|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on October 02, 2023 Pros: Dynamic range, high ISO sealing, ergonomics, construction, price, battery consumption, files, used price... Cons: few MF points Opinion: Coming from APS-C I could not fail to appreciate the beauty of the FF. A large and bright sensor that gives files already beautiful so, very little PP in some and only to adjust some areas maybe slightly over or underexposed. Beautiful colors, nice contrast. The thing that amazed me most is the tightness at very high ISO without showing noise (at 1600 ISO the file is perfectly usable, even in light conditions not excellent). Another point in its favor is the management of the backlight: I was impressed. I must say that I am enthusiastic about this machine and the few points of MF are actually a superfluous problem, when learning to use it. Now I have been using it for more than a year and I have also taken a lot of it, I have taken it on a trip, in the mountains and on a motorcycle, I have paired several lenses (even vintage) and I have practically never had disappointments. Needless to talk about the live view, the burst, the AF not very fast: it was not designed for dynamic use, but for a more reflective and contemplative one. |
 | sent on January 12, 2023 Pros: High ISO seal, battery life, solidity, value for money. Cons: Few focus points and poorly distributed, no adjustable screen, a bit too slow (not even 5 shots per second). Very slow live view focus. Opinion: I have this SLR for more than 3 years and it has been my trusted companion for my travels and my trips out of town. If you do not have too many pretensions it is the right camera. For the price of used you take home a lady reflex in the field of full frame entry level. However, using it for years and also improving your skills in photography, its characteristics no longer satisfy and inevitably you will feel the need to move on to something else. Of the genres for which I would recommend it are landscape and portraits. But I think it's absolutely unsuitable when it comes to photographing moving subjects because of the slow autofocus and the number of shots per second. Vote 8 |
 | sent on December 27, 2022 Pros: Sensor, ergonomics and much more Cons: Nothing from my point of view Opinion: Canon Eos 6D is a SLR that can still say its for photos of: Landscape, Portrait and Travel. I tried to shoot portraits a bit in these days of celebration and I can't speak ill of this camera. Obviously until now on the road I shot with a 5D MII even if I have 5D MI, 1D MII, 1d MIV and 1DS MIII but I only use them on some occasions. It makes really nice photos is impressive its sensor from an analog flavor. High ISO Noise etc. Be when you shoot with film in B & W Iso 3200 or Iso 400 etc. and you print in the darkroom comes out the Grain here is the Noise is like the Grain. Personally, I don't mind. Lightweight machine space-saving handle very pleasant in a word only Excellent ergonomics. AF with a single cross-type point. I do not see the problem can not be engaged in sports photos because it was not thought, nor designed for this. Low burst is not a problem because it is not needed if sports photos are not taken. I recommend it to those who take this type of photo. In the end WIF and integrated GPS very comfortable but we do not forget that the 6D is tropicalized. |
 | sent on October 22, 2022 Pros: Ergonomics-Durability and Battery Type-Ergonomics-Sensor Cons: AF Module Opinion: I have owned the car in question for years, which even if today it is defined as a dinosaur for my humble opinion in certain contexts beats it with the new sisters. Is AF prehistoric? Yes. Does it have only one card slot? Yes. But the merits are many as per PRO. the thing that even today at every shot makes me say WOW, is the sensor, with its always beautiful rendering, with a vintage flavor but without the noise that then, when present, is also pleasant. An ISO 5000 makes you a mustache. A timeless machine that coupled with the right optics will always make you feel with your buttocks in the soft. Vote 9 |
 | sent on October 22, 2022 Pros: Price, autonomy, file quality at any ISO, infinite battery, light and handy. Cons: Lack of double Card Slot. Opinion: I think it is among the best cameras (if not the best) as value for money produced by Canon and beyond. I had both the 6D and the 6DMk2 then resold to range over other brands. After a few years I bought back a 6D with very few shots and at a bargain price. Why did I prefer the first 6D version between the two? Fewer megapixels result in a better yield of the sensor that returns cleaner and "fresher" images. The other improvements later introduced on the 6DMK2 do not interest me personally, so I would have only spent more than double the money to buy it. We come to the ability 'to focus, honestly I use only the central point that in my opinion among all the points and' always to be used for every occasion: if then I have to shoot photographs to subjects who arrive on the scene and with the point more' unfortunately far away of all I want to focus it, I change passion ... I like photography not being a sniper. I conclude by saying then that the focus with the central point and 'you have vertices of the category (Canon teaches), the quality of the files and' indisputable, as the yield even at high ISO, also if there is' shadow on the scene the shadow must remain - but no, for many stubbornly that shadow must become celestial light - and anyway if you want to lighten the Raw file that produces and' very effective for such practices. I recommend it unreservedly. |
  | sent on October 20, 2022 Pros: Price, central AF point, high iso quality, FF, autonomy Cons: Side AF points, AF module in live view Opinion: It was my first full frame SLR. Crazy autonomy, possibility to control it with wireless smartphones. It has an af module in primordial live view and the side points are not very performing, on the other hand the central AF point is a sniper and sees in the dark. The sensor tolerates well opening shadows and shots at high ISO, the raw are malleable. If you find it at a good price it is a nice machine to start, perhaps coupled with a 50mm f / 1.8 STM: little expense TAAANTA YIELD! |
 | sent on June 26, 2022 Pros: the b / w is really good, falici menu, simplicity of focus points (essential). Cons: very bad in the management of medium / high ISO, sometimes not precise in the single focus points other than the center. Opinion: It is actually an excellent camera body and this is demonstrated by Canon's choice to make a second version which, in my opinion, remains Canon's best SLR (considering quality / price ratio). Robust, practical and versatile for every shooting situation. The ISO issue is a really sore point. I always remain stupid about excessive noise at really low levels (I'm talking about 4000 ISO. Working with fixed optics, the problem is greatly mitigated but the difficulty of the sensor to manage the ISO is always noticeable. |
 | sent on September 21, 2021 Pros: Lightweight, ergonomic, beautiful rows and easy to use. Cons: currently there would be several if compared to ML, but it does not seem to me the case to make comparisons in 2021. Opinion: I am happy owner of this car since 2012 and I can say with certainty (peek at my gallery) that the young lady still behaves very well. I remember that at the exit he made many turn up their noses for the simple fact of the shutter speed at 1/4000, to me as a landscaper no. From the moment that I am able to make me pass any monkey I can tell you that the difference between this machine and the most recent ones remains only in the speed, the 6D is a reflex for quiet amateur photographers accustomed to thinking control and recheck what you are doing during shooting, it is certainly not a tip and shoot. I said previously only speed 'because' at the file level if exposed correctly you do not notice the difference with an identical file taken but' with a FF today, I can say for sure because' I tried several SLR and ML and none has satisfied me to the point of making an upgrade, you want for the weight, you want for the price I did not feel it. As for the dynamic range (because it is what interests everyone) we are normal, obviously we do not do miracles but we are satisfied because in my opinion in the shooting phase you have to control everything and doing it well you can take away some nice satisfactions with the 6d, too convenient to say so much if I am wrong I recover the shadows in postproduction. Currently you will find a 6D at an honest price and trust that if you want to learn this is the perfect machine. |
| sent on September 18, 2021 Pros: ISO seal, min exposure time settable (finally), af AI SERVO and ONE SHOT programmable change with the button usually dedicated to depth of field, price, robustness, double ring, illuminated upper display, fairly responsive AF, display defined to sufficiemza, wifi and the related app (camera connect if I remember correctly) that allows resizing to 1920x 1080 directly in download, breackating in a single shot, the 17 mm becomes a real wide angle (great for shots inside I no longer have to take steps back), settings that can be persolized with C1 and C2 (but if you change setting eg aperture as soon as you deactivate the screen for the automatic stanby when switched on returns to the initial setting), very comfortable upper buttons, convenient joypad to set the few points of maf (but be careful they move easily with the giancia), Precise and reliable AF even with the 50 1.4 up to 2.5-3 meters away, image reproduction with the possibility of choosing whether to see the af points that have been activated for that shot and the default zoom level at the pressure of the lens, battery (easily exceeds 500 shots), burst (4.5 fps for me are more than enough), silezioso shooting and silent burst, Hdr in the car, vignetting correction and chromatic aberration in the car, micro-adjustment lenses and buttons partly sufficiently customizable. Cons: Dimensions and weights (for me too exaggerated), lack of built-in flash (it may seem like a crack but on some occasions it is very useful) lithium yongnuo flash not working in live view (I repeat dolo in live wiev), AF less responsive in the dark, weight and my menu limited to 4 or 5 items. Opinion: For me who come from a 1200d the jump was crazy and the first 2 pros I mentioned were enough for me to make the jump (finally I can shoot even at home at 1/125s and +16000 ISO without flash with unattainable results for an APSC. Obviously not having other higher-end machines the characteristics of this machine left me really satisfied. After 170 and + reviews this can only confirm what others have already written. I wanted to make a small remark about the lock button: someone complains about accidental activation, but it is customizable so it can also be deactivated, the app connected with the wifi nn exports the raw (or at least I did not succeed) and does not export for folders as in my old app. The wifi setting is difficult at the beginning and the machine underexposes about one stop (easily solved with exposure compensation) Better than any APSC? in my opinion yes. Only the weight is making me think about switching to an RP with RF 50 1.8 and rf 24-105 4-7.1 RATING 9.0 for me. |
 | sent on July 29, 2021 Pros: Stunning Iso seal, construction and excellent dexterity. Price, today be buy with just over € 500 new some inventories Cons: Capricious light meter is inaccurate,inaccurate side Maf points Opinion: What can I say, a real SLR that gives stunning files almost finished and nn have so much work in Pp.Iso to be scary, a 6400 comes out a file very but very clean and zero noise. As for the dexterity it is very ergonomic and the sn functions very simple and manageable with great ease. The sore point? Light meter dancer is inaccurate, but otherwise it is a real pleasure to shoot with a 6D, never disappoints you even at night. To this day in 2021 I would buy it another 100 times. As far as I'm concerned my vote is 9 |
 | sent on July 14, 2021 Pros: Colors, ISO, very generous and creative sensor, construction, very good center point, responsiveness, value for money, functions, battery life Cons: pros and cons are all known, not excellent in focus, white balance, dancer light meter, lack of self-cleaning Opinion: Recently purchased to use it as a second body, I already knew what I was up against, but after many years from its release I saw my generation practically "grow" with this camera body, built perhaps with the same updated features of the 5D Mark ii that I kept until a year ago, as far as ergonomics are concerned, it is really very beautiful, light and built with excellent materials, nice display identical to that of the Mark iii but slightly smaller, the joystick is missing but with the buttons you get used to it, I was amazed by the central point, which in the Mark ii was the only strong point but in the 6D has a much more reactive and precise focus area even in low light conditions or in fast situations, the laterals if used calmly and in stationary situations can also work properly... The colors of the raw files are really excellent, perhaps even richer in shades than the Mark iii, the dynamic range does not match with its older sister but looks very good, you can safely use 6400 IS0 without problems, in some cases even the 12800 ISO can occur without too much noise ... Highly recommended even today in 2021 ! |
 | sent on June 15, 2021 Pros: high iso seal, thread workability and lightness, ergonomics and lightness Cons: nobody Opinion: I think this is one of Canon's most successful machines. She has a crazy file, high iso never disappoints, almost better than 1Dx, but still has nothing to envy to her. For those who do not have sports needs, this is a machine that knows how to give great satisfaction, but still wanting to see using the central point is very precise and fast in focus. The flurry is barely enough, otherwise as a ceremonial or landscape machine it is perfect, although unfortunately it has only one slot for SDs, which could make ceremonialists turn their noses up. |
  | sent on March 29, 2021 Pros: Reliable, good ergonomics, intuitive use, battery life, very high Q/P ratio Cons: Inaccurate AF with poor light, sensor that gets dirty with ease Opinion: I used this machine body for many years with great satisfaction and taking several thousand photos. It is still part of my kit, although alongside other machine bodies, I certainly will not separate it so quickly. Without having entered to squeeze all the available features, I found the 6D versatile, intuitive, quite manageable and the results almost always satisfied me. Negative notes concern the difficulty of focusing with low light, the inaccurate sharpness at the extreme edges of the frame and the ease of obtaining flares in cases of backlight even non-extreme while using quality optics. 6D, however, remains an excellent body, super recommended especially now that it is on the market at very affordable prices. |
 | sent on October 30, 2020 Pros: 20 Mpixel, high ISO seal, reliability, battery life, used price Cons: Nothing so burdensome. It doesn't excel at focus speed (but it depends on what you photograph). Opinion: Purchased about a year and a half ago to support the 70d. Focus speed is the only flaw I honestly encounter. However, it seems to me to be precise and reliable; I only use the center point and recompose, so I don't lament the few af dots (just know it). Always comparing the two machines in my possession, perhaps it lacks the adjustable screen that in certain situations is convenient, but even here it is enough to get used to it. Convenient is the WIFI that in some cases compensates for the lack of the posable screen (with mobile phone and APP). The thing that is FANTASTIC is the high ISO seal, it really impressed me: at 3200/6400 (and with the right PP) you clean the noise from the photos excellently. I also find the recovery of shadows very good. We are, of course, talking about an 'old' machine, but still excellent considering the current price of used car; if you want to switch to FF, without fainting and without technological pretensions, I think it is the optimal solution! Highly recommended! |
 | sent on October 16, 2020 Pros: Ergonomic and comfortable in use-Hold high iso-Silent shooting-Battery life Cons: A few autofocus points-One memory card slot Opinion: It is a very good camera for professionals and amateurs. Light and at the same time robust and tropicalized. It holds well and the controls are easy and intuitive. It has a pleasantly quiet shot, and uses a truly long-lasting lp-e6 battery. As far as I'm concerned, it's a full-frame of excellent value. On the market compared to the undisputed quality of the camera, it is located at affordable prices. I personally consider it a truly "successful" camera, in fact it is one of canon's best-selling cameras in recent years. |
 | sent on October 07, 2020 Pros: great sensor, great raw, great jpeg, af with acceptable speed, battery lasts a lot, very good feeling. acceptable burst buffer Cons: af with a few stitches and the side ones serve little or nothing. inaccurate and slow. average burst. exposed while not very accurate. very large viewfinder Opinion: one of the best-selling cameras of the last 8 years, produced since 2012 and recently released. but there are still plenty of them around in new stocks at gift prices. everyone uses it: photo amateurs and professionals. artists and globetroer. even naturalist and matrimonial photographers I took it almost immediately at launch and even today, despite having nikon d800, sony a7ii and canon 5d, the 6dmk1 always remains one of my favorites. it simply does everything and does it consistently and the controls and the feeling of use are perfect. he lacks a built-in flash and the af is quite limited. the exposure meter is pretty simple and makes a lot of mistakes. but once you get used to it, the limits are very few. at the very low prices you find it at now it's a bargain if you're on a tight budget. today, in 2020, however, I would buy a used 5dmk3 which for a few hundred euros more has a much more advanced af and a better burst. |
 | sent on October 07, 2020 Pros: Optical quality, tropicalization, HIGH ISO hold, full sensor, ergonomics Cons: Few AF points Opinion: I bought this body for a few months (550th used guaranteed) because after careful research I think it is the best alternative in value for money to approach the full frame in the used Market Canon. Let's talk about a respectable semi-pro reflex. 20MPX I consider them effective for achieving quality results at a modest weight (another optimal ratio). The feeling in hand is among the best tested (one of the reasons why I preferred 6D to 5DII, another viable alternative for those looking, and 5DIII). In the city the pairing with 50 f/1.8 II is really comfortable. I find almost all of them well positioned. I would have preferred a stick for focus, but here you get to a sore spot of the machine, the few AF points. Being used to shooting in manual is not always a problem, but in situations where speed is essential and you are forced to recompose you feel a bit castrated (perfect center point, the other 10 a little uncertain). Holding high ISO really good. Not really suitable for sports shots and dynamic fauna, but it is not the field for which it was born. Good quality video, but here I prefer 5DII or 5DIII. |
| sent on May 27, 2020 Pros: Quality - Iso Estate - Few Good Points - Bring Home Great Results - Silent Shot Cons: One memory slot - burst - few af points Opinion: It's a battle machine, it has nothing entry level, higher than high iso to the 5D Mark III, the 5D certainly is superior for other features, such as files etc. Find it today in 2020 at just over 400 - 500 euros is a unique opportunity. Canon colors are inimitable, recovers raw files well, it is not the best but recovers. |
 | sent on March 24, 2020 Pros: FF, shredded used prices, tropicalized, robust, IQ, good battery life Cons: Maybe 1/4000 (but on the other hand it has ISO50), uncomfortable PDC preview button, WB car a little uncertain Opinion: I bought a 6D used in February 2020 as a second body, I also have a 7D mkII. What to say, as much as I paid it(400euro with 40stm, 40k shots) it's a crime to complain. The body is sturdy, not very big, but it holds very well, it is not at the levels of the 7D as grip, but it is still great, bad only for the door of the SD that is not very solid and holding it feels, but maybe it is just my a little worn. The menus are clear and easy as usual of the Canon, the interface is the usual of both my old entry-level and the 7D, integrates perfectly with the Eos system of Canon, shares the LP-E6 battery with a lot of models, including also the 7D mkII and the 5D mkIII. The IQ is really excellent, the colors are very beautiful, the images very sharp and defined if you use good optics. In my opinion 20MPX are great because it allows you to have light files and well-engraved images, sharp, clean and at the same time few MPXs help to keep the noise low. I found that the high iso seal varies a lot depending on the light present, for example in poorly lit interiors suffers a little, while it suffers much less if you are outdoors and maybe you need very fast times and a diafr. quite closed, there it does much better, coming to 6400 iso the noise is really very little. The viewfinder is not a big disaster, the AF works well if you use the center, the external points are not a great deal, but for the use that I have to make, that is, mostly static photos (for the action I have 7D) is absolutely not a problem to recompose a little. To do this it is very convenient to use the AF on the back button "AF-ON" so that you do not have to hold down the shutter button in half to recompose. In LV does not fare very well, the AF is very slow and uncertain, much better to focus manually at that point, if you are using the tripods. The only real flaw I found at this body is the PDC preview button, it's tiny and in a completely wrong position! In 7D the usual key is at least 5 times larger (not joke) and put a little more on so that you get there very easily even with the ring finger, on the 6D you have to use the other hand otherwise you do not press it! If you're looking for a body that's a bit of a handyman for more static genres, take it now. If you also do sports and other dynamic genres maybe it is not suitable for you. |
 | sent on March 24, 2020 Pros: economic - FF - tropicalized Cons: AF - excluding center point Opinion: I've owned it for several years and it's never had a hitch even under a cloudburst/snow/freeze/sand. Eexpress a lover's thought not as a professional, there is a whole other pair of sleeves. What are the best photos I've taken... certainly not the ones done effortlessly... and by effortlessly I mean tip and snap with automatic settings, for that there is the smatphone that sure gives equally beautiful memories. From this comes the success of the 6D, not a machine that excels and did not even exceed at the exit, in anything, but a machine that allowed me to spend time in what I like: composition of the image, work on the exposure and think a little like you did once with the film, trying to take advantage of every click, fatigue gives satisfaction, limits are transmuted in occasions to exploit, this is the challenge that poses you the 6D, the challenge? Photography is changing and it seems to me that you prefer to go out, shoot burst photos and then invest time in posts, it's not what I like! Not that developing a photo isn't tiring, in fact for me it's almost a heartbreak... and that's why I love 6D, the files it returns are ready. I like to relax photographing and the slow 6D works like this. in some ways and here "sacrilege" a bit like a Leica. If you like what I like about photography this machine will always please you, if you love working on the photos in the post you will definitely find much better in everything. |
 | sent on March 24, 2020 Pros: price of used, tropicalized, construction/ergonomics, high iso seal, battery life; wifi/gps (but they can be a con). Cons: clutter, af, fixed screen, 1/4000 Opinion: Taken used two years ago at about 600 euros and subsequently resold to switch to mirrorless, what to say.... A fantastic and super ergonomic machine body. Used in all weathers (especially in the cold) it has always held up well, excellent battery tightness, perhaps also due to construction and tropicalization. The shutter reaches 1/4000 and in cases of high brightness such as glaciers or high mountains can be a problem. As for the autofocus I could see a good reliability of the cross-centre point, the remaining 10 leave a little to be desired. 20 mp are more than good for this FF, you have the advantage of always having very beautiful and light files; certainly in my opinion in post production you will not make recoveries at the level of sony, however with a little effort you always pull out great photos. Wifi and gps can be an extra point, but not for me, never using them...... Its "battlehorse" if you can say so is the good iso estate, which makes it really great for night photographs......... in conclusion........ a great body machine that I recommend to all those who want to make a nice leap in quality in the world of reflex. |
 | sent on February 22, 2020 Pros: Hold high iso. Construction. Price used under 600. Sensor. Wifi. Cons: 11 points of AF. Low light conditions not always excellent. Opinion: Excellent FF suitable for those who want to make a leap in quality in the reflex world. For amateur or semi-pro use. It keeps qualities out of time including being Reflex. 11 points of AF really too few. The upside is that it's because you learn to shoot in manual focus. To be evaluated with a few hundred euros more if you buy the 6D II. But for now I'm content. With the 70 200 F4 makes a phenomenal pairing. |
 | sent on December 30, 2019 Pros: good quality sensor, excellent high seal iso, good af on the central point Cons: 1/4000sec, af not always accurate in poor light, awb dancer in different situations Opinion: I had this camera for about a year and I used it with a lot of lenses, the af in good light conditions behaves well (as long as you stay on the center point) but do not touch the peripheral points because they are unreliable, the machine body is robust and light, 20mpx I find them right for a camera of this band, the raw are not too heavy and are excellent lyper, the colors that returns in nature the sensor are not bad but the awb does a little too often. the shutter stops at 1/4000sec and with light lenses in the sun it takes a nd, combined with l-series optics that really show great results, the burst is great for what I used to do (weddings and studio photos). basically it is a machine discreetly fast, reliable and well designed although obviously it has some gaps that you can forgive it for what it costs ! first full frame given used prices. |
 | sent on December 30, 2019 Pros: Ergonomics, image quality, high ISO hold Cons: Automatic White Balancing Opinion: I decided to write after reading the previous comment. I've been using the 6D for 5 years and I'm more than satisfied. I use it for work, then architecture and furniture but also for some wedding of friends, mainly with the 24-70 f/4, but also with 50mm f/1.8 and 35mm f/2. Arriving at the 6D from a 50D I first enjoyed the hold at high ISO, which I can safely set even to over 2000 without having too much noise (which however is easily deleteable with so many software). The only flaw I noticed is in the use with the automatic WB, just change the frame a little to have a different color temperature. Maybe he calculates it on the focus points?. But working exclusively in RAW is a minor problem because I can set the point of white ness at my leisure during the "development" for homogeneous groups of shots. Many complain about the poor quality of secondary focus points, but it is a defect that I have not noticed (perhaps because hardly photograph in low light?). I don't make videos, nor do burst photos so I don't express myself on these features. |
 | sent on December 25, 2019 Pros: ergonomics and price Cons: sensor, af, viewfinder Opinion: great ergonomics, I found it new at a great price, too bad for the sensor and the af of pentax flavor... not to mention the viewfinder, a little peek of a dark cellar. High iso pitiful, af good to photograph statues, a real disappointment. I wanted to go back to canon, but I'll have to postpone when he makes decent cars, like ten years ago. |
 | sent on December 25, 2019 Pros: Current price, ergonomics, crazy image quality, Canon colors Cons: Boh, all things you know well before you buy it... LCD not unsourable, few points of focus and little else. Maybe poor video specifications Opinion: This is an amazing machine for me. I took it a year ago and now I've sold it to mirrorless, as the passion for video looms. I write these two words to pay tribute to her. I took it used at 500 euros with just over 10 thousand shots as the first full frame, and immediately made me fall in love. Holding it is very pleasant, it is perfect in the hand and has the right weight. The arrangement of the keys makes you feel at home and has so many possibilities to customize them to make you your favorite configuration. The images he churns out have always satisfied me. I used it in the mountains with a 14mm and the photos were postcard-worthy. The rest of the time has always been coupled with the 50mm, the PERFETTA lens for her. Always exciting shots. Even the bad photos were nice. There is some review that put the ISO hold in the cons, I personally have always been satisfied. Above 2,000 the grain you begin to see, but somehow even that manages to be pleasant. I've always loved playing with shadows in photos, and this machine returns a beautiful full-bodied black without artifacts. For this machine really just love! He's got flaws for sure. My old machine had a snooper screen and it wasn't easy to get used to the landscreen. The focus points are a few minutes like I said, but in my photography it was never a problem. For the video side maybe it's a little lacking especially these days with all these mirrorless popping up like mushrooms. I don't regret my choice because I really felt the need for a completely different car, but if I didn't need to pull us up a few pennies it would definitely have stayed with me with the 50mm glued forever. I have the feeling that when I reach the completeness with my new kit, sooner or later I will find a 6D in my room. Now, I've never tried the mark 2, but from what I understand is an improved mark 1, so in a few years it will probably be the mark 2 the real "pearl of the past" and it will no longer make sense the mark 1. But now with 500 euros and maybe a little less you make yourself a full frame with which you can do everything and that will make you love to madness. I may not have been very objective, but I really loved her. Hello 6D |
