B&H is one of the largest photographic stores in United States. You can find a wide range of products, reliability and great customer care; other than that, by purchasing on B&H you contribute to support JuzaPhoto!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 70000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Style, ergonomics, simplicity make managing functions, quality files.
Cons:Lack tropicalization, autofocus.
Opinion:I have owned for about six months this beautiful machine with satisfaction. Especially because it does not regret the camera if not for that focus speed in moving subjects reveals its limitations. The electronic viewfinder I found, perhaps, even better than the D800 querllo. Easy and intuitive management functions, supplied with a detailed manual and exhaustive. Excellent quality of files, comparable to machines of higher level. Accompanied me on several releases out the door, even in extreme weather conditions, cold and rain without ever missing a beat. Replaced by a few days for another system ML for the lack of weather sealing and the limited park optic Fuji.
Pros:Picture quality at high ISO, optical quality at an affordable cost, discrete autofocus. Excellent image definition and color management. Weight and dimensions
Cons:battery life, autofocus slower than a reflex, less feeling in the management of the camera body
Opinion:I took this camera kit with 18-55, for its size and for the curiosity to try the sensor x-trans, I must say that the quality of the photos produced has gone beyond my expectations. I come from a Nikon D7100 and I still have it and use a Sony A6000 downgraded to a machine for shooting video, activities in which in my opinion is unsurpassed, and as a car for family use. I must say since the first shots that the quality of the RAF files produced by X-E2 is, in my opinion, superior to that produced by both the D7100 is the sony A6000, although the latter machines with 24-bit sensor. The sensor x-trans that is attached to the fuji, in my opinion, is superior to detail, color management, and especially for the low noise at high ISO. The camera body is sturdy and well made but not weather sealed and recalls the old analog machines rangefinder. The electronic viewfinder is just great! I purchased along with 18-55 a 27 mm / 2.8 pancake thatmakes the machine truly pocket. The purchase of fuji, given the quality of the photos produced, for now I've convinced him to postpone the transition to FF. There are still some known defects of the system such as ML autofocus slightly slower in difficult lighting conditions, a lower overall responsiveness than the SLR, a park dedicated optics, though quality, not extended as the park optics nikon or canon, that defects between 'I have found also in other sony A6000. In any case, the machine is usable with a bit of foresight in 100% of cases. I took photos of the stormy sea at 23 pm at 6400 ISO with a quality in the management of the noise significantly higher than that which I had obtained with the sony nikon or in similar circumstances.
Pros:Tenuta high iso amazing, even better than many SLR. Fast and practical in settings and in focus. Sensitive in low light and high, glorious colors. Plenty of details to record.
Cons:Battery life: about 300. Automatically burn the white clouds. Banding pronounced and abnormal.
Opinion:Machine suitable for almost all, but especially to take trips, also challenging with little weight. I think the dream of photographers who have had previous experience with analog. The structure and commands are as old reflex and a sense of immediacy in the sudden changes. Solid robust, but leggera.rnAnche if XE2 and XT1 are the machines that are to be preferred by the reporter, remember that it is also suitable for many other types of photographs (recommended by National Geographic for all travel between the compact) .rnAvvertenze, is a machine freak of photography that can create problems in the relationship, because of its easy portability, wives and husbands complain ..... "Either I or the car!" rn
Pros:Aesthetics fantastic, the best electronic viewfinder pentaprism, white balance, ergonomics, weight and size to a minimum, control, sensor, image quality, ISO estate, raw full-bodied and full of information
Cons:Battery life ridiculous, one SD slot, focus sometimes inaccurate in low light conditions, raw heavy and unable to save compressed lossless
Opinion:I begin by saying that the X-E2 is not a camera defect-free, but has a domineering charm. The sights of this x-e2 is great: being electronically allows to photograph the dark as it is light and lets you see the shot before running it. This allows for perfectly exposed pictures. No ghosting or slowdowns. In very poor lighting conditions (boundary conditions ...) if you have to focus on the detail autofocus can be inaccurate and difficult. rnIl white balance is very good, better than most new SLR FF. With 4 buttons fn everything is within reach without taking your eye from the viewfinder and manage the camera becomes easy. The sensor trans-x is very good, however the lack of low-pass filter as well as the sharpness brings out the noise on time. A 3200 iso is nonetheless inaudible to manifest itself, in a completely acceptable, by iso 4000 starts to be a little 'longer present but always within the limits. The noise isstill very "analog" and also ISO 6400 is not particularly troublesome. The main drawbacks are the ridiculous battery life (on average 300 shots), make it impossible to save in raw lossless compressed (a raf weighs 34 mb ...) and of course the autofocus does not always rise to the occasion more criticism. RNLA real big difference between the system and the fuji reflex and that with the first photograph must know really well and have a keen sense of composition. This is because a fuji forgives less. SLRs have too many automatic and in one way or another they take home the shot. If overnight SLRs disappeared I think that professionals would remain 1/100 of those who are there. But behind clothes retro flavor there is also a lot of technology. Ergonomics, size and weight to a minimum, make it an alternative for a professional.
Pros:weight - amazing picture quality????? (it's just that I have not understood yet use to bottom) - at high iso is not less than the upper value of Nikon SLR - 10 - 24xf is greater than the amount dx nikkor - good idea of ??the two rings old style SLR even if you go to silt up in a cumbersome software - very low noise and even beautiful to look at
Cons:bad software (the Italian version is also loosely translated) - too many customizable buttons - vision in the electronic viewfinder sometimes shocking and not corresponding to the real snap - ridiculous battery life (as if there was the possibility of reflex to always turn off the display ) - the diagram iso car prefers the max iso-rnindispensabile on condition of highlights and shadows with strong intervention acr - the lack of a quick adjustment of ISO is that the choice of the point of focus
Opinion:usually use Nikon pro, this would seem a toy that seems to me to produce incredible pictures with the two rnusata xf 10-24 and 55-200 offers a range of images with very high weight and volume very low rnil sensor I think is not comparable to anything in circulation at least at home nikonrni defects seen the high prices are certainly not excusable / justifiable and I will not be overcome, even though in reality it would be enough of a nikon d90 software to realize the convenience and flexibility of use that divides a nice toy to a body performance (I think this might be even bloodthirsty) rnpersonalmante sorry because both the sensor and the two lenses that I have tried are safe qualitàrn
You can select up to three cameras to compare with Fujifilm X-E2.
Photos taken with Fujifilm X-E2
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.