 after selling all the full frame canon kit (specifically a 6d). The purchase was weighted after a long time and making several comparisons with my XT20. Image quality side, not being used to zommare at 200%, I did not perceive big differences, dynamic gamma side there is an abyss in favor of the XT3. The autofocus is exceptional both single and continuous and infinitely better than what I was used to previously (I don't know what it means to reassemble!). The machine is well built, leaves a little to the desire for the quality of the paint that turns out to be very delicate (at least the silver version). With this machine I also started to approach the video world (I make short clips of holidays and events) and the quality is really high! Great to be able to register in room 4k 60p (although mainly register in DCI 24p). |
 | sent on September 03, 2019 Pros: Wonderful aesthetics, great sensor, lightning autofocus, even jpg image quality, EVF viewfinder, performance in general. Cons: Battery life not great. Opinion: In my short review I would start from the first thing that impressed me about this camera: it is really beautiful and built impeccably. However, since it is not a piece of furniture, in addition to aesthetics, the substance must also be evaluated, and in this case there is plenty of it. The sensor is really great, the image quality is remarkable (also thanks to Fuji optics, all of them level) and the isO high hold more than good to be an APS-C. The autofocus is lightning fast and even the tracking works satisfactorily, the percentage of wrong shots is very low. The electronic viewfinder is excellent, very fluid and defined. The jpg churned out by the machine are already excellent and ready to use, in case the RAF are very flexible and allow you to recover so much from the shadows. The only downside of this X-T3 is the not exceptional battery life compared to a reflex, on the other hand the electronics have a heavy impact on the range. Given all the writing, I can only recommend this machine that I consider (and not only me, just do a little web search) the best APS-C currently on the market. |
 | sent on August 17, 2019 Pros: Compactness, image processor, tropicalization, electronic scope, video Cons: Nobody Opinion: Incredibly versatile machine capable of churning out RAW files of unspeakable beauty, going to edit a photo taken with this machine is not only easy, it is just fun and satisfying. For anyone who takes a number of photos contained in service (also for work purposes) should choose this machine, especially if the person concerned travels/turns a lot. My old Canon was so heavy and cumbersome that it made me want to shoot, with this the desire came back stronger and more vivid than before. At ISO too high you start to see that it's not really pro, but the grain typical of Fuji makes the photos almost magical despite everything, so I can not call it a real flaw. What if not to buy it at all?! (If you then combine a 35mm life becomes wonderful) |
 | sent on August 12, 2019 Pros: Sensor, improved autofocus, side dial Cons: I don't know Opinion: I can't find a real defect to this machine. It's lightweight, versatile, it makes really quality videos. It has all the latest Fuji technology, it has two sd memory slots that come in handy for those who use it for work (many more than you might think). It has the possibility to be fed even with a usb cable. In my opinion one of the best mirrorless aps-c ever produced. |
 | sent on August 04, 2019 Pros: Aesthetically eye-catching, body and controls of the highest quality, responsive, fast af even with first-generation lenses. Cons: Nothing, as far as I'm concerned Opinion: Third generation of a model that already in the previous version had reached maturity. With the XT3 fuji realizes an excellent camera also in the AF and video sectors, enriching the already excellent photographic experience of its bodies. Combined with high-level fuji optics the image quality is really excellent although unfortunately it still suffers a bit of decoding with Adobe software, although the situation is much improved compared to a few years ago. The real highlight of fuji, however, are the controls, mostly physical, that allow you to have control over the settings that, with a bit of experience, can make a difference in some situations. As far as I'm concerned I was very pleased with the purchase of this camera, I can only recommend it. |
