RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies

Canon 60D : Specifications and Opinions


  1. Reviews
  2. »
  3. Cameras
  4. »
  5. Cameras Canon
  6. »
  7. Canon 60D
  8. » All Opinions


Reviews

The opinions of JuzaPhoto members who use this camera.. (Click here to come back to the main page of the Canon 60D)


What do you think about this camera?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 241000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarjunior
sent on January 03, 2018

Pros: Autonomy, adjustable display, image quality, ergonomics

Cons: Tenuta iso, few points maf

Opinion: I used the 60D for 5 years, a few days ago when I decided to move to ff. It 'a machine that gave me great satisfaction and extraordinary photos, even if the well-known defects have created me a few problems, also because of my lack of experience being the first digital SLR - I come from the analog. Excellent construction and ergonomics with a solid grip that gives security. Simple and immediate menu. Sold a few days ago, not without some qualms.

avatarjunior
sent on March 27, 2017

Pros: Ergonomics, build quality, orientable screen

Cons: At the moment no one, except the weight.

Opinion: Purchased in 2013, I still don't feel the need to change it. Using L-series lenses is spectacular. Many complain about the few autofocus points, nine, for me are too many, I use only the central one and I find myself wonderful. Better the 60d, than other entry-level cameras, which in hand look like toys. The 60d gives an impression of solidity that reassures. Some complain about the 18 mpx, believing them insufficient, in my opinion instead being beautiful wide they are wonderful.

avatarjunior
sent on September 16, 2016

Pros: swiveling display, handy, good battery life

Cons: ISO yield, micro af missing

Opinion: And 'my current SLR (before I had the 450d) and is giving me a lot of satisfaction. Unfortunately the performance at high ISO is not great, but with the right precautions you can take home beautiful shots even with not very favorable light conditions. I use it mainly for portraits and landscape, I tried to take pictures of birds and dogs on the move with the Tamron 70-300 VC usd, but the f is not very responsive to this kind of photos. I recommend it to those who want to begin to enter the world of photography more thrust than the entry level.

avatarsenior
sent on June 15, 2016

Pros: Second display, double ring, battery life, good sensor, adjustable screen, good relationship quality / price in used (2015/2016 period).

Cons: Lack Micro AF, maf in live view slow.

Opinion: Using this camera from 9 months before I had a EOS M, of course, the most significant difference I found in the AF speed is that operations in general. The battery lasts a lot, then having the second display does not even need to keep turning on the main display to adjust shooting settings, increasing even more the battery life that goes beyond the thousand shots. The ISO seal is average, up to 1600 is quite easy to go further it depends on the usage. The lack of AF micro adjustment can be a problem, but fortunately so far I have not felt the need. AF points are only 9 but do not feel the need even more, because shooting almost always with the center that is fast and accurate. I am satisfied, I recommend it especially to those who want to start, in my opinion better than the 60d of a recent APSC but entry level.

avatarjunior
sent on February 18, 2016

Pros: Quality photos, rotatable display, precise autofocus, autonomy.

Cons: Iso too low, lack Micro.

Opinion: I have the 60d for about three years, qundo I will change it will be for a 6d or 5D3 used. No fury because the 60d I still like. I do not understand the post production, with today's menu you can get pictures as we want. (Or Guaso). Maybe because I speak so do not even know where to start to do the PP, however apathetic I see some photographs that seem impossible, maybe it's just that I can not do such works and the fault is not certain of the machine 60d acting on its menu because I can to let him do all cuello which voglio.Ma apparently not basta.Allora dorei thing to do? Buy me a program for post production and try to learn to use it? No I will continue with my 60d and try to improve myself

avatarjunior
sent on February 17, 2016

Pros: Autonomy, build quality, swiveling display

Cons: Few focus points

Opinion: The own now for a year and I am delighted, a well-made machine, easy to handle and with a range of truly exceptional battery, the convenient swivel display, just want to find a little fault it would be with a few more points of focus and with tropicalization would be perfect; until you'll jump on FF I do not I will separate

user86352
avatarjunior
sent on January 01, 2016

Pros: swivel screen

Cons: yield iso

Opinion: I had bought used for the price of opportunity but 10 minutes after I had already repented, has the same sensor canon 7d so assured to ISO low noise. It may be good for those who have seen the video screen up but did not seek something special anyway to avoid the I sold a month later to the despair of iso not think it was really well ... never mind !! after her I switched to FF and I solved all my problems with the Canon EOS 6D.

avatarjunior
sent on September 22, 2015

Pros: weight 18mpx video size

Cons: all the rest

Opinion: I used the 60d of friends 3/4 times, did not convince me before, not like now. The two main things that made me curse were: 1) to change the dial of the various types of shooting by manual priority must press a button above. Are we joking? what use is it? maybe I'm too novice to know but it seems one of those things will test your patience. 2. there is a pretty big wheel to turn as we have always done with the 40d and 50d pretty convenient to use to change his diaphragm but it was too easy to let the command nice comfortable where he was needed to force change it so every time you have to change my aperture in manual must Premer button on the top right 'Zoom' and then circling the shutter dial. Utility that will have a similar system? maybe you take a 7D for despair? or probably is an obvious choice from the marketing department of canon or is always me who are beginner and do not understand these technical innovations. Apart from that, theas soon as you pick up the car it looks more like a number than a xxx xx because of plastic, so it is obvious, if you want the magnesium body or 5d 7d but at this point I'm keeping a 600d and 'those who saw themselves as self'. Another downside is that I never liked the swiveling display, will be comfortable there is no doubt, as long as you just have at hand. Also in this case the best 7d. I conclude by listing the positives, or the fact that he does video and 3k.mpx more than 50d. The advice to anyone who is used to very little or those who have a 600d and 60d selling it takes just a few euros more. Absolutely if you have a 50d or 40d Keep it. However a better 50d or 600d (for video) and for those with the availability of budget 7d.

avatarjunior
sent on February 11, 2015

Pros: Constructive quality - Ergonomics - Collars and Hotkeys - Upper Display - Display Adjustable - Autonomy - Precision Autofocus - Video Quality - Quality Photo

