JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Tropicalization, stabilizer, construction quality, size and weight and good coupling with CT
Cons:Without teleconverter you risk being short as focal, for sharpness you need practice and good light, price not really popular
Opinion:Fuji's zoom red badges always give great satisfaction and this lens is no less, the construction quality is at the top, also considering the efficiency of the stabilizer and tropicalization. With canvases, however, the mm are never enough and 400mm is not many, so it is necessary to calculate the opportunity /need to combine a 1.4x CT. In terms of sharpness you can get the best around f8, with well-lit scenes and subjects not too far away. In combination with my xt3 the af works well, especially after the latest firmware updates. The price is high but in line with similar high-end lenses. Good lens.
user148470
sent on September 11, 2020
Pros:Stabilization
Cons:Unclear on distant subjects
Opinion:Bought just got out to satisfy my wild passions. gave me and gives me great satisfaction. Stabilization allows shots with unthinkable times and this sometimes allows you to compensate for the low brightness by keeping the iso low. Af not brilliant but also to throw away. Possible to use even for non-extreme macros. It loses sharpness with distant subjects while with subjects within 10m away it churns out a good detail and blurry
Pros:Balanced, freehand photographers almost everything.
Cons:I haven't taken it out of the car for 3 days
Opinion:Great lens, fast focus, bird photographers flying smoothly even with little light. I haven't used the easel yet, because freehand can do a lot. The weight is not excessive. In the backpack it is with 5 other lenses and I go out on skis, on foot or on bikes. A great purchase, I would always take it back. The price is quite high, but it's worth them all. Even cropping you do not have visible losses of quality
Cons:construction not at the level of the canon counterpart, MDF which could be lower
Opinion:After 1 year of trying, I decided to switch entirely to fuji from canon, taking advantage of an excellent cashback. Very clear goal, more than what was allowed to expect from the various comments on the forum. With the xt3 I'm also finding myself very well on the autofocus side, although I have yet to learn the various modes of AFS-C well. I can say that the fuji pairing definitely beats my old 7d-100-400 IS USM II, this also and especially for the goodness of the xt3. Freehand manageable, better than the canon which was more stocky and heavy. Only defects, although not huge, an MDF of 1.75 meters that on certain occasions (type of occasional freehand photos with butterflies) can be frustrating anda construction a little more plastic than the excellent canon, with a ring of the focal excursion that can not be adjusted (but only put in lock) and that tends to cause, during transport, the lens extends to 400mm. However good lens: I would take it right away.
Pros:Sharpness, microcontrast, absent aberrations, wonderfully balanced despite the weight, block at 5 meters, polarizer window, versatile, construction.
Cons:On the xt10 af continuous not very fast.
Opinion:It was so much that I wanted it, I wanted a superzoom apsc and fuji is the only one to do it. Moreover, my experience with 18/55 f2.8 / 4 was, all in all, positive. The weight of 1375g. it scared me a lot, but as soon as I picked it up I was stunned by the exceptional balance that makes it very maneuverable, another thing that scares me the combination with the tiny xt10, no problem, is held perfectly, with the due caution of course. The first shots made in the shop made me immeasurably immediate. I've been using it for seven months with satisfaction, the only digital lens that has really impressed me so far. Yield of colors, three-dimensionality, sharpness, microcontrast, stabilizer, aperture ring, absence of aberrations and vignetting, are, in my opinion, at the top (perhaps I found a particularly successful specimen). I would like to compare it with rivals Canon and Nikon, but I do not have them and I did not have them. The only defect is the continuous non fast on the xt10, which also say improved on the xt20. In practice what I can not do is stop birds of prey in flight, in return, the electronic click of the xt10 makes it great to get closer to the subjects. Highly recommended rating 10
Pros:OVERVIEW STABILIZER! 5m AF lock, unlocking the diaphragm ring in the car position, hinges with a polarizer window, not too bulky.
Cons:Not a little foot and little else for now, I use it for a few days!
Opinion:It seems to me better than other Fuji optics, at least with regard to the structure and coating that even on the body of the XT-1 leaves it to be desired! The diaphragm ring of other Fuji (23sample!) Does not provide a lock in the automation position and often moves to be particularly soft, but instead have a dedicated button (such as 10-24 and 18-135) on insertion Of the ring on the optic or the one on the body "A" .nn The hood, which has always been a defect of the Fuji, in this case seems well with a release button, hooks up well and easily and provides the window to rotate the Polarizer filter.rn Optical quality I think it's not arguable and it's not up to me to judge it, with the XT-1 doing well and with the xt-2 it does its utmost for autofocus! Rnrn PAZZESCO STABILIZER! ... I tried to 400mm with a 1/10 second time at a distance of about 20m and the picture was perfect! I still do not know how well it loses a lot of quality but I have evaluated that at long distances (in particular cOn the 1,4x teleconverter) on the tripod the photo with the stabilizer is kneaded! At 840mm, I think it's understandable! RnTo use at close distances like in the macro (it has a minimal focus on the eye!) Or for portrait over 10m is very useful! RnrnI am very satisfied and will add any considerations in the use if it is appropriate!
Pros:Low weight compared to other similar optical Brand, excellent stabilization (5 real stop), but I would advise you to use the stabilizer only if really necessary in spite of the quality.
Cons:Dial to the 'very tough zoom range
Opinion:I bought a month or so and tested in various situations both sports that fauna.rnLo ancestors find it very versatile, very engraved with subjects up close, less in others situazioni.rnHo found that the stabilization affects the quality of the image, then my opinion should be used only if really necessaria.rnLa the focal ring is very tough compared to 50-140 ... maybe because immacolato.rnPer even now I would not say altrorn
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