 | sent on July 18, 2019 Pros: beautiful, ghiere, general responsiveness, sensor, autofocus Cons: iso estate for those who need to go beyond 1600/2000 Opinion: I bought the Xt3 with the 16-55 f 2.8, permuting my Sony RII in anticipation of a massive devaluation, I would go back I would buy the same xt3 but I would not sell the RII but I would keep both, because despite the many comparisons, personal opinions and partisanships between the brands, are two completely different machines for different uses, both take great photos, Fuji has jpeg files of a unique beauty, an operational responsiveness that Sony (RII) dreams of, a precise autofocus and it give you a sense of Pleasure to grip the machine with two hands adjust times and diaphragms with the diaphragm and shoot, between the two evf there is no comparison, the Fuji is much more precise fluid and sharp ness same of the lcd. The Raf files are now managed quite well even by LR as long as you know what and how you are doing, it is not a file to be undone to be clear, to develop it requires small and limited interventions, subject to the complete loss of detail, in my opinion C1 is still a p and higher but the difference does not justify the change of software and workflow habits, in short the xt3 is a nice machine, it is probably the best aps-c at the moment. Turning to the cons of this little jewel, I can only point out the poor seal over 2000 iso that for me are the limit, of course the files can be used for printing up to 6400 thanks to the noise of Fuji that results in that very fine and uniform grain , but far from the quality you might have from an FF sensor to the same sensitivity clearly bearing in mind that you compare an aps-c with an FF. In conclusion I recommend the xt3 with eyes closed for professionals and advanced amateurs (it is not an easy machine to master) that for their type of work do not need to go beyond the above sensitivities, you will not regret it in the slightest, if then it is considered that in order to have the same optical quality, to build any Fujinon kit you have to spend at least twice as much for the equivalents of other brands, the scale hangs even more on the Fuji side. |
 | sent on July 18, 2019 Pros: Ergonomics, lightness, versatility, customization possibilities, performance Cons: Almost nothing Opinion: Tried and reviewed on my YouTube channel whose links I attach. It is the top of Fuji's range and is a great machine. Fast, light, backlit xtrans sensor, quadcore processor, 425 focus points. I tried it with 23 f/2, a Vincente combination, especially for street-like people like me. And then, icing on the cake, it's also tropicalized and has a wonderful treat that's the pre-shot. I hope soon I can put in the gallery some of the shots I've taken. In the meantime I hope that the tutorial is to your liking. https://youtu.be/wC6_luKSQ5c |
 | sent on June 06, 2019 Pros: Full camera. Probably the top as APS-C. Touch screen can also be extended vertically. Lots of useful functions (bracketing of all types including focus). Unparalleled analog feeling, weight and handling. Cons: Compared to a full-frame the only substantial difference is the ISO yield above 1600 Opinion: Purchase pondered for months. Given that I am (and will continue to be, for the reasons that I will explain shortly, also) Nikonista, I entered the Fuji world (and mirrorless in general) with an X-T10 used. It was love at first sight for ease of use, weight, handling, the focus system, etc. They are machines that give back the desire to go out, go to the mountains and shoot. The X-T3 takes all this to another level: it is true that it weighs 150g more than the X-T10 but adds another resolution, a solidity of much higher, the touch screen that is a libidinous, especially when you shoot from the bottom with the machine almost on the ground. Auto-focus with dots that cover the whole screen, which is great for me coming from Nikon D610. Focus bracketing, iso bracketing and many other very useful functions. The files it churns out - thanks to the excellent Fuji optics - are crisp, with a vibrant chromatic rendering. Of course they are perhaps slightly more difficult to work with than the Nikon FF files, which have a unique softness for me (especially in the shadows), but with a bit of practice, habit and capture one, I managed to achieve similar, if not superior, results. I don't talk here about the 30-shot/second burst and the video features, which I personally don't use doing almost exclusively landscape photography. I have also had in the past other (good) APS-C cameras like the Nikon D7100 and there is no comparison, especially to ISO over 400. So, if we really want to find a flaw in the X-T3 (but it's a limitation of every APS-C sensor, I think) is the ISO seal above 1600. The noise starts to be quite noticeable especially in the shadows and in that field the full frame sensor of my D610 still shows who the host is. Another problem (always due to the nature of the sensor) is the ability to obtain an extreme blur in portraiture. In this, even the excellent Fuji Pro optics remain behind as a result (but forward alas as price) to many of the corresponding Full Frame solutions, especially for the long focals. Fuji has at most 56mm f/1.2 or 90mm f/2 which, however good as sharpness and chromatic yield, cannot guarantee bokeh results of an 85mm f/1.2 or even f/1.4 or a 105 f/1.4. In conclusion, I will continue to use the Nikon full frame for portraits and shots at night or in precarious light conditions, and the X-T3 for pretty much everything else: everyday photography, backpacking outs, trips... |