Cons: Tenuta High ISO (Over 2000) - Lack Microadjustment AF - Points of Focus

Opinion: I own the 60D for almost a year, before I had a 1000D and the passage above in ergonomics and practicality of the controls is abysmal, just wield feels that it is not an entry-level body, holds up well the ISO up to 1600, after the quality the picture becomes very, very precise autofocus is a viewfinder that liveview! provided that your optics are correctly calibrated from the house, I would have liked the micro-adjustment af, but until now I have not felt the need, and I wanted more points of focus, not tropical conditions, but I traveled both in conditions of extreme heat or cold, and I have never had a malfunction, very useful the upper display that also has the timer of seconds in the poses in BULB, spectacular autonomy, even with liveview active, always overcome the 1000 shots per charge cycle, and in my sessions and outputs do not pass ever such numbers, so I'll save the weight and the purchase of a battery grip and 2nd battery, very practical also customizable controls, and also the Balanceent of white in CAR is very good, the same with regard to the video function and the main screen adjustable, very convenient for macro photography or in awkward positions where it would be tiring to keep your eye fixed on the screen, to exploit to the full the sensor requires the optics a bit more "valid" of the classic 18-55, overall I am very satisfied and I think I still hold it for 3-4 years ....

avatarjunior
sent on December 20, 2014

Pros: Really very good ergonomics, intuitive controls and buttons positioned wisely and functional. Very good image quality and color rendering faithful. Size and weight are right "compromise" between the lower end models and the models PRO. Battery performance. Very useful AF-on button.

Cons: held at high ISO good but nothing exciting. Absence of magnesium alloy body, while retaining however a feeling (and not only) of robustness. Enabling video mode very uncomfortable since it requires to fully rotate the mode dial.

Opinion: Overall I am very satisfied with the fotocamera.rnSono was a little disappointed by the performance at high ISO, especially by comparison with other APS-C held recently. The shots are still widely used up to 2000 ISO (of course according to my personal taste and opinion) as long as exposure and shooting conditions are correct. What struck me most positively is the color rendering, which I consider a faithful and pleasant especially if you use software for post production Canon.rnL'ho owner preferred to 70D because at this time of the 60D is new, at affordable rates and I think the camera awkward for video unless you use the equipment supplied for stessi.rnL'assenza joystick for selecting points of focus is not done much regret, since the points are just af 9 (which is sufficient in my opinion for a use not purely "sporting"), so it's easy to move from one to another through the rings or the joypad place within the second ring.

avatarjunior
sent on November 10, 2014

Pros: Image quality, good performance at high ISO (as long as we are not pixel-peepers), strength in the hands, layout of controls, adjustable screen, functionality, touch and feel and ergonomics, shutter speed up to 18000, battery really durable dialogue with external flashes, good center focus.

Cons: No tropical conditions, no AF micro adjustment, auto focus in live view is not very fast, many "average" points of focus

Opinion: Solid car and very versatile, quality shots and RAW quite good and in burst shooting speed average. I got this machine as a first reflex after several months of 600D on loan and I have to say I am very satisfied. The ergonomics of the machine is more than just an entry-level, the controls are laid out intelligently and you get used just fine. Great menu and LCD provide access to many features in a snap. I can not recommend this machine because now the price is abbordabilissimo. rnrnÈ one of those machines to use and re-use again.

avatarsenior
sent on November 09, 2014

Pros: Ergonomic, swiveling display, shutter speed up to 1 / 8000s, battery consumption, weight, flash, communication with external flashes without the need for additional transmitters.

Cons: Lack micro AF performance at high ISO, autofocus in live view is not fast, points of focus, not weather sealed body, no gps, no wifi.

Opinion: B placed second flash away from the camera body, you can create interesting light situations. Rated 8.

avatarjunior
sent on October 29, 2014

Pros: Versatile, high quality picture, ergonomics satisfactory, rolling screen, video quality, solidity and reliability.

Cons: High ISO improvement, devaluation

Opinion: I have this little gem from 2012, and from there I have not had any problems, even when I put the machine in considerable stress. I happen but also not to use it for long periods. It is very close to the business and for people like me, and an amateur is a true loyal companion and thoughtful. Sometimes I remain impressed by what I can do. It is easy to use, intuitive and the rings are solid, the screen has an excellent definition and videos are insanely good. I bought the kit 18-135, an objective that I sold for a 24/70 f2.8 The first series that does justice to this camera. Objective, since the body is also able to cover even a bit longer mm. Small defect ios a bit unstable at 6400 or a little less, but I always remedied with one or two stops +. rnIl worst fault is common to all the canon, the devaluation. As satisfied, I flashed the idea of ??moving to a full frame. But honestly, given the young age of the machine, I'd rather invest in someone obiettivi.rnMagari need some shots of theNo more on the multi-shot, but I would say to those requirements necessary to aim at professional level absolutely elevato.rnTutt'oggi and an excellent body in my opinion

avatarjunior
sent on September 09, 2014

Pros: Ergonomic easy to use and sturdy swivel screen

Cons: My first digital SLR defects it will definitely ..

Opinion: The possess about a year and I found myself very well. My first digital SLR, I found the fun and easy to use .la building and 'good I wanted to replace it with a FF but in the end I added a 6 D .. I could not do without the swivel screen for creative shots especially with the 8 mm believe it is essential

avatarjunior
sent on August 27, 2014

Pros: Relatively compact body, swiveling screen.

Cons: Lack fine tuning focus.

Opinion: Just bought out in 2010, it was expected that the camera after years with the 350D. The photo quality the great judge, often shooting at low ISO, but when I was needed, I worked up to 6400 ISO and still get shots that discrete downstream of a little 'cleaning job with Lightroom. rnIl its added value is smaller than a semi-pro bodies, but much more ergonomic and robust series x00D. The only flaw "real" is the lack of fine adjustment of the focus that I had to discard a Sigma 24-60 2.8 with significant problems with front focus.rnLa would change only with a 6D if this was not limited to a time minimum of 1/4000.

avatarjunior
sent on May 24, 2014

Pros: Body Solid, easy to use, swivel screen

Cons: Too great for anyone who has hands small / medium weight

Opinion: A great car, a little complicated commands for the less experienced and "novel" but once you learn to use it with all the settings, it gives you a lot of satisfaction! Price new / used very good, just that it was almost immediately forced to change the lens if purchased as a kit because the car needs good optics to give the best of himself :)

avatarjunior
sent on April 28, 2014

Pros: Aesthetically beautiful, ergonomic, robust, functionally complete, versatile, easy to use.