 | sent on September 18, 2019 Pros: Value for money, handling, image quality Cons: ISO, focus Opinion: After years of canoning at the amateur level, I decided, because of some "commissions", to switch to full frame. Since my budget was not very high I was immediately oriented to the purchase of an old guard with insured performance to accompany some good lenses. So I threw myself into the fantastic world of the used. Coming from a 700D (entry level aps-c) the jump was really remarkable; speed and quietness of shooting, robustness of the body, handling of the controls and of course a quality of images that does not even allow comparison. Despite the difference in performance I have to admit that I expected something more. The biggest criticism I have to do to the focus system. The central point of the crosshairs is really a sniper but the others leave something to be desired and not little. I don't think aiming and recomposing is the right way to take a shot. I read that the machine holds up well even at high ISOs, but honestly when I exceed 2000 I do not find many shots completely acceptable. I conclude by saying that the car is in my hands for only a couple of weeks. I hope in time I can think again. |
 | sent on August 23, 2019 Pros: Held high iso, materials, ease of use, colors, handling, price, wi-fi. Cons: Few AF points. Opinion: As before reflex I wanted to buy an FF and I relied on the reviews that this fantastic machine had got. I was immediately totally happy with the purchase. It is easy to use, it is not heavy, it is made very well and immediately give the certainty of being made with good materials. The colors are really beautiful. I use it especially with the wide-angle for landscape photos and I doubt that, for the price it costs, you can find a machine with better quality'/price. The dynamic range is not equal to modern machines, but when I bought it I was aware of it. I don't think I'm ever going to sell it, if one day I'm going to get you a different reflex like the 5DIV. Fantastic machine that suits perfectly those who want an FF of excellent reliability at a super competitive price. |
 | sent on August 23, 2019 Pros: Light, high hold iso, wi-fi, price Cons: Few AF points Opinion: I picked it up after a couple of years because at the price that is in the used currently is a best buy. I was tempted by the ML Canon, but in terms of weight savings in the end I didn't earn anything, and I preferred to take back the little Canon house. I use it in outputs where I want to stay light (I also have 1DX and 7DII), with attached the 24-105. The yield even at high iso is excellent, the 3200 are fully usable. Too bad for the few AF points, but the center is a real sniper, and that's enough. Great for landscape use, in the backpack with 14mm in the mountains you do not feel the weight, also great the ability to control it via wi-fi from your smartphone. Had she had a few more AF points would have been 10. |
 | sent on August 17, 2019 Pros: Trusted Allied, Canon "colors", used quote, size-to-weight ratio in the reflex world Cons: AF does not exist (improved in fact in the heir) Opinion: A very trusted ad. To date it can be found on the 550 euros with very few shots and held really well. You have to know what you are taking (and maybe this is the mistake I made): a machine with a particularly limited AF (although I worked on it in the circuit with the center point), with a dynamic range not excellent, especially when compared to its nikon peers, but with a made to high iso very valid. The colors, you can say what you want, but they are really beautiful: the jpeg are already ready to go out, the complexion does not need adjustments, if you shoot with the right light is a pleasure for portraiture. The files are sufficiently malleable, but don't expect miracles... he can't afford them. In conclusion, a great low-budget alternative for those who crave from FF, for those who love the Canon optical park and want to keep full compatibility. |
 | sent on May 21, 2019 Pros: Easy to use, lightweight and well-machinable files, high ISO seal, small size, cost of both new and used, center point, colors, WiFi, GPS, reactivity. Cons: Exposure meter not accurate to 100%, no joystick. Opinion: Bought the first time to replace the 5DII and remained completely satisfied, at the sensor level was much higher than the granny, then sold and recently regained to support the 5DIV. What about, a very unique "entrylevel" FF so much that I bought it back and I think I will not sell it anymore. Gives a lot of emotions even today, when you open the files on PC I'm always amazed by the colors and quality that can churge out this little house Canon. Not disfigure at all next to the sister 5DIV, in fact I took it especially to take it with me always, without getting too much trouble as with the 5D. For my strictly landscaped use and from time to time even portrait is truly a must have for what it costs (they almost give it to you). Much smaller and more compact than a 5D, I see it almost like a ML, beautiful ready and responsive, as soon as you turn it already is ready to shoot without many frills or without being there to puzzle in the settings. It has a very good dynamic range (for my way of working the files) with a central which is a real sniper. In short, for those who do not want to spend so much and want to have all the merits of a FF without many frills and technological mightily for me useless, this small FF is ideal. |
 | sent on May 11, 2019 Pros: High Iso seal, colours, price Cons: A few points Af Opinion: Choice after trying various systems and wanting to expand my kit with a FF without spending a capital. Love from the start, colors and white balance great, the development of the RAW is a pleasure. Breaths ISO at par with the current top of the range. The rendition in the complexion is superb, and manages to recover a correct color with a few clicks of capture one even in the night, without making tick annoying green dominant (why I had discarded the Sony options). Eternal battery and body quite solid. The only flaw of this machine are the 11 AF points, the low responsiveness of the AF in servo, and the AF in Live view virtually absent. Machine that for its price, in the fields of portraiture, still life and landscaping is an absolute best buy, especially in the guaranteed used where at those prices there is nothing comparable. Note. The 11 AF points, in good light situations work perfectly if used correctly, the control unit is reliable even in difficult situations. The 20 MPX dense FF sensor behaves very well with vintage lenses. Obviously not recommended for applications where you need a fast AF traking. General file Quality 8.5/10 | Seal ISO 9.5/10 | Recoveri 7.5/10 | Color Science 10/10 | Af 5/10 | Build Quality 9/10 |
| sent on April 30, 2019 Pros: Holding high ISO, small system canon, WiFi, is full-frame! Cons: Reactivity, viewfinder not 100% Opinion: Estate, used and loved, I finally sold it. I write this review to help potential buyers. Excellent full frame camera to get started, understand the focal lengths. It shares the batteries with the Sorellone 5D2, 3, 4 70,80, 7D etc., so it integrates very well into the Canon system. Equipped with Wifi, from the very simple setup, it becomes extremely comfortable. Perfect for shots a minimum reasoned (landscape, architecture, static portrait) because it has an excellent sensor (good shots even at 12800) and still a good color rendition species on JPEG complexion. Strongly castrated by the parent company, instead on the reactivity side. 4.5 FPS can even be acceptable, but the buffer is small (especially if you have RAW and JPG active where they are only 7 photos!, only RAW is better), then you get nailed almost immediately. The autofocus is good if one does focus & recompose with the focus to the thumb, however, for a versatile use does not inspire safety and always pushes towards a second step, maybe a tap of full-time-manual focus.. So the car gets in the middle. Another malus there would be, the dynamic range, you know.. is inferior to the competition and to the most modern SLR, I confirm it, better to have it than to have it.. But for the kind of photos I rarely need.. It should also be mentioned that the viewfinder is not 100% so for a millimetric composition better to rely on Live view.. In short it is a machine with lights and shadows. If you know it and do not expect a crazy reactivity, can be a good companion or a second body maybe that mounts a wide angle or a zoom lens that does not squeeze the autofocus (70-300 F 5.6 etc). And especially at the price you find.. Can be a viaticum to start thinking about Fullframe |
 | sent on February 08, 2019 Pros: Ergonomics, optical park, infinite battery, excellent construction, intuitive menu as on all canon. Cons: ISO seal, dynamic range, video 30fps, gust, Heavy, 1/4000 (but given the burst you can not ask for more), display not orientable, resolution, colors. Opinion: has only positive the 5 things I wrote above... then the dark. Holder of Sony a6000 and Samsung NX2000 and 3000. I say... let's try a little the world of full frame canon... bad idea! Thank goodness I had it in test for some GG and I have not spent money to have it! Really obscene! I'm comparing 1 machine from 300 euro only body, with a 1200 euro only body: I say... 20 MPX FF sensor, definitely a stellar ISO seal... useless FF sensor (holds the ISO worse than the Sony that has the APS-C), which sense has put ISO extended to 100,000 if already at 2000 you V Ede worse than my Sony at ISO 3200? I state that I had the Sigma 24mm f1.4, a spectacular objectivity for sharpness, while on Sony I had the 50mm f 1.8, bottomed in comparison to Sigma, and yet Oh, nothing, it does not make it! I say... oh well, I solve in PP... But what?!? Insufficent dynamic range and indecent automatic white balance. Canon, remove those gosh filters on the sensor!!! I say... patience, will only be the ISO the problem... I put the Canon 50mm f 1.8, compared to Sony with the same lens of its own brand, to see the definition of the sensor, nothing, a crap. Low resolution to make way for a high ISO seal? Wrong! Both poor, both ISO and resolution. I say... all that boast the colors of the canon as the best... disgusting here too! The Sony is even worse in the colors, but at least I have so much dynamic range to solve in PP. The Samsung with its nx3000 machine from 150 Euro with objective kit included, beats several both canon and Sony. Photo Part rejected Great! I say... at least it will be good for videos... again a flop! Only 30fps in 2013?!? The Sony was doing the 1080p 60fps from the time of N5. The quality is the same as the photos, unwatchable! I tried a bunch of Canon APS-C, from the 1000d, to the 7d, all bad compared to Sony. Let's give a pertaining to the average FF? (I'm not talking about irragiungible things like 1DX or 5d IV)... moral of the Fable: never more Canon in my life, prices of much above average and obscene quality of sensors. Photo part: 4; Video part: 4; Build Quality: 9. |
| sent on February 04, 2019 Pros: Best Full Frame Quality price on the market, ISO seal, reliable, light weight, cerntrale excellent fire Cons: Few points of fire (only the central is good), white balance not great, a few FPS. Opinion: I've had this car for two years, it never gave me any kind of problem. I do ceremonial photography and portraits, next to the 5d III. Use with the Sigma 24-35 F2, using only the center focus point. The other points are really unreliable. The white balance in automatic does not have the same effectiveness as the 5d in color rendering. But the image quality altogether is very similar to the 5d III. Especially in ISO rendition, shooting in Sraw I took home shots at 51000 ISO. I want to change it to go to R, but I highly recommend to those who now want to switch to full frame or want a second quality cover! On the used it is at bargain prices. Overall vote 8 |
 | sent on December 21, 2018 Pros: General quality, precise MAF, battery consumption, light and machinable RAW files, chromatic range Cons: Screen not fully orientable, few points of MAF a viewfinder but for me have never been a problem Opinion: Socket used with 5000 shots less than 700 euros to replace a 200d Rubatami (my budget did not allow me a higher expense for a 6d MK2) I am extremely satisfied. I use only with Canon L lenses: an old but perfect 70-200 L IS USM F4 of 11 years, a 24-70 L IS USM F4 new and a 16-35 L IS USM new F4 taken by very little. From the operative point of view it turns out for me, that I have no huge hands, well-challendable and well balanced with all three optics. The controls are all in the right place and the top display to quickly set several parameters is extremely useful. Very fast to light up. The only thing I miss compared to the 200d is the screen, however excellent, fully orientable and touch thing that in some situations is a limit. I use the camera almost always at aperture priority, occasionally at time priority or in manual, never in complete automatism. Excellent battery consumption if you use only the viewfinder, there are many but many shots; Using the Live view intensively (which I do often) consumption is much higher... I do not say how many shots because it depends on how much time is on the screen more than the number of shots anyway a full day I can do it and so far I have never needed to use the spare battery. MAF very fast and precise viewfinder, especially with the center point, while with the sides I find it always accurate but less fast. MAF in live view very precise but less fast especially in low light conditions. From the point of view of surrender I find it excellent, even if it tends to underexpose a little something perhaps solvable with some settings. Excellent color range and good, but not extraordinary as I often read, the high ISO that is certainly higher than the 200d. In Post Production The RAW files are very very good and small in size, which allows you to use even PC not very fast or last generation. Great recovery of Shadows, a little less that of the highlights but nothing dramatic. Unless you have completely wrong the exposure you always get a very good result. The FF format allows for good crop even if seen the megapixels is better not to exaggerate to have optimal results, personally I'm always less croppando with the passage of time. The JPEG generated by the camera does not satisfy me, I shoot only in RAW but I would not mind the JPEG in the room as those of the Fuji X30 that I had for some time or like those of the Olympus OMD 10 Mark2 The small ML that joins my kit reflex. Basically a camera that really recommend if taken used in very good condition with maybe with a few shots as I took it. Less than 700 euros with a one year warranty I think I paid the right. |
 | sent on December 03, 2018 Pros: Easy to use Cons: Few focus points, HDR little Flexible Opinion: Bought about a year ago, to enter the world of FF and for landscape, portrait and disengaged trips. I assembled them around a good-quality mini-kit: Samyang 14MMEF, Canon 24-70 f4 L and 70-300 l all in a small backpack cullman. Used a lot on several occasions, has never betrayed me: great noise tightness at high ISO, extended dynamic range, excellent overall performance. Only faults, in my opinion: the focus points in reduced number and poorly distributed (the MKII from this point of view is certainly later), the little HDR evolved (sometimes I like shooting with the option "artistic" but the result is not particularly brilliant). I don't need to shoot at 10 FTG per second and so the speed is enough for me. To be released in 2012, it remains a machine of excellent level. I also have a kit 7dii that I use for naturalistic photos but when you can (shed) horsemanship on the 6d the 500f4 e...ne throw away very few... |
| sent on November 24, 2018 Pros: Lightweight, high ISO hold, cost on second hand, center point of super Autofocus Cons: Construction, AF in general Opinion: I state that I've had this car for over a year! If we look from the point of view of the value for money we can definitely say that the 6d is a machine that is worth taking since it allows you to do pretty much every thing well. We can define it as a machine that satisfies but never makes you totally satisfied. Why?? So, first of all the construction is plasticose, anyone who has taken in hand a 7d or a 5d will notice how the construction of these machines is solid, picking up a 6d and squeezing it with a hand you feel instead of the plastic squeaked (obviously does not break But already this crunch does not make me fully satisfied), the autofocus on the control unit is excellent and personally I have never had problems to focus with the side but these are extremely central so in some situations (portraits with little PDC) you miss Having a few more points here too you don't feel fully satisfied. In Soldoni I would say that considering the value for money is a machine of 8 but in general does not exceed 7. But if you want to have more you have to pay twice as much. With my money I would not buy it on the used in good condition over 600 euros. |
| sent on September 24, 2018 Pros: Legerezza in all senses and raw quality. Cons: Unfortunately when it came out it was not needed to equip it with AF and higher performance shutter speeds. They knew they were still selling tons. Opinion: For some photographic scopes perhaps the best Canon of the old generation. No need for optics and PC to scream to be squeezed and in my opinion this is good. Forgive enough but still true is that under exposes half a stop in evaluative except with the 35 F2 is that F2 is also transmittance. Having also the 5d3 file is more "oily" less detailed but I repeat for some photographic scopes this is only good. Today they are sold used less than a third of the new a few years ago and so who wants and can has way to try the "mythical" photographic world of the FF. |
 | sent on September 04, 2018 Pros: High ISO seal. Central AF fast and accurate. Quality of the files (also in JPEG), but depends very much on the optics used. Battery life (without active GPS). Wi-Fi. Cons: Weight and footprint (but it's a full frame). Monitor fixed. Lack of a built-in flash. Opinion: I have this camera for 6 months and, coming from the APS-C, I have to say that I made a leap of quality... but I would have expected more to read the comments of other users. The shots made so far (both RAW and JPG) with this camera (Canon EF 17-40 F. 4 USM-Canon EF 24-105 F. 4 IS USM, Canon EF 50 mm. Macro F 2.5 and Canon EF 70-200 F. 4 IS USM), albeit better than those made with the Canon 600d , did not make me particularly enthusiastic about the results (maybe it is my fault that I do not know yet to use it). Yet the camera is manageable, accurate, with good high ISO (up to 25600 at night) and responds well to small changes in settings (sharpness, contrast, saturation). The quality of the files (low ISO) seems slightly lower than those obtained with the old Canon 1ds MARK III. The photos published by other users (evidently well worked in P.P.) do not reflect my experience with this camera, even in post-production of RAW files (but even here it may be my fault if I can not make good p.p.). Even the HDR function has not particularly excited me, returning images slightly less flat than those taken without HDR. Compared to the Canon 600 D you feel the lack of a tiltabile and adjustable monitor, useful for when you use the live view, as well as you feel the lack of a built-in flash, to lighten the shadows or in those situations where a flash is comfortable. Exposure meter (especially the spot) and AF are accurate. After 6 my use and a few thousand shots (5-6 thousand about) I feel I give a final vote of 8.5. |
 | sent on August 31, 2018 Pros: Light, fast, image quality, amazing power house, value for money Cons: Af in the sides, display meter, chromatic noise in the shadows Opinion: It is the machine of the amateur, I use it mainly for portraits and landscape, in the fast you have to have a little (so) malice to use only the central in AISERVO, but for sports photos I have a 7D. The image quality is good, it generates files that I like very much, does not save from wrong exposures but allows for decent recoveries. The AF in the central is great - 3 EV, in the sides works above f2 and in good light conditions but still I prefer to recompose almost always and the photos of portraits in the gallery tell me that it works, of course it is a compromise and there are scraps At the price that is now of FF there is nothing better but by spending a little more you will file the defects. |
 | sent on July 18, 2018 Pros: Versatility, cost, iso seal, file quality, FF, Cons: Insufficient tropicalization, ergonomics and command arrangement Opinion: I made the jump to FF returning "Back" since I came from a newer car (an 80D) but the leap forward was everything and I did not regret the choice at all! Although it is said of plague and horns on the AF system of this machine I have not found any major impediments at least for my use (landscapes and some portraits), you can very well always focus with the center and then recompose. Quality of files produced by the sensor good enough to pull out beautiful shots and sufficiently workable in post (clearly with a well-exposed photo). The high ISO seal is exceptional as has been said many times. The only flaws I can encounter are a low visibility of the screen in very strong but unimportant light conditions and, instead, something a little more annoying, the tropicalization that in my opinion is not much (dirty sensor already after a couple of months of meticulous and careful use, not that a piece in the inside of the glass of the AF but that of course is not seen in the photo). The viewfinder is a little disappointing. Like all Canons the arrangement of the buttons, at least for me, is not intuitive at all and forces me every time to have to look for them looking at the car. Limited dynamic range but may not be a disadvantage for those who want to pull out more incisive images working little in posts. It tends to underexppos to save the highlights, I always shoot at 1/3. For the rest I am very happy with the switch to this machine that despite a few years on the shoulders is still a very respectable entry level FF. Rating: 8.7 |
 | sent on July 18, 2018 Pros: Image quality, weight, high ISO output, FF. Cons: Commands (if you are coming from other body FF type 5d), 1/4000, joystick absence, WB available only from the rear display and not selectable with a dedicated key in the upper one. Opinion: I introduced in my setup a 6d used because my 5d old is slowly yielding in several parts and as such I decided to change body to have as main body a newer and more reliable. It's definitely a great SLR and the previous reviews I think have already said everything there was to say. I can add that the only negative note that I have yet to digest (coming from Body 5d) is the arrangement of some commands/functions (example the selection of white balance not selectable in the upper display). They are small if we want, it is a matter of habit, the photos then speak for themselves once post produced. I was undecided between this and a 5d Mk3, I would have chosen the 5d Mk3 with my eyes closed, but the prices are still excessively prohibitive for the real use that I have to make and certainly the final rendering of the images is not inferior. Rating: 9 |
 | sent on July 11, 2018 Pros: Superb image quality. Quality of Jpeg and Raw files. Cons: Autofocus. Opinion: The Canon EOS 6d is not a camera, but a palette of oil colors. The transition to FF, now already for a long over two years, cost me the Canon 7d. It was not easy to give up that image quality, but the 6d was up to par. A masterpiece of Jpeg and Raw files, is generated with each shot. The files are already ready without post-production, but they can also be pulled at will without ruining anything. Great elasticity. The colors are natural and of an extraordinary sweetness and expression. Excellent results at high ISO. I don't feel the need to go to MK II or 5d. The only drawback, the autofocus (with only one central point well functioning) does not live up to the machine it serves. The Gps is very convenient, but consumes a lot of energy. I know I've got a big car in my hands, and I'm not going to deprive myself. The 6d is considered a consumer, but its performance, in essence its sensor, are, in my opinion, of higher level, so much so that for what I know, many professionals use it for their services, even in support to a 5d. Lastly, the lack of the flash is a productive attitude of the Canon, which, for what I understand, does not like to equip its machines of high end of built-in flash. I have not therefore inserted among the cons the lack of the flash. It is my opinion, however, that a little built-in flash, without too many pretensions, so even light, would solve several problems of backlight, and, in general, would improve the images. Among consumer SLR cameras, perhaps, a little effort could also be made for the 6d, but as we saw on the 6d Mark II, it was decided otherwise. |
 | sent on February 14, 2018 Pros: Reactive, high ISO hold, amazing central AF, discreet noise, good ergonomics, low battery consumption (without wi-fi or gps inserted). Cons: impossibility to manage dual functions with the keys (see 5d mark II), need to insert the BG to better balance the bulky FF optics, for the price we include some forced castration, but nothing essential. Opinion: After so much prevarication, if it was better to keep the indestructible 5d mark II or go to the most performing 6d in terms of ISO and AF in low lights, I took the step and at the beginning it was not painless, as switch from a semi-pro setting at an entry level FF the difference is noted. First of all in the dimensions a little less generous than the 6d, then in weight, but above all you have to get used to the new layout of the keys and the multi-controller. After the initial impact, beginning to become familiar with the commands and especially taking pictures (I do not like videos and I did not take it for this, even if you have the chance to be able to shoot them more than dignified), you realize that the positive notes are there, and how if they are there. In different conditions where I would have to opt for the help of the flash, both for the AF assistance and to make the recovery feasible, I found myself focusing on without (with the central), with an ease that I could not imagine. The reactivity of the machineyou can see it already when the pause is switched on or when you wake up, as well as during the shooting and in the lightning response of the AF (especially the central point). The estate iso, as I said is excellent, the recovery in the shadows is the best among those of the SLR up to now I had. I can assert my full satisfaction with the transition to this camera. In addition there are HDR, Wi-fi and GPS, which can serve if necessary. Only note, beyond the forced castration operated for marketing issues, is the need, perhaps from my part, to necessarily have to provide BG to have a better balance with lenses such as 24-70 f.2.8 or with size and size more generous, both for the weight and for the contestability of the same. The 5d mark II remains a great memory, but I do not regret the passage 6d, I'm not a professional and the costs for a new 6d mark II or 5d mark III used (still too expensive considering what the market offers today) at the moment they would not be gjustifiable by the quality of the images (memories) that one brings home. In the future we will see! Promoted with full marks. |
 | sent on January 30, 2018 Pros: Image quality, lightness, manageability, tropicalised body, ISO 50 presence, ISO seal, central point, battery life, WiFi and remote control Cons: Lack of joystick, WB without a special button and not programmable, module af not the fastest Opinion: It's my first full frame, used socket. I owned and own 600D and 7D respectively, of the first I miss the swiveling display, second of all the joystick. As soon as I picked it up, it seemed much lighter than it really is and fits perfectly in my hand. Excellent image quality, keeping noise away from the standards that I was used to with my APSC. the WB seems to me to return files colder than 7D and is more correct under artificial lights, however it does not have a special button like on the 7D and is not programmable, it is inconvenient for me to change it every time from the menu. For what I do I do not need a form af last generation, the side points I have not found them so bad as you read around, in conditions of optimal light / normal or non-critical are reliable, fast and accurate; I would have preferred, however, that they were slightly less collected in the center. Good WiFi presence on occasions when it can serve. Battery with excellent durability (same as thethe 7D), even if taken used I quietly make 1000-1200 shots from viewfinder, which unfortunately become 200-250 from live liew. |
| sent on January 15, 2018 Pros: Size and weight content, excellent image quality, af one shot "precise and lightning (central point, the others I have not tested), wireless, noise, battery life. Cons: Shutter speed max 1/4000, automatic white balance tending to yellow (maybe it's a defect of my model). Opinion: Excellent compromise between quality and advantages of full frame and price; a reliable, lightweight and professional image quality machine. Personally I use it in 90% of cases with the central focus and without the need for very fast burst shots and I have never had problems. rn The battery has a disproportionate duration compared to other reflex used and has never made me regret the investment made. |
 | sent on December 27, 2017 Pros: ISO, weight and size, colors and dynamic range, points af. Cons: gust Opinion: My first FF, I have owned it for over a year now and I have photographed everything from church ceremonies to landscapes. A great car, if I had to find some cons, a few AF points and a few cross-stitches ... the side do not hook very well, especially with light not optimal.rnFor the rest is excellent, quite compact, although to be honest, as ergonomics I prefer the 5d mark2 just because it is bigger. |
 | sent on November 15, 2017 Pros: Big hold, ergonomics, ease of use, wi-fi, gps. Cons: If you intend to use it for sports. Opinion: I have this jewel for about 5 months and I am genuinely enthusiastic about it. Super excellent, lightweight, simple and intuitive hold are the adjectives that I have immediately approached. It's great for value for money. Battle horses are landscape photography, portrait, still-life, and all kinds of photography where the subject does not move fast, however, even for the sport it can go well without too much pretense, just a little bit of practicing and clicking with the center point you can do something! rnThink you. Vote 9! Rn |
