JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM is a superzoom lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2019. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Nano-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 979 €;

27 users have given it an average vote of 9.0 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon RF: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Canon RF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	24-240 mm
Angle of view	84 - 10.3°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4-6.3
Aperture blades	7
Lenses/Groups	21 elements in 15 groups
Min. focus distance	0.50 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.26x
Features
Zoom type	Ring, external
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Nano-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	72 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	No
Weight	750 g
Dimensions	80 x 122 mm
Buy
Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Mattiap78

sent on November 13, 2022

Pros: Good definition at almost all focal lengths, fast and accurate autofocus, relatively light weight, large focal range, excellent image stabilization.

Cons: Medium quality construction, not tropicalized, lacks hood, lacks manual fire selector, distortion at 24mm, high price.

Opinion: Economic lens with an important price: you can see almost immediately that it is built in economy, starting with the packaging of the box, but with the excuse that Canon prevents third-party manufacturers from producing lenses with the new mount, it allows it to offer medium quality products at exaggerated prices. Such a lens should be sold at 600 euros in my opinion, not 1000. The construction consists of a medium-low quality plastic that seems to be easily ruined, but we will see this with the use. For the use that is intended this lens, that is all-rounder and for travel, it would not be bad if it had been tropicalized. The switch to select manual fire is missing, although this is a marginal problem as far as I'm concerned. For the 1000 euros paid, you could also make a small effort to include the hood (it costs 15 euros of competition, Canon certainly less), useful accessory not only to reduce reflections, but also to protect the front lens. But it's not all a con to this lens: the relatively light weight and the large focal range will make it a faithful companion for mountain hikes and travel. The definition is very good at short and medium focal lengths, while towards the upper limit there is a slight loss of detail, but nothing serious. The autofocus is fast, precise and quiet. The optical stabilizer works in symbiosis with the sensor (for camera bodies equipped with a stabilized sensor) and is really very effective. The zoom dial has no backlash, and is pleasant to use; Maybe a bit too hard, but not a problem, and makes the zoom lock switch superfluous. Convenient is the freely assignable multifunction ring, which becomes the fire control if necessary (there is the selector to choose the control, but not the one to choose the manual fire). It should be noted that if you shoot in RAW, it is mandatory to correct the distortion in post production to 24mm (in jpeg the camera already does it automatically), otherwise you can admire the black border of the lens on the four corners. This is another potential lens defect, because the correction leads to a small loss of detail on the edges. In conclusion, the lens will certainly give me satisfaction, but at a somewhat expensive price for construction.

Daniele Ruggeri D2

sent on September 26, 2022

Pros: Focal range, dimensions/weight

Cons: Yield at the edges, 24mm so-so, 240mm a little soft, not very bright and cost.

Opinion: It is a fairly compact size lens for a 10x. The yield in the center is good, at 24 it loses a lot at the edges: deactivating the lens profile on camera raw you notice a lens wider than 24, a little fisheye, which is stretched and cropped by the software correction to obtain the final result that we are used to seeing. Between 50 and 100mm is pretty good; between 100 and 150mm gives its best, from here on it starts to drop until it becomes a little soft at 240mm. From my impressions in the wide focal lengths this super-zoom is poorer than the various 24-70/105 but at 70 and 105 beats them being halfway through its excursion. The convenience, however, is that compared to them the 24-240 reaches much further .. it's like having a normal zoom and a tele-zoom combined. I did some tests comparing with the 24-75 of the Panasonic lx100 (which I use on a trip) and beats it despite the greater focal range. Obviously it helps the FF sensor of the R against the 4/3 of the compact. Being a fairly dark zoom in the evening outings with the tip and shoot you go up a lot of ISO: I recommend for this to bring a tripod or flank a bright fixed. In my opinion it is the ideal optics for travel / trip because being able to shoot between 24 and 240 without changing lens is priceless! Being a handyman I also tried it in portrait and at the focal canvases manages to blur despite the dark diaphragm isolating the model. I am combining it with my set of fixed for travel use, reducing the use of the compact to the bare minimum, to take more advantage of the EOS R.

