JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
The Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM II is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2015. The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 2390 €;
55 users have given it an average vote of 9.6 out of 10.
MOUNT
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Excellent sharpness, built quality,design, handling,creamy bokeh almost everything.
Cons: None.
Opinion: This lens is perfect for crop sensor considering its equivalent focal length of 56mm on my 7d. I used this as my walk around lens from landscape,portraiture,macro & almost everything. At first i was thinking twice if i will buy this lens because it was very expensive but i was very very happy with the results and forgot that price. I almost forgot I have other lenses because it's always attached to my camera. i have made this opinion before i had no 5D IV. Now i am used it FF what can I say wow wow can express how happy with this lens the versatility, sharpness, color, bokeh, whether seal,mobility almost everything.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:Lens with really good features especially for professional use. Excellent sharpness and a soft bokeh. I also use this lens to make macros (rings) preferring it to the canvases I have in my backpack (85/135). It is fast and quiet. The only flaw is that the hood seems to be a number one chinoiserie! The weight is not a cons, the price maybe yes but now it is much less. I would replace it only with the RF version that I hope will come out soon maybe more macro and IS
Opinion:Excellent optics, three-dimensional, beautiful blur, destined to be always mounted. Great for the street but also for the portraits. Absolute precision with closed diaphragm. The weight is important but adequate to the type of lens. Excellent combination with the Canon R with adaptor. The optics can not miss in the Canon kit. The cost is not excessive for what it offers.
Pros:Sturdy and well done; Heavy, but light to be a 35mm f1.4; Sharpness character at full aperture; Simple and ergonomic use
Cons:Plastic lens hood, metal was better; Important dimensions.
Opinion:As a lens is great and weight, but you need to make some considerations: the lenses from 35mm to aperture F1, 4 for reflex, are all big and weights. But this compared to the Zeiss Milvus that I used for a long time, is much lighter. As far as size is concerned, it is true that a small lens is better, but I find that large ones are easier to handle: they give more stability when you grab the camera. This is a purely personal opinion because I have big hands, but that obviously goes to the detriment of weight and clutter. The 35mm lens for me is irreplaceable and has always been the fulcrum around which I have always made my choices. Until just now I had the 35mm F2 is, of which I was more than happy, but this optically was an unexpected surprise. I never thought I'd find all this difference. Quietly holds the comparison with the Milvus 35mm f1.4. Probably the pure quality of the Zeiss is better, but at certain levels it counts more the taste of the absolute performance and in this case I must say that this Canon I find it beautiful. The yield of the blurred is very beautiful, the colors are dense and plastic, the light-dark well modulated makes an excellent relief effect and all this in a way quite similar to the Zeiss. The surrender to all openness is truly exceptional and gives it its specific character. If you grant me the license, I would say that the photo with the 35mm f1.4 full aperture is everything except perfect, but in much like other Canon lenses, are beautiful, even more than when you use them to intermediate diaphragms of work.
Pros:L-series, 1.4 maximum aperture, creates addiction because of its very pleasant and creamy three-dimensionality.
Cons:Was it really a series two?
Opinion:My fifth 35mm f1.4, of which two Sigma art and three L series. I got in order: L Series first version, Sigma Art, L series first version, Sigma Art, and now this second version. In all cases where there was the transition between Canon and Sigma I regretted the canon. Innutile write a lot of disappointment on two different lenses sigma, usual problems known that many persist in hiding.... Anyway about this L series.... Very well built, it looks like a 16-35 F4 is, excellent three-dimensionality to TA, hooks the subject even with low light, no sign of gost or flare. Honestly I did not find much difference in the files between the first and second series, I do not know if you actually needed a makeover, maybe it's just a talk of marcendising and marketing. It is definitely a light optics to have in your kit, perhaps at the expense of a zoom. Personally I would have liked the diameter of the filters from 77 instead of 72mm, so as to exploit the same diameter from 16 to 200 mm.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
![[editors pick]](shared_files/layout/ep_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