 | sent on November 15, 2017 Pros: Good construction, lightness, excellent controls and infinite adjustment options, kept to high ISO excellent, today's best used price for performance, wi-fi and gps. Cons: Multi-zone autofocus not optimal, I loved the glittering 5D tones, and this is slightly over-contrasting and tending to bluish but easily adjusts Opinion: Purchased used for about a week to cover it with my 5OLD I will never sell, just got me disappointed, too cluttered and tending to bluish, not suitable for portraiture, at this point comparing the files obtained with those of the 5old I proceeded to adjust both the contrast and the tonality, after numerous small adjustments under variable light conditions, I significantly re-evaluated the machine, which is very handy, lightweight, even if taking the 5th feels it is of another category. the car is definitely holding up to the big iso, a beautiful light grain up to 6400Iso, similar to that of the old 1000as films I was fond of.rn i like to use the central focus and recompose the image and i have to say it's fine, the focal point focuses in any light condition very fast, I have to say that I have all optics with diaphragm 2.8 or lower, do not know how to go with it ive less luminous but I think well. rNon fit for sporting photography due to slow and inaccurate focussidebars, although you can try jumping a bit and using the central one.rn I strongly recommend that anyone who has never tried a full frame that I will never give up is, in my opinion, the best price / performance ratio in the used, I prefer it considerably compared to the 5 MKII that I've had to try and did not satisfy me for the color rendering. Voting 9.5 |
 | sent on November 10, 2017 Pros: Portability; Stunning ISO sensitivity; gps and wi fi functions; price Cons: Impeccable photo quality compared to the 5d series; not accurate meter; slow burst; non-professional reflex Opinion: My opinion is in contradiction to the positive reviews lette.rnrnHo alongside the 6d to my 5d mark II for a year. Although I liked the new features not in the 5d series (gps and wi fi) in addition to extreme portability, from a comparison I made with the same lenses, overall, qualitatively inferior to the 5d mark II.rnrnVero is that the iso sensitivity is considerably improved compared to the 5d mark II but in my opinion, at the same conditions, the quality of the photographs made with 5d is greater than that of the 6d.rnrnAttention, so I do not want to diminish the quality of the machine and the price, ( it's about 1000 euros) is really a big deal. However, if you can do without the improvements I referred to, you'd better orient yourself to a 5d used if the 5d mark III itself is out of your budget.rnrnI would go this car only if you need to shoot with little light and you want to do without a good stand.rnrnFor the rI block a good car but far away, in my opinion, from the quality of the 5d mark II which in my opinion seems to be a camera belonging to a superior series. The number chosen by canon (6d instead of 5d mark III, was not random) rnrn |
| sent on November 10, 2017 Pros: Portability; Stunning ISO sensitivity; gps and wi fi functions; price Cons: Impeccable photo quality compared to the 5d series; not accurate meter; slow burst; non-professional reflex Opinion: My opinion is in contradiction to the positive reviews lette.rnrnHo alongside the 6d to my 5d mark II for a year. Although I liked the new features not in the 5d series (gps and wi fi) in addition to extreme portability, from a comparison I made with the same lenses, overall, qualitatively inferior to the 5d mark II.rnrnVero is that the iso sensitivity is considerably improved compared to the 5d mark II but in my opinion, at the same conditions, the quality of the photographs made with 5d is greater than that of the 6d.rnrnAttention, so I do not want to diminish the quality of the machine and the price, ( it's about 1000 euros) is really a big deal. However, if you can do without the improvements I referred to, you'd better orient yourself to a 5d used if the 5d mark III itself is out of your budget.rnrnI would go this car only if you need to shoot with little light and you want to do without a good stand.rnrnFor the rI block a good car but far away, in my opinion, from the quality of the 5d mark II which in my opinion seems to be a camera belonging to a superior series. The number chosen by canon (6d instead of 5d mark III, was not random) rnrn |
 | sent on October 26, 2017 Pros: Great files, Wife and lightness, shadow recovery, great quality at high iso. Great price Cons: Not suitable for sports or fauna Opinion: Reflex in my opinion wonderful. Grip To mount the 5D Mark II. But in the end I kept the 6D and sold the 5D Mark II. For me it is a perfect reflex to travel and to do reportage. Lightweight and full frame. For those who complain about the meter, I advise you to take a basic photo course and then buy a fullframe reflex. It is a very reactive reflection, for the price it is now, the new 1050 euros worth every penny spent. There are few focus points, okay, but you're willing to spend $ 1000 more to fill this gap and buy a 6D Mark II or a 5d Mark III ..... I highly recommend it except for those who photograph wildlife and sports. As for the comparison with the 5d Mark II, the passage is noticeable. The 6D is more responsive, better holds the iso and retrieves the shadows better. Focusing is also better. What can I say, I recommend the passage. |
user105592  | sent on October 22, 2017 Pros: Robustness; focus on the excellent center point; high good ISO hold; widely processed raw files; permanent exposure block * H, double electronic level; wifi. Cons: At the moment nothing relevant. Opinion: I bought it on the Sfera Office Online Store, new to 1000 euros; replacing the Eos 60D. The first thing that struck me, compared to the previous model, is the robustness: the materials are obviously very different ... By carefully browsing the manual, I could customize the asterisk * key to block the exposure indefinitely ( * H), without having to hold down the button, just like on my beloved Nikon D60 (AE lock). It is a function of this, which makes me very useful in Av mode. The generated RAW files are very nice and clean up to ISO 3200; beyond they are widely recoverable up to ISO 12800. The focus point also engages in low light conditions: excellent! You can also view an electronic level in the viewfinder, as well as in live view, for precision photos when it is needed. What else to say? Very satisfied (in my little ...). |
 | sent on October 10, 2017 Pros: Value for money in the FullFrame category, ease of use, battery, high ISO hold, screen, sensation of use, sensor Cons: maximum shutter speed 1/4000 (in case of light fixtures) Opinion: After almost a year of use I know this great car well. Use for work, studio photography and natural light, for still life products and portraits. It is definitely a machine that makes me safe, I always use it in fully manual mode to control every parameter in relation to the exposure I want to get. Basically, I always keep ISO minima to 400, to have shaded shadows and to work better in post-production. By climbing ISO I do not mind, the RAW file stays clean even on the 3200 ISO and if you go beyond the classic Lightroom settings to fit the shot. The use mainly with the Sigma 35mm Art f / 1.4 and with Canon L series lenses and the resolution at the resolution level has always satisfied me. A limit to be assessed is certainly the shutter speed at 1/4000, which in the case of bright optics such as Sigma, requires the use of a variable ND filter. Battery life covers any type of output or work, but you should be careful about the live view that dimens for the duration. Quest Councilby car to all those who intend to enter the Fullframe world, both passionate and professional in the first jobs. At 98% you do not need a 5d mk4, but with quality optics and tailored to your needs. |
 | sent on July 17, 2017 Pros: Sensor, size and weight, iso, center point AF, wi-fi Cons: Shutter speed of only 1/4000, total number of AF points (only 11), AF "extreme" points, Brush speed, sometimes underestimated Opinion: I have been using my 6D for 3 years now so let's say I know the car well and I've been playing it enough. It has its limits that are known: I certainly would not feel like advising the 80% who photographed racing cars, birds, etc. due to too modest shutter speeds and bursts. Rn- The AF points that when I bought it did not seem to be so few, now I start to feel the need of someone else say that I would prefer to have at least 15 but above all sorry for the little use of extremes, we say that more than 11 They only use only 9, the two extremes sometimes cause problems. Rn- My model only seldom underlies and say it did a lot more when I was 24-105L compared to now that I have 35 f2 is usm and 85 f1.8 usm, however with only a +1/3 for my Personal tastes bastarnBene now we go on positive notes: it offers a gorgeous sensor that falls in love at first sight, finally iso is no longer a problem, it has the maneuverability and weight of an APSC. If you are not a photographer who has a useExtremely limited as I said above, and you look good that I almost all the years go to the Mugello Moto gp and with a little eye and knowing to truncate 1 photo every 3 of which then only 1 of the two meet me full (that Because I'm exaggerated) I never put my hands in my hair despairing. I am very happy, however, and I am fully convinced that I still keep it for many years after I have passed a middle-aged crisis (I had as many as the mirrorless monkey then for my great luck it went after having tested it thoroughly, maybe in another 3 years I will re-evaluate the choice, never say never). |
 | sent on June 01, 2017 Pros: Sensor, central AF point, ease of use. Cons: I loved her ... ;-) I do not find it. Opinion: Sacrificed by monetizing a little for the purchase of the 5DIV. Some have complained that they have encountered problems with the meter, my mood has always been correct. I never had any problems in weather conditions so so (I certainly did not show my little sister to snowboard or snow). High quality RAW files and easily workable. Together we drank cars and motorcycles and, knowing what I was doing and knowing its limits, I got good results even in her own areas. In short, 10. |
 | sent on May 13, 2017 Pros: Formidable sensor, price in used, file quality, shadow / lights recovery, high iso, fabulous central maf point, nice body to hold in hand Cons: Side-to-side focuses that are almost unusable or can not be relied on, only one SD slot, with uncomfortable exposure compensation Opinion: My first full frame. After having APSC Nikon and ML Fuji (always APS-C), this car despite having had years of shoulders remains really formidable. On high useless useless repeat the same solfa, it's awesome. ISO 6400 photos are clean, even 12,800 shots remain usable. Great car for those who like me do landscapes and some portraiture, but for situations where the side focus points are indispensable I do not recommend it. In this case the 5d mkiii will give more guarantees. Raw is the thing I appreciate most, about 20mb of weight, they contain a world inside. The 6D makes better than the 5d mkiii according to some image quality level tests, I did not try the older sister and I do not know how to express it. The only thing I would change with 5d mkiii is the focus points. Canon could do better from this point of view and I hope that the future upgrade of the 6d will give us a multipurpose machine. Of course if you buy it to mount on poor optics, it's worth taking a 7d with better optics. ThereRendered with 70-200 f4 IS and 16-35 f4 IS has exceeded all my most optimistic expectation. At the price it is today, it is a mustbuy, even for those looking for a second car body or wanting to launch into the world of FF. Again, evaluate the expense of the optics that cost as much as the car body. Should I recycle it? With eyes closed. For those who are waiting to buy the 6d mkii I just say it's pure madness. Taking it with this car is a huge pleasure and I doubt someone needs a bigger than 6400. If you wait to know AF side improvements, take 5d mkiii directly. Last note: I was undecided between this and the D610, eventually reading so many comparisons I preferred Canon. |
 | sent on March 31, 2017 Pros: Resistance to high iso, good dynamic range, GPS, functions, very advantageous prices, better than many cameras "modern" Cons: For the '' age 'that, no. Opinion: I got it used, as I had planned for some time (the limits of my first reflex did not allow me to always get what I wanted), and after a few months I can say I tried in all uses that servono.rnPer me the landscape I find it really good, actually even the photos taken directly against the sun are very good with a minimum of post production. With good lens sharpness it is formidable, even with very small apertures. The best results are obtained from raw, but failing jpg time are still good (shot mostly raw + jpg). I also found good dynamic range, I can recover shadows that I believed flat and sunk sempre.rnPer for night photography or in low light situations is a wonder that I had never felt before, the noise at high ISO is really reduced and also to 12800 is well recovered even though, of course, they are affected sharpness and detail. A values ??so extreme prefer jpg already "cleaned up" in the room rather than the raw, unless you want to get qualcosa different from what it is framed. Gusti personali.rnPer sports photography, although it is not his vocation, I got unexpected results. But we must use only the central point of MF, or block with the MF button, because the sides are not fast enough for fast-moving subjects. For photos that I was still turned out good (one of them is out of just two-page spreads Moto Sprint). In these cases only in jpg snap because I prefer to have everything ready and subito.rnPer regarding portraiture can not say much: I did very few tests, some beautiful other really bad, but only for lack of competenza.rnQueste my impressions, all the the rest is known to all, and I join the chorus of those who still prefers this "old" but still very good camera. |
| sent on March 31, 2017 Pros: lightness and files even at night beautiful Cons: flash absence Opinion: I had so many reflex both Canon and Nikon full frame, I have to say that this Canon 6D deserves praise 10 and without many pretensions is one of the best full-frame SLR, the only notice that you can do at Canon is why not equip a small flash SLR Full Frame, would be very comfortable. I got together with Canon 6D also the Nikon D800 and despite the difference in megapixels sometimes behaves even better than the Nikon, I used mostly only fixed targets so the photos have not been distorted by the bottoms of bottles more or less valid. Absolute perfection for Canon would be a 6d WITH FLASH AND AT LEAST 24 MEGAPIXEL to crop better for some shooting ........ |
 | sent on March 11, 2017 Pros: lightness, manageability, immmediato feeling, FULL FRAME Cons: ISO 3200 introduces some noise. Opinion: I love this car, but never leave you, it is a good reflex, in many vista.paesaggio points and portrait are his strengths, not fear certainly the 5d.é LA car or value for money does not fight at least for me rn RAW files are lavorabilissimi, maybe you potrva make a hair more on the dynamic range, I'm waiting for the bait MII |
 | sent on February 17, 2017 Pros: Resistance to noise at high ISO, price / performance / quality, raw beautiful and well workable, lightweight and compact body Cons: Lack swiveling display, control keys not among the most rapid available for functions Opinion: I purchased in January 2014, three years after a purchase is confirmed still very current, and - in fact - still is today to be recommended to many photographers, I would say potentially to all those to which the photographic genre practiced does not require you to capture subjects at high speed. .. to speed you still comply with the focus in low light! And 'able to produce files simply "beautiful" in themselves and also by post-producing, which in my opinion reflect in exemplary fashion "style Canon" .rnCosa add / change it? Add the orintabile display to easily exploit particular pdr, and would change the control keys for disposal and function: have passed three years but in the shots in Manual are still faster on my old 450D (!!!). Rnih conclusion. .. you can only reward you with the highest marks. |
 | sent on February 14, 2017 Pros: Lightweight and compact despite being full frame, lightweight, clear images, good management of noise at high ISO, convenient if you use the GPS for travel or street photography, interesting wifi although sometimes it is not very easy and intuitive to connect in a cell. Cons: Focusing not so fast especially in backlit or not very bright environments, the absence of the second memory slot Opinion: A comfortable car is not very large compared to other full frame and can be used in almost any situation, the full frame sensor ensures shots always used even if made in low light at high ISO. The images it produces is able to optimally manage with specific software. Autofocus is not always optimal sometimes hard to focus on the subject I have noticed in low light and backlit subjects especially in the central points outside remains slightly faster, too bad the absence of the second memory would be better to have a second slot for the backup image. |
| sent on December 13, 2016 Pros: too many :) Cons: lack of rotatable display in live-view - lack of a built-in flash Opinion: With this machine you get used to photograph without light and therefore you tend to leave home the flash, but sometimes it might be useful to a small exceptional dynamic aiutino.rnGamma, perfect colors for portrait, figure set and I started esterni.rnIo photographed in 1958 when having a light meter it was a dream ... I have always arranged to maximize the sensilbilità-time-diaphragm trio, even with the first SLR TTL remained the problem of the choice of the film, it was often necessary to have two machines with films of different sensitivity or a Hasselblad (or Mamiya) with 2 or 3 spines: rnDa when I retired I started doing the still photographer (you must use the light that is chosen by those who make the video shoot) with 6D problems no longer exist, you set the optimal time, you choose the optimum aperture value and lets make the choice of sensitivity to automatic ... a dream !!! rn |
 | sent on November 30, 2016 Pros: Raw File is very slight indeed workable-ISO also excellent in 6400 - great central AF-point Wi-Fi and GPS-lightweight and portable-battery life. Cons: 1 / 4000- one SD- dynamic range from migliorare- the viewfinder does not cover 100% - AF lateral points Opinion: Bought on 05.03.2013 and sold today .. I can say it was a fantastic companion .. coupled to optical pro L Series gives excellent results .. the fantastic high ISO sensitivity also in 6400. File nice and easy to work in PP . One of the things that bothers is certainly valid AF system only the central point in any lighting condition, engages the subject "-3EV"; rather bad side steps, hardly ever used in low light. "The internal vision of the viewfinder is not quite 100%. Today you buy around 800/900 € used, but I think that between April / May, with the release of Mark II the price will fall again. I hope that in the new canon generation is best in these small defects that Nikon, for the same categories, offers everything .. " |
 | sent on November 13, 2016 Pros: Sensor, value for money Cons: 'A slightly' camera "castrated". With bisognafarci hand menu. Opinion: I changed the 7D with this camera after much thought lungo.rnLa review will not be on the characteristics of the 6D which you can read anywhere, but a little 'a comparison of what I more and meno.rnL'ho used only a few times in sports: football and race in full equitazione.rnGli iso are not a problem, while they were on the 7D and parecchio.rnSforna beautiful files and work easily, unlike the 7D which basically was the reason that prompted me to change it and never was more choice azzeccata.rnL'AF is enough. You can not make good use of reeds in sporting events. Should I try with the birds to give a final judgment, but everything else is more than enough. Obviously what the 7D is another world, but also with the 6D I can very well to shoot moving subjects without many problemi.rnSull'esposimetro do not pronounce me because for the little that I used the results were good. These things are evaluated in tempo.rnSono been very satisfied of 'purchase, especially for the relationship prezzo.rnWI-FI useful qualities. rnTra a bit 'of time the affiancherò a 80D so I will make my perfetto.rnA cameras kit unless they serve you a blazingly fast burst and AF high-performance I recommend it, it is a purpose camera that produces wonderful file. |
 | sent on October 30, 2016 Pros: AF good, even in low light, ergonomics fast commands, not overweight Cons: Missing flash on camera, limited independence of battery Opinion: I purchased new after trying for several days a used model. Coming from Nikon (d7000) was a nice strong impact. I worried about changing the system, but in the space of one afternoon I had already got used to the 6D so as to have memorized the position of the controls and functions. I was surprised by the resistance to high iso, the autofocus speed and accuracy even in low light (with both Tamron 24-70 2.8 with either canon 24-105) and above the yield in the portraits. The Raw File now seem magnificent. I noticed that (at least in the tested models) the battery does not last much. I can fully recommend as the first FF. Son passed to Canon because I needed reliability that Nikon in recent years was no longer able to guarantee. No regrets, in fact, I wonder why I have not done before. |
 | sent on September 26, 2016 Pros: Raw file quality, handling, quality / price ratio, resistance to high ISO. Cons: Metering sometimes imprecise. Opinion: I myself stepping stone to the ranks of sull'esposimetro.rnHo comments bought the new 6D and I took about 1000 photographs. Not a lot to have a full review on the camera, but the first thing you notice is that the meter in the same picture changes the diaphragm or the time a little 'as he wishes. (Switch to P and evaluative exposure). The result of the file is still more than good, but not always as perfect as I pretended to be a ff Canon. rnContinuerò with the change of settings to see if you are having differenze.rnSaluti, Claudio.rnrnPSrnQualcuno of you have found an improvement by changing some shooting setting to make more stable the meter? rnAd as spot metering, priority of time, fixed ISO, etc. . ? RnGrazie ancora.rnClaudio. |
user69293 | sent on September 18, 2016 Pros: high iso estate, good dynamic range, quality and price Cons: inaccurate Metering Opinion: I have the 6D for almost a year and a half, and I think it's time now to express objectively the strengths and weaknesses of this reflex.rnPartendo from the Pros, in first place held at high ISO, really good, you can take great pictures up to 12800, and you can also push 25600 with some success. I personally imposed the ISO up to 12800, is more than enough to shoot in low light. If you want to shoot in total darkness the flash board. And then the raw files of this reflex are fantastic, combined with a good dynamic range, they always manage to save those photos under / overexposed, retaining all the lights, shadows and colors. Superbly followed ergonomics, autonomy and weather sealing. I'm not complaining as many that have an autofocus is a little scarce burst, because this is mostly a SLR for landscape and portrait, although sometimes I use it for photographing sports or running animals, with good results. Going against you, the only real drawback is the 6D; the exposure meter. A light meter almost always inaccurate and its nature tends to underexpose, compromises professional use. See for example a matrimonialista photographer can not correct the 1000-1500 photo show. As for an amateur photographer it is not a big deal, although it is still frustrating to never have a photo ready during shooting. However, it is a full frame with the right quality / price, I think the best-selling of the full frame Canon. The council. |
 | sent on September 06, 2016 Pros: image quality, resistance to high ISO, file workability Cons: Metering imprecise with strong tendency to under-exposure, display, commands available Opinion: I used the 6D for about a year, starting from the pros, the quality and workability of the files is impressive, as well as resistance to high ISO really good in these respects is exemplary, good ergonomics, offering a FF sensor to a relatively low cost. However is an SLR with many compromises, and despite the excellent quality I was not convinced because of its contro.rnCome repeated in many reviews, the thing that leaves more to be desired is that the meter is calibrated in a truly unique, it should be understood. RNLA tendency to underexpose is evident, in my case the correct exposure was, in most cases to +2/3, but are not always able to solve the fly so compensating the exposure, because the exposure reading is sometimes unreliable. In some cases, the correct exposure is +1/3, much more rarely to 0, clearly I'm not talking about extreme cases, such as on snow, strong contrasts etc ..conditions in which it is normal that you can rely on little indication of the exposure, but of all situations "normal" whether it's sun, shade, day, night, interior, exterior, and regardless of the spot mode, evaluation, etc. used, the behavior was described. Brought the car to the CS, it has not been resolved nulla.rnCerto can be considered a "no problem" but personally I find it unacceptable that a FF 1600 euro, although an entry level in this area, has a metering system so low to regret bitterly to entry level APSC. rnInoltre it is a very controversial issue because the 6D holders are divided between those who laments the tendency to underweight and those who say they do not see the slightest mistake on the part of their exposure. rnVista the prevalence of this camera body, talk about it on the forum seems almost taboo because people who claim to have a perfect exposure they spend the"Question underexposure" to an urban legend born from mental disorders to those unfamiliar with the operation of the exposure. However the large number of people who are in agreement with what I say leads me to think that there is variability in yield between the various specimens, otherwise it would explain so much conflicting opinions. This situation suggests to me the idea of ??something built to savings and approssimazione.rnIl rear display seems to be built or covered in plastic, not very pleasant to the touch, scratches easily and without any protection is dim, the sun also provides the maximum brightness visibilità.rnLa little control layout is not intuitive and I did not like very much (maybe because I came from Nikon). Few focus points and all pretty central, personally I used mostly just rearranging Central. rnWifi and GPS for me useless, but someone can undoubtedly serve. |
 | sent on August 10, 2016 Pros: sensor, weight, affordable, RAW Cons: burst slow, too slow .... Few AF points (to their users) Opinion: At one year of purchase I am satisfied with the 6D. It 'a FF entry level, the AF points are few (I always use the central and recomposed), the sensor is a real bomb, shooting virtually in the dark and the quality of RAW files is excellent. rnIl WiFi? Comfortable, with a simple tablet via the Canon application you can see the preview photos on a larger screen, the 6D display is not much che.rnIl GPS? I do not use often but those times I used looked like it very precisorn |
 | sent on August 05, 2016 Pros: High ISO, light, price Cons: AF, construction Opinion: It holds up very well the high ISO, is small and lightweight, low price. After 3 years of working with the 6D I can say that it is definitely a step ahead of the 5DII, the high ISO sensor according to me holding a little 'better than 5DIII, definitely under the latest Sony sensor as a dynamic range. Few AF points (forced to use almost only the center) and ricomporre.rnrnWifi convenient when you need to send files "on the run", never used GPS. Some problem with the meter, often requires light compensare.rnCorpo, from the feeling of being unsound, certainly less of my old 7D and 40D. |
 | sent on July 26, 2016 Pros: Tenuta iso, ergonomics, silent, screen, wifi Cons: Light meter that goes bust, underexpose, file quality is not at levels 1 series the oldest ... the Canon sensor quality not too advanced. Opinion: And it had resold after a few months of use. I became enticed by new technology but what is good in this 6D is too poco.rnil file seems too certain digital ISO sensitivity, the exposure meter that is damning from one shot does so by get your hands on something affidabile.rnPoche personalizzabili.rnVa functions well for those who want to approach the 35mm format, and travel light and still have a simple and FF last generazione.rnrnrnrn |
user82202 | sent on July 14, 2016 Pros: even at high ISO image quality, recovery of light and shadow, reliability, ergonomics, price, great approach to photography FF! Cons: video quality, MAF points, exposure that sometimes errs ... Opinion: I own this incredible FF 2 and a half years and I feel I have created a deep bond with her. rnOltre to the fact that I love the performance of its sensor to all shades of opinion, I find it beautiful and satisfying to use, have it in your hands, carry it around. rnConsiglio recommend this machine to anyone wanting to FF system unabashed and without spending inflated figures. RNLA 6D allows you to have a very good relationship between quality and portability, without sacrificing professional features and some whims as the wi-fi that allows you to connect to your smartphone and GPS. Highly recommended! |
 | sent on June 13, 2016 Pros: Price to be a ff Cons: B quality, video quality, body Opinion: I'm a photographer and videographer I joined a few times this machine to the 5D Mark II and 5D Mark III the quality of RAW files is certainly not that of the higher-level machines not to mention the video quality which I think is very bad; It is equal if not lower than that of the 70D. 6d has a good resistance to high iso and this helps but it remains a by amateur machine away from the body and from the building. The only reason to buy it and spend little and have a full frame sensor, but also for those who use APS-C sensors of this price range and well above the Nikon D7200 |