Angelillo

sent on February 22, 2022

Pros: Versatility, more than discreet optical yield discreet at all focal lengths, surprising for a super zoom

Cons: Reduced brightness, lack of hood, mandatory digital correction at 24mm, at 240 mm lower yield than shorter focal lengths, lack of any form of tropicalization

Opinion: Taken for a landscaping workshop with the intention of reselling it as soon as I could take the RF 24-105 L, unavailable at the time. The problem is that compared with other lenses (EF 35mm f2 IS, EF 50mm f1.8, EF 70-200 F4 IS L) and with the same RF 24-105mm F4 L on Canon EOS R, well the RF 24-240mm is not bad at all: it managed to undermine my prejudices about super zooms. Certainly it does not have the same performance as fixed focal lengths, certainly zooms with lower excursion are better, but the differences are no longer as macroscopic as they used to be. Even compared to the RF 24-105 mm F4 L the differences are not huge. The resolution in the center is more than decent on all focal lengths, at the extremes of the range (24 and 240 mm) are the edges to suffer a little. In the central focal lengths the situation is not bad, so for example at 105 mm at TA I can not say that the RF 24-105 mm L is better, indeed: at 105mm the 24-105mm is at the upper limit (which in itself has a lower yield than the shorter focal lengths, at least on my specimen), while the 24-240 is in an intermediate area of its range, where he gives the best of himself. Even when compared to the EF 70-200mm F4 IS L the differences, in the equivalent focal lengths, are not evident except when comparing the images at 100% or 200%, with the advantage of the edges for the EF 70-200 F4 IS L. For design choice it is necessary to use the digital correction of geometric distortion (otherwise enormous) and 24mm vignetting, a choice that obviously penalizes the yield at the edges. The color rendering is good, as well as the contrast. Effective stabilizer. The prerogative of having in a single lens a wide range of focal lengths, with a weight contained in 750g is a huge advantage, especially when traveling or hiking; In such situations, often not having to change the optics is also an advantage, limiting the dirt that ends up on the sensor. In this regard, the lack of any form of tropicalization is an important limitation. The biggest problem I've encountered is the limited brightness that pushes to use high ISO (especially at longer focal lengths, f 6.3 at 240mm!), and this reduces the image quality in low light more than the resolution limits. For the purchase price (1000 and more €) the lack of the hood is scandalous. Moral: not only did I not resell it, but very often it takes the place in the outputs of the RF 24-105mm F4 L.

Doriano Ciardo

sent on April 20, 2021

Pros: Very versatile and lightweight.

Cons: Diaphragms that force you to use ISO cars recklessly

Opinion: Used as a forklift for 10 days waiting for another lens. I was surprised at the lightness and optical hike. Also shot the interior with ISO up to 6400 with RP, the results were good. For outdoor shots it shows its true value, excellent colors and details. An optics to keep as a reserve of the L series, or on trips to unpleasant places.

Roberto Nalini

sent on September 06, 2019

Pros: Versatility, good image quality to be a 10x. makes it better in canvases than in wide-angle. acceptable size and weight.

Cons: lack of the standard lampshade. On a cost of 1000 euros we could put that piece of plastic of the lampshade , it is not made of gold!