Cons: The supplied strap is a bit 'shabby.

Opinion: Beautiful car. Versatile use: easy for a beginner, complete functions for the most demanding amateur photographer. Solid body, ergonomic grip and control of the keys. The swivel screen is very convenient, as well as the mode switch to shooting. There is even control the depth of field! The strap could do a little 'better ...

user24371
avatarjunior
sent on February 15, 2014

Pros: ergonomics, ease-of-use-file cleanup-swiveling display

Cons: total-coverage viewfinder lacks joystic focus

Opinion: In my opinion it's a great second body for those who are not sports photos of the few points f and the speed of 60d are more than enough and with the swiveling display becomes a great convenience for creative shots or shooting video, the only flaw is the manual selection of points of focus a bit uncomfortable ìinterno of the second ring for the rest of the safely use up to 3200 ISO, which in comparison with other aps-c that I had could not even look at 800 then, its ISO 3200 are a boon for me!

avatarjunior
sent on January 04, 2014

Pros: Ergonomics, double ring, battery, swiveling display.

Cons: over 1600 iso noise can be fatal.

Opinion: just take it in your hand you are delighted by its ergonomics, all the keys are in the right place, firm grip even for those with big hands. The two dials allow you to adjust shutter speed and aperture quickly. Keys, and individuals dedicated to Af, shooting mode, ISO, evaluation mode light. Excellent construction. After the release of his sister 70d you can find a relatively low price.

avatarjunior
sent on December 30, 2013

Pros: Like many before me, actually stands for: ergonomics, ease of use thanks to the low weight, good AF at the midpoint, battery longevity, rotatable display, double ring.

Cons: The issue of the absence of the micro is a bit annoying, although at the moment I have never run into this problem (although the optics have evolved in the meantime ...), the sensor is too thick, 2 mpx at least "maybe "would have contributed less digital noise in favor of a better image quality. is not a splinter about the fps, not tropical conditions.

Opinion: For the amateur photographer, is the perfect machine. Practical, lightweight and easy with all the functions and commands to the right place. And 'the right balance to practice an eye for the SLR ff or aps-c high level, without sacrificing image quality. The swivel screen you use it if you do a little video ... but when you need it, it helps a lot. Like all canon, there is plenty of space between the grip and the lens mount is a very personal feeling, but for me the favors making it very ergonomic grip. Too bad for the management of noise at high ISO, compared to the old 50d, I'm thinking that having so many mpx for a large print, but "dirty", better to have fewer, but "clean". rn

user36125
avatarjunior
sent on December 22, 2013

Pros: perfect machine, wonderful ergonomics of the buttons and dials, great video, it sounds crazy to say it, but I ISO 12800 I would expect more noise while on the other hand I was very surprised. there are so many privileges for this machine that does not come to mind. screen recliner

Cons: the ring to focus the viewfinder and too exposed and occasionally moves.

Opinion: I own this car for a few weeks and I am more than happy. use the old ZUIKO lenses as my father's old olympus om-s sp and I am fine. The picture quality is good and (to me) at high iso holds quite well. also a good speed 5.3 fps. perhaps the only flaw is that it has 18 megapixel sensor that weight making the files bigger. a fantastic car and stra is recommended as first SLR is for those who make a step forward

avatarsenior
sent on November 10, 2013

Pros: machine interface endless battery've never been able to download ergonomics and buttons put in the right place

Cons: yield high ISO, f inaccurate good yield with only L-series lenses

Opinion: I own this car for two years with the right settings you can take pictures but had very good 'series lenses with elle rnavevo previously il18/55 and 70/300 4/5.6 for APSC, sold immediately after you have tried and bought on24 / 105 rnbisogna clearly still lose a little 'time to get it to go to 100X100 it takes quite a bit' "Field test" case for demanding photographers rnun good car ......

avatarsenior
sent on August 24, 2013

Pros: Ergonomic, light weight, very convenient to display the top view shooting data, lock nut, put buttons in the right places

Cons: For high iso (though not quite high ..) you will begin to see those fastidiossisimi colored dots in the dark parts of the images, click the shutter a bit 'noisy, 9 AF points that do not satisfy me

Opinion: I own this camera for about two months. At first I was hesitant because its ranking among the semi-professional Canon cameras I was afraid it was a bit 'difficult to use for those who are beginners and above all I was afraid it was a bit' heavy (bought on the internet without seeing it first but doing a lot of research). Nothing could be more wrong, it is a great camera, perfect for anyone who is the first experience for both amateurs. I used very little automatic functions, after which I used immediately in the manual. Very professional, I like the fact that it has the display up to watch the shooting data. Usually I always look for perfection in the details, and this is aesthetically perfect. Very comfortable to grip, solid yet light, the buttons placed at the points giusti.rnLe only things that leave me perplexed when you are working with high iso, but now that I've got to know I avoid them when I can and 9-point AF, working with the central focuses quite well but others do not know, the focus is not so perfect.

avatarjunior
sent on July 29, 2013

Pros: APSC sensor identical to the 7D - swivel screen is very good quality

Cons: Only the lack of AF fine adjustments

Opinion: Many complain about the lack of micro-adjustments autofosus, yes, it is a major flaw, but I think the only one. RnSpesso is to decide between the 60D and 7D, simple to choose, if you need a burst very fast and you really need , then you have to take the 7D .... otherwise the 60D is ottima.rnLo swivel screen for me it is essential for eseguere shots from the ground or in strange positions. The screen is of excellent quality and is very useful if you use lenses that require manual bright live view to making fuoco.rnLa quality of the sensor is identical to the other machines in the same series as the 7D, then same yield iso etc.. . rn

avatarjunior
sent on July 26, 2013

Pros: yield, iso usable up to ISO 3200 (in some cases also in 6400), swivel screen, weight, polycarbonate and fiberglass, use sd, beautiful video full hd, manageability, price, fast and accurate autofocus, possibility to work in the room , battery life, and certainly I forget something else ...