 | sent on May 18, 2016 Pros: Images comparable and often superior to more expensive machines and / or higher performance card if combined with the right goals; iso estate, good recoverability Raw (although not at the top), wi-fi integrated very comfortable! Oh, I forgot: PRICE! Cons: MAF meter and points Opinion: Let's face it: if you were to ask me what I think of 6D and how I am responding that "It 'imperfection that helps to grow!" RnOvviamente there is no perfect car, some guilty of quality or price or some technical feature, however, there are combinations that can be stunning and give greater satisfaction than you would by spending astronomical amounts; in a nutshell, it is true that Canon, in some ways, is a step back to Nikon and Sony is fast climbing, but take a 6D and pair with some specific goals and you will have excellent results! rnParlo in particular the 35 f2 is usm and 135 F2L, the samy 14 ... I think the 6D combined with these objectives (do a quick search on Juza to believe) could deliver superior results or at least comparable to a 5Dm3 with goals L or Sigma much more expensive than on paper they are more performant! And to half or less of the price !!! rnHa defects? Yes, and they are famous: autofocus and youmetering system! To take pictures with the 6D will have to almost start again from scratch and you have to be very open, which is not for everyone; rnquando I arrived I thought I would be lucky: I have not found the side AF points so "preposterous to use" as I thought (even if it tells you to hook but you find yourself really is not entirely true), but the disappointment is the position of these points, 11 AF points and not put they come in third ?? OK! RnAllora perhaps it is good to come back a little 'back and practice well to rebuild starting from the night ninja sniper who is the central point (from tears to perfection also the DARK!), And, when possible, to rely on their eyes and use the good old manual focus! rnL'esposimetro is to be studied again totally, it's weird: I do not see only underexposure in each condition (as I see written in many parts) but also happens the opposite problem: on a medium gray card actually tends to underexpose, but other colors taken as ruses assembly "outside" sometimes took me too overexposed results (see the green grass .....)! rnDetto that the camera is solid, if the wi-fi allows you to do street at the discretion unimaginable levels, image quality is outstanding, yield iso ..... RNE 'you have to tame a wild horse, but if you do not Emboss out and tame you can compete with the best racehorses in the world! My vote is 8, but only because I hated those damn maf points not to third !!! |
 | sent on May 10, 2016 Pros: Usable up to ISO 25600, quality files, Access for remote release from smartphone (including bulb), Wireless to switch the images, pre-processing RAW Room, 20mpx ideal for report file quality / size, ideal for portrait / street / landscape / static genres occasionally also be used for dynamic subjects. Cons: Sometimes cumbersome selection of AF points but you learn with the habit, slow burst and few focus points for those who do sports / wildlife. Wifi is capable of halving the battery life (800 shots to 400 if it is very intensively used). AF points, perhaps a bit 'too concentrated at the center. Opinion: I come from 1100D (passage in November 2015), the jump was monstrous both in quality and solidity. Who says you do not know what plastic is used, proving the 5D mkIII I did not notice much difference. amazing ISO range and usable to 25600 with a bit of post-production. AF very good, especially the central point at very responsive -3EV, the slowness that known by the 50 1.8 II think is due to the lens, not to the body. I would have preferred, however, the AF points a bit 'more external and not as concentrated in the center. Access to shoot remotely really useful as well as to send on time a few shots to whoever requests it (is automatically converted to jpeg and a little 'downsized but still with a very good quality). Handy, small compared to the 5D and lighter, even the Manfrotto Pixi supports it safely (must be used with some care 24-105 if extended to 105 and facing down but still holds). sore point is the battery which dries using the wifi in maniera intense, otherwise it lasts for about 800 shots. The use 50 1.8 II 28 1.8 USM and 24-105L, in the past even with 70-200 f4. |
 | sent on March 19, 2016 Pros: High quality files, high resistance to high Iso, managgevolezza, central AF point that engages in the dark, construction and weather sealing quality. Value for money. Cons: Not perfectly suited to all types of photography. spot metering point is not anchored to the af points (even on 5D3). Tropicalization not at the level of 5. Lack dual memory slots. very quiet shutter: you do not feel that nice "clack" of 5D3. Opinion: fairly compact and handy camera but at the same time solid and functional. Sforna of extremely high quality files, comparable to those of 5dmkiii. Wifi and GPS do not use them but someone might be useful, although personally I would have preferred a tropicalization greater than these. The resistance to high Iso is at the top of the current technology. The price is similar to that of 7dmkii which I think is more indicatata for birds and outdoor sports because most AF performance in these areas and for the upper barrage. With the middle of the AF 6d manage to connect also almost in the dark and the side points, although not to cross, they are in any case always accurate. My specimen exhibits properly. Recommended for those seeking the highest quality files, but a body to handle the car and not overly expensive. |
 | sent on March 16, 2016 Pros: Yield at high iso - raw image quality - weight - video quality - wifi on camera Cons: need to "tweak" in the menu to enable certain functions Opinion: The Canon 6D is my first FF, was given to me, and it went and support a Nikon APSC. I am fully satisfied. I state that my remarks primarily derived from comparisons with the D7100. RAW image quality is very high and easy to work in post-production, the meter underexpose a little but once you understand it you can not handle it all with ease; the iso made is remarkable, you can safely shoot up to 12800 with no particular worries while above this value, you require a heavier denoise (personal opinion). rnIl viewfinder is very bright even if there is 100% coverage while in liveview mode, despite the focus by contrast, the performance is good, and I appreciate the ability to view the histogram while shooting and not afterwards as with Nikon . rnPer As for video shooting, the aperture control is a plus it lacks in Nikon and that is appreciatedimmediately in the first round while for the speed in focus in liveview it is preferable to the manual focus. RNLA burst is decent but for sports shots and birdlife think it is undoubtedly more indicated a 7D. rnUna small flaw in my opinion is the lack of a dedicated button for white balance, instead of the present Canon 5D and 7D, which obliges to always use the menu (still easily accessible via the Q key). |
 | sent on January 27, 2016 Pros: Made at high ISO, sharpness file, lightweight camera body Cons: A few points of focus, made with camera bracketing function Opinion: Purchased for conversion to a Full Frame, I immediately felt at home, the picture quality is very good, do not understand why did so few points of focus. The performance at high ISO is excellent, coupled with the 24-105 makes buying interesting. I found unsatisfactory the speed of focus in the bracketing function. Great file management also from the machine body. Unsatisfactory management also autofocus during video. |
 | sent on January 18, 2016 Pros: Cleaning files, good results at high ISO, wifi, decent focus, sensor exceptional price Cons: Burst ridiculous camera body a little small for large hands, less intuitive button layout of camera bodies 5d Opinion: Purchased for passage from 5d old, I was very happy with the quality of the files that you can achieve. Unfortunately it is not very suitable for sports photography and birdlife, although the possibility of using high ISO. The blast did not come close to the big sister 5D III and my 7D but for the price it costs you can turn a blind eye and dedicate possibly other fields. The compact body makes it usable as car travel, although the optics for FF are a bit large and pesanti.rnPeccato moving to sd card. I have a lot of expensive CF that I could share with the 7D. |
user86352 | sent on January 01, 2016 Pros: all, yield iso incredible, to be taken !! Cons: absolutely none Opinion: You have no doubt to take the canon eos 6d but nobody is an outstanding camera only having it in hand you can understand the beauty of this jewel canon .Costa a bit 'but you can get used to a little less than one thousand euro. With her, I made peace with the iso before I had a Canon EOS 60D and the move was a relief. Take it certainly will not regret it and you will not think even a moment of resale. |
 | sent on November 19, 2015 Pros: Held high iso - handy and lightweight body - central point to -3EV - wifi and gps Cons: I would say no but to be picky dynamic range of less than nikon Opinion: L 'had acquired in 2014 and then sell it (reluctantly) .... but the heart can not control, and since I was in love now the' I ricomprata.rnLa held at high iso think is the point of reference in 'scope SLR . The body is easy to handle and light to be full frame and has an ergonomic perfetta.rnDai test is to have a dynamic range of less than Nikon, but I really think that the photos baked have nothing to regret than other brands and has a modelli.rnNon quick burst but it is a machine designed to landscapes, portraits and still life. If you want to take pictures of sports or wildlife you have to buy a 7d mark ii (which is specifically designed for that, and I bought two months ago and which I reviewed) or a 5d mark iii 1dx.rnTrovo or a convenient Wi-Fi for the control away with the phone. While the GPS for me is not important and do not use it mai.rnUnico fault I could find is the command of the white balance that has its own dedicated key but that changed with the menu. rnSpettacolare point center cross which puts afuoco pretty much in the dark. rnih conclusion I consider it a spectacular car which I highly recommend. rnrn |
 | sent on November 14, 2015 Pros: Excellent yield High ISO - Ergonomics - Weight - Wi-fi Cons: Automatic white balance very often inaccurate - tends to underexpose Opinion: I deal mainly with shooting videos with the Reflex and very little of photographs. I bought last month 6D (used with 900 shots, receipt date: August 2015, warranty canon Italy four years, € 1000) as a second camera body alongside the 7DII. First of all I was impressed by the performance at high ISO especially in shooting at night, after, the three-dimensionality of the files returned compared to 7DII APSC. I happen to shoot scenes at ISO 6400 without the grain as flush, incredible !!! You have to climb much higher to see grain, always contained and a mellowness daresay poetica.L'unica flaw that is reflected in the operating mode with automatic balancing bianco.Molto often I have to resort to manual measurement of white to soften the dominant excessive magenta. Nothing to worry about ... First the straconsiglio !!!! The next step!?!?! 5DIII or hope in the output of the 5D MarkIV !! |
 | sent on November 04, 2015 Pros: High Yield Iso - Central Point Autofocus - Cleaning Del File - Ergonomics - Weight - Autonomy - GPS - Microadjustment Af Cons: Underexpose - Burst Slow - AF points Side inaccurate in low light - No second slot Memory Opinion: I came from a 60D, the body as ergonomics and preparation of commands I find it perfect, you to me like the joystick zero, in fact I have not experienced trauma in exchange for the body, and I noticed that the ergonomics of the handle that the fluidity of the nuts is better than on the 60D, hand expresses a feeling of lightness, making many trips to the mountains I do not mind at all, the battery life with GPS and wifi off is really good, using the mirror with LV off thus reaching 1000 shots while with the two mentioned above and the use of LV halving autonomy, although I avoid to keep them turned on both the wifi at least in my use does little or nothing, while I found very useful GPS to review the precise locations of my shots and also the altitude, we talk about the auto focus, the central point guarantee, I shoot in low light with moving subjects and I have never stoner clicks, while the side I can say the exact opposite, misbehave as soon as the light becomes short, even on static subjectsBut by 80% to the landscape is not a problem too, made amends with the quality of the files that churns obviously combined with slow to height, as ISO you can go quietly to 3200 to 6400, the detachment from the old 60D is 3 stops clean, and even the possibility of recovery are exceptional, the vertical banding is a bad memory, it remains only the problem of under-exposure, ranging from 3/4 to 1 stop clean, I would have liked a second SD / CF and a flurry of 6fps least, the preparation of the menu instead I find it perfect, convenient menu "customizable" and the presence of micro and another thing to start shooting sminuivo very quiet, is very useful in the presence of animals very close or in situations of general embarrassment, summing up all my choice today would fall increasingly on 6D, to fill the defect of the lateral points and underexposure would take at least another 1000 € for a body that 5dIII as final quality of the file è nothing more than 6D and if you studied landscape and still shots you've answered it yourself ... :) |
 | sent on October 21, 2015 Pros: Made at high ISO impressive, FF, quality grain and complexion, interior and menu display, Sprint Silent, AF reliable Cons: Commands not initially intuitive (I come from 5d2 and 7d), Lack Joypad multicontroller, gust, Viewfinder, Operation Speed ??General Opinion: I come from a Canon 7D, which is a machine of high level, but for practical genres (portraits, landscapes, reporting, event, wedding and still-life) I decided to buy a second body FF (the other is the "mythical "5Dmk2) .rnParto assume that I have not been able to squeeze it in the best, so my impressions are of use definitive.rnIl body is definitely not a good standard, certainly less solid than the 5 series or 7 series, but still it returns a very good feeling to the touch, as well as materials that seem solid. And 'slightly smaller and thinner SLR above but is being appealed and uses bene.rnIl menu is rich and quite customizable, with a nice display and a good list of funzioni.rnMolto interesting menu guide, especially on some features like correcting lenses and objectives, they can always come in handy: read the fine manual especially on AF and esposizione.rnLa quality dand it generates files that left me speechless (obviously positive). We stop at least 3 on the 7D and 1 stop and 1/2 above the 5Dmk2, which is certainly not a "dilettante" ... rnQuesto body holds the ISO in a stratospheric, with a beautiful grain (dry and pasty), an incarnate from series 1 (very natural). Above is absent banding and recoveries are really interessanti.rnAltro chapter is definitely for the dynamic range, very extensive. Compared to 5Dmk2 known a more "planed" and less crisp, but I think it had a speech to a different filter AA, perhaps less invasive. That said are two large machines, FF, with two rows still very beautiful even if different (being used for 2 years, MK2 can not see the differences) .rnHo noticed that the lenses 2.8 f4 and I (16-23 2.8 and 70 f4IS -200) can now also be used in environments less enlightened, thanks to efficient management of the above ISO 8000; across the fixed I own seem to have found new life: on APS-C ovviambody were "castrated" and now having two FF I can use them for their true value and interchange. rnL'AF is quick and accurate, but not to the levels of 7d, would be too;) It seems reliable and accurate: the normal burst (4.5 fps) .rnLo silent shutter is also interesting, especially in places such as the Churches , while Wi-Fi and GPS are gadgets that are currently not used, so for me superflui.rnLa which however I was blown away are the commands, really very different from those of the 5D2 and 7D, which seemed much more intuitive and certainly better prepared: it will be my duty to get used to the fullest, as well as the zoom button (Q + wheel) and the lack of Pad mlticontroller, as in selecting AF was comodissimo.rnPer now my impression is very positive: I was looking high ISO, image quality natural and good speed, and I must say I also found more than they imagined. Top marks! Rn |
 | sent on September 05, 2015 Pros: Eegonomia and lightness. Resiostenza high ISO and AF module (especially the middle) Cons: Burst a little lentina, lightweight chassis (seems less professional and durable) and as others say the tendency to underexposure. Opinion: I waited a few months to make my review for many reasons, one of them who does not have much to add than what others have told friends of the forum but above all to make a review you need a good knowledge of the machine. Not that I know of it, mind you, but in only 4 months as you can squeeze a car in order decantarne all the pros and cons? However, it does not matter, take this my opinion that is based on the experience and personal feelings. The machine has replaced my fabulous 5D Mark II and I must say I have never been so glad to no longer trust my 5D. The car sings very superb quality of the sensor and with the management of the high ISO the couple is really perfect. Truly, these are not the things, or rather are not ONLY those things that will make you understand that it is better than the 6D 5D Mark II. A little of everything has been improved, the management of the lights and the recovery of shadows (the files are in fact much more workable PP) colors of'Incarnate there is no doubt: the beats the 5D 6D 3 to 0. Of course, there are things that I would have preferred to have remained, such as the famous joystick 5D which I still regret. Or ergonomics Series 5 that makes the grip more comfortable and safe (to me that I have big hands). In any case, it's worth it. Hopefully a firmware upgrade as soon as possible to improve the AF module and we hope that sooner or later canon gives us an update that also trim the meter. |
 | sent on August 30, 2015 Pros: Clarity and workability of files, resistance at high ISO, GPS, weight and size of content, MAF midpoint good in low light conditions, weather sealing, solid machine body, great for video Cons: Burst slow, it tends to under-exposure, MAF slow and sometimes inaccurate, display soddisfacentern Opinion: After half a year of using this camera body feel the experience of writing this review. It states that the main use I do on the pitch and videos here gave me a lot of satisfaction, especially with regard to the performance at high ISO (really very good base, and further improved thanks to the installation of specific color profiles). Within the picture instead in this field the 6D does not disappoint at all. The MAF is quite good both in speed and reliability in relation to the type of photo you search (eg marriage, landscape, portrait, etc. ..) and the central AF point is staggering! Able to focus even though we are almost totally in the dark thanks to its -3EV !. The burst is sometimes limiting but for this price you can not expect more, in fact, to other kinds of photography (such as sporting or hunting can be a problem and it is better to focus on other bodies!). Another great quality about files that churns out! Workabilityit is great and the recovery is very good. Another advantage is the GPS and the wireless feature (although I would not give an opinion because I have not ever used). As for the flaws instead I found flurry low MAF and a little slow on moving subjects; the sharpness and brightness of the display, he was never convinced (in broad daylight sometimes struggle to focus in video mode); and finally the light meter tends to slightly underweight. Finally I would recommend this camera body for the quality / price ratio and excellent when used for the purpose for which it is intended does not disappoint at all! |
 | sent on August 22, 2015 Pros: Quality and processability of raw files, made at high ISO, point af central, GPS, size and weight, tropicalization Cons: It tends to underexpose bad, points positioned side af bad and inaccurate, buffer and burst Opinion: I decided to write my review after almost two years and about 30 thousand shots. I used the 6d especially traveling with different objectives that both canon Tamron rather than sigma, but also in many different occasions marginal travel-type ceremonies of friends or sports (volleyball and bikes). Coming from a 500D the jump was really huge and those who say that the photo makes her only the photographer has no idea (or does not want to remember) what it means to take an entry level, a good car will simplify things a lot. rnrnDetto this I must say that as far as the autofocus There are obvious limitations especially with the side and objectives brighter, I got to make some shots with a 5dmark3 and both the comfort of the joystick that the provision and accuracy of the lateral points really makes a difference, but for my use I never had problems (use the excellent central af-on and recompose) being careful not to move troppo.rnrnQuest'anno I finally decided to use the GPS on the go and I say that it is absolutely preferred in order todividuare the various places where it was stopped for 2 shots on the fly, or get back to that beach you do not remember the name; this function well if configured with a refresh time of the medium does not affect most of the 10-15% battery life. I find Tropicalized 6d globally good, we've taken to Niagara Falls and the Marmore really taking a lot of water and I did not have the slightest problem. rnrnCome have already written the other confirm the problems that the exposure tends to underexpose bad even in a rather constant, usually shooting av to +2/3 or check the histogram, but not always possible to solve it on the fly. rn |
 | sent on August 20, 2015 Pros: Dell final image quality obtainable and availability objectives. Cons: Metering scarce and focus slow and ineffective. Too expensive for defects that. Opinion: Were it not for the final quality of the photos that are obtained with the post production work, I would have given a low rating. Metering imprecise and focus bad. I wish canon that was my example to be poorer than others. I sold and I'm back in a good nikon d750, of which I am very happy. With no offense to the fanatics canon. |
 | sent on August 15, 2015 Pros: Astonishing yield high ISO, image quality, with MAF midpoint very good, compact body with excellent grip and ergonomics even for large hands. Cons: Being a body placed in band semipro perhaps articulated screen. rnPer else other plus would make too much closer to 5DIII compromising the excellent value for money. Opinion: I worked for a long as a second photographer for weddings using the 7D. After I cut his teeth with the well-known limitations of an APS-C such as the 7D joined the slavery of Flash for no more than 2000 ISO where the 7D shows already compromised image quality from color noise and grain evident, the qualitative leap the 6D is mostruoso.rnQuello of which I desperately needed was a body machine reliable enough to use in peace even setting auto ISO abandoning the use of the flash during the day I could not do without. Imagine what it means to rely on the flash when you're forced to shoot in difficult conditions controluci type or where you do not have the time to manage a completely manual machine ... shots that are never linear with each other and that we must correct and balance in post. The 6D cancels all ciò..ho could shoot up to ISO 12800 (DODICIMILAOTTOCENTO) in conditions of very low light and when I got to review the shots for me was fiction. A ISO 12800 machine comincia then to produce some grain completely manageable with little in post-production for a click sound and absolutely clean without seeing blacks smashed, details that are lost between the grain and the color noise as they did on the 7D over raising the ISO 1600. This translates into the ability to rely on the machine using several automatic, like that of ISO automatic, without fear that the machine combines some trouble and could trigger repeatedly in some particular moments finally getting linear images with light and color and much more natural. Weight much reduced during the work given by the absence of Flash (I used the Canon 600EX-RT) and good performance of the MAF with central point which is what I use going to turn off all altri.rnPotevo afford a 5DIII but several plus that are paid not just on 5DIII from complex system of MAF, I did not need for the type of work I do and how I carry it myself. This 6D was a purchase more than guessed. Unlike FF to APS-C mostruosa. Now I can work with more confidence, having optimized a lot of time post production could now already on the field taking pictures which in themselves are already valid without post production. |
 | sent on August 05, 2015 Pros: a bit of everything.... Cons: ... Perhaps the lack of flash ... Opinion: I come from an experience of several years with EOS 7D and ef-s 15-85, objective that I almost never removed from the camera and that I feel good traveling companion ... so when, after selling camera and objective, I decided to buy back the camera I chose a full frame .. and after reading and re-reading the opinions on this forum I decided on the EOS 6D and 24-70 f4 lens and f .. that waiting a while I found in the used market .. With the body rn I immediately familiar .. and I am finding the best 7D .. smallest and leggero..unico neo .. have a built-in flash .. see the address most amateur and professional camera ... rnHo tried at high ISO. . and am amazed at the quality, shot mainly in jpeg ... without pp .. I put a couple of pictures in the gallery ... then for the rest of the camera behaves very bene..facile and intuitive to use .. wi fi and GPS can be useful to the taste .. .. by the time I turned them nn .. then .. I'll see if wifi will remain useful ... |
 | sent on July 19, 2015 Pros: ISO sensitivity, even with slight telephoto lenses, lack of flash pop-up (at least for me), Wi-Fi and GPS (at least for me), the central point of maf great. Cons: Very sensitive to whites to reds and yellows, it tends to underexpose slightly, beginning to know her after a while 'time. Opinion: Orma the use for two years, with different equipment, as I said above tends to burn slightly white if you are not careful but you have to manage very well the reds and yellows in high light conditions. I have written that you have to know because it is a lady machine and like all ladies machine must know how to take the right point, the middle of maf definitely. For many Wi-Fi and GPS are useless, I actually use it a lot. On lightroom I geolocated photos by location and Wi-Fi allows me to share them and download them on smartphones to flight back to me safe. I would recommend it to anyone who wants a great machine and ff which bisognobei carry it around every day with normal lenses in backpacks. I use it for weddings, releases photos and photo projects street |
 | sent on July 17, 2015 Pros: sensitivity, cost, overall quality, battery life, quality of raw files Cons: lack Dual Card, tends to underexpose by one stop, very few focus points, burst too slow Opinion: overall a great camera. that something is missing to make it professional, I appreciated very much the dual memory card and a grid of points AF wider ... but it would be a 5D XD.rnl'esposimetro of my tendency to underexpose always almost a stop and reading on the net It must be a congenital defect of the model but is a problem in risolvibilissimo manuale.rnprezzo very competitive for what offre.rnSensore really good file up to 9600 ISO perfectly usable also for small to medium sized prints at 300dpi, to 12800 you see a little 'grained, well better not spingersi.rnho enjoyed the lack of flash (what there is does not break, it weighs less and can have other components of higher quality in the same figure) .rnSuggerimento: if you can not take it bundled with 24-105 ... searching only the body and a lens match them very bright as 24-70 old series or 2.8 (as I did) a 28-70 2.8 that will save money and get better pictures . |
 | sent on July 09, 2015 Pros: High iso, af midpoint stratospheric rnGamma dynamic. Cons: I would have preferred a shutter to 1/8000, it rnTende a Po burn bianchi.rn Opinion: The use now for about five months rnSono very satisfied, with good optics and bright is a killer, with the central point never misses a shot, RNI materials seem slightly below average, rnAvrei preferred a shutter to 1/8000, but you can not have everything, RNI file products up to ISO 8000 are excellent, RNI is a red Po loads, but manageable, RNI file must be corrected very little, and what little we work are easy to gestire.rnMi would say good Canon . |
 | sent on June 23, 2015 Pros: FF sensor, High ISO, low smear Cons: Points MAF side lenses Opinion: I recently purchased more 'than a month the 6D, immediately noticing some significant differences from the previous 7D and I was surprised instead of other differences mentioned to which I have not heard the slightest lack. First of all the buttons and joystick settings completely different, after one hour was all already 'guessed without much drammi..e' CanonrnAnche if and 'spent only a month, I have already' made a lot of shots and some 3,000 have already 'got to to test it thoroughly in various situations: RNLA big difference and 'now I can shoot at ISO 5000 without any problems, before already in 1600/2000 with the 7D was a drama, the noise coming out from the shots was already' very obvious, so PP so much that now I limit myself to a few aspects! rnAltra difference that I felt greatly missed and 'speed' limited, certainly the 7D and 'more' fast ... everything quadagno eg in the halls with the 7D although fast was complicated shoot under ISO 3200 with all the problems that followed then ... now we think more '! rnAltra deartteristica that made me lean to 6D were photos of portraits and landscapes, where I noticed a big improvement on the dynamic range, the tone '.. now this kind of photos are those that primarily affect me and I must say that the 6D ago his duty eregiamente. The lack of built-in flash I see it as a plus as well as wifi and gps useful! RNPs In my opinion I wanted to express my feelings and do not produce a range of sterile technical data which we know do not take good pictures ... rnrnrn |