| sent on May 22, 2019 Pros: AF speed, image quality up to 6400iso, general reactivity and improved ring nuts, reliability, BT remote management, excellent viewfinder Cons: Little to say, however, exposure mode not manageable from the menu (only ring on the RIGHT under the time) menu setting good but remained as XT-2 back to the beginning every time we leave the setting, low autonomy 400 shots max Opinion: Every time I read the reviews on Juza of products I find poetry, philosophical cues like: "Touch her in the hand makes me happy" the not plus ultra of perfection, beauty, divine masterpiece of human science, and in some cases also hints of erotic poetry, Type the lens is big and heavy and long but feeling of safety beyond any limit of pleasure..... Etc.. :) Well let's get back to us after the honored XT-2 and still great camera, needed the XT-3, what to say: general performance improvement AF, shooting cadence, Chase faces with blind hooking on subjects placed at considerable distance, then no battery needed Pack for Boost mode, only if you need more balanced for heavy optics and autonomy, more accurate and precise rings. Technological detachment not noticeable from XT-2 to XT-3 compared to that perceived between XT1-XT-2. Video mode I do not use so I do not know what to say, the viewfinder is excellent, the ability to shoot vols at 10 fps without obvious blackout of the EVF, we are almost at the level of the Sony A9. Images in line with the XT-2, but at high ISO more rumosa, was corrected the noise of chrominance tends to gray without fringing to be more pleasant, this was done, for me the sensor BSI at the photo level did not make great improvements QI compared to the XT- 2. Personally I find it a great camera in line with the XT2, professional and well-designed, but as every project to strong points and weak, here we are at high levels that's why they have sold so many, without making emphasis of the brand just because I bought it myself For Mè is a good product at a very aggressive price maybe ML APS-C Best in the market, the Fuji color profiles are excellent and manageable from raw with C1, here's why I chose Fuji, but this is purely personal opinion, then there are thousands of FF's available of other The brands for those who need FF, but with the XT-3 is not mistaken choice if you do not need FF hot and friendly;) Pro camera setting, not recommended for beginners!! |
| sent on May 03, 2019 Pros: Very light, snout, very good. Cons: Nobody. Opinion: With the Fuji X-T3 within the world of mirrorless after years of analog, Nikon D-60, Nikon D300s and Nikon d750 Co Tamron 28/75 2.8 and 70/200 2.8 G1. I didn't notice any difference except in maneuverability and weight. The chromatic rendition has not, in my opinion, anything to envy to the Nikon that I had. High ISO is great. If I change my mind, I'il talk to him, but I'm so happy with this little gem right now. Only thing... I bought 4 more batteries... of competition. And, if I have to be honest... This put an hour to get used to the different menu. It reminds me so much of my first love... A FX3 Yaschica! |
 | sent on March 04, 2019 Pros: Ergonomics, weight and transportability, remarkable evf, overhead monitor, outstanding AF, High ISO seal Cons: The exposure meter tends to underexpose, chaotic menu Opinion: Great little gem. Purchased as a Christmas present (the beauty of being single is that you choose gifts by yourself;-)) as a second body to be flanked by 6d and 7dii. A few exits are enough and the XT-3 becomes the most used machine. It is really well built, it falls well in the hand and it is light. The AF is really remarkable, fast and precise and with many customization possibilities. The light meter always finds a fair compromise between lights and shadows even though it must be said that it tends to underexpose. The shutter speed dial is a real gem, very comfortable and makes it really vintage in appearance. The shutter in electronic mode makes it extremely quiet and gives way to shoot freehand with slow times. The battery does not have a great autonomy but if you do not keep off the monitor 350 shots or more you take them home. I do not say my on the video industry because I do not know. Ultimately a very nice device. Recommended for beginners Amateurs, given the simplicity of use as well as those more advanced and with more demands |