Cons: I could say the micro, but I do nothing, the magnesium body (???) for those who do not know what and polycarbonate and glass fiber ... just

Opinion: I have this body since April and just gave me satisfaction for me and perfect in every way! the fps is good for me (I tried a 50d and those are pretty much similar) ... great the swivel screen that allows you to take pictures unimaginable, in very difficult conditions, made good up to ISO 3200 and ISO "workable" in 6400iso according to shooting conditions! rnresa crazy with the 40mm pancake and 70-200f4 ... does very well with the classic 18-55! rnrifarei the choice made at the time of purchase! change it only for a 5d mark iii!

avatarsenior
sent on July 23, 2013

Pros: Swivel screen iso-variation versatile-peso-qualità/prezzo-funzioni very practical-megapixel more than enough.

Cons: Do not weather sealed management of iso-low-high-magnesium body burst slowly does not have the micro-adjustment

Opinion: It 'a aps-c discreet, suitable for many types of photography such as macro, street and landscape. Not suitable for sports pictures as it is rather slow in the blast and more than 1600 iso is difficult to eliminate the noise, the quality / price is good. Recommended without a amateur photographer needs to study and continuous shots.

user28555
avatarsenior
sent on July 20, 2013

Pros: Ergonomics, high image quality, beautiful (and robust) orientable display, reliable and precise focus system even with only 9 points of focus (all cross), the central one rarely misses a shot, weight all in all contained, gives the best quality lenses, long-lasting battery life.

Cons: It would have been liked an autofocus system more advanced with a few more points as well as having the MICROregulation AF (considering the positioning/cost and quality of the machine). The management of videos in Live View, even with the "fast or fast" focus system is still cumbersome "and noisy" (on paper these improvements and others will be implemented in the new EOS 70D); Finally, which is quite annoying, if you do not use a comfortable bag, it can happen quite frequently that you move the small diopter's diopter (in my opinion they had to protect it better).

Opinion: I've been using this reflex since summer 2011, I consider it in its segment a very good machine still able to give beautiful shots up to 1600/3200 Iso, especially when flanked with quality optics. The orientable screen is robust and of high quality, has colors and definition that expand the possibilities of shooting and gives the best in the control of macro photography where it allows, "cropping" to the maximum, to display beautiful details and allows photos from shots not possible with fixed screen. Of course, Canon could have strengthened the autofocus system as it is obvious that greater coverage of sensitive points on the sensor area can only bring benefits in the composition and focus of the frame (limited to my personal photographic experience, I must admit, however, that I rarely felt the need to have a higher number of points of focus as a "shot" mainly with the central punt of MAF that has greater sensitivity and Among the APS-C, for me, it is still a reflex that knows how to churn out photos of excellent workmanship (more or less the same consideration that expresses those who have viewed the shots that is able to return). Basically, great machine to reevaluate. It is not perfect but it has a lot of quality to offer, it is certainly not a "point and click" machine for everyone, to make it make the best sometimes you also have to experiment and patience is sometimes rewarded with "shot" really flattering; for me I vote 8.5. For now, 20/07/2013, still in the Canon product list and at the current price to definitely prefer, in my opinion, to the 700D. I close with a thought about the new Canon Eos 70D that, in my opinion, although with apparent aesthetic similarities, both in reality much more than a simple evolution of the 60D but usable in every photographic field with important improvements everywhere (new the sensor and the image processor, 98% viewpoint, better tropicalization, introduced a double focus system, present the microregulation AF, the "touch" screen, the possibility of remote dialogue with wi-fi, the chirofon. Just make a technical comparison with the 60D and you notice the quantity and "substance" of the improvements made (we wait for a full review for the evaluations of the case but it seems that the premises of further general improvement seem to be there all).

avatarjunior
sent on July 17, 2013

Pros: Swivel screen, quality, high autonomy, exceptional exposure (equal to 7d), light weight, uses sd (very cheap and fast), possibility of using wireless flash control, microphone, joystick integrated in the wheel, the intuitive button layout, excellent button that locks the ring.

Cons: Lack micro AF, Video mode to be activated very uncomfortable, it is very hot in intensive and prolonged.

Opinion: I consider this machine trendsetter in the world "professional and semi-professional", and for what it costs (about 620 € new) is a great machine. The focus has only 9 points but fails to track the subject in a precise and fast. The noise is equal to that of 7d. The swivel screen I opened a new world, and above all it saved me a lot of back pain with the prop in the lowest position. The ability to change the raw file directly in the room allows you to use a high quality screen that returns true color, it is vital for people like me who does not have a good screen for photo editing (otherwise it is pointless). The machine is intuitive to use, has been simplified a lot and is very fast to set up. What is plastic not known, it is solid and sturdy, it is also lighter, the magnesium alloy is useful for a profesisonista, but an amateur like me it treats its instruments, so it'swell also the plastic (which is not only plastic, is also reinforced with glass fiber). The exposure of the 60d is something exceptional, is the same (with some modifications / improvements) of 7d, so it offers the same benefits. rnHo noticed that many critical aspect of this machine have been written in ignorance by people who can not use their own tools, when she arrived home in the 60d I discovered that most of the problems of setting beds in the forums, do not exist. rnRelativamente the price, it is a great car (indeed, more than good).

avatarjunior
sent on July 08, 2013

Pros: Swivel screen, light, HD video, good seal iso, function dial button with safety, outstanding battery.

Cons: burst worse than the 50D, not tropical conditions, the absence of micro

Opinion: It 'was my second SLR, I came from the 1100D and the differences are significant. is considered a semi-pro but in fact is un'amatoriale advanced. with the right optics produces files at up to 3200 ISO 6400 and then gradually decays the noise is quite pronounced. However, I think it's a great car, suitable for different types of photography. the burst by 5.3, the proper management of ISO, the movable monitor, and shooting HD video combined with low weight and competitive price make it a reflex suits demanding amateur photographer as a second body.

avatarjunior
sent on June 14, 2013

Pros: Price, swivel screen, smaller burden, good yield ISO up to 1600

Cons: yield high iso

Opinion: It 's my first SLR ... I chose it because it has a good burst, double ring and swivel screen. For now I have not felt the need to have a burst faster, as I would have liked to have multiple AF areas (the center is good .. the other 1 bit less). The iso is not a problem up to 1600 ... after the noise becomes 1 bit too obvious (but are still unable PP). The swivel screen is very useful in different situation you off the hook!

avatarsenior
sent on June 02, 2013

Pros: Swiveling display, excellent crowds at high ISO and management of the same car, sturdy and relatively light.

Cons: Lack micro.

Opinion: I am fully satisfied with the performance of this camera and the extreme comfort of the display orientabile.rnSforna very beautiful pictures and videos just as beautiful, but it requires high-quality optics to saturate the dense 18-megapixel sensor. rnL'unica sore point is the lack of micro-adjustment and I fail to see what is the reason for this choice "strategic" by Canon, since it just serves to adjust the same goals not perfetti.rn

avatarjunior
sent on May 20, 2013

Pros: handy swiveling display great for macro very bright high resolution (for money)

Cons: AF micro adjustment suffers a bit 'after 1600 iso

Opinion: I own this camera for several months and I can say it was delicious. (I take photos with 70-200 / 24-105 f4 / f4 50/F1.4) I have read many opinions on the merits and defects but do not forget that it is not the 7d but is very close to the same 18MP sensor. there 'to say that to have excellent file must fit good optics or L series Whereas new costs half' of 7d and is an amateur semi pro Raflex the 7d is suitable for those who want to take pictures (sports or nature ) for its exceptional burst and focus. then vote for the 60d 8.5 (certain to have the highest quality 'of the FF with today's times you have to spend 2000 € and up)

avatarsenior
sent on May 17, 2013

Pros: Ergonomics, autonomy, high ISO performance, price, weight, rotatable display

Cons: not Tropicalised

Opinion: It 's my first SLR, so I have no direct experience to be able to compare. I come from compact and bridge. Well what to say: another planet! RNLA I have a month and I'm passionate ... rnErgonomia: I have big hands and even though I can hold it firmly, sometimes even with one hand. Autonomy, one of the criteria that heavy han made me choose, incredible: more than 1000 shots without flash and with flash over 300 venture. I put the price between the Pro because, given the competing amateur 100D and 700D, you can take home with a lower price from a body "prosumer" (I found it on the new € 600). RnIl weight I put between the pros, because I've always found with any balanced perspective, the've tried (not overly large): tested with 15-85 (mine), 17-40, 40STM, 70-200 L IS (my father). rnl ' only drawback I found was that every time the dirt settles on the bottom face of the prism, but this may depend on the fact that I do not use optical tropicalizzate.rn

avatarsenior
sent on May 13, 2013

Pros: Lightweight, adjustable display, including the APS-C has the best picture quality (like the 7D).

Cons: Lack of particular strengths, not really excel in anything if inserted into the broader context of Canon DSRL. The ISO makes "only" up to 1600, then begins to suffer dramatically. However, we can coexist peacefully.

Opinion: For the most part the 60D seems a bit 'cut off, whereas we tend to believe the FF immensely outweigh the 7D and the APS-C have, especially for sports and wildlife photos. Yet it has two big advantages that I think people tend to underestimate and (I do not understand how) sometimes even to demonize: lightweight and adjustable display are in all respects the true strength of 60D. Make it ideal in certain contexts, as in Street photography in which a machine's smallest and lightest definitely helps, and adjustable display can help disguise so as not to agitate the subject. The swiveling display is definitely very, very, very comfortable even in some aspects of nature photography (including macro), especially when you have time to prepare for a shot but it is better not to move too much, or just want to be comfortable. And it is also practical in the photography of every day, to a family party and so on. Ultimately, if you do not need the speed of the 7D, and want to save agood 50% on the price of the cheapest FF, the 60D is absolutely advisable.

avatarsenior
sent on May 11, 2013

Pros: Good ergonomics, reduced weight and size compared to competitors. Movable monitor robust and practical. Excellent battery. The machine returns excellent files. Efficiency of the system and the competitive price now. A great all round machine. Excellent for macro and hikers.

Cons: knowing what you are buying there are not many. Insufficient tropicalization and microtaratura autofocus. The autofocus system is a little dated, even if the point center cross is fast and responsive but you could do more. Use a DIGIC4 and you notice in the rendering at high iso.

Opinion: I went to the 60D when I heard the need to try something more robust than a series XXXD. The jump was remarkable and I can say that he had been satisfied. The machine is well studied and the arrangement of the keys is functional. Despite the much-mentioned absence of the joystick, the wheel performs its function well. The monitor is articulated an excellent addition, and despite some initial concerns proved to be robust and practical. Useful in some situations, it gives the best of itself in macro photography and in some special situations. Although the machine is not tropical conditions, I was able to test it in enough situations to the limits, such as desert and high mountain, and employing the proper attention, the machine has never given me problems. Lighter ee slightly smaller than the 7D is a great traveling companion, great, but never cumbersome. The sensor is able to churn out high-quality images, is basically the same as the 7D. Up to 800 ISO is pienamente usable, ISO 1600 the noise is quite known, while in 3200 is evident. ISO 6400 is the usage limit, beyond which we must not go unless absolutely necessary. The form of focus is perhaps his Achilles heel, it is highly evolved and only 9 points of focus suffers when compared with those of the competition. This limit does not make the machine best suited to those dedicated to sports photography or photographic hunting, nevertheless the focus has always been responsive and accurate even in unfavorable lighting conditions. Not to be underestimated is the fact that the machine uses SD cards that if, for some it is a limit, it is from a economic point of view, a point in its favor, since they are cheaper and perhaps those coming from small canon has already provided some. Dignified the burst, especially when shooting in JPEG and having cards faster. Excellent battery life, which can be up to 1000 shots. Furthermore, the battery is the medesima of the 7D, 5DII and 6D; small details to take into consideration, especially in times of crisis. Interesting and useful also the ability to control an external flash via the flash popo-up of the machine, a gem that saves considerable and can bring the world of Remote control lighting flash. The video industry is very comprehensive and produces excellent video file, even if the system of focus is hard and not really responsive to follow the subject. Ultimately a machine more than satisfactory, too often criticized, which also has the advantage of not being overly expensive and readily available on the used market at reasonable prices, which is no small feat. Rating: 8

user24742
avatarjunior
sent on April 19, 2013

Pros: Body lighter than magnesium alloy bodies, but the feeling is of a rugged camera, you hold well and the swiveling display is really useful, very intuitive