| sent on June 22, 2015 Pros: Sensor, high ISO, excellent ergonomics, weight, wifi and gps, control points of focus with the pad Cons: Body tropicalized / Consumption quite high with wifi and gps lit Opinion: Given the fact that not a professional I wanted to share my experience. I've also recently purchased this Canon 6d by many described as a full frame really excellent capabilities. I was a bit dubious as you move from the 7d 6d because I came from a 7d. I pretty much used in the 2 years of using the joystick and could not find the momentum to make this purchase. Seeing here in the forum all the advice I decided to take it and I'm really very satisfied. Unfortunately I have not had much time to make the most of it from the few pictures I took definitely looks to a higher level, compared to 7d. The 7d tended to underexpose and sometimes sinned precision on focus. The 7D is a fairly difficult to manage and I must say that the 6d with its 11 points of focus behaves really well. I noticed that when you leave active for a long time is that the wifi gps tends to discharge very quickly, so I recommend you to activate at least the wifi only when you have to pass photos sun mobile tablet, or more so you do not trovarsi with battery immediately download. I find it very suitable for people like me who is an amateur photographer of landscapes. I do not know hardly ever flash q so the lack I was not negatively affected. It has good ergonomics and weight is well balanced but I think I'll do a test more accurate with my l 70/200 series to see how it goes. The sensor is excellent and the files that come out are really exceptional. I noticed the different dynamic and a fluency in the complex overall picture that I never noticed before. In most I documented after I saw that there was the possibility to manage the points directly from the pad. Ultimately for those who do not want to spend a stratospheric figure and who does not claim a quick burst the board definitely. |
| sent on May 09, 2015 Pros: Sensor, ISO Ati, the central point of focus. Cons: Materials, 1/4000, only one memory slot Opinion: Not a professional, I do not use video and practically never the flash, but I would like to write four lines after two years of use. The quality of the files as they exit the machine still surprises me, when paired with fine lenses gives a very high quality. When using high ISO values ??noise there is, practically. As for ergonomics, I much prefer the series 5D, but that does not mean that it is uncomfortable to hold, indeed. The materials could be better. The viewfinder 98% is not a problem. The maximum shutter speed of 1/4000 maybe yes: a large openings and outdoors is often a limit difficult to overcome. The central focus point is sensitive in dim light. To conclude, really a lady camera. |
 | sent on April 03, 2015 Pros: Quality at high ISO excellent overall yield of the sensor very good, the central focus that engages even in very low light, features Wi-Fi and GPS as a reference. Cons: Protective plastic display Opinion: I purchased as a replacement for the 6D 7D; I must say I am very happy with the change, because I find in 6D some features that I missed a lot in 7, the cleaning of the files in low light, first of all, and I have lost a few that I do not consider essential for my photographic genres, such example a burst rate double. I find the 6D a machine designed intelligently for those who want a full frame from the affordable cost, without having to face the cost is not affordable for all budgets a 5DmkIII. Obviously saving leads to the compromessi.rnLa 6D has a sensor from the yield remarkable, able to work at very high sensitivities with little-very little noise. From this point of view, the gap with the 7D is really evident. Shooting, especially in silent mode, it has a nice sound and professionale.rnL'autofocus has only 11 points sensitive, pretty little scattered, on the other hand the central one is really able to allow the focus with very little light. This, for many types of photography, can'Be more' important compared to having many more 'points, but less sensitive. The machine holds good, is not colossal, indeed, it is also appreciably lighter. Have not been able to determine if the materials it is made of are "cheap" looking pro, or good unpretentious; time will tell. I have no idea of ??the level of weather sealing, and I do not want to have to put it to the test. The display is bright and clearly visible even in the sun. I do not like the fact that it is detached from the "glass" external. The latter, in particular, is a plastic panel, with anti-reflective coating, perfect to make visible fingerprints or capture cheeks flushed. Much better the reinforced glass "gapless" the 7D. rnI buttons are logically positioned, who has already had a Canon, in ten minutes is operational. The rear wheel multifunction is not bad, not great either feel the lack of the joystick. Someone complains about the lack of '1/8000 second shutter time, useful per use optical light wide open in full sun; I think it's not a problem, since there is a 50 iso, the 7D for example not aveva.rnWifi and GPS are by reference; currently there is no other machine with all the features of the 6D, in this area; in particular the possibility for full remote control via smartphone or tablet can 'be utile.rnNiente hurt the ability to log gps of all trips; also works with the machine in the bag, inside the trunk of the car. rnL'autonomia is very good, it drops a bit 'with the use of GPS, and with the refresh rate of the latter, which remains active even with the machine off. It seems illogical, but it is not, since all the gps need time for the fix, so if you would not be extinguished more 'can quickly regain the position. And 'precise and also indicates the altitude. Missing bussola.rnLa burst is not particularly fast, about 4 ftg / sec. All other features of the machine, burst apart, are practically istantanee; the 6D is always very reattiva.rnNon feel the lack of a second memory slot, definitely absent to save on costi.rnNulla objection particularly for the video industry; the exceptional sensitivity it is noted also in this case. It is sometimes visible moire ', that there is on 5DMkIII, which pays this benefit at a lower resolution of details more' fini.rnAnche in this area, the gap with the 7D is quite obvious; The videos evening or night are really very clean and piacevoli.rn |
| sent on March 26, 2015 Pros: Tenuta ISO, sensitivity, focus, weight, wifi Cons: 1/4000, display and pad plasticky Opinion: After 7 years on a 450d last Monday I finally decided to take the leap. The remorse and doubts born in outlay statement just made have disappeared as soon as I took the first photo in 6400ISO (midnight the city was deserted well, better than that ...), and have been replaced by a sense of fully worthy of the best Christmas dinner (or Easter, given the period)! RNLA held at high ISO is exceptional, very low noise even in 6400 (below is virtually absent)! The sensitivity of the center point then something miraculous, given that manages to focus on where I see only black to the naked eye (note: with the opportunity I have also sold off the optical APS-C and I happily coupled to a Tamron 24-70 f2.8 vc, amazing too!)! The speed of focus and the flurry honestly seem more than adequate (for those who need superior performance are affixed 5D3 and 7D2, but at another price!), And the presence of only 11 points of focus I do not create disorder (so hor more and only used the center) .rnIl wifi I find it very useful, especially if used to connect with the EOS remote cel, ditto for the GPS (okay, it is not essential but is fat that drips) .rnOttimo weight, well lightest sisters maggiori.rnNote negative: limited speed to 1/4000: With 50f1.4 can be felt the limit; display and pad: give me the feeling of being a bit 'fragile ... RNLA machine ultimately is not a tank as was the 7D and the models above, seems to recall a little' more attention in use, and how performance does not excel in anything (except maybe in sealing and ISO sensitivity), but what it does it does very well (and it is also simple to use). I can only straconsigliarne buying ... |
 | sent on March 25, 2015 Pros: Discrete rendered to high ISO (nothing at all), File Cleanup, HDR (not particularly exciting), Multiple Exposures and RAW Development in the Machine. Cons: Mean autofocus even in light not particularly low, assembly, materials and components of poor quality, no exposure, Wi-Fi and GPS for me absolutely useless. Opinion: Taken to side up the 5 D Mk II, which, despite the years, is still a lady machine and of a much higher level, above all in the constructive aspect. The 6D autofocus, at least that in my possession, is far from being lightning-light as it is said, even in light not particularly low, and in my view the display presents disconcerting disparity; assembly and materials then give the idea of ??having a fragile and mischievous machine in the hands, absolutely not worth the money it costs ... and I regret bitterly having spent it! I am increasingly convinced that Canon has tremendous problems of quality constancy and is far from resolving them. It's a car I do not think I'll keep for a long time! |
 | sent on March 18, 2015 Pros: Handling, sealing Iso, file quality, prezzo.rn Cons: Slot mindful, viewfinder Opinion: I purchased the 6D few days and coming from the 7D I immediately appreciated the estate Iso is the quality of the file. Currently I'm using a sigma 24-70 f2.8 emi impressed the focus of the center point. I do not have big notes to do because I had no way to test it thoroughly. Not at all feel the lack of the joystick 7 because I configured the pad and the operation is the same: direct and efficace.rnPer me is for the use that I was a great machine that I would recommend to all but ... as everything must be assessed purchase depending on the use you have to make it .. |
| sent on March 12, 2015 Pros: Yield at high iso, manageability, ease of use, value for money, precision and speed af. Cons: 1/4000 sec. max, and sd memory slot, 4 fps. Opinion: C files that churns are stunning. I still do a lot of confusion with the commands that are arranged in a completely different way from the 7d, and that some are only accessible from the menu and not from the buttons on the body, but also this whole lack of joystick for someone who is unforgivable, in my opinion does not create no problem (aside from the habit). Top marks ... especially for value for money. |
 | sent on March 11, 2015 Pros: Grip, excellent performance at high ISO, value for '/ price for a full frame Cons: Only goes to 1/4000 Opinion: I state that I'm just a fan of photography. I own this Reflex recently, I bought (in a kit with the 24/70 F4.0 L IS USM)) at RCE Padova (049.876.11.88), where I found in the person of sig.Marco availability, competence and professionalism . I come from the 60D and I was immediately at ease as a handle and distribution of the buttons. I was looking for a machine to high ISO and I found it. Perfect and fast the maf, especially the central and excellent image quality. Now that the price has come down a lot, I recommend it to all who like me want to move to full frame without fainting finanziariamente.rn |
user59759 | sent on March 04, 2015 Pros: Ergonomics, speed AF, excellent files in jpeg, complete and essential Cons: I can not say because I have not yet fully "explored" Opinion: I bought six months ago to enter the world of FF. Although the comparison is obviously not feasible with the 600D, which I still kept as a second body for now, I must say that the transition has been absolutely outstanding. I was impressed by the speed of focus, even in low light with the focus that engages all. With 100 L macro has some uncertainty, but I depend lens while the 70-200 f4 L and with 35 F2 focuses almost the speed of pensiero.rnLa use mainly for portraits both ambientati that foreground and photos macro, mainly for plants and flowers, and I must say that gives me emotions species to detail that can dare.rnSono just happy with the purchase and would recommend sicuramente.rn |
| sent on February 24, 2015 Pros: Lightweight camera body, made at high iso, workability of the file, precisely the central point of focus Cons: Construction weak, I broke lcd only with vibration, low gust, shutter 1/40000 Opinion: Machine exciting. Despite my favorite genre is the landscape I was never made to feel the need to change the logo for a better dynamic range. rnTenuta at high ISO up to its reputation. Transportable, lightweight, I prefer to use it without greep, really a featherweight and passes inosservata.rnMi also love the color rendering, I used this car to sports photos, rally in particular and I must say that the af does not disappoint, because they are accustomed to using only the center focus point |
 | sent on February 20, 2015 Pros: The reason why I chose the Canon 6D and is its strong point: noise management. Coming from a 5D Mark II, for which already click on ISO 1600 could create me problems, while with the 6D are surprised to be able to shoot at ISO 4000 and have photos spotless. Cons: the lateral points are a little slower to engage the subject, but nothing so worrying. The central point and 'really accurate even on subjects in dim light. Opinion: The files in post them work very well without compromising anything, recovering the shadows that there is no trace of noise, as well as the recovery in the post of the highlights I can shoot up to 6400-8000iso preoccupami without the slightest grain of .AF 6D is very more precise than I imagined. The sides are a little slower to engage the subject, but nothing so worrying. The central point and 'really accurate even on subjects in dim light. Certainly not 'a miraculous AF in sports .Ottima build quality, great menu and button layout. |
| sent on February 08, 2015 Pros: Clean high ISO (up to 3200 ISO does not have big concerns. Up to ISO 5000 are acceptable), excellent workability of the raw, central point af fantastic, accurate, fast and sensitive. Weight more than good and I would say a good compromise even with heavy lenses. Cons: Perhaps 1/4000 in certain situations is limiting, lack second memory slot, viewfinder with 100% and, for certain requirements, not the AF system of 5dmk III (but not see it as a negative element, otherwise it would be a machine even better 5dmk III!). For the rest it is a machine that does its job. Opinion: I have the 6d now for almost two years and, after an intense use in a myriad of uses and situations, I also would like to share my impressions. Contrary to those who call themselves professionals and complain its size and weight too much content, I find the 6d compared to 5dmk III perfectly balanced, even with a 70-200 2.8 is (the balance in hand you do it more than on optics camera body ...). It 'a machine that you do not like the fatigues enormously 5dmk III and allows challenge it comfortably to those who, like myself, has great hands. This whole story about the absence of the joystick is excessive, the limit of hysteria. The control pad is gestibilissimo, indeed, reduces to a single element control of navigation is that the playback menus. The button placement, we know, can vary from model to model, but I have not found any problems in store in no time orienting its disposal, now, with your eyes closed. There is all the essentials that you need and, for the rest, the other mainC are useless) that allows you to work safely in many contexts. The only real flaw that impute is the absence of the double slot for data storage, unique element that puts it a step below the basic requirements for the professional. The metering system is reliable. Personally I almost always use the spot mode and I am fine. Another element that can be a marginally discriminating shutter speed is limited to 1/4000. This element can be discriminating for someone, and then be taken into consideration. Nikon from this point of view is more generous than Canon and offers the same price a lot more features ... rnComparto video: there is little to say, if you use video covers a good% of your business, then please contact 5dmk III. Either way you get good results even with the 6d but with due attention paid in particular to moiré.rnCosa ask for more? At the stator present a dynamic range that can be compared to the Nikon d810 in joint a bit 'more resolution (which in the workplace is now increasingly required) but that does not come at the expense of its excellent high ISO. For the rest, as mentioned, is a machine with few frills and that does its job and does it well. |
| sent on January 17, 2015 Pros: a car, finally no frills, with only what you need really. Outstanding performance, files "aseptic" in all conditions! Cons: Still a chance to make movies ... you decide to do with that option models apart ... then the odious SD card and to conclude the festival futility, WI-FI and JPS. Opinion: Developed to "do" photo practical and robust: a device in which, quality, simplicity, intuitiveness to the flight are the main dish, if they really want to make it perfect, take away the above, do make at least 7-8 fps and will render useless all the top models .... quiet .... they will not have a market to defend .... anyway who wants to hear, let him hear! |
 | sent on January 09, 2015 Pros: lightweight, excellent performance at high ISO, good value '/ price for FF Cons: absence of the joystick, could use a second slot, a hair slow AF in my humble opinion and even some point of focus in more 'would not hurt ... the wi fi nn honestly I think indispensabile.rn Opinion: Accustomed to the 5D III seems to have in hand a toy, and 'much more' lightweight and fits my hands definitely not great ... I recognize a great versatility 'and reliability'. In 15 days the 'proven with different optics L series and with the 85mm 1.8. In portraits and 'excellent, as well as in landscaping, but nn stand comparison with the mark III in the burst (I will be' I used bad ..). L 'I tried it with the 70 200 f2.8 that weighs a lot' and and 'rather unbalanced. I l 'I purchased at a price I would say ridiculously low with very few shots, I was lucky, not the full price I would have bought it having already' l 'other. Ultimately x a first step in FF I find it advisable. |
 | sent on December 23, 2014 Pros: Value 'SENSOR / UNBEATABLE PRICE - Cons: NO JOYSTICK - SLOT MEMORY - SIGHT - FOCUS - METER DIFFICULT TO UNDERSTAND - KEY PDC unusable - MANY THEY BOUGHT STRONGLY BELIEVE THAT IN ADDITION TO MAKE HIS SENSOR "PHOTO" THEIR SHOTS Opinion: Before this camera had a 1D mark II, and was looking for the 1Ds Mark III, but are not able to find at reasonable prices (in my area) .rnTralascio to speak of the qualities of the sensor, which everyone knows to be on top, behind only the 1Dx home Canon, iso held very high, excellent cleaning image during long exposures. Good also the white balance automatically, marginal function for raw, but I stress that does not shoot at random as other cameras; different view however the exposure, which is why I started using all the settings in the manual (I had already begun with the 1d, actually) .rnPer can keep the price low, Canon has made some compromises: the viewfinder is not really suitable steps a 35 mm, pass the lateral points of 'af which are quite useless, moreover is not designed for the action, and the central works fine; but the memory slot is disturbing, both for construction and for the absence of the double slot, a semipro must have, exhaustive! Terrifying is also the pad / wheel to movepoints maf, unusable. rnAvrei much preferred slot and joy of 5D3, or a tiltable viewfinder, instead of wifi (one of the most useless things that are mounting cameras) and GPS, is useful, if not drank battery as a dodge charger.rnI problems found that all the construction / tropicalization, for now, after the desert, rain, snow, I found none, the question also user's attention ..... rnMacchina to take if you want one offering, or a full frame sensor ISO 6400 for use (I use it without hesitation even at 12000), using glass series L superbright, if you want to feel, speed, accuracy, eternity, the council 1Ds 3.rnPresa with approximately 1600 shots in assets, warranty remaining three years and half amateur photographer, to 1200 € sull'unghia.rnrn |
| sent on December 15, 2014 Pros: Output image quality, especially at high sensitivity; wi-fi and GPS; silent shooting mode; central point autofocus sensitive. Good viewfinder. Cons: Lack of joystick, buttons on the left side of the LCD screen and built-in flash. Opinion: Using this camera for three months, I come from the 7D. Of this I am missing several things, basically the joystick and button layout in the back. Display images in the LCD screen during playback to me is more uncomfortable with the new layout of the controls. I also lack the built-in flash very useful to control other flash estrerni addition to the most advanced system of autofocus and burst. Having said that the files produced by 6D are better, sharper images in low sensitivity and much less noisy at high sensitivity. Very convenient connectivity wi-fi. Rarely use the GPS. The viewfinder of the FF is obviously bigger and piacevole.rnUsando this machine to do almost exclusively architectural photography, the biggest difference I noticed compared to 'APSC, are in post-production of the raw files. With 6D recovery of the shadows and the processing of the file in general the results are very migliori.rnApprezzo the shutter with silent mode (in 6D is verambody quieter) that produces less vibration and sound in my opinion the most pleasant. rnih nutshell, for static and low light photography, the council 6D. For all the rest the 7D is more versatile. |
 | sent on December 08, 2014 Pros: image quality, performance at high ISO, a real FF ideal for portraiture, landscapes and study, great f using the center point, easy to use and very intuitive and simple with a few "frills." Cons: if you really look a flaw I would say the quality of the buttons compared to the various 5d which are firmer and the AF but only with respect to 5dMK3 and 1DX (within FF) Opinion: her own about a year and I must say it is money well spent. If you point to a room "essential" with a lot of substance and a few "tricks" that's great questa.I raw files are lavorabilissimi (+ than the 5D MKII). I can not evaluate images with iso "absurd" but for sure when you are in such conditions as to raise them a little (1000-1600-2000) behaves very well. It is not a room to "trench" should be used with due attention, given the quality of the materials, but if you are interested in the end result and you deal with portraiture is excellent. I think it is always the optics to make a difference greater than the camera body. The rest, at times, is pure marrketing the manufacturers emphasize that unnecessary features and complex that rarely ever be used. |
 | sent on November 13, 2014 Pros: Excellent performance at high ISO and noise management, full-frame at a good price, Wi-Fi and GPS integrated weight Cons: Accustomed to 7d suffer the lack of buttons on the left side of the screen, but it is not necessarily a "Cons" Opinion: Bought this camera body about a month ago. rnProvenendo a 7D Mark I, the first impression was the weight difference and the lack of buttons on the side of the screen (I was used to and fond of), but mostly the difference already taken in the .jpg image quality even at 1600 ISO and over (for me before unusable) .rnChe say, whereas before I used to spend time on post production to remove excess noise that often made it unusable picture (my favorite photo evening and / or night), now do not even think about it: shooting, discharge of PCs and ENOUGH .... fantastico.rnSono still in the process of settling in, but for now I am fully satisfied, both with the use of the 24-105 kit supplied, and with the great Canon 85mm f1.8 (which mounted on the 6d is giving me really good feeling). |
 | sent on November 04, 2014 Pros: I own a great camera and I am fine Cons: Lack dual slot but is fine with SD, do not get to 1/8000 sin Opinion: I purchased this body with the Canon 24/105 and it is really fantastic maneggevolissima and yield good performance at high ISO is a beautiful image quality, Canon has made a good full frame the board. Price good enough now to when I got it I was down a lot and it's even better for those who want to buy a good full frame. At the beginning I was on the 5d 3 but I preferred to spend less on the body and invest in lenses but as soon as I can I'll take a second camera body that will assess. |
 | sent on November 01, 2014 Pros: Excellent performance at high ISO, FF, ergonomic body. Cons: Slight tendency to underexpose, but nothing unsolvable in postproduction. Opinion: I recently purchased this camera body moving from the 550D and I have to say really pleased with the value for money. At first I was torn between 5D mark II (used as new if they are not already) and 6D. Of course he won the latter as superior in virtually all also given its attractive price point. This plunge into the world FF I was really happy with it. The details and the light output is excellent at high ISO so great performance of the new sesnsore. |
 | sent on September 23, 2014 Pros: ff, Wi-Fi, noise iso Cons: kneads the details colors slightly underexpose the file Opinion: I had the 6d for a year I've made a couple of trips and I got it new after school years with a 50d with 17-85mm (practically reach the bone) honestly apart from the yield at high iso struck me little, I develop the best photos made in the first or travel plans etc. kneads the details underexpose at least one stop using the neutral style, the contrast is still too much of the 50d instead remained faithful to the light, color, detail .Also I tried it with both the 24-105 f4 kit that with a 24-70 f2.8 sigma new model really nice but the result is always the same |
 | sent on September 19, 2014 Pros: Quality of the file, price, weight. Cons: Shutter 1/4000, a tendency to underexpose, lack double slot. Opinion: In my opinion the best Canon camera for money. The quality of the file is creepy. Superpuliti are also high iso. I believe that the workability of the file is slightly higher than the 5d mark III and slightly less than the 1DX. Very convenient implementation of the wifi and gps. With wifi you can download the photos anywhere on your smartphone and also use its screen to "see" what he sees the camera and use it more as a remote control. Even the GPS does its job well and is beautiful when you return from a trip to instantly see the place where the photograph was taken. Limiting speech is the shutter to 1/4000. I shot that often with important openings I have often set the mode L (low, iso 50 for instance) on sunny days otherwise the photos are overexposed. I would have liked the shutter to 1/8000. I find it very convenient to move the pad in the photos. I'm better with the joystick. The burst is not great but it's not too slow. 4.5 fps are sufficient for a while all situations, except where the sport is definitely improves with at least 6 fps. The af is not his strong point in terms of points of focus but it works very well, especially the central point. Who needs photographing sports events is better to orientate on the 5D mkIII. The meter tends to underexpose without a precise rule. It is definitely not the top. I hope to settle down with a firmware update. Another thing I liked is the double slot. If you are shooting important events is always handy to have a backup copy of the data. I really like to use instead of the SD. They are very comfortable because they cost less, have become almost as fast compact flash, are for sale just about everywhere and also the majority of computers today have a built-in SD reader. They are, however, in my opinion the most delicate compared to CF because they have the contacts to view. The overall assessment of this camera is very positive. I suggest buying! |
 | sent on August 26, 2014 Pros: Quality of raw files, weight, AF, construction, size Cons: If you really do have to look for one, I'd say the shutter speed "limited" to 1/4000 Opinion: I am a very "down to earth", I do not like bullshit technology like gps, wifi or controls noise / lights / shadows of any kind. For me, it might not even be on the menu, for me, it would not be a problem. I estimate the reflex with other parameters, to me, much more useful. I own this camera now for several months, has taken the place of the 5Dmk2 and although initially I was almost afraid of the choice made, I have to say that I am satisfied to 99%! In my photographic history, I have had many SLR bodies, before I was in Nikon and I had almost everything, including FF. Then, from the D700, I jumped back, and I entered the world with the Canon 5DOld. Well, today .. I can say that the 6D, is my favorite SLR. I use it in a myriad of situations, I always carry it with me, I'm doing sports photos, portraits, paesaggi..tutto! I'm not one that saves certainly !! Lately, I also happen to do some work, including weddings, rallies, marathons, baptisms, book ... and yet, the 6D seems to be unable to disappoint. Churns out excellent file and malleable even at high iso, many complain of sHarsha focus speed, especially to the side ... well, I use them ALL and I have never stray a picture, even in bad light conditions or with fast-moving subjects such as children, car, lemurs, bike downhill! ! The weight and size, you appreciate a lot if you have to hold for several hours or during a hike in the mountains ... It 's nice to come home in the evening without the sore wrist !! The keys on the body are essential, but there are those that I serve. The construction is solid, no creaking or tires you scollano. So .... I would buy another 1000 and would replace only with the 6DMk2, hoping that it remains the same philosophy !! If you just have to find the flaws, I would say that the weather "limited" to 1/4000 puts fear in those who use optical bright .... I have used with the 135 f2 f2 .. 35 .. 50 with 1.4 ... and I am a lover of the "tuttoaperto", and yet, even under strong light, the problems are minimal and never really been limiting !! Missing the key of the WB .. but personally, shooting in Auto WB, and if I have to fix it, I do it in PP. Well ... ineaunts, in my opinion. The SLR, it will not be perfect for everyone, but I think it's really good and who is not to be considered a "compromise". Absolutely recommended. |
 | sent on August 13, 2014 Pros: Accuracy and speed central point. Wifi. GPS. Excellent file without post production. Cons: Only af central good, the lack of flash excludes the possibility of controlling studio flash (the 600d has it ... They might put it). Slow in the burst. Missing the headphone output for video. Opinion: Unlike when declared by experienced users of this forum, I have to say that the central point of the AF is accurate and sensitive. Rest even more appalled by the fact that experts in the condition of focus difficult, instead of focusing in manual, take another machine in hand ... How long it takes these couples to enter into the Church? RnrnResta the fact for photos of sport (depending on the sport) may not be suitable. Not good for cars, bikes, maybe even a bike, but I do in rugby, football, volleyball and basketball I found bene.rnrnLa recommend to everyone, for still life in particular, I found there are well. rnrnBuona light. |
 | sent on August 09, 2014 Pros: High ISO quality, ergonomics, weight, center AF precision, sharpness and image quality, wifi and GPS Cons: 4.5 FPS burst of Opinion: I own the 6D nine months (November 2013) and after using it enough I can be very happy with the purchase. I came from a 50D which I was happy but I was always tempted to move to FF. Reading several reviews and knowing therefore its "limits" I still decided to purchase. For the kind of photography I do is a very nice car and almost perfect, great for landscape, night, portrait, macro, street. The center AF is a shrapnel and precise, the files are amazing, the quality at high ISO with the 50D impressive that before was impossible. Very convenient is the wifi with which you can control the machine via a smartphone / tablet with the EOS Remote application. In conclusion I think it is a machine suitable for all those who do not have a need for speed burst but the rest is almost perfect. I believe that Canon has put on the market a buana FF at a price almost accessible to many. |