 | sent on February 21, 2019 Pros: Sense of professionalism, quality files, completeness and simplicity of the menu, particular attention to the modes of focus, video top, touchscreen, three upper ring nuts. Cons: Specks in the sensor. Opinion: I have it from a month or so and I can give a little opinion. I come from a Fuji X-T10, a little gem that I struggled to sell because I was very sorry, it was perfect! But I decided to try a more professional car and I chose the X-T3. The difference is already in weight, the first did not feel even when it was hanging around the neck, the X-T3 is more massive but the handle is perfect. At the moment I added the 10.24 mm and together they make a nice pair... A little ' Pesantuccia (first the main pairing was with the Samyang 12mm, so very light). The files are of excellent quality, the colors are beautiful. The menu is full of functions, from Fuji filters to the focus mode to which Fuji has given much importance. The 4k video files are amazing and even in this case the focus has various setting parameters. With regard to the screen is not a serious lack of the fact that it is not tilting, but with the app you can see the preview on the smartphone that, therefore, could be used as a front display. Another positive factor is the presence of three rings, including that of the ISO that in the previous was not there and you had to go on the menu; I think the isos are important at par with aperture and timing. I found a flaw in the sensor because it has some specks, now I'm taking off with Ps, but I'll have to take the cleaning kit; Of course it is not nice that a camera has this defect just bought. |
 | sent on January 29, 2019 Pros: Nothing to say about the quality of the structure and the quality of the images if it were not..... Cons: Specks that appear on photos taken with two different camera bodies. Opinion: I recently bought the Fuji XT3 and after a while I realized that the photos appeared annoying specks. The assistance told me that it could be the dirty sensor. I made the camera body at Amazon that promptly replaced me without charge. But even the second machine body behaves the same way. The cars even are even more than one and in different places from the previous and appear from focal 11 to rise, while they disappear at lower focal points. What do you recommend? The lens is the Fuji 18-55. |
 | sent on January 17, 2019 Pros: It is the state of the art of mirrorless technology. An APS-C able to contend the primacy to the best FF on the market. Cons: I haven't found any real flaws. For someone, it can be the non-complete tilability of the display, which I find totally useless in a professional camera. Even the scarce autonomy complained about in some review is currently quite inevitable, being a mirrorless, so famously starved for energy. This limit is however surmountable with the use of the battery grip, equally valuable in the invoice and in the functions, on which is also positioned the convenient "boost" command, able to further enhance the already hyperbolic performance. Opinion: Finding a fitting adjective for this Fujifilm body is easy: wonderful!!! It has everything you could want in an "operational" camera: lightning-fast MF, both single and continuous (of course, with lens height); Very effective tracking of fast moving subjects (sport and nature); Very sharp files, with very nice colors; Miraculous dynamic range; Excellent viewfinder; Almost absent noise at high ISO; Very rich menu, with useful customization possibilities. Everything is contained in an elegant and sturdy tropicalized body, with a pleasant retro appearance, equipped with regulating nuts from "Swiss watchmaking". A decisive step forward compared to the already good XT2, which I owned before, as it is equipped with a new backlit sensor, denser than two megapixels compared to the previous version, and a processor of the latest generation, able to manage the best Even the performing video functions. I practice mainly and for passion nature photography, and I confess that after a couple of months that I use it regularly I forgot in the closet my trust Canon 1d Mark IV, hiding a slight sense of guilt. |
 | sent on January 13, 2019 Pros: Detail, Image Quality, Colorimetry, Ergonomics, 4K 60p Fullhd pariah to fullHD etc... Etc... Cons: Nobody Opinion: To say that I bought the machine for my video productions, very convinced that Fuji could land in the industry already from X-T2 but I had GH5 in my hands . I stress that ... there are many that define that or this best machine to make videos but in many machines, like the Sony video always remains and only an option, already from the fact that, if you compare the video features of Sony are all the same but ... logically Sony has on the market FS5 and Fs7II and can not give you to 1999 Euro a machine that does you the same thing but... let's set aside the Sonys. Lover of Gh5 I have always called it the most pushed machine in the videographic sector on the market and basically it is but... until I had X-T3 in my hands and everything changed. Of detail and image quality higher than Gh5 absolutely , the Colorimetry absolutely superior , F-Log much more manageable than the V-Log "I liked the V-Log more as it behaved on gh4, the stabilizer I can not care less , excellent durability of the battery , nice that I can already choose between 50 or 60p without enabling ne PAL or NTSC nice sta thing. Beautiful to manage the Dynamic Range at percentages something that is not in GH5 and above all an impeccable autofocus system , perhaps the strength of Sony but today with X-T3 there is to fight. Photographically will come the day that I will try but I think it will not disappoint me ... it is physiological and therefore ... Let's say that Fuji X-T3 and even in certain situations at GH5s and in certain equals to GH5 , I will look forward to X-T4 and Gh5 always remains a great choice in place of Fuji ... The features of the machine ... are astounding and that is everything else that remains. For friends Videomaker is something to try , it will make you afraid only at the beginning the management of the machines but then from the result you can not stay anymore without ... Guaranteed. Here I review my review, I declare that I made the switch to Fuji also photographically When the purchase I promised not to photograph and if it had happened I would never post produced the file, in the full knowledge that if I did I would immediately made the switch from Canon to fuji and so it was. At the first I flanked him a second with optics 18-55 - 56f1.2 - 35f1.4 and instead of a canvas like the 50-140 hearing about this 80 2.8 macro ois bought the one with cash back they also returned 350Euro because purchased new. What to tell you, love at first click, pasta and colormetry not common, detail present taking into account my optics, lightning-fast and impeccable car focus on the burst with af-c . |
 | sent on October 28, 2018 Pros: Size and ease of shooting if you make hole stree or reportage do not run the risk of being intrusive by shooting from the monitor with excellent quality... Cons: Being very electronic between eyepiece and monitor the battery lasts little compared to a reflex but with a couple of batteries in the pocket the problem does not exist Opinion: I think the mirrorless planet is slowly climbing the peak for convenience and files, I work in raw but the jpgs are spectacular. I think the top reflex system but for my use I would never go back in behind the handling is total when I was doing services with my canon... felt at the end of the day the back a bit under stress.. Shooting with the tilt monitor is unparalleled |
 | sent on October 07, 2018 Pros: Fuji Sensor with Ready Jpeg, viewfinder, size and weight, excellent optical park, first-rate building materials, FUJI serii firmaware. Cons: Maybe the price but it will probably decrease. Opinion: I already own other Fuji bodies from the mythical X Pro1 so I have not found some difficulties in managing the Fuji menu that I think is quite easy to manage. I bought and I am using the XT3 with the 100-400 and I find that the pairing works really well. A very fast autofocus but what is very good is the tracking system with AF-C. Even with non-original batteries the machine works well. I ordered it black but it came silver that reminds me so much the analogue that I used a time and aesthetically is very beautiful. If you like the planet Fuji is the TOP. 13/02/2019 I recently bought on Amazon a quick release plate that increases the grip making the whole thing even more performanant. |
 | sent on October 05, 2018 Pros: operation, evf, AF excellent, focus Stacking and more Cons: Without BG I find it unergonomic with more voluminous lenses, with BG is perfect Opinion: My first ML was a Lumix GF1, then Fuji arrived in the field I took a XE1 that I changed with a XT1 that I still possess and I will not sell. I think this XT3 is a mature product in the APSC ML segment, the new 4 times more Powerful/faster processor of the XT2 is well noted and leaves margin for future FW upgrades, as FUJI has already proven to do. The new electronics proves absolutely powerful bringing the AF to the highest levels, excellent also the eye AF that works even in low light conditions, of course the operation of the machine makes it reactive to the point of not making a camera regret Level. I don't feel the lack of the stabilizer being a long time photographer and where the stabilizer serves, Fuji mounts it on the Optics. I have always nikonista and I compare with my current D810 and a good optical park and I have to say that this XT3 is an APSC of wonders and can replace my FF SLR in many Areas. I also took the BG that at the level of ergonomics makes it perfect, and with the BG you have assembled 3 batteries that make the autonomy absolutely suitable even for long photographic days. The sensor behaves well also at high ISO the RAF developed in C1 Express for fujifilm, among other things free of charge; It makes files well workable in PP, the dynamic range it makes is respectable by allowing important recoverables in the Shadows. Excellent connectivity with smartphones and tablets, connected with my iPhone also records GPS coordinates in the Shots. Absolutely Recommended. |
