JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II : Specifications and Opinions

The Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II is a supertele lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2014 to 2021 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 6000 €;

25 users have given it an average vote of 9.3 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.

Specifications
Focal lenght	400 mm
Angle of view	6.2°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/4
Aperture blades	9
Lenses/Groups	18 elements in 12 groups
Min. focus distance	3.30 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.13x
Features
Stabilization	Yes (built in lens)
Focus	Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	Yes
Extenders	Yes
Filters	52 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	2100 g
Dimensions	128 x 232 mm
Buy
Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Baran

sent on April 25, 2019

Pros: Weight, size, contrast, sharpness

Cons: none

Opinion: This lens works fantastic with 5D MKIV. Great sharpness wide open with 1.4x TC or even 2x: still perfectly usable. You will notice that focusing speed goes down whole using TCs and sometimes miss a shot with 2x TC but hey...it's handholdable 800mm F8! Some people complained about "nervous background". I can't confirm: bokeh looks great as well.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Lucenton

sent on December 18, 2020

Pros: Sharpness, portable compatibility with 1.4X and 2.0X SERIES III multipliers

Cons: Price maybe, but compared to older siblings 400 f/4 and 600 f/4 much cheaper.

Opinion: I have never written reviews of goals but in this case I feel obliged to do so given the level of satisfaction for this lens. I'm going to come from 400 f/5.6, so the jump in quality was expected, but I have to say it went beyond my expectations. It is light enough to be used freehand for hours without major problems, and is not particularly bulky during transport as long as you remove the lampshed. I was lucky enough to find a used copy, practically new getting a considerable saving compared to the new one. For the kind of photography I practice in 99 % of cases, this is a fantastic goal. Combined with the R6, it enhances the focus capabilities of this new mirrorless body, allowing you to focus more on the composition. I almost always use it with the 1.4 X III extender mounted and of course on the R6, always with the EF-RF adapter, without ever noticing any drop in autofocus performance. Maybe with small or very shy birds it is a short thread, but it always depends on where you photograph and for me it is such the advantage in terms of footprint and weight compared to the big brother 500mm f/4 (which I admit I have never tried) that compromise in my opinion makes a lot of sense. Another plus is the very effective image stabilizer, which combined with the IBIS of the R6 allows its use freehand in most cases. I find myself in the need to use the tripod more and more rarely and almost only when I mount the 2.0X III.

Zidany71

sent on December 30, 2018

Pros: Lightweight, versatile, sniper autofocus. Sharpness at the top

Cons: Price.. But the quality you pay

Opinion: I come from lens Canon 500 F 4 L is II.. And so accustomed to him I was a little doubtful that the little one could be on par. Well the Canon 400 F 4 do II and a real gem. Very light, versatile allows you to use it freehand everywhere. In sports or wildlife photography is really deadly. Sharpness, blurred, colors are at the highest levels. Used with TC 1.4 x III and 2x III works very well at professional level.. I absolutely do not regret the 500. Only downside the price. But it's worth them all.. and fantastic.

Lupolu

sent on December 21, 2017

Pros: Weight, speed and accuracy of AF, excellent sharpness, excellent yield with 1.4x III and 2x III multipliers,

Cons: Transport case too small and there is no lens belt, rather high price.

Opinion: Driven by positive reviews and looking for a quality, but at the same time transportable canvas, I decided to replace my old Canon 500 mm f4 IS with this lens and found it to be of a rather poor quality. From the first tests done with the Canon 7D Mk II on static subjects, located at distances between 10 and 40 meters, I realized that the lens fails to focus: the fire dances and the photos are 90% blurred , also a lot.rnThe real problem, however, lies in very little sharpness. Since I also own the Canon 400 mm f5.6, I made comparisons, always on the same static subjects, and I found that the old 400 mm f5.6 is always sharper than 400 mm IS DO II.rnSe it was just about problems focusing, the problem would be minor, but even in the few shots in focus you can clearly see the lack of sharpness and the fact that even fails to equalize the old 400 mm f5.6, which costs six times less. And do not tell me that 40 meters are too many, because the old 400 mm f5.6 to 40 meters is una lama.rnI cases, then, there are two: the lens has been assembled badly (it would be the minor problem), or the lens is of its nature not very clear (and in this second case the problem would be unsolvable). I definitely question the positive opinions that have given the other owners of this lens, I assume it is mine to have problems and then I packed it and sent it to the Canon center for a check and I await an answer. In any case, the judgment can only be totally negative because, if on a target of just over a thousand euros, such as 400 mm f5.6, you can also expect some factory defect, on a lens that costs € almost 7,000 problems do not have to be there.rnrnUpdate. A month after the purchase (as CPS Gold I should have repaired within 3 days !!!!) the goal and returned back with the words "Defect not found". According to the laboratory, therefore, the goal is perfect. I propose myselfin any case, to send it back together with the machine body, which try to carry out the calibration. According to them, then, it is normal that a target of € 7,000 is less clear than a lens of the same focal length but from € 1,200.RnI am increasingly convinced that Canon has come down a lot of level and that the laboratories pull to campare.rnA this point I would like to try to compare it with that of those who speak very well.rnUpdate update: Canon Italy, after three months of discussions, I replaced the view and the results I get now with the new one can not be absolutely comparable with those I got with the goal that they replaced me. This is very clear, even by mounting the 1.4x III multiplier and also with the 2x III multiplier. The lens is sharper even than the Canon 500 mm F / 4 IS, which I sold. I add one last thing: Canon Italia, although replacing the lens, did not want to admit that the previous objective had any kind of problem.