Cons: lacks the fine adjustment for non-Canon lenses, but with my Tamron 17/50 2.8 I had no problems,

Opinion: The first impression Veneda from a 50D and a 40D, the latter acting to buy the 60D was a little strange, putting it close to the 50D clearly the difference and ... minimal, but there is, the 50D is slightly larger and heavier, the button layout changes and of those 60 are smaller, but cmq already after a few days you get used to holding the camera well and making the first tests the quality of the files are excellent, Up to 3200 ISO the ruomore is contained, besides better not to go, the quality of Full HD video are also excellent, rnih Conclusion continuing to use it and to test it really starts to like it, it's fun and complete,

avatarsenior
sent on April 07, 2013

Pros: Display orientebile, ergonomics and low weight

Cons: no micro, plastic body (however strong), noise at high ISO, high density sensor

Opinion: To be a semi pro SLR is a quite valid. Lightweight and functional, honest companion for hiking, lacks in speed and gust af for birds but is comfortable to the macro with the orientation (unique comfort that many seem not to appreciate ... until you try it!). To obtain satisfactory results requires optical quality given the density of the sensor and the use of ISO not particularly high (up to 1600 max). AF truthful and accurate even with "only" nine points (all cross). Too bad for the absence of micro :-(. Practically comparable range to 7D banding with easy recovery of the shadows.

avatarsenior
sent on March 18, 2013

Pros: Ergonomics, swiveling display, lightness, SD cards, good definition

Cons: Not tropical, it would be better tilting display

Opinion: It 's my first (and so far only) reflex, so I have no experience, but the' ergonomics for example, I could compare it with the 7D and because of my small hands but I also believe it is preferable for many women. The lightness is important thinking of the weight of certain optical from having to assemble (thus saving weight). My Mac is equipped with SD card reader and then another advantage. The lack of tropicalization I 've noticed on a couple of occasions where the' humidity was high and the sensor was full of macchie.rnPer the last display as it sometimes hinders the work (eg macro). For the rest I am fully satisfied.

avatarjunior
sent on February 24, 2013

Pros: The swiveling screen is very convenient for photos razed to the ground or leave the machine above your head. At the touch of a strength and if the double ring is used in a wonderful way. you should take some confidence from the first with the joypad integrated in the second ring, which quickly becomes very useful above all to select points of focus.

Cons: The body is not made of magnesium makes it a little lighter, lack of fine adjustment, lock the wheel to select the shooting mode can be bothersome. For ISO higher than 3200 is a lot of noise.

Opinion: Certainly not I never traded micro (which we miss each time you want to buy a lens with known problems of f / b focus) with the orientation is very useful, but that's could give up. I personally find the joypad extremely convenient and easy to use. However, I am satisfied with my purchase and even more so for the price at which the 'I bought it, € 700 new.

avatarjunior
sent on January 31, 2013

Pros: Screen, the burst and maintains the high iso

Cons: Software to reduce noise too aggressive satisfactory details with photos only external and great light, and body (for me) a little one pó

Opinion: I have this machine a good year nn are so happy because I do landscapes and ceremonies ... The machine has great definition and nn nn pulita. so I think it's a good second camera body, the port around the "Sunday" riba serious but not if you can do I also have a 1100d for what satisfies me more in the end nn I say that 60 is puu poor but I was expecting the saltone quality and nn a simple jump

avatarsenior
sent on December 02, 2012

Pros: remains at high iso (for a sensor aps-c), screen orientabile.file very detailed.

Cons: 18mpx at an amateur level are useless.

Opinion: I switched from 450d to 60d. I reason behind the change was mainly related to a matter of high precision iso and f (the 450d I consider a great machine). rnCon the 60d I found all the features that I missed on 450d.rnle its features are the perfect compromise between a 7d and a 600d .... if you want more from an entry level and you do not need the micro, 19-point AF and a great burst over the body of magnesium in 7d is the right machine for voi.rni 3200 iso are utilazzibilissimi as long as not too much to crop the image and correctly expose the foto.rnla burst is good, but if rarely used, if they make frequent use is much more indicated 7d.rnaltra very useful are the means iso, so if you want to exceed ISO 1600 does not mean you have to put 3200.rnusa SD cards.

avatarjunior
sent on December 02, 2012

Pros: ISO sensitivity, speed of focus, size and comfortable grip

Cons: I can not find fault

Opinion: I have the 60d of two about two years I am fine, when I go out to photograph I always come back with the result in his pocket, in any conditions thanks to a low noise and high iso, the focus is fast especially when it comes to photographing moving objects , always up also good exposure in low luce.Un good buy recommend it very good value for money.

avatarjunior
sent on October 05, 2012

Pros: Excellent value for money. Sensor as the 7D autofocus as the 5D MkII

Cons: At this price range no

Opinion: At a price around 800 € (body only) will take home a APS-C good quality. easy and intuitive with many functions. With the money you save compared to the 7D take a matter of good quality and enjoy. Wagon throwing money on the machine does not make much sense today, however, within 6 to 12 months have since passed through technologically superior models.

avatarjunior
sent on August 06, 2012

Pros: handy, lightweight, adjustable display, sensor as the 7D, HD video, technologically advanced

Cons: rumone at high iso, lack micro-adjustment, not tropical, 9 point AF, requires high quality lenses!

Opinion: is my first DSLR, and I must say that I am very satisfied! Knowing that it is a semi-professional is great, only one step below the 7D. not magnesium but sturdy and durable, the quality is very good but must be purchased objectives of high quality to make the most of it. With ISO 1600-3200 is not very noticeable noise, overtaking there is a significant noise without PP. the swiveling display is very handy in macro photography or when you are in a large crowd to take pictures with your hands up, also useful in the video to give a particular shot. Tropicalization missing but it would be convenient for those who often makes trips where the weather changes quickly, and the micro-regulation is missing, but can risultarsi useful only in rare cases. I feel useless creative filters and raw processing directly on the machine, why? filters are mostly for "geeks" not for a semi-professional, and processing raw and convenient only to decrease the weight of the picture "not great", Iexplain: this function using only photos that I have seen no exceptional but simply good, so as to process the raw drive and save a jpeg file that weighs four times less! for great pictures better go to the pc and open DPP or CAMERA RAW. Personally I would have removed the basic functions such as portrait, landscape, night shot, auto, creative auto, sports, macro and added a C1 C2 C3, but it is still a semi-pro. As a first reflex meets a lot! especially when used with L-series lenses! (Obtained with the 18-135 that was very disappointed!) When I can not think of anything else ... I recommend it to children and women for the light body and small, recommended to those who want to enter the world of EOS from a semi-professional feature-rich!

avatarjunior
sent on May 13, 2012

Pros: Dsplay, high ISO, practicality.