 | sent on August 06, 2014 Pros: Image quality, color yield, quality at high iso. Cons: Af a disaster, logical layout of the controls outside and a little googie. Opinion: When purchasing this 6d knew I had to give up some features that already regret (I had a 50d). RnPosso give up everything but a system af quickly and precisely and priceless, this seems 6d to take pictures with the af smartphone.rnAvevo the 'impression that this car was a red herring and I do not sbagliavo.rnConcordo with Ermannocazzola; extraordinary at high iso, beautiful images and nothing more. |
 | sent on July 25, 2014 Pros: Exceptional FF sensor, Image Quality, Yield of colors, ergonomics and reduced weight, precise AF, estate at high ISO, dynamic range of the sensor, battery life, Customization Cons: None in particular Opinion: Purchased used as a second body to match the 5D3, I was amazed .. what to say .... except that the autofocus Mark III is obviously more powerful (center point aside), everything else is in favor of the 6d.rnInnanzitutto Price, now the new is about 1250 Euros and used on 1100 file cleanup incredible color rendition, held at high ISO and higher above no color noise and vertical banding problem that the 5D Mark III instead I encountered in recovering shadows in landscape photos .. very fastidioso.rnI limits of this machine are all deliberately created by Canon to maintain high sales also 5D3 that would inevitably collapsed, if there are 61 AF points, shutter to 1/8000 and dual-slot 1000 to save yourself those passes for € L series optics, and take their eyes closed the 6d, has a yield that is above chance! |
 | sent on July 19, 2014 Pros: Sharpness and image quality; color rendition; ergonomics and construction; solidity and handling. Cons: The viewfinder does not cover 100%; in some cases tends to underexpose (but you just know it). Frankly, I struggle to find major limitations. Opinion: I own the 6D for about a year and a half. I come from a 40D (great camera) and a 5D (Mk I) that I bought second-hand. What interests me especially the photographic yield (ie do not do video, nor use Wifi or GPS). RnCredo who, speaking of a camera, you can never be separated from what we seek in it: what is my photographic genre? What interests me the most? Why begrudge a burst not too fast, I do not care if the photo sport? To me personally, I photograph landscapes, portraits, portraits settled, architecture, some event, such as weddings or small parties of grandchildren, more than enough: I do not think to exploit fully the potential, and this .... I rassicura.rnDevo say that this 'small' FF is by no means small: in addition to the now celebrated high ISO in which it competes with the 'sisters' more quietly 5D, the picture quality never disappoints. Processor and sensor are of excellent quality. With good targets the central point of focus canalso to compensate for the peripheral areas of the image and is fast and accurate in every situation. Now photographer always in JPG files and are well 'workable' program with a 'simple' as PsElements 12.0. I also bought the 24-105 mm f4, which comes in the kit and I must say that it blends well as a 'do everything' with the 6D, despite certain limitations found in some small recensioni.rnTendo now choose fixed lenses: l ' last purchased is the 28mm 2.8 IS USM, which with the 6D is a wonder! rnChe else to say? For my needs of amateur, until today has given me great satisfaction, both in landscape photos, which in the portrait. Of course, as with any camera, are key quality objectives: the 6D enhances them in full. I highly recommend it at all, really! |
 | sent on July 02, 2014 Pros: File Cleanup incredible, low weight, excellent ergonomics, estate ISO embarrassing (positive) Cons: Lack joystick, lack dual-function buttons on the second LCD, be classified as an entry level ff Opinion: I have the 6d since January and I must say I do not regret at all camera bodies that I had before. rnPassato by a good 40d to a 7d. rnIl transition from 7d to 6 was like discovering another world. rnLeggo often you do not need the PP ... I always do, shooting in RAW, but probably do it more out of habit. RNLA held at high ISO is really an extraordinary thing ... Ditto the quality of the files that it generates. rnC'è little to say, they have done a good enough price for the camera body content and the potential of a professional machine. rnrnInutile be complaining about some limitations desired by home type the shutter to 1/4000 or the speed synchro flash or not af performance as that of the 5D3 5D3 ... obviously there for a reason ... Canon mica could pull themselves in the foot by creating a 5D3 economy. rnrnErgonomia very good: I had the 7d which has a pro body type, but frankly I like to say that the 6d has nothing to envy (of course also depends on the size of your hands). rnrnUnica flaw in my opinion is the lack ofthe joystick in favor of the pad inside the rotellone. A little 'uncomfortable. rnrnPeccato also removing the dual function of the buttons on the second display ... Now you have to operate via the Q button and set by them. rnrnUna which, however, can not conceive of the display cover is plastic instead of glass like my old 7d ... is not that if you put in the glass, the machine would have been closer to the 5D3 ... crazy things. rnrnDisplay nice detailed as that of 5d3.rnPeccato always just read the title right entry level to classify everything ... Where, however, in some respects like the quality of the shot, I often read that it is also the best big sister 5D3 ... meditate. |
 | sent on June 27, 2014 Pros: FF "most economic", lightweight, super-equipped (wifi-GPS), excellent yield high ISO, the central point of focus sensitive. Cons: Do not seem to find. Opinion: His files are of the highest quality. With 5m of PP you can get great results from its RAW. rnSe want an SLR FF "accessible", with weights and overall dimensions are looking for a 6D. rnMi like the ability to customize many features in the menu and in the mode dial exposure: for example, I've customized the C1 works for portrait with 100 f / 2 and the C / 2 to use when 200L; in these functions you can choose the time of security, among which values ??of ISO must choose the camera, and even the aperture preferred. RNLA thing that surprised me the most is how well the iso holds even at very high values! Automatically can rise to ISO 25000 but I have to say that doing the tests I decided to lock it to 12000 ... limit within which I think the pictures can be recovered in PP to perfection without losing detail. Up to 6400 ISO instead of no use to eliminate the noise in PP because there is. Useful adjustment of whites in the manuale.rnBellissima whatity of the video! Did not buy it for that, but once you get a chance you use .. My advice is to focus on the subject in the photo mode, then go in and record video (for static subjects). If the subject is moving and changes the fire touches the MF (still quite intuitive after a little 'practice. Maybe better than many video AF which then lose the subject) .rnC'è who strives to find as against the materials but it is known that defects belonged only to the first models. In fact those 2013 onwards no one has complained several necklines of grommets or other defects. My after a year is still BRAND NEW. rnSecondo me save € 1,000 rather than choosing 6D 5DIII agree if: you do not need 1/8000 "(the 6D stops 1/4000") and if you do not need a body carrammato for use in places "difficult" (deserts , swamps, rain, etc ..). rnIo 1000 € I have invested in the kit lenses ... |
| sent on June 24, 2014 Pros: High quality of the images produced, a great time saver for the "not" post production Cons: Nothing. The faults of others are not my business. Opinion: I state that I do not like to review a product arrogandomi the right to find out more just because I have this or that body photo, seen in the photograph that what really matters is not the current account "or kg of bills signed," but the neck or better yet the talent. That being said I will not say it then my equipment that type of experience within the photo but I'll tell solely my opinion of this body macchina.rnDevo say that I left very, very biased towards this eos. Just out of the felt together to MarkIII and not appreciated ergonomics. The judged very badly in this respect a priori excluding it from my bag. As time passed, however, have come forward new requirements, including that of being lighter possibile.rnRiconsiderai so this camera body and I must say that I am very happy that I did. The photo quality is class leading, currently I think this is now the best sensor that Canon has in higher net price listof charge to MarkIII and similar to the 1DX but with an advantage in risoluzione.rnPer as I'm concerned the review ends here because of the AF module, FPS, GPS, WIFi, DUAL SLOT, I can not care less. If your prerogative is the quality of the photos and do not spend hours at the pc in pp to create beautiful images, then this machine is for voi.rnSaluti. |
 | sent on June 22, 2014 Pros: Quality and cleanliness of the file price midpoint very sensitive in low light Cons: The AF system for dynamic photo ... not exactly the best! Opinion: I bought this camera about a year ago, I needed a second body to accompany the 1dmark4. The quality of the file is of a high standard and is extremely clean, all at a price rather contenuto.rnL 'AF instead I was not really sure ... we are at the levels of the 5d mark2. Not ideal for photography dynamics, but it is perfect for other genres "reasoned". In fact, the 6d 5d mark 3 is a castrated .... but with a newer sensor and prestazionale.rnLa competition, however, can do better, the Nikon D610 has more AF points, better autofocus system and a burst ... rn |
 | sent on June 22, 2014 Pros: High iso but nothing sensational Cons: Lots: AF slow with any optical joystick absence, missing buttons for fast adjustments, lackluster screen and reddish and many other difettucci Opinion: Before giving my opinion precisely my present set of cameras to better expose from that point of view I parlo.rnAttualmente: Eos 1Dx - Eos 5D3 - EOS 6D - Eos 5D2rnCredo this Centre that already suffice to adjust my thinking and make it clear that My words are to be evaluated well because obviously I'm talking about a "cheap" in comparison with the EOS series ... MUST weigh up my parole.rnrnSull 'wave of the thousands of excellent reviews of this 6D, I wanted to take it as a whim for have fun and put in the hands of my son a camera body Easy to start the photo (sorry but I never conceived the idea of ??starting with an APSC ... is counterproductive in my opinion). rnrnSubito excited about the high iso so this camera is famous now and I would say VERY resemble the 1Dx ... kudos to canon that has well married and ISO quality file.rnrnDopo an initial enthusiasm, however, the 6D has been a disappointment after another. rnCome ever? rnNon so much for the prerogatives of the camera which I think have the best price-quality but since the Recently from the previoussions I was expecting much more in the basic functions ... and the precise subito.rnrnrnAFrnsistema fast AF almost like the 5D2 ... nothing more, I would say that in low-light conditions and when times are tight even peggio.rnSui points side is much better than the 5D2 but the central is nothing to do ... a disappointment compared the expectations described in recensioni.rnIl backlight sends the ball ... went to church entrance ... Put it on a slow AF and imprecise (of course I had two bodies ready and I quickly recovered without losing the moment) .... and all this by fitting an EF 50mm f / 1,2 perspective that I would be in lightning MAF ... with the 5D2 and the 135 f / 2 instead ... no problem even without the help of the ST-E2 as did the 6D.rnIl AF system has disappointed me a lot .... in optimal conditions is faster but when the situation is critical, better the old carroarmato.rnrnrnTVrnin TV mode the camera I was stunned ... I would have expected a rather underexposed, out of the church, measurementspot on the bride in the sun more complete, the camera has overexposed by at least 2 stops .... that precise time was 1/4000 iso 200rnAnche here luckily I had the second 5D3 body ... that does not sing a shot ... only a few stylus bruciachiatino curves gown but my fault that I had not dictated a great time at MODE? MANUALE.rnrnCOMANDIrni buttons at the top of the camera are pietà.rnarrivato from other cameras you really feel so much the lack of pulsed "dual option" ... rnad example on the other with the AF button adjusts the AF mode and the mode ONE Shoot or burst with the 6D ... no ... well, there are two buttons distinti.rne this obviously brings its repercussions ... if you want to adjust the white balance, you must enter the menu with the button Qrnidem for other adjustments. rnrnGrandissima lack even the M-fn button next to the shutter release button; for those who make flash photography (I use them more and wirelessly) this button is a must for accurate readings and measurements and not random .... 6D is missing on me and very annoying ... who uses flash knows how this blocks the flow of lavoro.rnrnAltra great lack is the Joystick ... this is a flaw for those who do not come from xxd bodies because it is essential for be able to exploit it in the selection of the AF point ... with a click selects the center point or the active one already selected, and then move where you want ... with the 6D instead you have to remove your thumb, move the button most uncomfortable of all (top to the right) and then move the finger and go back to the ring and move around but not so simple ... every point movement requires physical movement of the finger ... instead of the joystick is ideal for rapidità.rnrnrnPDCrnil preview button PDC is really non-existent ... small, very low and uncomfortable ... for those who make landscaping is impraticabile.rnrnrnWI-FIrnhi-fi really slow ... too slow ... used with a macbook pro retina 15 "of 2013, we employed about 10 "to move an image to 2 meters away so the maximum range of the Wi-Fi set to q hoc.rnDireilmost inutilizzabile.rnrnrnUn positive side in comparison to the 5D2 in LiveView mode ... the "bubble" is also visible image while superimposed on the 5D3 you have to turn off the liveview and activate the bubble .... this is a great comfort to work in real-timernrnrnrnrnPRECISAZIONE: rni files are of excellent quality, nothing to ridirernle my opinions are a little biased since arriving from foreign series 1 and 5 from semprernè a great camera for those who are not in a hurry in the photographic process; for landscapers is a godsend as well as for ritrattistirnda strongly advise to matrimonialisti and to sportivirnrnrn |
 | sent on June 18, 2014 Pros: Low weight, quality files, Full-frame to a relatively low cost, silent shutter even in normal mode, custom commands, lack of various scenes from the dial settings Cons: Single slot, lack joystick Opinion: Joins the faithful to 50D shots of various system genere.rnIl focus is primitive when compared to the 5D3 but compared to the 5D2 is already a big step forward: the central very sensitive and good side, they lose shots only subjects with little contrast . rnQuello missing are the intersection points of the third frame for use with the large aperture lenses without ricomporre.rnIn AI-Servo with automatic selection of the operating points is very good and you can adjust the system according to the type of movement to follow (not like the 5D3 but you can get significant differences with the different settings). RNLA quality of the files is now well known, coming from un'APS-C dated (but also of the last generation), the difference is huge, so as the viewfinder is huge and bright. Excellent opportunity to mount slides diversi.rnL 'shutter to 1/4000 for now there is a limit because I rarely shot under the bright light of the sun at all apertura.rnE' can customize the commands sopperendo to the lack of dedicated button for flash compensation (set it to SET), you can also use the button to preview the depth of field to temporarily switch to AI Servo to One Shot and vice versa: a large comodità.rnUtili GPS functions Wi-fi: the first great for travel, according to the study by viewing photos directly on your PC or tablet (only jpg, with the Raw is really too slow). RNLA unnecessary scene presets are grouped under a single voice on the mode dial settings by leaving it free from unused più.rnPer heavy usage is not serious lack of joystick because the pad is easily accessible even if a little 'spongy. Too bad for the lack of the second slot with wifi backup even if you can make a copy of the card to volo.rnRaffica enough, reduced shutter lag, low weight and good ergonomics round out the quadro.rnrnEDIT: update with the latest considerations. With the battery grip ergonomics is still nautical milesbream, now the handle is perfect. Using it in the dark is known that they could put some relief on one of the buttons back (review and magnification) to distinguish them. The selection of the AF point is still faster with the pad but it has a behavior that gets on my nerves: by choosing one of the peripheral, if instead of going to the adjacent point you accidentally choose a point that does not exist (to the outside), go to automatic choice. It would be much more comfortable for me, it stopped there or pass at the opposite point (for example, from the left to the right by pressing the left). The exposure is proving to be quite reliable now that I know him better. The upper part of the polycarbonate is very sensitive to scratches. Come off by rubbing it takes very little to give segni.rnIl sensor is great. |
 | sent on June 04, 2014 Pros: Great ISO sensitivity, color fidelity, intuitive, quiet shutter-release mode, customizable controls, wonderful ... Cons: Not always connects with GPS, fast enough ... (slightly sottoespone not a problem). Opinion: I am a happy owner of the 6 D 4 days or so and I state I just did 500 shots situation both day and night in Florence with light and strong contrasts, I must say that behaves well under critical conditions (embankment at night) if adjusted well to dark locks faithfully without noise at ISO 800 where APSC work well over 1600 iso and start by saying I have a canon 650 of which are satisfied but the comparison and unforgiving, I mounted a tokina 11 16, resulting panoramas are superb, shooting very well at 50 iso. With the canon 50 1.4 photographing the night and a piacere.Molte are adjustments 6 D in every situation you find yourself, especially useful adjustment wb (white) personalizzata.Tenuta hand in the strength that transmits and substantial without being too heavy. purchased with sacrifice OLLO STORE Empoli, I finally switched to a FF. |
| sent on June 03, 2014 Pros: High ISO monstrous point center cross idem, light weight, exceptional value for money, wi-fi well supported by the Canon software, dynamic range at high ISO higher than Nikon Cons: Tropicalisation partial movies without continuous autofocus, continuous autofocus rather slow and not suitable for moving subjects unless they are of the 'handles', improved auto-exposure, dynamic range at low ISO lower than Nikon cameras Opinion: The dynamic range of up to 800 ISO is undoubtedly lower than rival Nikon, especially the D600 (the D800 should be considered to belong to another segment), while above this threshold and in proportion to the increase in ISO, the situation is reversed: this sensor seems devised to work better (proportionally speaking) to 12800 to 800, both as 'see' in the dark is just for the workability of the shadows pulling out where others (many others) are cut off from the noise of the basis of the fact that flattens the dynamic curve. The proof is in the wonderful jepg-made car, the best I have EVER seen; the 6D manages the impossible, as he pulls out files even acceptable to 25600 (limit his native), a clear sign that the soft internal interpolation can work on a sensor that, on its own, generates very little electrical interference. Consider that shooting in jpeg you can afford to eliminate all noise reduction for up to 12,800 (!!) we will file a bit 'of luminance noise but NOT chroma. If we take intojpeg with noise reduction limit extends up to 25600, but for postcard size prints you can push up to 51200 ... Crazy. The amazing thing is how to keep the color even with such high values. Speaking of Raw, with the files 'cold, hard' not processed in any way after it is considered that up to 1600 ISO the noise is practically absent both luma and chroma (unless you zoom in beyond the limit 'vision' of the A3) and becomes visible (but very manageable pp) only from 6400. I took Raw to 25600 overexposed at night, and normoesposte in LR are impressive: with the signal / noise ratio is optimized by the high sensitivity is in front of an impressive result, the noise is reduced. However, if shooting at low ISO (say up to 800) and then a little contraption 'with the shadows you see the most (only) default' sensory 'of the machine, in the sense that at low altitudes the dynamic range does not compare Nikon (D600), which in fact is equipped with a sensor for deadly dynamic range, I think the best ever (if you work at low ISO, Though.) But it does not compare even with Pentax (K-5) that mounts the aps-c more performant from this side, but that's lower level ... Okay. Nothing dramatic if you think that is inserted in the package even the most sensitive AF focus of the story (for what I do, at least) ... After I bought it because of the high ISO and good for the development fire from the pupil of feline ... That's right guys, this is a car that really sees in the dark, without exaggeration or phrases sliced ??... SEE IN THE DARK, POINT. I shot that almost always at night or in the evening, street and live events are over the moon: the focus on the cross (I only ever use that, but I am told that even the peripheral points are only slightly lower) is the I've tried most sensitive, manage to connect the fire in absurd situations and in fact allows to shoot in any light condition. This, coupled with the behavior at high (these forthcoming) iso super allows this machine to be the 'must have' for anyone cerAC professional results in critical condition without having to spend a fortune. From this point of view, only two machines ALL OVER THE MARKET, in fact, exceed, the 4DS and the 1DX, it was clear ... but the pass very little and cost 3-4 times more. Pity about the weather sealing and the burst: the first is partial and probably ineffective in a real downpour (sd door without fittings, as well as that of the battery), it can hold up some sketches but nothing more for me; the second, stood at 4 frames per sec, Pochini ... And the 11 AF points do not help to Engage well being mobile. Sensitive to the darkness, but you can not ask them to behave as if they were 61 when something is moving fast ... However, with a good workout and if you are the 'handles' you lavoricchia even in these cases, but if you're a photographer sports / nature of a certain level there it takes another, the 3d Mark III, for example. rnInsomma: Total machines, excellent throughout, are the two top of the range mentioned above, which cost between 5 and 6000 eurotti.Removed those two, if your genre is the street in the evening / night or live events (or situations from interiors in general) this is the car to be taken. Compulsory. and without the 1.2 ... It takes 50 to 35 1.4 Sigma.rnHo started working using the s-raw mode. This is a very important aspect of the machine, since, unlike the m-Raw that at least to the eye is not that a processing of the raw materials and which then provides a similar result in terms of noise and worst in terms of sharpness (in addition of course at a lower resolution), the s-raw it seems to be the result of an effective pixel binning. This technique works in the construction phase of the file and not a posteriori, that is, the sensor uses 1/4 of physical pixels (5 megapixels then instead of the native 20) at the time of the shot, turning blocks of four photodiodes in place of a (typically 4 located around the central pixel, which is not activated), with the predictable result of reduce noise at high ISO. Canon has never officially released on this format in cow functions, so it is impossible to have the CERTAINTY that it is an effective binning, but if you try to lower the resolution of a raw normal up to 5 mpix and compares colleagues' s-raw will immediately notice that in any case the end result is significantly better in terms of noise and also of color fidelity, especially to ISO 25600 and 12800. Therefore, this experiment should be ruled out that the picture may show less noise just because the car down to the 5 mpix. Further evidence of the activation of binning should be that if you do two identical photographs is at a standstill, with a raw and one with s-raw meal and are given in the DPP applying a noise reduction elastic, interpreting pictures, and not fixed a priori (such as LR) we see how the software applies much less to the NR-raw photo's ... It is not over: although the picture is starting at 20 mpix, the luminance noise reduction applied by the DPP makes it very acquerellosa by 6400 iso up, and with no small format, with the end result that the s-Raw only 5 mpix is ??becoming increasingly clear (andless noisy) than that by 20! Empirical evidence shows that then, if yes, with this car, it was not possible to apply the NR least up to 3200 ISO in RAW, with the small size limit is extended up to 6400, they speak of untreated raw files in post at all. .. One thing stratospheric. |
 | sent on May 27, 2014 Pros: File quality, ergonomics, light, held high iso very satisfactory Cons: Lack joystick and plugged speed 1/4000 (using aperture lenses god day I went close several times) Opinion: Coming from a 40D, 6D is far from the world. The use by September and I find it fantastic. I bought keeping in mind the "limits" or better, the differences with the 5D3. And 'the camera fits my needs as a photographer passionate but not professional. It does not have a burst pro maf or 61 points, but for my purposes is perfetta.rnLa advice. |
 | sent on May 16, 2014 Pros: Features / price ratio unbeatable performance of the sensor, cleaning and image fidelity, workability files, AF sensitivity in conditions of almost total darkness, silent shutter mode Cons: it has everything I need I do not complain later if I have to say what I would be willing to spend a few euro more I would say, with 100% coverage viewfinder, dual-slot, 1/8000 but then again, very well so it is worth every euro that coast but also more. Opinion: The essential features are at the top, does not fear comparisons with the most expensive flagships of the same house or competition. Announcement, drooled for the 5D3, read the datasheet I had not understood the value, snapped two raw it was love at first sight and I bought it right away. After one year, the rewards are a thousand and zero regrets. |
 | sent on April 29, 2014 Pros: Image quality even at high ISO, the center AF fast and accurate, ergonomics, quality / price ratio. Cons: Concentrated at the center AF point, the rear surface of the display. Opinion: After a year of use I can sum up and try to give a review of this macchina.rnPer me is fantastic, I am very happy that I decided to take it and it is perfectly in line with my esigenze.rnAl unlike many I consider the lack of swivel screen, the pop-up flash and a joystick value, then full satisfaction, while apart from the GPS (always geotaggato manually) find the function WI-FI very utile.rnSulla image quality confirm all the good that has been said while a special mention for me goes to the ergonomics of this machine that goes far beyond the weight / size, this is obviously a subjective but to me it "fits" perfectly and I could not ask for neo meglio.rnUnico true for me is the surface display, coming from the 7D which had a glass (I think) I find it very nice that the 6D plasticky, it gets dirty easily and cleans difficilmente.rnEstremamente satisfied with this machine, at the moment I would change for the 6D MKIIrn |
 | sent on April 23, 2014 Pros: Image quality, light weight, wifi, gps, excellent value for money, iso impressive 3 "screen Cons: 4.5 fps, single-slot memory, lack joystick Opinion: Camera body excellent, coming from a 40d, we are light years avanti.rnLa I'm using for a month and I got used to the second ring instead of the joystick that I had before, I honestly was not anything dramatic, indeed, it takes a little time to take the file mano.rnQualità excellent, lots of little things and tricks that are very useful, from 3 "screen, excellent management of the island high, optimal live view, high portability thanks to its small size and management wifi . rnEvito to make comparisons with other bodies, I think the 6d an excellent solution for advanced amateur photographers who do not need to have a burst picture to scream and endless points of their own making machine fuoco.rnCorpo successful. Very happy with the choice I suggest vivamente.rn |
 | sent on April 20, 2014 Pros: Not overly large, excellent performance at high ISO, focus sensitive, easy to use, excellent dynamic range, wifi and gps function funny and sometimes see the essential self-timer with wifi, excellent grip. Cons: maybe a few more would not point autofocus quastato, Double SD slot ... but just want pignolare. Opinion: use for several months this camera, the grim to say the least wonderful easy to use, suitable for all situations, only in the extreme sport goes a little distressed to burst, autofocus the grim ottimo.rnSopra say that some AF point more would not gaustato but those who are absolutely sufficient mind you ..! What about the sensitivity of the central points Af focheggia almost dark and the sides are very accurate. I personally found to photograph side by side with a friend of mine has 5DMIII in a dark situation, he did not riusiciva more focuse and had to stop I continued to shoot without problems, easy to use intuitive controls and simple once you find them and the manage very well in all situations where you need to change settings without cheat the brain. I highly recommend the excellent value for money with a fantastic ful frame sensor with excellent stability at high iso. |