Opinion: Taken from a couple of days and tried on the fly with mundane photos just to compare it with RF 24-105. I must say that I expected worse for a 10x , in direct comparison with RF 24-105 loses quality at the edges in the focal courts, but not dramatic. Very good yield to the long focal points, compared with the EF 70-200 f4 is last series holds him almost head. the problem is that you have to use the new digital photo professional of canon because at the moment the raw files on raw camera are not correct , you can use but for example at 24mm you see at the corners angry the edges of the lens. in Practice shows a photo more than 24mm than the same in jpeg. More information will follow in the field. But it's crazy to go out with the only car around your neck with a lens that does pretty much everything, leaving the heavy duffel bag at home. It's only been a few days and the raw camera update has arrived, I say right away that it's a strange thing, applying the lens data corrects well and the black corners disappear, but giving the correction 100% on the distortion that makes the photo change a lot, but straightens the lines to perfection. With other 24 mm lenses you do not see the black corners even without applying the correction. Boh...... However, I confirm the decent overall quality. He loses a bit of sharpness at the edges in the focal courts, but I'm a good judge. Going around without the heavy duffel bag pleases me and I think in the end that if you don't have to do professional photos for advertising can go well. Ps tried at a wedding for the outside....... Never had so much fun! Great result!

Photos taken with Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
50 comments, 2159 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

What a view!

by -zeppo-
49 comments, 3728 views

HI RES 19.4 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
36 comments, 1742 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Lessinia

by Roberto Nalini
21 comments, 1846 views

HI RES 13.3 MP

Towards the church

by Roberto Nalini
23 comments, 1295 views

HI RES 9.0 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
27 comments, 3440 views

HI RES 8.4 MP

" WE COULD HAVE DRUNK MORE "

by Gazebo
58 comments, 1483 views

HI RES 12.2 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Mussomeli Department (CL)

by Vincenzo Sciumè
26 comments, 1648 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Seligman

by -zeppo-
27 comments, 1105 views

HI RES 5.9 MP

Bernina

by Giulietta Cazzaro
64 comments, 871 views

HI RES 26.0 MP

The Florentine beauty

by Gazebo
65 comments, 1346 views

HI RES 19.4 MP

Moments of professional unity

by Gazebo
59 comments, 871 views

HI RES 14.4 MP

Drink by+++++++

by Gazebo
49 comments, 1095 views

HI RES 13.8 MP

Monument Valley at dawn

by -zeppo-
17 comments, 806 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

I'll bring the wine!

by Gazebo
53 comments, 558 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Bricipilla absorbed in his projects

by Gazebo
69 comments, 920 views

HI RES 16.1 MP

Sunset in the East

by Gazebo
39 comments, 588 views

"THE PLEASURE OF BEING AND PARTICIPATING"

by Gazebo
50 comments, 1455 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

Engraved in focus.

by Vincenzo Sciumè
24 comments, 944 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Collegiate church of San Giovanni Battista in Castel San Giovanni

by Gazebo
39 comments, 707 views

HI RES 19.4 MP

Lemonade

by Gazebo
37 comments, 946 views

How to interpret Moira's answer

by Gazebo
50 comments, 905 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
19 comments, 260 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Italic orchid

by Vincenzo Sciumè
25 comments, 1013 views

HI RES 10.7 MP

Founded in Castrezzato (BS) on 24-03-2024

by Gazebo
47 comments, 575 views

HI RES 15.7 MP

Photogenic? The answer is yours

by Galiano59
14 comments, 1728 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

The President's New Purchase

by Gazebo
59 comments, 1167 views

HI RES 17.8 MP

You don't live on water alone

by Gazebo
24 comments, 633 views

HI RES 17.4 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
16 comments, 1144 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Bonassola

by Gazebo
37 comments, 565 views

HI RES 19.6 MP

The Duck Brute

by Gazebo
40 comments, 406 views

HI RES 15.9 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

"Little Red Riding Hood"

by Ruzza Stefano
40 comments, 1116 views

Morning hatches in Pellestrina VE

by Roberto Nalini
10 comments, 1567 views

HI RES 18.7 MP

Santa Maria dello Spasmo

by Daniele Ruggeri D2
6 comments, 1828 views

HI RES 12.1 MP

Untitled Photo

by Vincenzo Sciumè
12 comments, 803 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

But it's a nudist beach

by Gazebo
42 comments, 775 views

HI RES 20.0 MP

They called them Trinity

by Gazebo
47 comments, 1153 views

HI RES 18.2 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM

Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM