There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 86000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Aesthetically it is wonderful, quality image at the top, discretion and silence, rear display excellent
Cons:Battery life (always better to have one or two in your pocket), AF sometimes inaccurate especially in low light
Opinion:I already have a XE-1 so I know the X series of Fuji, and already with one I was comfortable. I took the XE-2 is used (but nearly new) to be improved especially for the WIFI and the electronic viewfinder. All improvements that I have found in this camera. The picture quality is undoubtedly the TOP of the range in the APS-C sensors. FA is definitely better than the XE-1, especially in the speed of engagement ... remains a little "lacking" in low light ... but nothing to worry about. Excellent management manual focus, with both the Focus Peaking that with the broken image, you are able to use with great satisfaction even manual lenses of third parties with great entertainment. The use mainly with his 18-55 and 35 1.4 ... It 'a camera that you buy used now at a great price and that definitely can give a lot of satisfaction. Not to mention the park optical Fuji undoubtedly be an added value to the quality of the final images. Attention to battery life, simple cKing have one or two in your pocket.
Pros:Quality and image files, kept at high ISO impressive, electronic viewfinder very useful but ... (see cons), practical manual
Cons:Battery life (approx 250 shots, the spare is also mandatory in the outputs short), AF struggling in dark, false image to the EVF and LCD monitor SCREENS
Opinion:socket used with lens 18. 55, that is, I immediately felt at home with the management of the parameters, the lens aperture find it more practical, the same goes for the ring time and exposure correction. I come from Nikon. sharpness in jpeg truly remarkable. I will continue testing with more time in the coming days, but I'm pleasantly impressing. AF have not found it too slow (in the sense: if you do not do sports photos or moving subjects "on the fly" is divinely), however, accuses difficulties in situations of low light. the electronic viewfinder it was a pleasant surprise, but the picture seems to me to distort the color scheme from this LCD SCREENS, and even to the monitor. nothing serious: slightly darker and less vivid in monitor.rnper park objectives, that I will always have enough little, but in the essential (apart from the huge canvases) lacks nothing, are just expensive, but the quality c 'and it is very well paga.rnvideols
Pros:Lightweight yet sturdy, RAW (RAF) rich in information.
Cons:Battery life, not intuitive menu (for me, coming from Canon!)
Opinion:Mirrorless charming, perhaps a little expensive. The RAW (RAF) are very rich in information, you can bring out a lot of the areas in shadow and the colors are more vibrant. The autofocus is decent, with optical kit 18-55 f2.8 / 4 you can not get a good sharpness (but do not expect precision sniper!). All in all a good car to always carry in your bag or a good second car to take to work for a wedding or for a report.
Pros:Compactness, quality of the file, made at high ISO, simple controls, so many wheels where you can set everything at hand, excellent jpeg, ergonomics (for me), another category
Cons:Honestly I have not yet found, perhaps sometimes the auto focus in low-light conditions
Opinion:Well, I bought this gem a few months ago, I tried it immediately out of the landscape for a walk, you say it does not weigh anything, you carry it along and forget it, and you have to hand in the neck (not to make Chinese tourists ) ... rnTestata unparalleled quality in a marriage, I had with me D7000 and various optics, is a bit that I pondered the move to mirrorless, moral of the story remained in the D7000 zaino.rnUna made at high use in church from fear, I shot at ISO 4000 or 5000 without any problems, perfect pictures sharp, in focus, a detail is an incredible three-dimensionality, coupled with the 18-55 2.8-4 is perfect, but the best I got with the 23 mm 1.4, I was in the scene as never before ... rnDecido to test it on another wedding, the same as before, so much so that those who accompanied him very skeptical at first, once given the file and its D3s with me said quietly use it, scary for resa.rnQualche next day, I sold the Nikon kit and I added to a kit Fuji xt1 and the fantastic ... 50-140 rnrnBeh boysOnce placed a minimum auto focus I think the market mirrorless Sara very ahead
Pros:Style, ergonomics, simplicity make managing functions, quality files.
Cons:Lack tropicalization, autofocus.
Opinion:I have owned for about six months this beautiful machine with satisfaction. Especially because it does not regret the camera if not for that focus speed in moving subjects reveals its limitations. The electronic viewfinder I found, perhaps, even better than the D800 querllo. Easy and intuitive management functions, supplied with a detailed manual and exhaustive. Excellent quality of files, comparable to machines of higher level. Accompanied me on several releases out the door, even in extreme weather conditions, cold and rain without ever missing a beat. Replaced by a few days for another system ML for the lack of weather sealing and the limited park optic Fuji.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.