Barabicu

sent on September 21, 2017

Pros: Yield, speed and accuracy of AF, lightness, dimensions, multiplication

Cons: Cost

Opinion: After having long wished I have this lens for over a year and I can safely summarize my review in one word: excelled. Staying around the two kilograms of weight is easily transportable, even for hours during long hikes, and quietly usable even freehand. Excellent already at TA behaves very well even with the Canon 1.4 x III and contrary to what I expected does not show any decrease in yield as well as autofocus speed. The AF is always accurate and fast, to the point that very few times I have used the limiter. The stabilizer allows to shoot at very unthinkable times, I would say without a doubt that the four stops promised are real. Compared with the Canon 500/4 IS II of an output mate has proved quietly at par, much like quality that as AF speed.

There are 3 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II

A new day is coming # 2

by Fabio Usvardi
57 comments, 9043 views

White-tailed sea eagle

by Marco50
67 comments, 3136 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Sea Eagle White Tail

by Marco50
78 comments, 3175 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Portrait of white-tailed sea eagle

by Marco50
73 comments, 3762 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Pernis apivorus (Honey Buzzard, male)

by Fabio Usvardi
69 comments, 6876 views

Dwarf Owl

by Fbspora
38 comments, 2573 views

White-tailed sea eagle

by Marco50
69 comments, 2679 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Bearded Vulture

by Marco50
66 comments, 2862 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Martial Eagle (Polemaetus bellicosus)

by Stefano Bonfoco
60 comments, 2461 views

HI RES 8.8 MP

Sea Eagle White Tail

by Marco50
67 comments, 2755 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Young white-Water eagle

by Marco50
65 comments, 2128 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Grey Heron

by Marco50
58 comments, 2215 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Northern Hawk Owl

by Zaltys
35 comments, 1311 views

HI RES 3.7 MP

Major Crested Grebe on parade

by Valerio Bollin
34 comments, 2358 views

Firecrest

by Valerio Bollin
35 comments, 3196 views

Young Sea Eagle White tail

by Marco50
52 comments, 2321 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

The Blue Forest

by Stefano Bonfoco
27 comments, 1526 views

HI RES 12.8 MP

Cannaiola Canterina

by Marco50
47 comments, 1566 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Breasted Jay (Coracias caudatus)

by Stefano Bonfoco
45 comments, 2112 views

HI RES 7.3 MP

Heron with rat snake

by Cagi13
46 comments, 3130 views

HI RES 4.5 MP

Almost friends

by Fabio Usvardi
29 comments, 4468 views

Kori's Otarda (Ardeotis kori)

by Stefano Bonfoco
36 comments, 1980 views

HI RES 20.1 MP

Fiery landscape

by Marco50
43 comments, 1346 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus)

by Stefano Bonfoco
31 comments, 1992 views

HI RES 14.0 MP

Greater White Heron

by Marco50
47 comments, 1371 views

HI RES 3.8 MP

Pheasant

by Valerio Bollin
22 comments, 2442 views

Mother's Love

by Stefano Bonfoco
31 comments, 1336 views

HI RES 30.1 MP

Verdone

by Marco50
41 comments, 1628 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

The eye

by Valerio Bollin
21 comments, 2184 views

The Ice breaker

by Marco50
27 comments, 1362 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Encounters that leave you breathless...!

by Fbspora
27 comments, 1438 views

Moonlight Shadow

by Fabio Usvardi
46 comments, 3841 views

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Deer and deer

by Valerio Bollin
26 comments, 2555 views

Reed Warbler

by Marco50
51 comments, 1552 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Heron

by Marco50
36 comments, 1291 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Young Bearded Vulture

by Marco50
40 comments, 1632 views

HI RES 6.0 MP

Dendrocopos major (Great Spotted Woodpecker)

by Fabio Usvardi
33 comments, 3397 views

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Canon » Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II

Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Canon EF 400mm f/4 DO IS II