Cons: From amateur, no defects.

Opinion: Preface: I am an amateur photographer, although very demanding and passionate about technology. I bought the 60D because I need the APS C (animals etc.). 7D and the judge too demanding for size and weight. It has a lot of useless things (file processing in the car, creative filters), but the main things that really matter and there are and have quality. It also has an easy to use as a reference and picture quality really fine (I've used it only 17/40L and 70/200L + 2x extender and so do not know how it behaves with standard lenses.) So some criticism read (micro / sealing / magnesium alloy) are in my opinion misplaced whereas it is not a professional, it costs as a professional, but the performance we are very close. Super recommended for those coming from the series 400/550D. It 'a good choice for the amateur photographer who likes to engage in all kinds without any special preferences-

avatarjunior
sent on May 03, 2012

Pros: Build quality, autofocus, adjustable display exceptional, resolution and lens excellent, ergonomics and function in general, noise at high iso but if this picture is taken properly kept under control.

Cons: Demanding with the lenses (because of the 18 Mpix), lack microtaratura AF (if it has the need).

Opinion: I have this camera for more than a year and, although it is my first SLR, having tried many others I can express my opinion on the 60D. It 'a car for all uses, I could appreciate the excellent autofocus, even with only nine points, but all cross, combined with slow speed and precision ultrasonic sports I would say more than satisfactory. The general construction is also very good and does not regret the magnesium body than previous models, because plastics are excellent give a sense of solidity and provide good insulation from the elements (I've used it for a couple of ' hours in the rain without problems), in short, nothing to do with the various models and xxxxD xxxD. Another point is the ergonomics: all the buttons and dials are arranged in an orderly and easily remembered by those who come from another model or brand and display ... that is to say how exceptional definition, viewing angle and adjustability, and also seems very sturdy. The sensor gives excellent images provided to use lenses very sharp and resolvents, in fact with the plasticotti disappoints, and at the level of noise is present it as they rise the iso (still usable up to 1600 - 3200) but with a good post-production There's a remedy, but this is why I do not recommend to novices of photography. Lacks the micro objectives and, even if I did not have fortunately never need it, I do not doubt it could use in case of lenses with F / B focus. So a good car sometimes denigrated, but I would say rightfully belonged to the xxD series. Rating 8.5!

avatarjunior
sent on February 24, 2012

Pros: lightweight and good ergonomics (although it is slightly better than the 7d), excellent swivel LCD 3 "FORMAT 3:2 (unlike almost all others)!, good dynamic range, good exposure, burst not so bad , great video, wireless flash management, good the ISO up to 1600 (usable up to 3200), silent, price.

Cons: lack micro af sensor too dense, noise (noise but not really) even at ISO 100, 100% coverage viewfinder, requires perfect optics, autofocus improved sooo good but the central point, although occasionally cane fire.

Opinion: In my opinion a good aps-c, fantastic landscape and macrofotografi thanks to the screen very useful in many situations, which can be closed to avoid scratching. also good dynamic range and yield raising the ISO, but too bad a background noise is always present at low ISO, but noise is not real. If photoshop is not for you, or do not have much time to get lost on, I'll just downsizing at 10-12 megapixels to decrease significantly and files more engraved (as recommended by mactwin). Furthermore a sensor so dense requires mandatory optical almost perfect, however, and the risk of shake increases considerably. However, if you can manage it the best I find it is a fantastic machine suitable for many purposes, except for sports and wildlife. I highly recommend it, especially for an amateur, considering the price at which it is now online, but I do not think is suitable for beginners, because the files difficult to work ....

avatarjunior
sent on February 22, 2012

Pros: Display, ergonomics, durability, overall performance

Cons: Noise not always under control

Opinion: Possess it for a couple of months. I evaluated before buying 50D and 7D. Compared to these bodies, the only gap that I have (for my needs) are the micro af adjustment and joystick integrated in the multi controller which is not always as comfortable as the original solution, despite the overall ergonomics and solid feel that disseminates are excellent. The performance of the sensor is great if the exposure is perfect. Unlike brings out your digital noise at ISO 100 and loses detail. It 'a machine that would not recommend to people just starting out and probably a pro would feel tight. I am an amateur enthusiast.

avatarjunior
sent on January 20, 2012

Pros: Great display (adjustable and with good resolution). Good sensor and meter. Improved ergonomics.

Cons: Lacks the AF micro adjustment

Opinion: Wonderful machine, that with the Battery Grip achieves fantastic ergonomics. Does not feel the lack of magnesium in the body of his predecessors, the construction is sturdy and does not disappoint even when used in environments not favorable. Has the same level of sealing of the previous 50D, so did not lose anything on this front. The only real failure is the AF micro-adjustment, though fortunately none of my 5 goals has still needed.

avatarjunior
sent on January 02, 2012

Pros: Display, light weight, low noise and burst

Cons: Noise filter will damage the detail

Opinion: Held for about 1 year, nice car, nice management and consistent in performance, beautiful in night or in low light. I've loved for macro (sigma goals, unfortunately never tried canon L series), the anti-aliasing filters and correction of equipment noise will damage the detail and brightness, although certainly the whole is not very visible in small prints. Let's say there is almost always goes on the safe side but I was never able to find the result very surprising, perhaps you would have to invest more on lenses with higher risolvenza seen on the high resolution sensor aps-c. Positive vote anyway, I do not think is the true heir to the 50D.

user5222
avatarsenior
sent on December 29, 2011

Pros: Very ergonomic and handy video full hd high quality (but requires a obittivo well-made). Adjustable screen useful for macros and in certain situations. White Balance perfect. Excellent performance up to ISO 3200. Pre see the merits best requires the presence of objectives of excellent quality.