| sent on October 05, 2018 Pros: Build Quality, viewfinder fidelity, autofocus speed/precision, high ISO image quality, color playback Cons: No IBIS, battery life Opinion: My adoption brand is always Nikon, I have owned and/or used, with great satisfaction, Nikon D700, Nikon D4, Nikon D810 with 2.8 optics and very bright fixed. My bag has become, year after year, more and more heavy and voluminous, so much to relegate the photograph to the only commissions of work (especially ceremonial). For my way of seeing/living photography, this aspect had become a huge limit, for some time, in fact, I was looking for a body/optics that, without sacrificing quality, allow me to "go out on the street" and photograph, just for the pleasure of doing it and Have a practical and powerful means that could change the way I work. Fuji X-T3 was for me Love at first click (exactly, because falling in love only looking at it is too simple). The aspect that prompted me to sell my Nikon Kit and switch to Fuji was the incredible operating speed, safety and accuracy of the autofocus, the fidelity of the electronic viewfinder and the very high quality of the files (both JPEG and RAW) in any condition of Light and also to higher sensitivities (12,800 ISO). The transition from full frame to APS-C is only mental, once you start to shoot and see the files on a nice EIZO any perplexity fades. |
 | sent on September 27, 2018 Pros: Design, ergonomics, FPS, quality locking nuts Cons: Battery, eye fatigue with prolonged times Opinion: I Update my review after six months of use: I Have done some work (mainly sports) and now I can draw my considerations in particular thanks to the work done Saturday. This is a climbing competition with about 150 participants. I tripped for 7.5 hours intercalating 50-140 2.8 and 16-55 2.8. The first thing that scared me a bit is the battery life. I used the battery grip thus having 3 batteries inside. I shoot a lot and especially many bursts (ca 2600 photo). It was Also turned on for 70% of the time and I arrived with about a notch of the last battery at the shots of the awards. From this point of view with the 6d and three batteries I would go on for another day. But you know this is the limit of the ML. The other thing I ever would have thought of is a great sense of eye fatigue with which I aim. Evidently watching a screen half an inch away for prolonged time is not the best... Finally, after almost 8 hours with battery-grip and 50-140 all freehand, I had a certain pain in the fingers of the right hand. I guess it's because of the center of gravity moved forward from the optics. As For autofocus and performance I remain amazed as I was at the beginning. The menu is just a matter of habit and to set the machine initially then you do not touch it anymore.. In These six months I have completed the trilogy of lenses 2.8 WR and I can now say I can do anything. Also because I find them really quality (given the price D:). I think the next lens will be the 100-400 to be able to do faunistics. ____ ____________________......-__________________... ____ ________________... _____ _____-_____..... ________________________......-_________________... ____________ I Write this impression in hot weather after I bought it a little bit later on. After Selling all my Canon kit, consisting of 6D and various optics I ordered the XT3 with the 16 55 F2.8. Just taken in hand I realized the attention to detail and the build quality certainly more refined than my previous SLR. I was impressed by the speed of auto Focus and the various functions as well as the fast burst I was not used to. The Ergonomics, although it is a mirrorless, is definitely good. I found the menu slightly complicated and all the different settings but this is also due to the fact that I was used to the Canon menu, definitely it is a matter of habit. The application to connect to the smartphone is an unstable hair and the default camera is set with the touch off. For those looking for a camera with vintage appearance, fiddle with the ring nuts as at the time of the analogue is a Pleasure crazy! Many have complained about the screen not tiltabile forward but not being one of those who speaks alone in front of the camera I do not give a damn. Maybe I find it Unfortunate not to have the stabilizer directly on the sensor. I Will Update the review once you have done a couple of jobs. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
