There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 80000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Quality and image files, kept at high ISO impressive, electronic viewfinder very useful but ... (see cons), practical manual
Cons:Battery life (approx 250 shots, the spare is also mandatory in the outputs short), AF struggling in dark, false image to the EVF and LCD monitor SCREENS
Opinion:socket used with lens 18. 55, that is, I immediately felt at home with the management of the parameters, the lens aperture find it more practical, the same goes for the ring time and exposure correction. I come from Nikon. sharpness in jpeg truly remarkable. I will continue testing with more time in the coming days, but I'm pleasantly impressing. AF have not found it too slow (in the sense: if you do not do sports photos or moving subjects "on the fly" is divinely), however, accuses difficulties in situations of low light. the electronic viewfinder it was a pleasant surprise, but the picture seems to me to distort the color scheme from this LCD SCREENS, and even to the monitor. nothing serious: slightly darker and less vivid in monitor.rnper park objectives, that I will always have enough little, but in the essential (apart from the huge canvases) lacks nothing, are just expensive, but the quality c 'and it is very well paga.rnvideols
Pros:Lightweight yet sturdy, RAW (RAF) rich in information.
Cons:Battery life, not intuitive menu (for me, coming from Canon!)
Opinion:Mirrorless charming, perhaps a little expensive. The RAW (RAF) are very rich in information, you can bring out a lot of the areas in shadow and the colors are more vibrant. The autofocus is decent, with optical kit 18-55 f2.8 / 4 you can not get a good sharpness (but do not expect precision sniper!). All in all a good car to always carry in your bag or a good second car to take to work for a wedding or for a report.
Pros:Compactness, quality of the file, made at high ISO, simple controls, so many wheels where you can set everything at hand, excellent jpeg, ergonomics (for me), another category
Cons:Honestly I have not yet found, perhaps sometimes the auto focus in low-light conditions
Opinion:Well, I bought this gem a few months ago, I tried it immediately out of the landscape for a walk, you say it does not weigh anything, you carry it along and forget it, and you have to hand in the neck (not to make Chinese tourists ) ... rnTestata unparalleled quality in a marriage, I had with me D7000 and various optics, is a bit that I pondered the move to mirrorless, moral of the story remained in the D7000 zaino.rnUna made at high use in church from fear, I shot at ISO 4000 or 5000 without any problems, perfect pictures sharp, in focus, a detail is an incredible three-dimensionality, coupled with the 18-55 2.8-4 is perfect, but the best I got with the 23 mm 1.4, I was in the scene as never before ... rnDecido to test it on another wedding, the same as before, so much so that those who accompanied him very skeptical at first, once given the file and its D3s with me said quietly use it, scary for resa.rnQualche next day, I sold the Nikon kit and I added to a kit Fuji xt1 and the fantastic ... 50-140 rnrnBeh boysOnce placed a minimum auto focus I think the market mirrorless Sara very ahead
Pros:Style, ergonomics, simplicity make managing functions, quality files.
Cons:Lack tropicalization, autofocus.
Opinion:I have owned for about six months this beautiful machine with satisfaction. Especially because it does not regret the camera if not for that focus speed in moving subjects reveals its limitations. The electronic viewfinder I found, perhaps, even better than the D800 querllo. Easy and intuitive management functions, supplied with a detailed manual and exhaustive. Excellent quality of files, comparable to machines of higher level. Accompanied me on several releases out the door, even in extreme weather conditions, cold and rain without ever missing a beat. Replaced by a few days for another system ML for the lack of weather sealing and the limited park optic Fuji.
Pros:Picture quality at high ISO, optical quality at an affordable cost, discrete autofocus. Excellent image definition and color management. Weight and dimensions
Cons:battery life, autofocus slower than a reflex, less feeling in the management of the body
Opinion:I took this camera kit with 18-55, for its size and for the curiosity to try the sensor x-trans, I must say that the quality of the photos produced has gone beyond my expectations. I come from a Nikon D7100 and I still have it and use a Sony A6000 downgraded to a machine for shooting video, activities in which I believe is unsurpassed, and as a car for family use. I must say from the very first shots that the quality of RAF files produced by X-E2 is, in my opinion, superior to that produced by both the D7100 is the sony A6000, although the latter machines with a 24 megapixel sensor. The sensor x-trans that is attached to the fuji, in my opinion, is superior to detail, color management, and especially for low noise at high ISO. Even the camera body is sturdy and well-made though not weather sealed and recalls the old analog machines rangefinder. The electronic viewfinder is just great! I purchased along with 18-55 a 27 mm / 2.8 pancake that makes the machine truly pocket. The purchase of fuji, given the quality of photos produced, for now I have convinced you to postpone the transition to FF. There are still some known defects of the system such as ML autofocus slightly slower in difficult lighting conditions, a lower overall responsiveness than the SLR, a park dedicated optics, though quality is not extended as the park optical nikon or canon, that defects in the 'I have also seen in other Sony A6000. In any case, the machine is usable with a bit of foresight in 100% of cases. I took photos of the stormy sea at 23 pm at 6400 ISO with a quality management of the noise significantly higher than the one I got with the nikon or with the sony in similar circumstances.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.