user5958 | sent on April 14, 2014 Pros: Cleaning the RAW file at high iso, full hd video of excellent quality, good customization features than xxd bodies and XXXD. Cons: Focus during the video can only MF. In AF unusable if not before recording. It would have been helpful to have at least the Focus Peaking function. The Auto-iso sottoespone dramatically. Opinion: I am writing this review after after 4 months of use, and in the case of account update. USAO this machine primarily for making portraits, and bought it hoping to improve the performance especially at high iso for pictures in action without a flash. To this I can say that up to 800 iso file remains extremely clean, and you can apply noise reduction to obtain excellent results especially using LR5 who does it better than dpp). At 1000 ISO you have a levy deterioration that gradually increases with increasing ISO sensitivity. We must first of all point out that the seal iso Stratta mind is related to the ambient brightness. With good lighting you can take safely to 4000 ISO amazing results, but personally I dwell more on the performance in low light conditions. (Type 4ev). Under these conditions, I prefer to work up to 1250 only if strictly necessario.rnA go over 100 ISO, while reading around reviews extolling improved dynamic range I'm not glaring differences compared to my modest 400d, or if you knowno (there will be also) are not revolutionary. RNLA mode to see made is truly exceptional, here you can also record at 2000 ISO with excellent results. The only flaw the focus. Although accustomed to it in the manual, and it is difficult to make beautiful shots with subjects in slow motion. Obviously I am referring to shooting amateur and nothing more. rn |
 | sent on April 05, 2014 Pros: FF at a good price, great at high ISO, focus fast, handling possibilities, light to be a FF. Cons: So far found no cons. Opinion: Goodmorning everyone. Four days ago I received the 6D at home. I immediately set to work, especially with the Tamron 24-70 F 2.8 stabilized. Files clean and high quality characterize this highly successful SLR of the Japanese brand. Up to 6400 ISO, you can shoot without the slightest worry of mind. I found, however, that the ISO "cleaner" are those intermediate (160, 250,320,640). However, any type of sensitivity, from 50 to 6400 ISO, you decide to use, always fall on their feet. The construction is solid and professional, as you'd expect from a camera of this type. It grab that is a pleasure, even if you have big hands, mine are not small. He finished really well. A shutter sound is very reasonable. Using to focus the central point always, I have no problem raising other users regarding the number of focus points that owns this camera. Among other things, the central point focuses virtually also to -3EV dark. Finallya camera as it should, FF, at a fair price. I have purchased in the offer from OLLO STORE Empoli. It arrived in three working days. Camera which I highly recommend to everyone, absolutely everyone. Great performance at the right price! Good life! G. |
 | sent on April 04, 2014 Pros: FF low price, good grip, good joypad, Wi-Fi function, battery info Cons: 11 AF points are few Opinion: Before FF of my life, I come from a 600D and a 350D before (and a 30V to film) so I found myself in the wonder of a digital SLR to take pictures as film .... with the previous two because it does not was the finding of having a good quality. Shooting with the L series lenses for which the maximum and bright .... anyway so it is all too easy to get decent shots. Great Wi-Fi although I always used SanDisk Eye-Fi cards. The GPS function also personally do not use because it consumes a lot of battery! Excellent battery info function with memory type MAC address that identifies each battery actually recorded. Custom features beyond belief! Too bad because the GPS has the top cover and plastic ..... shame to have only 11 points AF.rnBuono remote shooting via the App!! RnConsigliata highly voting 9.5 |
 | sent on February 21, 2014 Pros: Excellent construction, weight and size, yield at high iso, very intuitive menu Cons: Af points, double-slot memories. Opinion: Perhaps as a first impression points to are a bit 'compressed towards the center. The fact of the two slots for the memory fades into the background as soon as you pick up this machine. The keys and adjusting rings are perfect. Fluid movements and velvety. The weight and size of this machine are nothing short of spectacular than others. The af engages in the dark. The various menus are very intuitive and it does not take much to get the hang of. wifi I find it very convenient, connected to the iPhone that serves as a remote control and you can download photos directly into the roll of the phone. gps personally I find it irrelevant but I think for those who travel a lot might come in handy ... The battery of well over 1000 shots with wifi turned on ... With GPS I've never tried. |
 | sent on February 10, 2014 Pros: Excellent yield at ISO elevati.rnOttima ergonomics, weight and arrangement of pulsanti.rnPunto central efficiente.rnFotografie very very sharp, very puliti.rnWifi & GPS files, not essential but comfortable if necessary. RnSemitropicalizzata, but still well-protected, solid feel , the moment on the take in hand from the first volta.rn Cons: Display a little 'piccolino.rnMancanza of direct WB button, but you do not die senza.rnHDR only jpeg.rnAvrei maintained the system of digital zoom as on my old 600D, but it is only a matter of abitudine.rnUn slot for SD memory . rn Opinion: The defects described to me by this camera are relatively significant. At the time of purchase on the person concerned is already aware of all the features of prodotto.rnSi is therefore of little comfort to them that we would probably not even caso.rnConsiglio this machine to all the people who want to make the leap quality by APSC to FF, is a gem, really. Exceptional photographs even in the most "dark" of the day. |
 | sent on February 06, 2014 Pros: The central AF point is aggangia well even in low light, high ISO is made to fenomenaleperchè grain produces a very soft and I are still in disbelief coming from the 7D, has good ergonomics, good build quality and is semi-tropical conditions. The controls are slightly different from the 7D but with a little practice you abiutua especially the absence of the joystick. The snap is quiet and has Wifi and GPS that differentiate it from other cameras of its level. Cons: For me to use it with the 70-200 should have the battery grip because the grip is more solid in the hands. The speed of 1/4000 to me is more than enough so it is not a counter but if the points of focus were more would be better. The battery is consumed quickly with wifi and gps turned on. Opinion: Coming from the 7D and having the nightmare of the ISO too high, this SLR photographer and relaxed as possible, with the aim of a certain level, you can make otttime photos and especially to achieve very good workable files in PP. It tends to overexpose. I was undecided whether to take the 5D Mark III but in the end I'm happy with the choice I made because with the money saved I got a good perspective that I can make the most with the quality of the sensor. If we decide in the future that is close to me I can always change it but for now I'll keep strettae recommend it to all those like me who look out for the first time in the world FF discovering the pros and cons. |
 | sent on January 31, 2014 Pros: All Files: perfect, sharp photos, I use it with obbiettiv. Sigma 70 200 Os 2.8, Canon 17 40 L, Rokinon 14mm, Sigma 50mm 1.4, Sigma 150mm no Os, produces beautiful photos that are strategic to say happy really a nice room. Cons: better when used with the battery grip with the GPS turned on the battery goes down, dual-slot absent, other not know Opinion: Or bought this full frame February 2013 I was really excited about the room, made at high iso so much that I put it in automatic does everything by itself, then with the sigma 70 200 2.8 Os releases a creaminess phenomenal, with the sigma 150mm macro photos from the show , say that 10 times the buy another one, even though I admit I am a lover of the nikon. D7000 APCs but not to do with being 6D Full Frame. |
 | sent on January 07, 2014 Pros: Completeness Canon offer world (for people like me who came from another manufacturer, Pentax), ease-use menu, the central AF point. Quality yield high ISO. Cons: Assembly quality battery grip BG-E13, with GPS on battery consumption. Burst not really fast. Tendency to underexposure Opinion: Bought in November 2013 with the kit 24-105 F/4.rnrnSono amateur photographer for many years and I come from a very large kit Pentax done in time between various bodies (film Z1-P, * ist D, K-10) and slow ( a dozen) then a few months ago I "exploded once again" the desire for photographic reasons of time and effort I had dozed off a little bit and when I looked at what was current, well I wanted to try a full frame Pentax that unfortunately did not have a list, and then I are diverted to a kit + Canon 6D Canon 24-105 F / 4 (to which I then added immediately after a Canon 50mm LF / 1.2; then always Canon 70-200 f / 2,8 L IS II USM, EF 2X III and the little 40mm 2.8 430EX Flash in addition to, PocketWizard etc.etc .... in short, a small bloodbath in terms of the €!). rnrnLa 6D I was immediately struck by the yield of the images at high ISO in practice the flash does not feel the lack and shoot at ISO 12800 is more than good results with ordinary amministrazione.rnrnMolto convenient function of GPS for geotagging photos and also the wi-fi (mostly for remote shooting Smartphonebecause the rest seems quite cumbersome). rnrnSono was very disappointed by a small detail that does not change the perception of very good quality product but in the Pentax which I never had, so I want to tell you an anecdote: I have machine with the body also bought the battery grip Canon BG-13 more than anything else for ease of grip (as well as increased autonomy, since then the high consumption if the GPS is turned on), and right away I noticed that the slide that contains the two LP when closed-E6 is a little play (stuff tenths of a millimeter) which produces an effect a little annoying that when you grab the camera and holding her hand at the sled feels (and is perceived on palm of the hand) a little crunch of plastic is not really that great. rnEbbene, having the good fortune, for family reasons, you can often go to Tokyo, as well as spend some time in the temple photo of the place (Yodobashi Camera in Akihabara Electric Town or if you prefer, a city suburb of Tokyo that gi & agrave, the nickname suggests kinds of entertainment), I wanted to go straight to the source to ask for an explanation (in Italy I would not have gotten anything I think) so I went to Canon Gallery Ginza (Tokyo area) and, in addition to try and touch with all Canon products (but if you have the chance went to Yodobashi Camera in Akihabara where they are placed on a tripod all the "toed" Canon, the 300mm F / 2,8 up to 600mm ready for you to take on a variety of Canon bodies , a blast to try the real optics that level) I went to the service department where with the help of my wife (Japanese) I asked the always friendly and helpful technicians if it were normal for their tolerance of this type of coupling between the Plastics: the technician did not bat an eyelid, he took another BG-13 and put it in place of my own but, alas, the result was not so very different, too, has confirmed that this was their standard. Two clues are a test? RnrnAltra little flaw I've noticed is the tendency to underweight: alwaysYodobashi Camera I wanted to try the new Pentax K3 and between the various tests I made several shots pointing the viewfinder toward the ceiling with a forest of neon lit does not have anything underexposed, to which I pulled out of my backpack and made my Canon 6D the same shot, same shooting mode, the same fully automatic mode and here is the classic underexposure ... I do not know if it depends on a defect in the 6D which tends to underexpose as I have read in various reviews but the fact is that I do not really have much impressed ... but I tried the same thing with the 5D Mark III and the things that are not going too meglio.rnrnComunque, for me this is the first Canon product and seeing how I've already invested in economic terms, I think it is a good product (thankfully remain the lenses, you can also change the bodies .....): The thing I like most, however, is the considerable extent of use of the ISO that really make it a jack of all trades and always be used in any shades of luce.rnrn |
 | sent on December 26, 2013 Pros: Excellent qulità sensor and files, excellent performance at high ISO so the exploitability is high, the central point of focus from very good to excellent and good the rest, the body strong and light machine, practical and intuitive to use (I do not I never had the joystick so for me it is not a problem that there is not) rnil buffer is full and you can never make a lot of continuous shots, good management of the external flash, very convenient wi-fi Cons: Body a little bit for those with large hands, when mounting a perspective quite heavy as the Tamron 24-70, you feel the need of a battery grip for more comfortable grip and a balanced weight, but for the ' precisely with the battery grip problema.rnSento solve the lack of dedicated WB button but considering everything else I close an eye !! : DrnPer the rest I do not find other flaws, who puts a fault the flurry, 1/4000 and the second SD slot, could buy the 5D mark III if he was bothered by these shortcomings! XD Opinion: I admit that I was hesitant before buying it, I was convinced that the files of this camera body were not really good as it was called, even though I knew they were obviously better than those of my old 500D, but I was considering other camera bodies to make the ' upgrade, I finally decided, and I bought it, and the files are really good as they say, I was incredibly surprised they are! rnL'ho proven with the 50mm 1.8, the Canon 70-200 f4, the Tamron 24-70 f2.8 and 17-40mm f4, and the level of detail in all optics it is altissimo.rnNe I was fully satisfied! rnPer my needs this camera body is perfect, I could not wish anything meglio.rnrnP.S. after more than two years of use and experience can only say that xi money that is offered this camera in my opinion is the best choice of purchase that can be done, the possibility of exploiting heavily iso allows you to take home always some good shots in any situation, gave me a lot of satisfaction in this two yearsand passes, I made more than 120 million clicks, the shutter unfortunately does not last more than 100,000 shots, my to 97,000 was gone but the replacement was not as costly, with 164 € I replaced it and clean the sensor, I thought he plucked me hearing other colleagues and their experiences so very happy also to questo.rnMi feel I advise to all those who have no intention or ability to spend too much money but had cmq a product that produces professional-level files. |
 | sent on December 26, 2013 Pros: FF File fantastic, ergonomics and durability, dimesioni and low weight (great for travel and not only), LCD Cons: None (whereas if you wanted more you bought the 5D MarkIII) and when used with optical quality. Opinion: I state that for me it was huge sbazo quality (all fields), I come from a 1100D and it's like being on another planet, file immaculate and full of retail, the sensor captures the colors in a clean and consistent with the Actually, I was at high iso shokato (I know that maybe you do not write well) is already perfect 6400 until 8000 but also the noise and light and easily coregibile, solid front and rear body magnesium alloy top cover made of polycarbonate (only for SOLUTIONS To use GPS EWI-FI) tropicalizazzione very buona.Conclusione if you do photos of sports, wildlife or autofocus reportaje where they serve exceptional and high burst the 6D and the car that's right for Euro 1404 voi.I better spent in my life. |
 | sent on December 07, 2013 Pros: Quality of the file, iso, ergonomics Cons: None if you buy it with the awareness of the limitations sought by the house. If he lacks what kind af a better system, etc. would be a flurry 5D3 ... Opinion: I was looking for a machine with a file quality better than the 50D, and I found it. Usable up to ISO 6400. As for me up to 1600 do not even noise reduction. Besides if I did not need to go. No particular problem with the af often criticized. For me, better than the 50d. Using mainly the central point I never had any problems, but I had not even with the sides. Compared to the 50d the only limitation is the burst, under certain conditions have a few more shots per second could use. Under certain conditions of bright light tends to underexpose. |
 | sent on November 11, 2013 Pros: Sensor fantastic. Resistance at high ISO spectacular. Professional dynamic range comparable to the TOP. Very solid and compact camera body, a really handy FF (from D600 to 6D weight change a little 'you can see it). Menu well done. Management of the external flash. System focus good in particular for the central point. The advice to venture into the FF Cons: Maximum speed shutter. It would have been interesting dual slot. System focus is good but a camera that deserves more. Front ring is not very intuitive to use. Keys auditing and zoom shooting, less intuitive and speedy 600D, need to practice as a ring. Opinion: Hello I wanted to add my review "Fast Impact", in the sense that I took this wonderful two days ago, and maybe an opinion on the first coat might be helpful! RnPremessa until now I used a Canon EOS 600D and my opinion is therefore in relation to this: rnrnUn great means! This we have done in the past several tests with all my goals, I had already thought for the FF, well, this camera really enhances them in full! Give their best and in a sense, with great pleasure, they are "rediscovered"! The Sammy then demonstrates in all its full potential and finally the 14mm is a 14!. RNLA picture quality is fantastic and the dynamic range is the same, these two factors are really awesome for me! I had a few reservations for the maximum speed of the shot and to control the focus, but in the end for my use they're fine indeed! RNLA burst is good and in particular the buffer is not more annoying as in the 600D! The control of the mesa is very similar to fire and then there I did not notice big difference, as I have seen in several reviews is certainly not his strong point. The menus are comprehensive and well-made, in no time you find yourself in control of every thing, in particular, I really liked the control menu of the external flash. The ability to customize the SET button is very useful, along with classic favorites menu really helps a lot to speed up the control of the camera. In terms of practical use, well ... there is a difference in weight compared to the 600D, and then the neck need a little 'getting used to it, in his hand is a beast! Solid, safe and durable. The only flaw for me is the front ring to rotate, I do a little 'hard to use and I was not so comfortable. Also the control system and the zoom and revision of the shots is a bit 'more laborious and unintuitive. rnLe novelty of GPS and Wifi, are very useful in some ways but pe me just outline ... hardlyand maybe I'll change my workflow by downloading the photos with Wifi without removing the SD! Great if you have these possibilities, but it is not for these things that I bought it. RNLA great thing is its quality and use in the field! For me the FF sensor feels great, both for quality and for reference to the optical fantastic for me this thing that I sell to APS-C! RNE 'really precise and respond blow for blow, it is a great pleasure to use! The way I see get the shot before profit, often with the 600D imagined the photo, mailed the car, and then after shooting constatavo that the sharpness or something else was not quite as I wanted, so I had to revise (often with amazement) the parameters several times even sacrificing time or aperture to get where volevo.rnI 6D instead of the first uses were incredibly accurate. I thought ... I mailed ... a couple of shots ... ZAK and there she was! Perfect! rnMi immediately gave a great feeling indeed! I'm excited! Even the optics kit is great, & flaggingI; coupled say good! rnIo the really recommend it to anyone who wants to go to FF! rnSaluti friendly smile |
| sent on October 28, 2013 Pros: Sensor spectacular especially at high ISO. Advantages of a FF in a compact body. Wi-Fi is very convenient for time lapse and remote shutter release via smartphones, wi-fi is also convenient to view photos via cell phone ... with the camera in your backpack. With optical right fails to focus almost dark with the central point a-3EV. Cons: Mon counts as against it? Comsuma GPS as a microwave oven even with the camera off .. so the only active if needed. Opinion: But wait ... how do I consider "against" the characteristics specified on the box as well, shots per second, 1slot for sd, etc? The car is fine to take pictures ... the quality is superb. Its compact size is relative ... and with the BGE6 becomes larger as needed. The points of maf are few compared with the 5dm3 but well positioned. The final word ... amazing. |
 | sent on October 20, 2013 Pros: Camera Compact and lightweight, it combines compact dimensions the quality of sensorre FF. Good management of noise up to ISO 6400, can also be used on higher values. Excellent image quality and a central point of focus sensitive and accurate. Battery life. Wifi and GPS connectivity and geolocation. Costs. Cons: Maximum value shatter 1/4000. Wind gusts improved. Improved autofocus system. One slot for sd cards. No tropicalization more "push". HDR only in JPG format. Opinion: I went from 60D to 6D in March this year and several months of the jump can be said to be satisfied. The 6d is not the true replacement for the 5D mark II but an SLR is designed for all those who want to approach the FF without spending too significant digits. RNLA machine looks in size and contained weight and with an approach more similar to the 60D that their elder sisters. If this setting has been, by some, criticized, I never having used machines with the joystick confess I do not miss them. Good quality display, even if sometimes I regret that swivel of her younger sister. The resolution of the sensor is high and returns excellent images and allows you to appreciate the transition from APSC to FF. The colors are saturated but I have noticed a tendency to underexpose the machine. The autofocus system is the least thrust of the machine, perhaps to emphasize the difference with the 5dIII. The central point is very Sensile and accurate, others a bit less. The points are 11, maybe a few considering competingon the market, but it still works in an optimal manner. The burst is not the strong point of the machine, even though good, does not make it an SLR for sports photography. It lacks the flash pop up on the machine but it is a trend that follows Canon in all its machines evenings Pro and semipro. The lack of flash is, however, is balanced by the possibility to set the sensitivity to high ISO settings enabling shooting in low light situalizione. The sensor is able to optimally manage the noise until volori high, at 6400 ISO photos are perfectly usable, while going beyond this limit you start noticing the noise but the photos are still quite usable. I would have preferred the maximum shutter speed with a value of 1/8000s 1/4000s is because in some cases a threshold value especially if you use bright lenses. The gadget's availability by 6D are significant, GPS pemette geolocation of photos, as well as the function of the altimeter while :) WiFi allows for the connectactivities with computers and portable devices such as tablets and smartphones, giving the possibility of remote control truly remarkable. But attention to the use of these features are considerably cut down because the battery life, which otherwise has a remarkable ability and allows you to take almost seven hundred photos, but being thrifty you might be able to go even further. I would not have disdained the dual slot sd IMMULITE the possibility of HDR in RAW, but these are features that the parent company has implemented more expensive models. The absence of sealing could be heard, although I have made so far using me it gave the impression to resist well to splashes of rain and dust (no exaggeration). After a few months of use I can claim to be absolutely satisfied with the transition, the machine has always returned good files with high yield and high lights to significant improvements in the treatment of shadows (though improved). I recommend it to anyone who wants to make the leap to the FF and want to keep aeye to costs (batteries 60D, 5DIII, 7D and sd cards cheaper) and the weights. Great for landscapes and portraits, would not recommend it for sports and all those kinds that require more thrust and a flurry autofocus system more efficient. E 'and remains a good buy that I would recommend it fully. |
user17361 | sent on October 13, 2013 Pros: Price, yield at high iso, GPS, silent shutter, focus fantastic and the good side Cons: Missing the double slot, Pad, limited shutter to 1/4000 that of bright lenses can make use filters nd a dedicated switch to the white balance Opinion: Lightweight, durable, made a fantastic high ISO, GPS that can come in handy when you wander in the middle of nowhere and you end up with time scodarsi where they were, the center point snaps even in low-light situations, produces RAW files very workable, I would have liked it to have two SD slots, but mainly that they had the damn pad inside the ring but rather the joystick, even the absence of a dedicated button to the white balance would have been useful, in general, however, is a lady with a Full Frame image quality superb! |
 | sent on October 11, 2013 Pros: Size, wi-fi, made a wonderful way in high iso Cons: I do not know Opinion: I own this machine and use it exclusively for photographing weddings, and I must say that is perfect for those who want to use it in this field. The high iso help you to capture the natural light especially in the church, because I'm not a lover of the flash, in fact I never use it. In 3200 the noise is really poor, the quality of the files is great, and if it mounts on a 50mm 1.2 you can manage all light situations without using a flash and manual focus with the lens in you photo magic (but you have to be a some expert). Take home after a stressful day of wonderful pictures that few photographers can give instead of the usual who use fire in automatic machine automatic flash and always pointed in faccia.rnLa definitely recommend it (if it is used exclusively and all manually) |
 | sent on August 28, 2013 Pros: The first experience with a full frame and I have to say is very much appreciates the opportunity to make shots in low light. Net system wifi to download photos on smartfone and send them on the web. The GPS I used it only on vacation, but maybe it's useless. The video recording is better than the 7D (and lower), also for the ability to record only I frame up to 90 Mbit, videos have best colors and detail. The writing speed of the memory is significantly higher than the 600D and does not force you to use professional memories for videos. Cons: The HDR function perplexes me is not that great, if you keep wifi and GPS on the battery does not last long, the audio recording is monaural and disturbed stabilizer off, forcing you to an external microphone. Opinion: Product characteristics more than satisfactory for an amateur. I bought a spare battery is not original and it works great, including the status of the battery indicated by the software. Too bad for the lack of adjustable monitor, it's useful not only for videos. Interesting opportunity to erase pixels CCD Disability adjusted by manual cleaning software, it is just a dot avoids sending in assistance. |
| sent on August 11, 2013 Pros: Ease of handling, ergonomics, quality of the shots, especially at high ISO, Gammam tonal extended use optical park very complete and valid. Cons: Some exposure errors in situations of very high light and / or backlight (tends to underexpose). Opinion: Camera wonderful, it is appreciated very much for the high quality of the shots ISO, and shutter noise for the full-frame sensor. I switched from EOS 7D which I really appreciate the robustness, speed of use and accuracy of both the exposure system that autofocus. It has a very wide tonal range and lends itself well in many photographic situations, from portraits to reportage. |
 | sent on July 16, 2013 Pros: Sensor, high ISO sensitivity, dynamic range, gps, wifi, ergonomics Cons: Battery life with wifi / GPS that tracks the path, ocular 97% Opinion: Coming from APSC some full format can only make you smile. I tested the maf the central point, which is the only one to cross over to the other 10. However I have tried shots at f 2.8 on the sides and fairly static subjects does not seem to have screwed up mai.Utilizza sdhc cards which for me is a good, veteran of the fantastic 500D. 20.2 megapixel sensor managed by the DIGIC 5 + processor. When I started to take over the 6400 iso the grain, although a minimum, post-production needs to eliminate it. Not being a guru can tell you that compared to my 500 iso 800 is a "comparable" to 6400 putting the raw side by side without NR. The frames are of 4.5 per second, not bad since I do not do photo hunting on Sunday or am I in monaco to take 2 ferrari cornering. In cross I put the battery life with wi-fi and gps on. Is solved with the purchase, recently arrived in my hands, the BG e13. The HDR on camera acts only with the. Jpg, but I remain faithful to the bracketing. So to conclude, from the owner, I am very happy with thispurchase soto many points of view. Great nice car, I'll 'definitely time to test it yet. |
 | sent on June 25, 2013 Pros: small and light despite being full frame (easier to carry around), high ISO exceptional management, silent shutter already basic (even better with "silent shutter" activated), GPS and WIFI, uses SD (more comfortable than CF) , good AF. Cons: despite being small and lightweight Full Frame (more cumbersome lenses important, even if the battery grip improves), maximum 1/4000, time sync of 1/180, it tends to underexpose, joysticks, missing a button for direct selection White Balance Opinion: To know my opinion you can read the complete review of two posts that I wrote on my blog: http://www.stefanotealdi.com/2013/canon-6d-la-recensione and http://www.stefanotealdi.com/ 2013/canon-6d-la-recensione-2rnNel first link I analyze in detail the management at high ISO of this machine, with examples of 100% per ISO disponibile.rnNel second link I analyze the general aspects of the reflex, the balance in hand to 'exposure to unique goodies only for this reflex (GPS and WI-FI) |
