JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:excellent image quality, a choice of circular and diagonal fisheye
Cons:Diaphragm not bright (for those who make night photos)
Opinion:I used this fisheye in different trips and I was very satisfied; compared to the previous Canon 15mm f / 2.8 it is vastly superior in terms of image quality and construction quality. The ability to choose between circular and diagonal fisheye is very innovative and was convenient on several occasions; personally prefer the diagonal fisheye, but in some cases I was able to exploit the fish move and I was back comfortable have it available in the same goal. Another distinctive feature of this lens is its outstanding macro capabilities; It has a 0.39x magnification ratio that lets you take great macro acclimatized. The only fault I could find is the f / 4, dim, that in the night photos obliged to raise a lot of the ISO; for those who snaps prevantemente day is not a problem. He 'a specialized lens, but for those who love the fisheye or macro wants to devote himself to set recommend it very much!
Cons:Perhaps the lack of a protective filter to the lens.
Opinion:Skeptical until its purchase, after it tested a Canon Day in Franciacorta in 2014 on APS-H, I decided to buy this Fisheye to have something to use to below 16 mm classic Canon EF 16-35 F4, perhaps give a more creative touch to your photos and to "close" the range of 8 to 105 mm in F4. Initially the use of 8 mm, on FF, I was not impressed, the circular image is is particular, but in my opinion tiresome after a few shots. Different and 'use by 12 mm (approximately) to rise, which is appreciated as very wide angle, especially ideal in particular portraits, sports and why not on the geometry of buildings and landscapes (use this lens for close-up pictures of rally cars in a static position, or the inside of the cockpit of planes or cars). It 'a particular objective, because incentive to look, as noted by others, points of view not convenzionali.rnTecnicamente nothing to say, I think it is an excellent lens:robust, very compact and solid construction! The zoom ring works very well and does not have any type of game, to the validity of the excellent build quality. A TA center is crystal clear and the angles are more than acceptable. Closing the image quality improves across the frame, giving the images very sharp and contrasted. Good, in my opinion, the resistance to flare, while for chromatic aberration turns out to be, always, in my opinion, very minimal and therefore easily eliminated through the software; good resistance to flare. Autofocus very precise. rn
Pros:Great lens, sharp and contrasted quite correct.
Cons:Perhaps the cost but it is perhaps the only zoom with these specifications.
Opinion:is a great zoom quite correct from 13 to 15, while 8 to 12 distorts as it is logical immaginare.Quindi you can use it both as a good wide-angle (pushed) both as a lens for use on the effects particolari.Io 5d MARII and are satisfied with this lens for both its ductility that yield of the details to the whole apertura.la distorsine is minimal in the case where it is to be used as a simple wide angle.
Pros:Quality construction and L series lenses; Range of use; Weight.
Cons:Can not mount a protective filter for the lens; price.
Opinion:I purchased this light after a bit of inner dilemmas. I was torn between the 16-35 f2.8 L and ottca in questione.rnLa choice fell on the FishEye sostanzailmente because I wanted a perspective that had a focal length of 15 to 16mm in order to get the views as far as the eye can see. RnInoltre mounted on a APSC me becomes a 16-24mm (approx) which is not bad as optics for street light travel (APSC, fisheye and 50mm). rnL'utilizzo to 8mm is purely creative (on FF) and in different circumstances returns photos different from the usual shot! rn
Pros:Solid construction, optical quality, image quality and color saturation, handling, sharpness, resistance to flare, extreme distortion, autofocus.rnDa circular fish (FF) or diagonal (aps-c) to super wide angle lens with a simple twist of the dial .
Cons:Hood who occasionally stacca.rnPrezzorn
Opinion:Use this lens by about 1 year of aps-c, a little in all situations, street, Holidays, Portraits (very special), portraits settled, particularly in sports or contextualization of the sport. With this goal, you must "enter" in the picture, but the results are incredibili.rnPer exploit this objective it is necessary to use non-conventional points of view, so getting photos RNE 'Must one of my backpack, for any purpose situazione.rnOttimo, solid, well- built and reliable. Resistant to flare, returns excellent colors and good sharpness. Its strong point is given from the perspective that offre.rnLo stabilizer is superfluorn
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
