There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 80000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: Pleasing and soft bokeh (rounded aperture blades), very good contast and colors, solid construction, not too heavy,
good and usable image quality even wide open, very good and sharp at f/2.
The only 50mm lens with f/1.2 (but that's only 1/3 stop brighter than f/4) ;-)
Cons: Very expensive (compared to other brands), not as sharp as newer constructions form Sigma,
visible reddish CAs (but that's part of its typical image look)
Opinion: much better and sharper than I expected since its image quality was criticised in many tests and forums.
Of all Canon 50mm lenses this is by far the sharpest lens between open aperture and f2!
With its high contrast, vivid colors and its pleasing bokeh (rounded aperture blades) it delivers very harmonic images.
My most used lens for indoor available light photography since I purchased it in 2010.
AF is fast but a little slower then most other USM L-Lenses.
Solid constuction with weather sealing (if used with filter).
But a very expensive lens. Today the new Sigma 50mm f/1.4 ART lens could be the better choice (even sharper and less expensive).
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Robustness and manageability, sharpness even at room temperature (about 5D MIII)
Opinion:If you like the pictures or photos ambientati style reportage and street, for which you need a lens manegevole and fast, here it is the 50 f1.2 optics for you, clearly if mounted on immense body FF.rnQualità to all the openings, do not personally the shot never up to f1.2 unless there is a real need for light, but also in this case the lens behaves in admirable fashion without showing any defect. Going from f1.2 to f1.8 - f2 image quality clearly increases a little ', but the difference is really lieve.rnSu 5D MIII, which bears great high ISO without returning an annoying noise, and shooting at f1.2 ISO 1600 is pretty much more light "day" on a person's face with the light of a candle in a dark room! rnrnLente manegevole compact and with the right weight on the one hand returns precisely feeling of strength, on the other It provides the right balance to the body macchina.rnAutofocus fast (I use almost exclusively the focus spot and of 5D MIII is virtually instantaneously). No stabilizer but absolutely do not feel the need, I do not remember it a shake-out of a picture taken with this lente.rnInsieme all'85mm f1.2 L lens is the brightest by Canon, given that I do not see imaginable dating a "cartridge belt" of objectives, rather all'85mm because the scope of use is more ampio.rnMolti wonder if there is difference of approximately 1000 euro with the younger brother 50mm f1.4, the answer is: it depends on what we expect from their photo. If there are "satisfied" of a good quality then the 50 f1.4 is certainly good, if you want the leap then go to 50 f1.2 is necessario.rnLa difference also highlights firmly in extreme conditions, for as a backlight driven to TA with 50 f1.2 still returns of well-defined contours of the figure and "sharp" with aberrations in control, something different with the 50 f1.4 wherethe contours are noticeably pastosi.rnA I think the lens "normal" is a view that should not be missing in the bag of a photographer (although need for capacity and experience for its use), and from this point of view Canon beyond his concorrenti.rnLente that holds very well the price of used also, and this is an aspect that should be taken into consideration when purchasing.
Pros:Opening, color, three-dimensional, construction, yield of blurred as regards the areas of focus, comfortable size. You will ALSO very well ..
Cons:Poor efficacy with lateral 6D, requires a precision and high concentration. You will ALSO very bad ..
Opinion:The sharpness is not in the top 1.2 (far better to f2) but not for what you take, there is something more. The three-dimensional, clean images (Gabola solves many of the skin without the use of Photoshop) and character maybe a little 'Vintage because of AC (sometimes very strong) ... But not good for work, maybe you most indicated an ART. It is a great traveling companion, but need to know that on 10 shots only a few will be good to save or print, because it is very complicated stage focus. I'm sure on a system as 5D3 or 1DX behave much better like that with my 6D, separate center. RNE 'a perspective from which it is very difficult to break away. Unique sensations when aiming and shooting. Sensations very different from the 135L, the pairing is successful, each creates a different atmosphere and a yield.
pubblicata da Antonio Dalla Porta September 14, 2015
Pros:Blurred crazy, super brightness
Cons:Not so straightforward to use
Opinion:I purchased it for about a month and is perhaps the most difficult task that I have .. you can just make a small movement with his hand and the photo is out of focus at TA .. but as you become more familiar with this lens you He realizes all its magic! rnCerto the price is challenging for a 50mm, but I can tell you that since I got I have not removed from the machine!
Cons:Either you love it or hate it, price, lack of adequate housing, space. But there is a perfect target?
Opinion:Particular goal. blurred dream. In my opinion this is the only point that ^ interesting to those who like certain photos. The rest does not matter, graphics, etc. rnDa use certainly very wide open, otherwise what you buy to do.? RNLI worth all this money? I do not know, what might be the exact figure, but this is c ^ and has a market all its own. rnio I keep it for life.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.