 | sent on June 23, 2013 Pros: Dynamic range, high ISO performance, image quality, ergonomic keys, wifi, silent shutter. Cons: For now, no. Opinion: I come from a 7D, and this is my first full frame. It was love from the start, I found there are from the first shots coupled with the 24-105! It is probably very suitable for beginners like me, since the first shots I got results that I have met in full !! rnL'autofocus until now has not missed a shot, but even if I do not do pictures that stressed out particolarmente.rnrnA equal optics that I also used on the 7D seems to me that image quality, blur and sharpness are superior, and not poco.rnrnLa I find it even more convenient for the weight of the 7D a bit 'more content and especially for the posizone of the keys; shooting without worrying about the ISO, the shutter is very quiet, the jpeg from the machine are already excellent. The viewfinder is fantastic, now focuse on hand is easy, with the 7D I could not see well! RnrnUna special mention to the wifi, I considered a useless gadget, instead of on vacation I find it convenient, I can download the photos on your iPad and watch them on a Fullscreen largede in an instant, same thing on your smartphone when I'm around, really comfortable as possibilità.rnrnChe mean, I can not be 100% satisfied! rnrnAGGIUNTA: after 6 months of use I renew my satisfaction. I got shots that I was not able to get with the previous bodies (50D and 7D), I abused with excursions in the midst of mud, dust, summer and winter, he also did some motorcycle trip over that accompany every day from home office. It will not be robuta as a series 1 but up to here holding limit bene.rnL'unico I've found is ergonomics: with a Speedlite 430 and optical heavy, feels the need of the battery grip ... rnCredo that many who complain the lack of joystick do not know that the pad can be set to vary the point of maf with a single press of an arrow key, just like the joystick, many insist on complaining and recur at a pressure of more buttons, just read the manual ;) |
 | sent on May 26, 2013 Pros: Compact and comfortable grip, lightweight, precise af the midpoint, good / very good even on the side, made at high iso incredible, silent shutter Cons: Shutter limited to 1/4000 Opinion: When I read the opinions of this room on the forums I understand now who has tried it or who shoots judgments without knowledge of causa.rnSfido whoever tried-owned company to say that it is poorly constructed, which is inconvenient that the pad has little feedback and other crap simili.rnAl moment is definitely the best-buy canon, with a value unattainable. The yield at high iso is truly phenomenal how dice.rnL 'only cons that I would move (for the use that I do) the shutter is limited to 1/4000 (even if you do not think I have ever encountered difficulties in this reason). |
 | sent on May 26, 2013 Pros: ISO management, weight and size, WIFI, FF. Cons: With the weight and size limited, of course you have to give up some useful button. AF points are limited in number and too much power, and the station is only really reliable. Opinion: Ultimately, the 6D is a FF in a body like the 60D, but more solid and without the swiveling display (which would make it too inviting for its price range). RnrnNon hate to see one day a 6D Mark II with display Adjustable AF point and maybe some more (even without going to millemila the 5D mark III), however, is absolutely waiting for a recommended purchase for those who want to get closer to FF. |
 | sent on April 23, 2013 Pros: Lightweight, cost, quality, imagine, WiFi, GPS, full-frame, high ISO yield. Cons: Gust not so fast, in some rare cases limiting AF, flash sync speed 1/180, no headphone jack, moiré in some movies. Opinion: The Canon 6D is the body with which I have made the leap from a photograph as a hobby to something much more serious. I received it as a gift for graduation. For an amateur to me is a great entry into the world of full-frame. The quality of the file is insanely rich in color and detail. The yield at high ISO is amazing, so much so that sometimes I leave ISO in the car and take pictures without thinking too much about because the noise is always little or no effect. In ISO 25600, especially in black and white, the machine returns files that have a grain that is even pleasing to my eye and gusti.rnL 'autofocus widely criticized, it does not seem so bad, in fact, often surprises me how quick central point with poor lighting. Obvious is not the 5D mkIII, but it is definitely better than the MkII which in the past many detractors of the 6D took photos, even of birds, very belle.rnLa car I "falls" in the hand very well and with the 24-105mm f / 4 IS everything is being done. For small size, coupled with the 40mmf / 2,8 STM makes the 6D a compattona with which to shoot a whole day without getting tired. The notes on ergonomics for me are the lack of rubber on the back edge right, a bit 'like the 5D mkII, all the buttons on the right, the lack of joystick. And I say this without ever having tried the Canon bodies with the joystick, then I think that the pad inside the rotellone is a bit 'a ripiego.rnPresto I should add the battery grip: I think for use with the GPS turned on two required and also the 6D would be more balanced with more lenses grandi.rnIl wifi I find it very useful, I can take away from the machine much more than with the thread and do not have to be from the front to do it. Another advantage is being able to place the machine the particular places and then not take positions absurd or dangerous to shoot. Also, if you place the selector in M ??scenes, on iPhone or other smartphone or tablet, you can change all the basic parameters and the point of focus! RnrnPer who believes that it is slow and not very handsome in the AF I have to make a observation, but according to you, sand Canon had said the presentation had presented the car like this: "Here's the 6D, has 8FPS, 51 focus points, wifi + gps and costs 1000 € less, including lens, the 5D mkIII!" what would make the audience? rnrnCosta just over 1000 € less than the 5D mliii and is not comparable. I see it as a 5D mk2, 5 in salasa amateur. But I, who am an amateur and just think it's already superdotato for the price it has. |
 | sent on April 16, 2013 Pros: great for my small hand Cons: not sure you can compare it to the older sister 5d mark 3 Opinion: I borrowed for a day, I immediately felt at home there since I can hand a little, but here is the site if they have talked enough I am a wedding and cisono most influential photographers who can make judgments, for my part I will I felt good even posted some pictures in the gallery portraits used with large 85mm 1.2 lens |
 | sent on April 08, 2013 Pros: AF improved, wi-fi, gps, excellent performance at high iso files, fast fps, manageability iso minmax from the menu. Cons: Lightweight and non alloy buttons moved and decreased attack syncroflash missing sync flash decreased, speed time decreased, SD Memory Card delicate for my opinion Opinion: The transition from my 5dmk2 to 6d was not completely painless, I immediately felt that I described in the lack of contrast, and lightness senzo gave me the impression of having a toy in his hand than the 5dmk2 and 7d I had. Slowly I'm ricredendo based mainly on the quality of the files that churns especially at high ISO, and lightness that ultimately can not make me just fine. Too bad for time attacks ee revolutionized keys and left for a machine that basically by physical store costs as much as or more than a 5dmk2. I think you could leave them unchanged just like the 5dmk2. Gps useful, especially for nature photography and reporters who will always know where you took that particular photo at the expense of an early battery consumption. Satisfied instead of the af improvement and the ability to enter a value min max of iso |
| sent on April 04, 2013 Pros: A beautiful full frame, and almost everything to me :-). RnFile beautiful all the iso. Body discreet and lightweight but strong at the same time. Quiet Shutter-release eccellente.rn Cons: Lack of joystick to the maf. Lateral points of maf not very responsive in low light, they take a little more time to hang up, but very accurate. Some point in most af did not hurt the Canon, valleys capire.rnLi I preferred to place the gps and wifi, which I never used before. Opinion: I own the 6D 2 months and I come from a 40D. After the initial confusion due to the slow reaction (maybe it was simply faster to focus on the 40D), points maf side I had to change my mind on this f. I have many more photos to focus now on how the servos than I did with the 40D, which in theory has a more powerful f having all cross-type points. The joystick, however, I really miss, it is the pad, but in terms of ergonomics is not the same thing. To change the point of maf "quickly" use the key on the right and move the point with the aperture wheel, the pad I use it only to move from one line to another point. Therefore quite cumbersome, the joystick is another thing. We're not of course levels, rather we can say that we are very far :-), of 5mk3 and 1Dx, but if you have no claims on the professional af of this machine is more than decent and I think higher than that of the 40D. For the sport feel somewhat limited, especially for the positioning of the points of maf (too Stretti), given the need could not recompose the picture. If we then move to other types of shooting as landscapes, macro, theaters, concerts and various events in the evening then I believe is second to any machine, with the central focus pretty in the moonlight and the files are, for me, the perfect even at ISO 25,600 (with a bit of pp). In my final judgment on this machine is extremely positive, because even considering the final price and selling a bit of equipment I managed to get to the dream of full frame, unthinkable for me in advance of the 6D. |
 | sent on April 03, 2013 Pros: Gps and wifi built-in camera, sharpness, and performance at high iso at the top, manageability, robustness, HDR Room, processing RAW files in camera, Full HD video and I could never end. Cons: If you really want to find flaws: lack of adjustable screen (although I think it is useless for those who use professional cameras), renal battery with GPS function and fixed in if you are constantly in smanetta Download Download photos with wifi. Opinion: Personally, I was amazed by the quality, sharpness and color rendering of images. Even the yield at high iso is certainly outside of the norm. By downloading a simple and free application for smartphones "Eos Remote", both in a version for OS and Android, you can shoot remotely managing the camera directly with the phone. In addition, with the same application, you can take pictures that can be loaded directly onto fb.rn |
 | sent on March 25, 2013 Pros: ease of use, high ISO performance, ergonomics, click silenziosorn Cons: control of white balance Opinion: A big leap for someone like me who comes from a 500D. Reduced weight and size, is comfortable to hold. Build quality perceived quite high. Very pleased with the overall image quality (it is my first FF). The high ISO performance is impressive: excellent up to 3200, very good up to 6400 and still acceptable up to 12800. The focus is fast and accurate at the midpoint. Perhaps some limits on the points side: not a number (the ones that there are more than enough), but the speed in case of low light or pursuit. Tends to a little underweight. No immediate access to the control of white balance. Gust, shutter speeds and flash sync is not at the top but more than adequate to photos of landscape, portrait, action and travel provided they are not too fast. I appreciate the choice of the SD card. A second card would have been nice but not essential. I do not feel the lack of built-in flash. Long battery life. Ability to activate silent shutter. GPSintegrated. Possibility of remote shutter release and transfer files in WiFi. The HDR Room churning out good file. With the step Multi instead have not been able to get pictures of quality but I made very few shots with this mode. I do not find myself using the image processing raw Room, understandably incomplete functions and limited by the size of the screen. In conclusion, I am very happy with the purchase. Definitely recommended for those who want to make the transition to the FF and did not need a burst of faster or more AF points. For its ease of use and automatic (scenes) can also be considered as entry level, albeit "luxury". rn |
 | sent on March 25, 2013 Pros: Image quality generally made at high iso, weight, wi-fi, silent Cons: minimal manual controls and no joystick, viewfinder 97% Opinion: I come from the 7d that although I have exceptional features, I've never been convinced by the image quality ... better to say that each file in the 7d I had to spend the time (and time) on PS ... here, even after this 6d a week it seems to me that the images already practically Sforni pronte.rnLe first test shots I made at 4000 iso just after sunset and did not believe that the noise was so content ... excellent! rnAnche if still early (and perhaps caught enthusiasm) I would say that the jump in terms of quality, which is what I was looking for, it's really sostanziale.rnIl body is small and light, I consider this a quality importante.rnIl management software is as usual very Good. RNLA Wi-fi is a wonderful thing, in addition to the remote control can be downloaded on smart-device just made photos and send them to email later - the app [Android] works properly but is still a bit 'sour ... let's give tempo.rnPeccato for that 97% of all viewfinder.Rispetto 7d I miss although the joystick.rnSono very pleased with the passage fatto.rnrn rn |
 | sent on March 12, 2013 Pros: yield high sensitivity, responsiveness and quiet shooting, completeness of the information on the display, image quality generally accurate exposure. Cons: not all-metal construction though generally excellent, battery consumption. Opinion: I'm almost two months since I did the upgrade from the EOS 5D Old (or rather ORIGINAL) so I think it's time to add my other opinions on the new Canon SLR. The consideration of a general nature and which would give more weight can be summed up this way: there was an upgrade but not on every aspect. Beyond secondary characteristics for me as the reduction of the maximum shutter speed and flash synchronization after all consistent with the field of use for which the 6D was conceived I noticed that the improvement of the sensitivity and speed of autofocus is not so important from the practical side and the image quality of the EOS 5D Old up to 800 ISO is indistinguishable from 6D and indeed the JPEG baked from Old seem even a little better. For higher sensitivity and a lot of things change in favor of 6D. Completeness, the aesthetics of the menus and the quality of the LCD rear are far superior as, The rest is logical given the years of technological gap. L 'LCD is not, however, tempered glass but plastic. Another element questionable constructive and which I have read in the forum conflicting opinions is the polycarbonate shell. And 'my belief that from the point of view of the mechanical characteristics the magnesium alloy is superior to polycarbonate. Indeed, given the hardness defined as the resistance of the material to permanent deformation (measured according to various scales) magnesium alloys certainly exceed the polycarbonate (even though they are "linked" also) and such alloys provide a far superior dimensional stability with reduced voltages distortion and residual. Perhaps the need not to electromagnetically shield the integrated GPS module (which is very useful and practical) led to this choice. One factor which I consider much improvement over the 5D Old is the choice of the SD card slot instead of CF. Now the capacity and the speed in R / W of SD are more than sufficientfor most of the professional needs but the SD pù comfortable (think that every PC has a SD reader) and the lack of pin slot makes smaller and sturdier than dust, humidity, etc ... The presence of a only slot seems coherent with the field of use for which the 6D has been designed. Another aspect that I was very impressed with is the responsiveness, cushioning and quiet shooting to the point that once you choose the shooting mode to "silent" (it would be better to say "further silent") I find myself with an SLR, the 6D, with a jerk maybe quieter than my Leica M6! Very impressive! And in certain circumstances (ceremonies, theater ...) extremely useful. I seem to have noticed so far more battery consumption than the 5D but a more accurate exposure. Great reduction in the banding recoveries PP, excellent dynamic range, excellent ergonomics and do not forget the possibility of video.rnConcludendo: they satisfyundone purchase but HONOR and GLORY to the Canon EOS 5D ORIGINAL! |
 | sent on March 07, 2013 Pros: Lightweight construction very good (considering it is not 'magnesium), quality' image, autofocus very precise and sensitive, even in low light (center), lateral points very good if it is considered that they are not to cross, full menu and customizable , Simplicity 'usage, Wi-Fi functions well laid out, built-in GPS (but both reduce battery life). Very good dynamic range and low noise. I see the SD more 'convenient than CF utizzo. I think there are more 'big differences. Quiet Shutter-release (increases but 'the lag) Cons: with shutter times up to 1/4000 sec (not a drama anyway) Flash sync speed 1/180 (again, not a drama because the 5D3 gets to 1/200). The functions of the upper buttons are splittate ring between top and back. For example, to access the WB must go on the Q key and go from there '(that' s what I found more 'fast). Gust for the type of car, but if they reached 5 was better but still better than the 5D2. Opinion: Having already 'the 1D Mark IV and I had to replace the 5D3 5D2 that I did not use more'. I decided after many doubts (including that of selling 5D2 and the Mark IV to take the 1Dx) to take the puppy 6D. Given the type of photos that I do and the primary need to be more 'light as possible, the 6D (to which I attached a wonderful 40mm pancake) and' become my "compact" since, except for Sony and its Zeiss 35mm or Leica mirrorless FF then there are none around, and there are those that cost more than 'the 6D and eventually weight and size are them'. rnFatta this premise, 6D and 'in my opinion perfect for those who should not do sports photography or nature of animals in motion (even if the AF is not 'all that bad in tracking and e' also customizable in a more 'easier than 5D3/1Dx.) also tried to get rid of the 5D2 because of single CF card, as more and more 'often use the SD slot via the Macbook and use that FLashair Toshiba and' good to send the photo immediately on smartphones and share photos online (there are things that I use, many hereof course not). |
| sent on February 25, 2013 Pros: Compact and robust. Workability file. Overall image quality Cons: Focus on the points side still not at the top. Opinion: It 's already been said and add a little altro.Provengo 5d old, and what I write can possibly serve those who want to do as I do the upgrade. Who would expect increases stellar image quality will be disappointed, the files of the old 5d exposed well and L series lenses have a little less in terms of sharpness and detail. What I was greatly surprised, however, is the ability to recover in PP. I run a series of shots with flash overexposed and evidently the recovery of raw files with lightroom was impressive. Working on "exposure" and "lights" I reported shooting at the correct exposure with almost no loss of detail, what is not feasible with the 5D. For the rest I found greatly improved the management of high ISO and focus, even if the end points still are not perfect. In low-light I had to help with the focus instead is very efficient. The commands me aback a bit, used with those of the 5d I often confusing especially for review delgthem shots. |
 | sent on February 21, 2013 Pros: Body solidity, quality files, made iso, noise, size, point af central autoiso. Cons: Lateral points fire, af tracking, sd, no joy Opinion: A small dedicated to events, portraits, paesaggi.rnrnResa iso star is coming from the latest aps (for yield and detail) is coming from the previous series ff (d700, 5d mkII) where at least 1.5 stops of guadagno.rnCorpo hard, made good shot and really soft and silent; excellent file to be processed (head and shoulders above the mkII). rnrnImpressionante the central point af ... now I really do not swear more when I have more light Focusing, first I envied the auxiliary light competition now. no longer needed ..! rnrnAutoiso finally programmed as competition and smart enough, comfortable developing raw onboard wifi and gps I was missing after the sony a55.rnrnIl body to have if you love the three kinds mentioned without fainting. |
 | sent on February 14, 2013 Pros: Ergonomics, compactness, materials, quality files, very good step in the recovery of the shadows, excellent high ISO, AF station, wifi, gps Cons: pad inserted in the wheel a little 'uncomfortable, more' points (cross) would not be spoiled, af AIServo inaccurate. Opinion: The 6D and 'a machine specialist lightweight and compact, with essential and interesting features for those who make certain types of photography. The quality 'of the body and' very high, on a par with 5DIII, but the size of the body are a cross between 7D and 60D. The files that churns out are crisp, sharp, high color rendering, and a recovery of the shadows at 100 and 200 ISO truly remarkable. In high iso behaves traordinariamente, giving file with low noise even at iso 6400-10 thousand. Maybe it 's the best home sensor Canon. The central AF point and 'very fast and accurate, and allows you to fit even in low light conditions. The sides are rather more 'slow, but very accurate. If they were all on the cross would be ideal. WiFi is an interesting feature, useful for taking pictures with the phone keeping a safe distance from the camera, as well as communicate images in real time. GPS and 'useful to those who want to automatically geotag your shots. RNLA 6D and 'a great camera for those who do landscape photography, street, reportage and portraits. In thesegenres from the best. |
 | sent on February 14, 2013 Pros: full frame, ergonomics and performance at high ISO, wi-fi and GPS integrated Cons: 1 point in the cross Opinion: is a machine that is doing very well in almost all situations, it feels good in the hand, gives the impression of being solid and well built, ergonomics like you have the ability to manage the machine with one hand, have a yield at high iso really good, the f has only one cross stitch, but despite this, is doing very well on the sides and also has the ability to adjust the speed and responsiveness of AI servo, wi-fi and gps active accelerate if the battery power, but this is normale.rnrnin final is a very good car for me I owned a 500D is another world ... if you want a full frame and do not serve the gust best and super f being the big sister to the new mkIII is almost an obvious choice |
 | sent on February 13, 2013 Pros: Robust, high iso management, ergonomics, AF. Cons: no Opinion: I come from Nikon D700 and I switched to Canon 7D and 5D old, but I always regret the management of the high ISO of the D700. I do a lot of photos in poorly lit gyms and I found the perfect camera for this purpose. Can I safely use my Tamron 70-300 @ 300mm-f5, 6 with 1/250 at ISO 12800 without appreciable noise in the press, see here: (http://www.juzaphoto.com/galleria.php?t=362153&l = it). Let alone with my Canon 200 2.8 L. Extraordinary movies of 4 seconds (slides in motion). The AF is very fast, at least the central and engages virtually in the dark. The AI ??Servo unfortunately is not the 7D, but it would be asking too much. The exceptional Jpeg on camera, I no longer use LR. WB car quite accurate but it is easy shiftare. The council. |
| sent on February 05, 2013 Pros: small full frime light, wi fi and GPS integrated management high iso impressive, fast and accurate AF system also lati.rn Cons: tends to underexpose, uncomfortable wheel with dual controls on the back Opinion: Very similar to the 7D in size, but a large FF.La management iso is impressive has many more features than her sisters "more." Despite the 6D has a lower cost of the 5D Mark3 has nothing less quite the contrary, this will go a long way in FF more. The only problem I found is the wheel on the back with dual functions within very uncomfortable for me, another little flaw the machine tends to underexpose. To buy. |
| sent on January 14, 2013 Pros: Wi-Fi, high ISO, image quality setting, the center AF velocce and precise AF lateral running, quiet shutter-release Cons: A bit small and if you see it around from a distance could mistake it for a 60D, sometimes inaccurate AF to AI SERVO, obligation in the purchase of original batteries Opinion: Purchase the 6D after two intense years to squeeze on the 450D and what to say ... the passage was enorme.rnrnIn first place for the ISO. Whereas before I could limit myself only to ISO 1600, now equivalent (in terms of noise) is more or less 12.800.rnLe pictures are very clear and there is no history with the 450D that made me go anyway beautiful momenti.rnrnMolti have criticized the number of AF points of the 6D, but in my case I must say that enough, in fact, I wonder what sense to make lots and then concentrate them all in areas very close to the center point loro.rnLa accuracy is very good and fast , even in low light, while all other points work egregiamente.rnDiciamo one of the main reasons why I did not buy a 5D Mark II and I chose the 6D was just right for questo.rnrnIl Wi-Fi is a beautiful revolution because it allows you to make shots from remote Android phone or iPhone. Who does not have one? I! Bad to say but I'm waiting to die my Nokia 5800 ... rnTuttavia I tried shooting from a Samsung SII and I must say thatis great, also I think it is also possible to transfer RAW files, not just the JPEG.rnHo proved also by the computer, but the transfer is rather slow, but can not remove the Memory Card SD or every time to insert the cable USB.rnrnIl GPS, in my case, it's useless but could use to someone else. |
 | sent on December 30, 2012 Pros: AF precise and fast ... Compact and easy to handle penzo have made a good buy Cons: x now I do not know ...... forces if the 'canon had put a little' frames in more 'I would piciuta even more' Opinion: owner in recent years of all the '5d find this little made with all the feelings ISO management but very' real acting very good separation of whites and outstanding color GPS comodorn posted the very first shots a little 'macro a little' natural rncon much satisfaction I read the commentirn a dispassionate opinion ... you have no doubt buy it x |
 | sent on December 24, 2012 Pros: Compact, FF, very good construction and sealing, high ISO, GPS, WI-FI. Cons: The battery does not last long if the GPS is active! Opinion: Really great! I come from the 5D MkII and I'm glad I changed to this newly Canon.rnGià the 5D was great, but the 6D being even smaller and with integrated GPS and Wi-Fi is really unica.rnLavorare at very high ISO (over 6400) is really satisfactory! rnQuesta 6D looks like a computer rather than a camera, since it has really a lot more features than any generation a few years ago. The AF although it may seem identical to the 5D MkII is much faster and preciso.rn |
 | sent on December 15, 2012 Pros: Size, high ISO management, WiFi, HDR Room Cons: HDR in the room (only jpeg) Opinion: I come from 5D and 5D MKII, and this camera, I was expecting only a small improvement of the already 'high quality' of predecessors. Instead, I realized after a few shots that this is a different machine from the "sisters" take the high ISO in impressive fashion, maintaining a great detail and an extended dynamic range, even at ISO extremes as 16,000 or 25,600. rnrnQuesta quality ', makes the difference between being able to use a' point of view, or having to leave home. I refer to lenses as the 24-70 or the 135 f / 2, which I have always deemed slow "by day". With 6D I can carry around, and dare ilibera hand, even in low light or after tramonto.rnrnL 'AF has improved a lot, and allows you to take fast even in low light. The lateral points finally work (the comparison is with the "old" 5D). Maybe a little flaw 'reading with little contrast, but all in all I think satisfactory' s upgrade from MKII.rnrnUtile the HDR in the room but I was disappointed with the NOT configurability 'of this option: you can' do only jpeg, and you will notNgono even saved shots fork, then left alone with the jpeg finished in HDR without the possibility 'of change (such as the MKIII). rnSecondo my point of view, it is totally useless GPS, but I think that will' easy to photojournalist. Interestingly, WiFi, allowing you to control the 6D using a smartphone by downloading the 'free appropriate APP for Android or iOS.rnrnLe size and weight, are another point in favor of the 6D: finally a full frame small, compact and lightweight . rnrnSecondo me, is a huge machine, which will become 'the new benchmark for the segment FF semipro.rnrnRiccardo |
| sent on December 13, 2012 Pros: compactness and robustness, high ISO management, integrated Wi-Fi Cons: lack adjustable screen, there is no pop-up flash (although this, unfortunately, is a feature of the full-frame Canon) Opinion: I own this car for a few days, replacing a 40D who has done his duty for 5 years. the impression is good, despite the compactness of the machine in hand, gives a feeling of strength. management ISO is remarkable, in my opinion, working them a bit 'in camera raw files can also be used to 25600.rnnon use a lot of gps, but for some it can be useful, I find it very idea of ??Wi.Fi, but not to post the pictures on FB but to control the machine remotely. it allows you to see the photos on the memory card, you can also save the file to your device and also send them via e-mail E 'can then use your smartphone as a real remote shooting with the added ability to change the focusing and, the exposure time, aperture and ISO sensibiità. |
 | sent on December 13, 2012 Pros: GPS, Wi-Fi built-in, ISO sensitivity, size Cons: lack of adjustable screen, and the inability to manage the 'multiple exposure in RAW information on the state of charge of the battery will have only with canon Opinion: I do not have a lot of experience, is the first full frame camera I use and I own a few days ago, so I can not make comparisons with other machines, but the first impression is definitely positive, the machine is very small, not heavy. Much appreciated the 'high ISO sensitivity that allows you to shoot in extreme conditions by expanding the opportunities. The built-in GPS that allows you to automatically geotag my profession (geologist) an accessory indispensable. The integrated Wi-Fi allows you to manage your smartphone 6D is discovered in different situations such as in macro photography, I look forward to other applications that allow other settings such as the bracketing of the fire. Appreciable shooting silenced that significantly reduces the noise. Functional the possibility of multiple shots for night photography and hand-free mode High Dynamic Range.rn |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