Cons: The 9 AF points belong to a technology already seen on other cameras. If you used only the middle gives a lot of satisfaction and AF in this case does not miss a beat. Body is not weather sealed. Lacks the AF micro adjustment.

Opinion: I own this excellent reflex 7 months and I can be very satisfied. This is my first SLR so I can not make comparisons. Until recently I mounted the kit lens (18-135), which gave me a little 'satisfaction, but from the moment I put on a quality lens like the Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS USM The 60D has comunciato to give the best of themselves in terms of quality. Now I'm waiting to mount on my 60D the famous Canon 24-105 that replaces the 17-55 because they are too short focal length. From this L-series lens I expect great performance from the 60D. I then noticed that high ISO noise is not as obvious as you read eg. with other APS-C. The adjustable screen is very convenient for Macro but also closing every time you avoid unwanted scratches. Personally, I prefer not to close inconvenient because every time open and close to take pictures. Another point in favor of the 60D ergonomics and light weight of the machine. As the very first SLR I think you can not ask for anything else.

avatarsenior
sent on December 05, 2011

Pros: Display, Rugged, Lightweight, Fast, Full HD Video, up to 3200 ISO Awesome!

Cons: no one in particular

Opinion: I bought this machine about a month ago and I got to try it already anyway! Well what to say, is pretty much a 7d smaller and less expensive! has an amazing display, fast even for sports photos, made up to 3200 iso iso stunning detail over the falls a bit but we consider that we are talking about an aps-c sensor! live-wiev very effective and focus fast enough! That said, the advice to virtually everyone, is manegevole not ingobra and you can do almost all types of photos with great results!

avatarjunior
sent on November 18, 2011

Pros: Handy, convenient to use and with lots of features

Cons: Requires a certain level of optical, fine adjustments for missing targets, not weather sealed body

Opinion: Ok, let's start with the problem of the body is not weather sealed: in reality 'the material' still very good and seems resistant even though I have no intention of making any test. The problem 'that previous versions had xxD tropicalized then it is immediately obvious to everyone as "missing" and not as diversity' for example. Same goes for the micro, probably 70% of users will not ever use, but if anything even once served, now there '. Let's move to the new 18-megapixel sensor, dense, makes her beautiful work, especially through the power of the Digic IV in the "clean up" the images to a noise level that what it 'is normal to be in a bit more' high compared with other sensors with less. And 'here that fits what' I wrote one of the "cons": I think this machine and 'excellent for those who upgrade from an entry level body, for example, provided, however,' that they have already 'a kit at least decent . Are often disappointing fact shots with expensive 18-55 IS kit or with various 17 -85, 18-135, 18-200, and any other "zoomone" third party see the many Sigma. I recommend shooting in RAW as always shoot in JPG and 'another case that makes us lose a lot of quality' because of direct compression performed by the machine. I agree with those who have reviewed it before me on the goodness' of the AWB that does not miss a beat, excellent autofocus and comfort 'of the swiveling display that before he criticizes harshly but once the machine is used almost half' of the times ! In short, the 60D judge as an "upgrade" compared to previous machines of the series xxD especially with regard to the video section and the multiple functions attached. Discourage other as the transition from a xxD 60D say because you will not find the big changes that would instead switching to 7D or FF, so to speak. Rating: 8

user181
avatarsenior
sent on September 24, 2011

Pros: The rotatable screen may be useful in certain situations, hd very good, good image quality, lock ring.

Cons: Semi-pro camera that actually is amateur, the body is magnesium alloy as the 40d and 50d, the screen can be rotated in the way, does not have the micro AF instead have the 40d and 50d, the possibility of process to a lesser extent in the file room in my opinion useless, not burst fast, uses sd cards instead of compact flash (for those who think this move from a 5o/40d to a 60d ... sconsigliatissimo, it is not an upgrade! rather buy the 7d!)

Opinion: I've owned for a short time then you probably are not able to give an informed judgment: I can only say that this camera is purchased only if appropriate to your needs. I found it quite amateur, NOT suitable for those who have special needs as may be established in a nature photographer, sports and study. I've sold after just a month and a half.

avatarjunior
sent on September 08, 2011

Pros: ergonomics, adjustable display, management iso drive, uses sd

Cons: yield high iso, no micro

Opinion: The swiveling display is really great, large and high definition, for those few videos that I've done I was almost indispensable. I found it very well done management in AV ISO Auto, the machine tries to keep the safety time and varies the iso accordingly, until the maximum that can be set from the menu. I found myself very well as ergonomics, especially with the bg mounted. Also excellent white balance in auto mode, almost always right, and the meter, two aspects are significantly better than the 40d I had before. I find a lack not just that of the micro, the other end of the same are all equipped. Are not satisfied with the 18MP sensor, in my opinion just too noisy lighting conditions are not perfect ... When I'm perfect, well defined which is spectacular.

avatarjunior
sent on July 08, 2011

Pros: Exceptional swiveling display. A semi-pro camera but manages to have a smaller size than the others. Image quality identical to 7D!

Cons: It has micro-adjustment, which is useful in the case of Sigma lenses not perfect.

Opinion: It 'a camera with professional features but is also suitable for those with smaller hands. The advice to women who shoot for work. E 'built in a robust way while not having the body of magnesium alloy. The photo quality is very good and the very fine detail (but you must use good lenses) has a low noise up to ISO 1600 in low light conditions. In light conditions discreet yet very little noise at ISO 3200! It has a large and brilliant display, outstanding! Live View mode works very well and offers a choice between phase detection with contrast mode, and even the Face Index. It also seems much improved speed focusing with Live View engaged. And 'quite small compared to 7d (of course it is much bigger than a 550d), but it is very powerful and full of features, very technologically advanced, despite a flurry not fast, for that is the 7d. Sin for the absence (as in the 40D) of micro-adjustment that is useful in the event of objectives Sigma very bright (type F/1.4) with some defect, otherwise it is not a great lack ...



Reviews » Cameras » Cameras Canon » Canon 60D » All Opinions




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me